Skip to content
1981
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2046-9861
  • E-ISSN: 2046-987X

Abstract

How does one partner’s television consumption impact their romantic partner? While romantic relationships often centre on shared values and interests, media preferences – particularly television shows – are not always mutually embraced. This study explores the concept of ‘second-hand fanship’, a phenomenon in which one partner adopts fanship behaviours based on their significant other’s enthusiasm for a fan object, such as a television show, without ever directly engaging with the content themselves. Television, as a central and enduring form of popular media, often serves as more than entertainment – it becomes a part of daily conversation, routine and identity. When one partner deeply connects with a television series, their passion can influence the relational environment, prompting the other partner to respond in ways that mimic fanship: learning character names, referencing plot points or expressing emotional investment, even in the absence of first-hand viewing. Second-hand fanship plays a pivotal role at the intersection of media studies and interpersonal communication by illustrating how television’s cultural reach extends beyond individual screens into the intimate spaces of romantic partnerships. Through a survey-based design of open-ended questions, this study examines 283 individuals in long-term romantic relationships. The findings demonstrate that aspects of fanship can be transferred interpersonally, not through media exposure but through emotional connection and communication. Yet, the study also uncovers avoidance behaviours among some partners, highlighting that media influence can foster both connection and tension within relationships. Ultimately, this research offers a new lens for understanding how television’s influence transcends individual viewers, shaping relational dynamics and fanship culture. Future work should investigate how second-hand fanship functions in other interpersonal contexts, including friendships and family systems.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00141_1
2025-11-18
2026-04-13

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bennett, L. (2012), ‘Fan activism for social mobilization: A critical review of the literature’, Transformative Works and Culture, 10, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2012.0346.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Booth, P. (2015), Playing Fans: Negotiating Fandom and Media in the Digital Age, Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Brooker, P. and Brooker, W. (1996), ‘Pulpmodernism: Tarantino’s affirmative action’, in D. Cartmell, I. Q. Hunter, H. Kaye and I. Whelehan (eds), Pulping Fictions: Consuming Culture Across the Literature/Media Divide, London and Chicago, IL: Pluto Press, pp. 123–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell, L., Lackenbauer, S. D. and Muise, A. (2006), ‘When is being known or adored by romantic partners most beneficial? Self-perceptions, relationship length, and responses to partner’s verifying and enhancing appraisals’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32:10, pp. 1283–94, https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206290383.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, N.-T. N. (2015), ‘Predicting vaccination intention and benefit and risk perceptions: The incorporation of affect, trust, and television influence in a dual-mode model’, Risk Analysis, 35:7, pp. 1268–80, https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12348.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Choi, S. (2015), ‘The two-step flow of communication in Twitter-based public forums’, Social Science Computer Review, 33:6, pp. 696–711, https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314556599.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Collins, M. R. and Stern, D. M. (2015), ‘The online community: Fan response of Community’s unlikely fifth season’, in A. Slade, A. J. Narro and D. Givens-Carroll (eds), Television, Social Media, and Fan Culture, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 109–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis, J. L. and Rusbult, C. E. (2001), ‘Attitude alignment in close relationships’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81:1, pp. 65–84, https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.1.65.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Deutschmann, P. J. and Danielson, W. A. (1960), ‘Diffusion of knowledge of the major news story’, Journalism Quarterly, 37:3, pp. 345–55, https://doi.org/10.1177/107769906003700301.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gwinner, K. and Swanson, S. R. (2003), ‘A model of fan identification: Antecedents and sponsorship outcome’, Journal of Services Marketing, 17:3, pp. 275–94, https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040310474828.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Harrington, C. L. and Bielby, D. (2018), ‘Soap fans, revisited’, in P. Booth (ed.), A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Hills, M. (2002), Fan Cultures, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hinck, A. (2019), Politics for the Love of Fandom: Fan-Based Citizenship in a Digital World, Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Hubbard, C. G. (2020), ‘An American alien: Supergirl’s immigration message to fanbase’, National Communication Association Conference, Seattle, WA, 18–21 November.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hubbard, C. G. (2023), ‘Fanship scale development’, Ph.D. thesis, Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma, https://shareok.org/handle/11244/337508. Accessed 12 August 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hubbard, C. G., Hammonds, K. A. and Meeks, L. (2024), ‘One-above-all: Stratifying communication within Marvel fandom’, Transformative Works and Culture, 43, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2024.2571.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Jenkins, H. (2012), Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture, 2nd ed., New York: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Jenkins, H. (2013), Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture: Updated Twentieth Anniversary Edition, London: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Jenkins, H. and Tulloch, J. (1994), Science Fiction Audiences: Watching Star Trek and Doctor Who, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kammrath, L. K., Peetz, J., Hara, K., Demarco, A., Wood, K., Kirkconnell, J., Meirovich, H. and Allen, T. (2015), ‘It’s a matter of time: The effect of depletion on communal action in romantic relationships is moderated by relationship length’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109:2, pp. 276–91, https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000023.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Katz, E. (1957), ‘The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 21:1, pp. 61–78, https://doi.org/10.1086/266687.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Katz, E. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955), Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Communication, New York: Free Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kilmann, R. H. and Thomas, K. W. (1975), ‘Interpesrsonal conflict-handling behavior as reflections of Jungian personality dimensions’, Psychological Reports, 37:3, pp. 971–80, https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1975.37.3.971.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim, M.-S. and Kim, H.-M. (2017), ‘The effect of online fan community attributes on the loyalty and cooperation of fan community members: The moderating role of connect hours’, Computers in Human Behavior, 68, pp. 232–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.031.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1948), ‘The use of panels in social science research’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 92:5, pp. 405–10, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3143053.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. McCroskey, J. C. and McCain, T. A. (1974), ‘The measurement of interpersonal attraction’, Speech Monographs, 41:3, pp. 261–66, https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757409375845.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Mittell, J. (2009), ‘Sites of participation: Wiki fandom and the case of Lostopedia’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 3:3, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2009.0118.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Nisbett, G. and Schartel Dunn, S. (2021), ‘Reputation matters: Parasocial attachment, narrative engagement, and the 2018 Taylor Swift political endorsement’, Atlantic Journal of Communication, 29:1, pp. 26–38, https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2019.1704758.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Rosario, F. Z. (1971), ‘The leader in family planning and the two-step flow model’, Journalism Quarterly, 48:2, pp. 288–303, https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907104800213.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Schul, Y. and Vinokur, A. D. (2000), ‘Projection in person perception among spouses as a function of the similarity in their shared experiences’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26:8, pp. 987–1001, https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002610008.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Stansberry, K. S. (2012), ‘One-step, two-step, or multi-step flow: The role of influencers in information processing and dissemination in online, interest-based publics’, Ph.D. Thesis, Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1979), ‘An integrative theory of intergroup conflict’, in W. G. Austin and S. Worchel (eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Monterey, CA: Brooks and Cole, pp. 22–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Weimann, G. (1982), ‘On the importance of marginality: One more step into the two-step flow of communication’, American Sociological Review, 47:6, p. 764, https://doi.org/10.2307/2095212.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Williams, R. and Bennett, L. (2021), ‘Editorial: Fandom and controversy’, American Behavioral Scientist, 66:8, pp. 1035–43, https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642211042290.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Community (2009–15, USA: NBC and Yahoo! Screen).
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Survivor (2000–present, USA: CBS).
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Linden, H. and Linden, S. (2017), Fans and Fan Cultures: Tourism, Consumerism and Social Media, Madison, WI: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Weimann, G. and Brosius, H. B. (1994), ‘Is there a two-step flow of agenda-setting?’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6:4, pp. 323–41, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/6.4.323.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00141_1
Loading
‘Even if you don’t watch it with me, I will tell you about it’: Understanding second-hand fanship with television’s influence on romantic partner
Journal of Popular Television, The 13, 161 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1386/jptv_00141_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00141_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00141_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): fandom; interpersonal communication; popular culture; romantic relationships; second-hand fanship; two-step flow

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test