Skip to content
1981
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2046-9861
  • E-ISSN: 2046-987X

Abstract

HBO’s (2023–present) stages a climate-linked dystopia in which institutional collapse renders distrust and violence as ordinary conditions of survival. This article introduces violent care to name a moral imaginary in which care emerges as emotionally and ethically legible through the willingness to do lethal harm on behalf of the few. Drawing on Fisher’s narrative paradigm, Bormann’s symbolic convergence theory and Berlant’s account of affective life, I analyse Season 1 as a rhetorical artefact, tracing how recurring fantasy themes consolidate into a rhetorical vision that makes suspicion of institutions and strangers feel prudent and morally compelling. Across key sequences (the outbreak prologue, Kansas City, the encounter with David, and the hospital finale), the series repeatedly rewards guarded intimacy and lethal protection, framing family as the only trustworthy ethical unit. The finale crystallizes the cruel optimism of this logic. Joel’s attachment to protectorhood sustains purpose and narrative closure while foreclosing more diverse imaginaries of solidarity, justice and responsibility for the many. The article argues that survivalist prestige television can function as a kind of affectively persuasive moral orientation, narrowing what forms of care and governance feel plausible under crisis.

© 2026 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00154_1
2026-03-31
2026-04-15

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agamben, G. (2005), The State of Exception, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Beckert, J. (2016), Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Benko, S. A. (ed.) (2024), Better Living Through TV: Contemporary Television and Moral Identity Formation, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Berlant, L. (2011), Cruel Optimism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bertsou, E. (2019a), ‘Political distrust and its discontents: Exploring the meaning, expression and significance of political distrust’, Societies, 9:4, pp. 1–18, https://doi.org/10.3390/soc9040072.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bertsou, E. (2019b), ‘Rethinking political distrust’, European Political Science Review, 11:2, pp. 213–30, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773919000080.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bitzer, L. F. (1968), ‘The rhetorical situation’, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1:1, pp. 1–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bizzell, P. and Herzberg, B. (eds) (2001), The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present, Boston, MA: Bedford/St Martin’s.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Booker, M. K. (1994), The Dystopian Impulse in Modern Literature: Fiction as Social Criticism, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bormann, E. G. (1985), ‘Symbolic convergence theory: A communication formulation’, Journal of Communication, 35:4, pp. 128–38, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Campione, K. (2023), ‘The Last of Us Season 1 finale draws 8.2 million viewers, another series high’, Deadline, 13 March, https://deadline.com/2023/03/the-last-of-us-season-1-finale-ratings-hbo-1235284144/. Accessed 7 July 2024.
  12. Edelman (2022), ‘2022 Edelman Trust Barometer’, Edelman, 25 January, https://www.edelman.com/trust/2022-trust-barometer. Accessed 8 July 2024.
  13. Edelman (2024), ‘2024 Edelman Trust Barometer’, Edelman, 5 February, https://www.edelman.com/trust/2024/trust-barometer. Accessed 8 July 2024.
  14. Edelman (2025), ‘2025 Edelman Trust Barometer’, Edelman, 24 January, https://www.edelman.com/trust/2025/trust-barometer. Accessed 8 July 2024.
  15. Eyman, D. (2015), Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Fisher, W. R. (1984), ‘Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument’, Communication Monographs, 51:1, pp. 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390180.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Flew, T. (2021), ‘The global trust deficit disorder: A communications perspective on trust in the time of global pandemics’, Journal of Communication, 71:2, pp. 163–86, https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab006.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Green, A. M. (2016), ‘The reconstruction of morality and the evolution of naturalism in The Last of Us’, Games and Culture, 11:7-8, pp. 745–63, https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015579489.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hatchuel, S. and Cornillon, C. (2020), ‘The ethics of serial narrative structures’, Series: International Journal of TV Serial Narratives, 6:1, pp. 57–64, https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.2421-454X/10393.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Holt-Lunstad, J. and Golant, S. (2023), Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on the Healing Effects of Social Connection and Community, Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson, P. E. (2017), ‘Walter White(ness) lashes out: Breaking Bad and male victimage’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34:1, pp. 14–28, https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1238101.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kaplan, E. A. (2015), Climate Trauma: Foreseeing the Future in Dystopian Film and Fiction, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kelly, C. R. (2016), ‘The man-pocalypse: Doomsday Preppers and the rituals of apocalyptic manhood’, Text and Performance Quarterly, 36:2-3, pp. 95–114, https://doi.org/10.1080/10462937.2016.1158415.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Mittell, J. (2010), ‘Previously on: Prime time serials and the mechanics of memory’, in M. Grishakova and M.-L. Ryan (eds), Intermediality and Storytelling, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 78–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Moylan, T. (2000), Scraps of the Untainted Sky: Science Fiction, Utopia, Dystopia, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Moylan, T. and Baccolini, R. (2003), Dark Horizons: Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Neville-Shepard, M. (2023), ‘“Better never means better for everyone”: White feminist necropolitics and Hulu’s The Handmaid’s Tale’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 109:1, pp. 2–25, https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2022.2136738.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Neville-Shepard, M. (2025), ‘Gore empowerment: Patriarchal appetites and white feminist delights in Showtime’s Yellowjackets’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 111:3, pp. 347–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2024.2413613.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Putnam, R. D. (2001), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Schmitt, C. (2005), Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (trans. G. Schwab), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Schmitt-Beck, R. and Wolsing, A. (2010), ‘European TV environments and citizens’ social trust’, Communications, 35:4, pp. 475–500, https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2010.024.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Seeger, S. and Davison-Vecchione, D. (2019), ‘Dystopian literature and the sociological imagination’, Thesis Eleven, 155:1, pp. 45–63, https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513619888664.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Shehata, A. (2014), ‘Game frames, issue frames, and mobilization: Disentangling the effects of frame exposure and motivated news attention on political cynicism and engagement’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26:2, pp. 157–77, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edt034.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Strömbäck, J., Djerf-Pierre, M. and Shehata, A. (2016), ‘A question of time? A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between news media consumption and political trust’, International Journal of Press/Politics, 21:1, pp. 88–110, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161215613059.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Taylor, C. (2004), Modern Social Imaginaries, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Thompson, A. C. and Fisher, F. (2021), ‘Members of several well-known hate groups identified at Capitol riot’, Frontline, 9 January, https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/several-well-known-hate-groups-identified-at-capitol-riot/. Accessed 8 July 2024.
  37. Vaage, M. B. (2016), The Antihero in American Television, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Wink, W. (2010), The Powers That Be: Theology for a New Millennium, New York: Harmony Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Breaking Bad (2008–13, USA: AMC).
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Doomsday Preppers (2011–14, USA: National Geographic Channel).
     [Google Scholar]
  41. The Handmaid’s Tale (2017–present, USA: Hulu).
     [Google Scholar]
  42. The Last of Us (2023–present, USA: HBO).
     [Google Scholar]
  43. ‘When You’re Lost in the Darkness’ (Season 1, Episode 1; 15 January 2023).
  44. ‘Infected’ (Season 1, Episode 2; 22 January 2023).
  45. ‘Long, Long Time’ (Season 1, Episode 3; 29 January 2023).
  46. ‘Please Hold My Hand’ (Season 1, Episode 4; 5 February 2023).
  47. ‘Endure and Survive’ (Season 1, Episode 5; 12 February 2023).
  48. ‘Kin’ (Season 1, Episode 6; 19 February 2023).
  49. ‘Left Behind’ (Season 1, Episode 7; 26 February 2023).
  50. ‘When We Are in Need’ (Season 1, Episode 8; 5 March 2023).
  51. ‘Look for the Light’ (Season 1, Episode 9; 12 March 2023).
  52. Yellowjackets (2021–present, USA: Showtime).
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R. and Nanetti, R. Y. (1994), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jptv_00154_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): affective ethics; cruel optimism; dystopian television; paternal protection; post-apocalyptic television; rhetorical criticism; state violence; symbolic convergence theory

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test