Skip to content
1981
Volume 13, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2046-9861
  • E-ISSN: 2046-987X

Abstract

This article examines the representation of female political leadership in Netflix original political dramas through quantitative content analysis of four central characters: Claire Underwood ( [2013–18]), Queen Elizabeth II ( [2016–23]), Birgitte Nyborg ( [2010–22]) and Kate Wyler ( [2023–present]). Using automated sentiment analysis and stereotype classification algorithms, the research reveals significant patterns in how streaming platforms construct female political authority. Results demonstrate a predominance of the Maternal Nurturer archetype (50 per cent of characters), alongside the emergence of a Professional Expert archetype that is prominently featured in recent productions. American characters exhibit marked divergence, with Claire Underwood displaying the highest Iron Lady stereotype scores (75.76) and a negative sentiment polarity (−0.089). At the same time, Kate Wyler demonstrates strong Professional Expert characteristics (62.0) with a positive sentiment polarity (0.334). European characters maintain positive sentiment orientation (0.36–0.45) aligned with collaborative leadership representations. These findings suggest that, despite global distribution, distinct cultural frameworks persist in Netflix’s construction of female political authority, with recent productions introducing competence-based representations that potentially expand available leadership models. The research contributes to an understanding of how transnational media platforms balance global reach and local cultural specificity in their representation of women’s leadership in politics.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00146_1
2026-02-19
2026-04-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aalberg, T. and Jenssen, A. T. (2007), ‘Gender stereotyping of political candidates: An experimental study of political communication’, Nordicom Review, 28:1, pp. 1732, https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0198.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Appadurai, A. (1996), Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler, J. (1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Campus, D. (2013), Women Political Leaders and the Media, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Crenshaw, K. (1991), ‘Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color’, Stanford Law Review, 43:6, pp. 124199, https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Duerst-Lahti, G. and Kelly, R. M. (eds) (1995), Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Eagly, A. H. and Carli, L. L. (2007), Through the Labyrinth: The Truth About How Women Become Leaders, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gerbner, G. and Gross, L. (1976), ‘Living with television: The violence profile’, Journal of Communication, 26:2, pp. 17299, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01397.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hancock, A. M. (2007), ‘When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm’, Perspectives on Politics, 5:1, pp. 6379, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592707070065.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jamieson, K. H. (1995), Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jenner, M. (2018), Netflix and the Re-invention of Television, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kraidy, M. (2005), Hybridity, or the Cultural Logic of Globalization, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lauzen, M. M., Dozier, D. M. and Horan, N. (2008), ‘Constructing gender stereotypes through social roles in prime-time television’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52:2, pp. 20014, https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150801991971.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lobato, R. (2019), Netflix Nations: The Geography of Digital Distribution, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lotz, A. D. (2006), Redesigning Women: Television after the Network Era, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. McDonald, K. and Smith-Rowsey, D. (eds) (2016), The Netflix Effect: Technology and Entertainment in the 21st Century, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Okimoto, T. G. and Brescoll, V. L. (2010), ‘The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36:7, pp. 92336, https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210371949.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosener, J. B. (1990), ‘Ways women lead’, Harvard Business Review, 68:6, pp. 11925.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Smooth, W. (2006), ‘Intersectionality in electoral politics: A mess worth making’, Politics and Gender, 2:03, pp. 40014, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x06261087.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Zoonen, L. (1994), Feminist Media Studies, London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Borgen (2010–22, Denmark: DR/SAM Productions; co-produced with Netflix for Borgen – Power & Glory, 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. The Crown (2016–23, UK and USA: Left Bank Pictures for Netflix).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. The Diplomat (2023–present, USA: Netflix).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. House of Cards (2013–18, USA: Netflix).
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00146_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00146_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test