Skip to content
1981
Volume 13, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2046-9861
  • E-ISSN: 2046-987X

Abstract

In the early 2000s, television witnessed the ascendancy of reality TV, profoundly influencing societal norms and behaviours. Taking the culturally situated phenomenon of (2006–present) in India as a prime case study, this research scrutinizes the Hindi-language version through the frameworks of Michel Foucault’s panopticon and Gilles Deleuze’s concept of the ‘society of control’. Utilizing close reading of episodes, the study examines how the show’s surveillance mechanisms shape contestants’ behaviour and the evolving power dynamics between producers and participants. The analysis explicitly traces a shift from traditional disciplinary surveillance towards post-panoptic, rhizomatic control within the house. It reveals broader social implications for identity formation within mediated environments and critically reflects India’s contemporary sociopolitical shifts, particularly the interplay of digital democratization, performative nationalism and the commodification of personal lives. Ultimately, the research illuminates how both reflects and reinforces the dynamics of societal control and personal identity in the digital age, offering a critical perspective on the intersection of media, surveillance and social behaviour within the specific Indian context.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Indian Council of Social Science Research (Award 02/138/2022-23/ICSSR/RP/MN/OBC)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00144_1
2026-02-19
2026-04-23

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alam, S. and Haque, S. A. (2021), ‘Gender, language and Indian reality television: Locating social stereotypes and linguistic sexism’, Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12:2, pp. 48292, https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2021.2.482.492.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ball, K. (2002), ‘Elements of surveillance: A new framework and future directions’, Information, Communication & Society, 5:4, pp. 57390, https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180208538807.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ball, K. (2005), ‘Organization, surveillance and the body: Towards a politics of resistance’, Organization, 12:1, pp. 89108, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405048578.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Berger, J. (1972), Ways of Seeing, London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brusseau, J. (2020), ‘Deleuze’s postscript on the societies of control updated for big data and predictive analytics’, Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 67:164, pp. 125, https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2020.6716401.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Deleuze, G. (1992), ‘Postscript on the societies of control’, October, 59, pp. 37.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (2004), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, vol. II (trans. B. Massumi), London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Foucault, M. (1977), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (trans. A. Sheridan), New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Frisby, C. (2003), ‘Reality TV has positive impact on viewers’, Newswise, 8 May, http://www.newswise.com/articles/reality-tv-has-positive-impact-on-viewers. Accessed 2 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hall, A. (2006), ‘Viewers’ perceptions of reality programs’, Communication Quarterly, 54:2, pp. 191211, https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370600650902.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hannah, M. G. (1997), ‘Space and the structuring of disciplinary power: An interpretive review’, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 79B:3, pp. 17180, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0467.00016.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heller, D. (2007), Makeover Television: Realities Remodeled, London: I. B. Tauris.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hill, A. (2002), ‘Big Brother: The real audience’, Television & New Media, 3:3, pp. 32340, https://doi.org/10.1177/152747640200300307.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jaggi, R. K. (2022), ‘Reality television and cultural shift: The Indian story’, in S. Sharma and O. Gupta (eds), Media and Communication Research: Changing Paradigm, New Delhi: Gyan Publishers, pp. 125, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3685.8962.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kshirsagar, S. (2018), ‘Means are important, too: Bigg Boss in context’, Journal of Media Ethics, 33:4, pp. 22122, https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2018.1509614.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Marx, G. T. (2015), ‘Surveillance studies’, in J. D. Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 73341, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.64025-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Pahad, A., Karkare, N. and Bhatt, M. (2015), ‘Influence of reality television shows on society’, Indian Journal of Applied Research, 5:4, pp. 70305.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sen, B. (2014), ‘Big Brother, Bigg Boss: Reality television as global form’, in B. Sen and A. Roy (eds), Channeling Cultures: Television Studies from India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 20125, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198092056.003.0009.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, V. and Tucker, J. V. (2017), ‘Surveillance and identity: Conceptual framework and formal models’, Journal of Cybersecurity, 3:3, pp. 14558, https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyx010.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wood, D. M. (2009), ‘The “surveillance society”: Questions of history, place and culture’, European Journal of Criminology, 6:2, pp. 17994, https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370808100545.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. American Idol (2002–present, USA: Fox/ABC).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Big Brother (1999–present, Netherlands: International, Endemol).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Bigg Boss (2006–present, India: Endemol Shine India, Viacom18 and Colors TV).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Candid Camera (1948–2014, USA: Various).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dancing with the Stars (2004–present, USA: ABC).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jersey Shore (2009–12, USA: MTV).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Survivor (2000–present, USA: CBS).
    [Google Scholar]
  28. The Voice (2011–present, USA: NBC and Peacock).
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00144_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00144_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test