Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Popular Television, The
  4. Volume 11, Issue 1
  5. Article
Bridgerton
  • ISSN: 2046-9861
  • E-ISSN: 2046-987X

Abstract

Despite its popularity with viewers, the television series , which aired between 2016 and 2022, has received relatively little scholarly attention. Yet there is an emerging critical consensus that viewers’ self-image and behaviour is informed by the lessons they learn from the series. This article explores the series’ representation of gender as ideological precept, analysing the ways characters modify their behaviour to conform to gendered expectations at the same time as those ideological behaviours lead to relationship conflict. I argue that sells viewers the fantasy of good intention and performative affection, whilst implicitly normalizing unhealthy behaviours: poor communication, impulsiveness and self-centred decision-making. That the characters in the show exhibit these traits – these pathologies – is justified in the logic of the show, which paints them as righteous protagonists. Reading the series against the grain reveals that these individual shortcomings can only be understood as pathologies, presented as they are in the series with no material base.

© 2023 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00095_1
2023-04-12
2025-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anon. ( n.d.;), ‘ How long is a football game?. ’, Sports Fan Focus, https://sportsfanfocus.com/how-long-is-a-football-game/#:~:text=High%20school%20football%20games%20usually,always%20played%20on%20Friday%20nights. Accessed 12 January 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Elsaesser, T.. ( 2012;), ‘ Tales of sound and fury: Observations on the family melodrama. ’, in B. K. Grant. (ed.), Film Genre Reader III, Austin, TX:: University of Texas Press;, pp. 366–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Foss, K. A.. ( 2020;), ‘ Death of the slow-cooker or #CROCK-POTISINNOCENT? This Is Us, parasocial grief, and the crock-pot crisis. ’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 44:1, pp. 69–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Gilstorf, A.. ( 2022;), ‘ This Is Us review: “Four Fathers” (season 6 episode 3). ’, Tell-Tale TV, 19 January, https://telltaletv.com/2022/01/this-is-us-review-four-fathers-season-6-episode-3/. Accessed 19 May 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Hagy, M.,, Hamilton, A., and Miller. C.. ( 2019;), ‘ # ThisIsWe: A content analysis of live tweets of This Is Us. ’, in M. Hagy,, A. Hamilton, and C. Miller. (eds), The Golden Age of Data, New York and London:: Routledge;, pp. 254–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Hoffman, B. L.. ( 2020;), ‘ Changing the narrative-aging & the future of care: Study of the impact of This Is Us’ Alzheimer’s storyline. ’, The SCAN Foundation, December, https://hollywoodhealthandsociety.org/sites/default/files/attachments/page/This%20Is%20Us_SCAN%20report.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Hornsby, E. R., and Groover, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ For the love of Jack Crock-Pot™ This Is Us and the convergence of crisis communication and parasocial connection. ’, Florida Communication Journal, 48:1, pp. 21–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Lawrence, N.. ( 2020;), ‘ Nothing new under the sun: The reimplementation of 80s sitcom tropes in NBC’s This Is Us. ’, in J. Wasko, and E. R. Meehan. (eds), A Companion to Television, Hoboken, NJ:: John Wiley & Sons, Inc;, pp. 307–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Middleton, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ A rather crude feminism: Amy Schumer, postfeminism, and abjection. ’, Feminist Media Histories, 3:2, pp. 121–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Nickels, B. M.,, Tenzek, K. E., and Lattimer, T. A.. ( 2021;), ‘ This Is Us: An analysis of mediated family communication at end-of-life. ’, OMEGA: Journal of Death and Dying, Article First, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00302228211036307.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Pandey, N.. ( 2019;), ‘ Contesting “ontological blackness”: An examination of racial representation in This is Us. ’, IIS University Journal of Arts, 8:1, pp. 14–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Pehlke II, T. A.,, Hennon, C. B.,, Radina, M. E., and Kuvalanka, K. A.. ( 2009;), ‘ Does father still know best? An inductive thematic analysis of popular TV sitcoms. ’, Fathering, 7:2, pp. 114–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Porter, R.. ( 2022;), ‘ TV ratings: “This Is Us” finale earns seasons highs. ’, The Hollywood Reporter, 25 May, https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/tv-ratings-tuesday-may-24-2022-1235154007/. Accessed 6 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Schwendybrit ( 2022;), ‘ Mothers and fathers. ’, R/thisisus, Reddit, 26 January, https://www.reddit.com/r/thisisus/comments/sd7zvp/mothers_and_fathers/. Accessed 2 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Snierson, D.. ( 2022;), ‘ This Is Us producers break down that flash-forward cooker scene: And four struggling dads. ’, Entertainment, 18 January, https://ew.com/tv/this-is-us-producers-on-flash-forward-cooker-four-fathers/. Accessed 6 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Tingle, E, L.. ( 2021;), ‘ Glimpses of acceptance through problem frames: An analysis of the lessons on fatness in the television series This Is Us. ’, Fat Studies, 11:3, pp. 318–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Wooten, L.,, Jordan, A.,, Simon, K. M., and Gold, J. A.. ( 2021;), ‘ This Is Us: A case examination on black men in therapy. ’, Academic Psychiatry, 45:6, pp. 763–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. This Is Us ( 2016–22, USA:: NBC;).
     [Google Scholar]
  19. ‘ I Call Marriage. ’ (Season 1, Episode 14; 7 February 2017).
  20. ‘ Moonshadow. ’ (Season 1, Episode 18; 14 March 2017).
  21. ‘ R&B. ’ (Season 3, Episode 17; 26 March 2019).
  22. ‘ Four Fathers. ’ (Season 6, Episode 3; 18 January 2022).
  23. ‘ The Hill. ’ (Season 6, Episode 9; 22 March 2022).
  24. ‘ Katoby. ’ (Season 6, Episode 12; 12 April 2022).
  25. Kunert-Graf, Rachel. ( 2023;), ‘ Primetime pathology: This Is Us and heteronormative ideals. ’, Journal of Popular Television, Special Issue: ‘Bridgerton’, 11:1, pp. 75–87, https://doi.org/10.1386/jptv_00095_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00095_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): educational function; escapism; gender norms; melodrama; parasocial; parenting; work life balance

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test