Skip to content
1981
Volume 14, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2042-7891
  • E-ISSN: 2042-7905

Abstract

Cinema is particularly suited for illuminating the kinaesthetic aspects of cultural subjugation. In () (2016), writer–director Amanda Kernell portrays the self-assimilatory journey of an indigenous 14-year-old girl as a result of forced and voluntary exposure to novel bodily experiences. Using as its conceptual point of departure the term ‘kinaesthesia’ – the body’s sensations of movement and spatiality – this article analyses the filmic techniques Kernell uses to offer audiences a vicarious experience of assimilation, and later, cultural revitalization. A century after majority-population Swedes subjected Kernell’s family and other Sámi to social Darwinian racism, the director’s third-eye film turns the camera back at those who portrayed them as inferior. exemplifies how important sensory and affective experiences are for our politics, histories and perception of cultural texts. The film is part of the past decades’ Sámi revitalization, an artistic movement in which screen media have played an important role.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jsca_00121_1
2024-12-13
2026-04-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barker, Jennifer (2009), The Tactile Eye: Touch and the Cinematic Experience, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bollen, Jonathan (2001), ‘Queer kinaesthesia: Performativity on the dance floor’, in J. Desmond (ed.), Dancing Desires: Choreographing Sexualities on and off the Stage, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 285314.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boltegård, Annika (2017), ‘Regissören bakom succéfilmen Sameblod: “Det är som ett öppet sår för många samer”’, Land, 16, p. 14.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Collins, Felicity and Davis, Therese (2004), Australian Cinema after Mabo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dancus, Adriana Margareta (2022), ‘Sámi identity across generations: From passing for Nordics to Sámi self-exposure’, Journal of Critical Mixed Race Studies, 1:2, pp. 26276.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Deldén, Maria and Törnegren, Gull (2020), ‘Identitet, etik och historiemedvetande: En analys av filmen Sameblod som potentiellt undervisningsmaterial i ämnena religionskunskap och historia’, Utbildning & Lärande, 14:1, pp. 6585.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fjellheim, Unni M. (2018), ‘Daelie mijjen våaroe klitnjiestidh/Nå er det vår tur til skinne’, SÁMi ođasmagasiidna, 4, pp. 69.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hedenström, Mats Gustafsson (2017), ‘Amanda Kernell långfilmsdebuterar med Sameblod: “Många som ser filmen upptäcker en ny värld”’, Kommunalarbetaren, 3, pp. 3637.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Janson, Malena (2017), ‘Sameblod’, Flm: En kulturtidsskrift om film, 38, p. 66.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kjellman, Ulrika (2013), ‘A whiter shade of pale: Visuality and race in the work of the Swedish State Institute for Race Biology’, Scandinavian Journal of History, 38:2, pp. 180201.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Knobblock, Ina and Höglund, Johan (2022), ‘“Im sïjhth årrodh naan bahha cirkusdjur – Jag vill inte vara ett jävla cirkusdjur”: Dekolonisering av det etnografiska skådespelet i Sameblod’, in Å. B. Larsson (ed.), Bilder av ras i svensk visuell kultur, Stockholm: The Royal Swedish Academy of Letters, History and Antiquities, pp. 7388.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kuokkanen, Rauna (2000), ‘Towards an “indigenous paradigm” from a Sámi perspective’, The Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 20:2, pp. 41136.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kyllingstad, Jon Røyne (2012), ‘Norwegian physical anthropology and the idea of a Nordic master race’, Current Anthropology, 53:S5, pp. S46S56.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kyllingstad, Jon Røyne (2023), Rase: En vitenskapshistorie, Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kyrölä, Katariina (2017), ‘Sameblod och gränsöverskridande politik’, Ikaros: Tidskrift om Människan och Vetenskapen, 4, pp. 2627.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Larsen, Mads (2018), ‘Ofelas: Filming Otherness in indigenous revitalization’, International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 14:2, pp. 23341.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Larsen, Mads (2021), ‘Probably ghostwritten, L’enfant noir: A lost African vision for global interdependence with 21st century relevance’, Research in African Literatures, 52:1, pp. 5270.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Larsson, Fanny (2020), ‘Framställning av samer i film: En kvalitativ innehålls-analys om framställningen av samer i spelfilmer producerade på 2000-talet’, MA thesis, Halmstad: Högskolan i Halmstad.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lury, Karen (2011), ‘The “basis for mutual contempt”: The loss of the contingent in digital television’, in J. Bennett and N. Strange (eds), Television as Digital Media, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 181203.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Marks, Laura (2000), The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mattsson, Andreas (2017), ‘Filmaren som vill vara jobbig’, Fokus: Sveriges Nyhetsmagasin, 10 February, pp. 4243.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Olsen, Torjer A. (2018), ‘This word is (not?) very exciting: Considering intersectionality in indigenous studies’, NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 26:3, pp. 18296.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rony, Fatimah Tobing (1996), The Third Eye: Race, Cinema, and Ethnographic Spectacle, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sand, Stine (2022), ‘Dealing with racism: Colonial history and colonization of the mind in the autoethnographic and indigenous film Sami Blood’, Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 16:3, pp. 20923.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Shacklock, Zoë (2019), ‘Queer kinaesthesia on television’, Screen, 60:4, pp. 50926.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Shohat, Ella and Stam, Robert (2014), Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sikku, Katarina Pirak and Griffin, Gabriele (2020), ‘“My body, my self”: Indigeneity, bioprecarity and the construction of the embodied self – An artist’s view’, in G. Griffin and D. Leibetseder (eds), Bodily Interventions and Intimate Labour: Understanding Bioprecarity, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 20931.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sobchack, Vivian (1992), The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Södergran, Edith ([1925] 2000), ‘Landet som icke är’, Landet som icke är (ed. H. Olsson), Stockholm: Podium, p. 23.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Tavares, Hannah M. (2022), ‘A prelude to postcolonial cultural histories of education: “Reading” Amanda Kernell’s Sami Blood’, Paedagogica Historica, 58:4, pp. 50424.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Wahlund, Stina (2021), ‘Same eller svensk? Om livsåskådningsperspektiv i filmen Sameblod’, MA thesis, Uppsala: Uppsala University.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ante (1975), Norway: NRK.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Gaup, Nils (1987), Ofelaš, Norway.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. George, Terry (2004), Hotel Rwanda, UK/Italy/South Africa.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kernell, Amanda (2016), Sameblod, Sweden. DVD, Denmark: Nordisk Film, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Schnéevoigt, George (1929), Laila, Norway.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Westfelt, Ragnar (1928), Viddenes folk, Norway.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jsca_00121_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jsca_00121_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test