Skip to content
1981
Ted Lasso
  • ISSN: 2046-9861
  • E-ISSN: 2046-987X

Abstract

Leading up to the (2020–23) series finale in May 2023, fans anticipated whether various white, heterosexual romantic relationships on the show would come to fruition. When the finale finally aired, there was considerable disappointment at the lack of romantic conclusions for their characters, rather than satisfaction in the friendships that were developed over the show’s three seasons. Yet, queer and feminist theorizations of friendship position friendship as central to the human experience and valuable in analysing the social impacts of cisheteropatriarchal norms. In our analysis of social media posts, we employ feminist queer analysis to critically examine the interplay between the show’s portrayal of friendship and fans’ reactions to these plotlines that were shaped by cisheteronormative imaginaries of what types of relationships we should expect in television while the show defied romantic comedy tropes to focus on friendship. We argue that the romance-focused fan reactions obstructed the full spectrum of possible relationships, platonic and romantic, that were developed throughout the show’s run. When taken together, these relationships deepen our understanding of the ways that can be taken as an illustration of the importance of friendship and care in our everyday lives, which should be treated with the same gravity as romantic relationships in popular culture.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Award 776-2023-2001)
© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00125_1
2024-08-23
2026-04-20

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amaya, A., Bach, R., Keusch, F. and Kreuter, F. (2021), ‘New data sources in social science research: Things to know before working with Reddit data’, Social Science Computer Review, 39:5, pp. 943–60, https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319893305.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arvin, M., Tuck, E. and Morrill, A. (2013), ‘Decolonizing feminism: Challenging connections between settler colonialism and heteropatriarchy’, Feminist Formations, 25:1, pp. 8–34, https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2013.0006.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Barr, J. and Hou, L. (2016), ‘“Nobody calls me chicken”: The multiple masculinities of back to the future’, Journal of Popular Film and Television, 44:4, pp. 184–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barr, J., Roberts, D. J. and Sandoval, E. (2019), ‘There are different ways of being strong: Steven universe and developing a caring superhero masculinity’, in S. Parson and J. L. Schatz (eds), Superheroes and Masculinity: Unmasking the Gender Performance of Heroism, Lanham, MD: Lexington Press, pp. 81–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartos, A. E. (2019), ‘Introduction: Stretching the boundaries of care’, Gender, Place & Culture, 26:6, pp. 767–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2019.1635999.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Berridge, S. (2016), ‘Cher and Dionne BFFs: Female friendship, genre, and medium specificity in the film and television versions of Amy Heckerling’s Clueless’, in F. Smith and T. Shary (eds), ReFocus: The Films of Amy Heckerling, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 17–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Booth, P. (2018), ‘Introduction’, in P. Booth (ed.), A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 1–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bourdaa, M. (2018), ‘May we meet again’, in P. Booth (ed.), A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 385–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Boyle, K. and Berridge, S. (2014), ‘I Love You, Man: Gendered narratives of friendship in contemporary Hollywood comedies’, Feminist Media Studies, 14:3, pp. 353–68, https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.740494.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, J. A. (2009), Black Superheroes, Milestone Comics, and Their Fans, Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bunnell, T., Yea, S., Peake, L., Skelton, T. and Smith, M. (2012), ‘Geographies of friendships’, Progress in Human Geography, 36:4, pp. 490–507, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511426606.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bury, R. (2021), ‘“A small Christmas for me”: A study of binge-watching and fan engagement on Reddit’, in M. Jenner (ed.), Binge-Watching and Contemporary Television Research, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University, pp. 40–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fisher, B. and Tronto, J. (1990), ‘Toward a feminist theory of caring’, in E. K. Abel and M. K. Nelson (eds), Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives, New York: University of New York, pp. 35–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Green, M. and Lawson, V. (2011), ‘Recentring care: Interrogating the commodification of care’, Social & Cultural Geography, 12:6, pp. 639–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hannell, B. (2020), ‘Fan studies and/as feminist methodology’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 33, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2020.1689.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Herrera, J. (2015), ‘Spatializing Chicano power: Cartographic memory and community practices of care’, Social Justice, 42:3–4, pp. 46–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hobart, H. J. K. and Kneese, T. (2020), ‘Radical care: Survival strategies for uncertain times’, Social Text, 38:142, pp. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-7971067.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hubbard, P. (2008), ‘Here, there, everywhere: The ubiquitous geographies of heteronormativity’, Geography Compass, 2:3, pp. 640–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hughey, M. W. (2012), ‘Racializing redemption, reproducing racism: The odyssey of magical negroes and white saviors’, Sociology Compass, 6:9, pp. 751–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hunt, B. (2023), ‘I’m Brendan Hunt (co-creator of Ted Lasso and Coach Beard)! Ask me anything in r/TedLasso!’, Reddit, 1 June, https://www.reddit.com/r/TedLasso/comments/13xllge/im_brendan_hunt_cocreator_of_ted_lasso_and_coach/. Accessed 15 November 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jenkins, H. (1992), Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture, Oxford: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Jenkins, H. (2018), ‘Fandom, negotiation, and participatory culture’, in P. Booth (ed.), A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 11–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kitchin, R. (2014), ‘Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts’, Big Data & Society, 1:1, pp. 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Leszczynski, A. (2018), ‘Digital methods I: Wicked tensions’, Progress in Human Geography, 42:3, pp. 473–81, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517711779.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lingel, J. (2021), ‘A queer and feminist defense of being anonymous online’, HICSS Conference: Critical and Ethical Studies of Digital and Social Media, Hawaii, 5–8 January, https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.311.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lotz, A. D. (2014), Cable Guys: Television and Masculinities in the Twenty-First Century, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Mills, B. (2009), The Sitcom, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Pande, R. (2018), ‘“Who do you mean by fan?” Decolonizing media fandom identity’, in P. Booth (ed.), A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 319–22, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119237211.ch20.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T. and Tacchi, J. (2016), Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice, London: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Place + Space Collective (2018), ‘Care-full friendships: Resisting the neoliberal university through solidarity collectives’, April, https://placeandspacecollective.wordpress.com/. Accessed 6 June 2024.
  31. Ross, S. (2004), ‘“Tough enough”: Female friendship and heroism in Xena and Buffy’, in S. A. Inness (ed.), Action Chicks: New Images of Tough Women in Popular Culture, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 231–55, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403981240_10.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Saeed, A. (2007), ‘Media, racism and Islamophobia: The representation of Islam and Muslims in the media’, Sociology Compass, 1:2, pp. 443–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Seitz, D. K. (2023), A Different Trek: Radical Geographies of Deep Space Nine, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Thomas, A. (2021), ‘The dual imagining: Afrofuturism, queer performance, and Black cosplayers’, in R. Williams and P. Booth (eds), A Fan Studies Primer, Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press, pp. 193–206.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Thompson, S. (2022), ‘“Not your ‘poor dear’”: Practices and politics of care in women’s non-profit housing in Vancouver, Canada’, Gender, Place & Culture, 29:8, pp. 1121–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Thompson, S. (2023), ‘Caring housing futures: A radical care framework for understanding rent control politics in Seattle, USA’, Antipode, 56:3, pp. 779–800.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Topel, F. (2020), ‘Jason Sudeikis: “Ted Lasso” a little nicer than in sketches’, UPI, 13 August, https://www.upi.com/Entertainment_News/TV/2020/08/13/Jason-Sudeikis-Ted-Lasso-a-little-nicer-than-in-sketches/8131597253851. Accessed 12 October 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Vist, E., Popova, M. and Largent, J. E. (2021), ‘What does fan studies feel like?’, in R. Williams and P. Booth (eds), A Fan Studies Primer: Method, Research, Ethics, Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press, pp. 19–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Williams, R. (2011), ‘“Wandering off into soap land”: Fandom, genre and shipping The West Wing’, Participations, 8:1, pp. 270–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Brooklyn Nine-Nine (2013–21, USA: Fox and NBC).
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Parks and Recreation (2009–15, USA: NBC).
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Ted Lasso (2020–23, USA: Apple TV).
     [Google Scholar]
  43.  ‘Pilot’ (Season 1, Episode 1; 14 August 2020).
  44.  ‘Make Rebecca Great Again’ (Season 1, Episode 7; 11 September 2020).
  45.  ‘The Diamond Dogs’ (Season 1, Episode 8; 18 September 2020).
  46.  ‘All Apologies’ (Season 1, Episode 9; 25 September 2020).
  47.  ‘Rainbow’ (Season 2, Episode 5; 20 August 2021).
  48.  ‘Headspace’ (Season 2, Episode 7; 3 September 2021).
  49.  ‘Midnight Train to Royston’ (Season 2, Episode 11; 1 October 2021).
  50.  ‘Inverting the Pyramid of Success’ (Season 2, Episode 12; 8 October 2021).
  51.  ‘International Break’ (Season 3, Episode 10; 17 May 2023).
  52.  ‘So Long, Farewell’ (Season 3, Episode 12; 31 May 2023).
  53. The Office (2005–13, USA: NBC).
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Dittmer, J. and Bos, D. (2019), Popular Culture, Geopolitics, and Identity, 2nd ed., Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Duggan, L. (2002), ‘The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism’, in R. Castronovo and D. Nelson (eds), Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 175–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Framke, C. (2020), ‘For your reconsideration: Ted Lasso’, Variety, 19 September, https://variety.com/2020/tv/columns/ted-lasso-season-1-jason-sudeikis-1234772230. Accessed 15 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Kustritz, A. (2003), ‘Slashing the romance narrative’, The Journal of American Culture, 26:3, pp. 371–84, https://doi.org/10.1111/1542-734X.00098.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Williams, R. (2018), ‘Fate has a habit of not letting us choose our own endings’, in P. Booth (ed.), A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 447–59, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119237211.ch28.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00125_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): care relationships; fan studies; feminist theory; masculinities; queer representation; Reddit

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test