Skip to content
1981
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2046-9861
  • E-ISSN: 2046-987X

Abstract

This article analyses the evolution of the phenomenon of television from its beginnings to the present day, exploring how this reality has adapted to social and technological change. Using a documentary analysis methodology, this exploratory study proposes four main phases: the early years, the maturing years, the technological transition and the present and future. The analysis suggests that, in each new phase, television has not completely broken with its past but has ‘only’ adapted and/or added new features to what was already there. Compared to the past, television is no longer so dependent on a specific device, place and time but is increasingly diluted across a variety of devices, places and times. This study concludes that television is less and less an object of communication and more and more a phenomenon of communication. Less an object, more a phenomenon – this is what television is today, and this also seems to be a clear and growing trend for what television will be in the future. This evolution also calls for a renewed notion of public service – less focused on devices and more on phenomena.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • FCT (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) (Award UIDP/00736/2020 and UIDB/00736/2020)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00139_1
2025-11-18
2026-04-22

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abercrombie, N. and Longhurst, B. (2007), The Penguin Dictionary of Media Studies, London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aladro, E. (2000), ‘De la telenovela a lo televigilancia: “GranHermano” y la nueva era del perspectivismo relacional en la televisión’ (‘From soap operas to television surveillance: “Big Brother” and the new era of relational perspectivism in television’), Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 5, pp. 291300, http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CIYC/article/view/CIYC0000110291A. Accessed 1 January 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Almeida, A. (2024a), The Future of Television: Cultural Trajectories of Media Consumption in the Digital Age of Emotion, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Almeida, A. (2024b), ‘Do societies have emotions?’, Societies, 14:5, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14050065.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Almeida, A. (2025), ‘Technology leaders should “pay back” society to support the common good’, Nature, 646, pp. 3437, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-03152-y.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Almeida, A. and Wolton, D. (2024), ‘The role of television in shaping democracy: An old dream with a big future?’, Comunicação e Sociedade, 45, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.45(2024).4893.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Anderson, S., Bateman, H., Harris, E. and McAdam, K. (2006), Dictionary of Media Studies, London: A & C Black.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bottomley, A. (2020), Sound Streams: A Cultural History of Radio-Internet Convergence, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brants, K. (1998), ‘Who’s afraid of infotainment?’, European Journal of Communication, 13:3, pp. 31535, https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323198013003002.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bustamante, E. (2003), A economia da televisão: as estratégias de gestão de um media (The Television Economy: Media Management Strategies) (trans. L. Calapez), Lisbon: Campo das Letras.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. CAEM/MediaMonitor (2021), Total TV 2020, YUMI Analytics Desktop, unpublished internal report.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Carey, J. W. (1992), Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Carmo, H. and Ferreira, M. M. (2008), Metodologia da investigação: guia para auto-aprendizagem (Research Methodology: A Guide to Self-learning), 2nd ed., Lisbon: Universidade Aberta.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Casetti, F. and Odin, R. (2025), ‘From paleo- to neo-television: A semio-pragmatic approach’, Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies, 20:1, pp. 13448, https://doi.org/10.1177/17496020251321738.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chandler, D. and Munday, R. (2011), A Dictionary of Media and Communication, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Corner, J. (2003), ‘Finding data, reading patterns, telling stories: Issues in the historiography of television’, Media, Culture & Society, 25:2, pp. 27380, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443703025002498.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Correia, J. C. (2015), ‘Ubiquidade: a próxima revolução televisiva’ (‘Ubiquity: The next television revolution’), in P. Serra, S. and W. S. Filho (eds), A Televisão Ubíqua, Covilhã: LabCom, pp. 3952.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Danesi, M. (2000), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics, Media, and Communications, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Denscombe, M. (2003), The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects, 2nd ed., Maidenhead: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Donders, K. (2019), ‘Public service media beyond the digital hype: Distribution strategies in a platform era’, Media, Culture & Society, 41:7, pp. 101128, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719857616.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Drisko, J. and Maschi, T. (2016), Content Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Eco, U. (1986), Viagem na Irrealidade Quotidiana (Journey into Everyday Reality) (trans. M. Pinto), Lisbon: Difel.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Enns, A. (2021), ‘The illusion of control: History and criticism of interactive television’, Television & New Media, 22:8, pp. 93045, https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420959770.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Esler, M. (2021), ‘In plain sight: Online TV interfaces as branding’, Television & New Media, 22:7, pp. 72742, https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420917104.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Faltesek, D., Graalum, E., Breving, B., Knudsen, E., Lucas, J., Young, S. and Zambrano, F. (2023), ‘TikTok as television’, Social Media + Society, 9:3, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231194576.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fidalgo, J. (2005), ‘De que é que se fala quando se fala em serviço público de televisão?’ (‘What do we talk about when we talk about public television service’), in M. Pinto (ed.), Televisão e cidadania: contributos para o debate sobre o serviço público, 2nd ed., Lisbon: Campo das Letras, pp. 2340.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Filho, W. S. (2015), ‘A influência da tecnologia na transformação da televisão no século XXI’ (‘The influence of technology in the transformation of television in the 21st century’), in P. Serra, S. and W. S. Filho (eds), A Televisão Ubíqua, Covilhã: LabCom, pp. 83104.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Giddens, A. (2008), Sociologia (Sociology) (trans. A. Figueiredo, A. Baltazar, C. d. Silva, P. Matos and V. Gil), 6th ed., Lisbon: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gougenheim, I. and d’Hérouville, Y. (2003), A Televisão (The Television) (trans. A. Rodrigues), Lisbon: Editorial Inquérito.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gradim, A. (2015), ‘A televisão no seu labirinto’ (‘Television in its labyrinth’), in P. Serra, S. and W. S. Filho (eds), A Televisão Ubíqua, Covilhã: LabCom, pp. 6982.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hagedoorn, B., Eichner, S. and Lozano, J. (2021), ‘The “youthification” of television’, Critical Studies in Television, 16:2, pp. 8390, https://doi.org/10.1177/17496020211011804.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Johnson, C. (2019), Online TV, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jones, J., Thomas-Walters, L., Rust, N. and Veríssimo, D. (2019), ‘Nature documentaries and saving nature: Reflections on the new Netflix series Our Planet’, People and Nature, 1:4, pp. 42025, https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10052.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lopes, F. (2008), ‘Da pós-neotelevisão: a reconfiguração do prime-time nos canais generalistas portugueses’ (‘From post-neo-television: The reconfiguration of prime-time in Portuguese generalist channels’), in M. Pinto and S. Marinho (eds), Os media em Portugal nos primeiros cinco anos do século XXI, Lisbon: Campo das Letras, pp. 3346.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lopes, F. (2009), ‘Estudos televisivos: perspectivas diacrónicas’ (‘Television studies: Diachronic perspectives’), Comunicação e Sociedade, 15, pp. 727, https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.15(2009).1042.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lopes, F., Burnay, C., Santos, C., Santos, F., Wemans, J., Romano, R. and Silva, S. (2023), ‘Serviço público de média – Livro branco’ (‘Public media service’), white paper, Lisbon: Ministério da Educação e Ciência.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lourenço, E. (2006), ‘À sombra de Nietzsche’ (‘In the shadow of Nietzsche’), in C. D. Sousa and J. D. Lima (eds), Heterodoxias, vol. 1, Lisbon: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, pp. 52126.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Luque, S. (ed.) (2018), ¿Por qué amamos a Pablo Escobar?: Cómo Netflix revivió al narcotraficante más famoso del mundo (Why Do We Love Pablo Escobar? How Netflix Revived the World’s Most Famous Drug Trafficker), Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Machado, A. (2011), ‘Fim da televisão?’ (‘End of television?’), Famecos, 18:1, pp. 8697, https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2011.1.8799.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Maffesoli, M. (1995), A contemplação do mundo (The Contemplation of the World) (trans. F. Settineri), Porto Alegre: Artes e Ofícios.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Maffesoli, M. (2001), O eterno instante: o retorno do trágico nas sociedades pós-modernas (The Eternal Instant: The Return of the Tragic in Postmodern Societies) (trans. M. Figueiredo), Lisbon: Instituto Piaget.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. McQuail, D. (2003), Teoria da comunicação de massas (Mass Communication Theory) (trans. C. Jesus), Lisbon: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Miller, T. (2009), ‘A televisão acabou, a televisão virou coisa do passado, a televisão já era’ (‘Television is over, television has become a thing of the past, television is gone’) (trans. V. Purper), in J. F. Filho (ed.), A TV em transição: tendências de programação no Brasil e no mundo, Porto Alegre: Sulina, pp. 925.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Morazzo, L. (1975), ‘Televisão’ (‘Television’), in Enciclopédia Luso-Brasileira da Cultura, vol. 17, Lisbon: Verbo, pp. 123239.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Moreira, S. V. (2005), ‘Análise documental como método e como técnica’ (‘Documentary analysis as a method and technique’), in J. Duarte and A. Barros (eds), Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa em comunicação, São Paulo: Editora Atlas, pp. 26979.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Newcomb, H. (1998), ‘Television: An overview’, in M. Kelly (ed.), Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, vol. 4, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 36269.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Pardal, L. and Lopes, E. (2011), Métodos e técnicas de investigação social (Social Research Methods and Techniques), Porto: Areal.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Phillippi, J. and Lauderdale, J. (2017), ‘A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation’, Qualitative Health Research, 28:3, pp. 38188, https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317697102.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Pinto, M. (2005), ‘Serviço público – uma perspectiva’ (‘Public service: A perspective’), in M. Pinto (ed.), Televisão e cidadania: contributos para o debate sobre o serviço público, 2nd ed., Porto: Campo das Letras, pp. 1121.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Popper, K. (1999), ‘Uma lei para a televisão’ (‘A law for television’) (trans. M. Carvalho), in G. Bosetti and J. Baudouin (eds), Televisão: um perigo para a democracia, 2nd ed., Lisbon: Gradiva, pp. 1531.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Postman, N. (2006), Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sawaia, J., Juliasz, F., Crippa, T. and Kakazu, K. (2016), ‘The television consumption journey in different platforms in the era of liquid content’, Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 9:3, pp. 192212, https://revistapmkt.com.br/pt_br/categoria/publicacoes/2016/. Accessed 1 January 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Scolari, C. A. (2008), ‘Hacia la hipertelevisión: los primeros síntomas de una nueva configuración del dispositivo televisivo’ (‘Towards hypertelevision: The first symptoms of a new configuration of the television device’), Diálogos de la comunicación, 77, pp. 19, https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2694422. Accessed 1 January 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Scolari, C. A. (2009), ‘The grammar of hypertelevision: An identikit of convergence-age fiction television (or, how television simulates new interactive media)’, Journal of Visual Literacy, 28:1, pp. 2850, https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2009.11674658.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Serra, P., , S. and Filho, W. S. (eds) (2015), A televisão ubíqua (Ubiquitous Television), Covilhã: LabCom.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Sheble, L. and Wildemuth, B. M. (2009), ‘Research diaries’, in B. M. Wildemuth (ed.), Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited, pp. 21121.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Sousa, H. (1999), ‘Serviço público, televisão comercial, e a implementação da lei: alguns elementos para o debate’ (‘Public service, commercial television and the implementation of the law: Some elements for the debate’), Comunicação e Sociedade, 1, pp. 12130, https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.1(1999).1441.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Stockwell, S. (2004), ‘Reconsidering the fourth estate: The functions of infotainment’, APSA (Australian Political Studies Association) Conference, Adelaide, 29 September–1 October.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Teves, V. H. (2007), ‘Anos 60: No reino do “Directo”’ (‘The 60s: In the realm of “direct”’), in RTP: 50 anos de história, Lisbon: RTP, pp. 122, https://museu.rtp.pt/livro/50Anos/Livro/DecadaDe60/NoReinoDo/default.htm. Accessed 1 January 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Torres, E. C. (2011), A televisão e o serviço público (Television and Public Service), Lisbon: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Túñez-López, M., Campos-Freire, F. and Rodríguez-Castro, M. (eds) (2021), The Values of Public Service Media in the Internet Society, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Tutan, D. (2023), ‘Simulating the past in the present through biopics: Queen Elizabeth II on screen and on TV’, Journal of Popular Film and Television, 51:2, pp. 7383, https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2023.2180615.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Verón, E. (2009), ‘Os públicos entre produção e recepção: problemas para uma teoria do reconhecimento’ (‘Publics between production and reception: Problems for a theory of recognition’), Eco-Pós, 12:1, pp. 1126, https://revistaecopos.eco.ufrj.br/eco_pos/article/view/965. Accessed 1 January 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Wolton, D. (1994), Elogio do grande público: uma teoria crítica da televisão (Praise of the General Public: A Critical Theory of Television (trans. M. Goucha), Porto: Edições Asa.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Wolton, D. (2000), E depois da internet? Para uma teoria crítica dos novos médias (And after the Internet? Towards a Critical Theory of New Media) (trans. R. Branco), Lisbon: Difel.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. YouGov (2020), ‘One in eight people watch TV on their phone each day’, 29 October, https://yougov.co.uk/technology/articles/32766-one-eight-people-watch-tv-their-phone-each-day. Accessed 1 January 2025.
/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00139_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test