Women in science: Theatrical representations and the realities they mirror

References

1. American Association of University Women (n.d.), Why So Few?: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, Washington, DC:: AAUW;, http://www.aauw.org/resource/why-so-few-women-in-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-executive-summary. Accessed 15 April 2019 .
   [Google Scholar]
2. Backalenick, I.. (1999);, 'Review: Theatre: An Experiment with an Air Pump'. , Stage: The Performing Arts Weekly, 5-11 November , p. 36.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ball, P.. (2015);, 'Lab's labour lost'. , Nature, 525:7540, p. 454.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boboltz, S., and Yam, K.. (2017);, 'Why on-screen representation actually matters'. , Huffington Post, 24 February, https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/why-on-screen-representation-matters_us_58aeae96e4b01406012fe49d. Accessed 4 August 2018 .
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brantley, B.. (2015);, 'Review: In Photograph 51, Nicole Kidman is a steely DNA scientist'. , New York Times, 14 September, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/15/theater/review-in-photograph-51-nicole-kidman-is-a-steely-dna-scientist.html. Accessed 8 March 2016 .
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cobb, M.. (2015), Life's Greatest Secret: The Race to Crack the Genetic Code, London:: Profile Books Ltd;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Etzkowitz, H.,, Kemelgor, C., and Uzzi, B.. (2000), Athena Unbound: Advancement of Women in Science and Technology, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Farr, P.. (2018), A Lab of One's Own: Science and Suffrage in the First World War, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ferro, S.. (2015);, 'It takes just 2 years before corporate America drains women of their ambition'. , Business Insider, 18 May, http://www.businessinsider.com/women-and-ambition-a-corporate-story-2015-5. Accessed 25 July 2018 .
   [Google Scholar]
10. Garber, M.. (2017);, 'Enter the ambition fatigue'. , The Atlantic, 8 April, https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/04/ambition-robin-romm-book-review/522333/. Accessed 9 August 2018 .
    [Google Scholar]
11. Glynn, J.. (2012), My Sister Rosalind Franklin, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Haynes, R.. (1994), From Faust to Strangelove: Representations of the Scientist in Western Culture, Baltimore:: Johns Hopkins University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Haynes, R.. (2017), From Madman to Crime Fighter: The Scientist in Western Culture, Baltimore:: Johns Hopkins University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Howard, J.,, Risman, B., and Sprague, J.. (2008);, 'Series editors' foreword'. , in S. Crawley,, L. Foley, and C. Shehan. (eds), Gendering Bodies, Plymouth:: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers;, pp. viii-xi.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Johnson, P.,, Widnall, S., and Benya, F.. (eds) (2018), Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC:: The National Academies Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kaplan, S., and Guraino, B.. (2018);, 'Half of women in science experience harassment, a sweeping new report finds'. , Washington Post, 12 June, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2018/06/12/half-of-women-in-science-experience-harassment-a-sweeping-new-report finds/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.859d1461bc57. Accessed 14 October 2018 .
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lloyd, R.. (2010);, 'Rosalind Franklin and DNA: How wronged was she?'. , Scientific American, 3 November, https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/rosalind-franklin-and-dna-how-wronged-was-she/. Accessed 10 December 2017 .
    [Google Scholar]
18. Marks, P.. (1999);, 'Theater review; cutting ethical corners in the name of science, then and now'. , New York Times, 1 November, http://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/01/theater/theater-review-cutting-ethical-corners-in-the-name-of-science-then-and-now.html. Accessed 3 March 2016 .
    [Google Scholar]
19. Mervosh, K.. (2019);, 'How Katie Bouman accidentally became the face of the black hole project'. , New York Times, 11 April, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/11/science/katie-bouman-black-hole.html. Accessed 19 April 2019 .
    [Google Scholar]
20. Pew Research Center (2018);, 'Representation of women in STEM jobs varies widely'. , Pew Research Center: Social & Demographic Trends, 8 January, https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2018/01/09/women-and-men-in-stem-often-at-odds-over-workplace-equity/ps_2018-01-09_stem_0-02/. Accessed 8 August 2018 .
    [Google Scholar]
21. Pollack, E.. (2013);, 'Why are there still so few women in science?'. , New York Times, 3 October, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/magazine/why-are-there-still-so-few-women-in-science.html. Accessed 22 November 2017 .
    [Google Scholar]
22. Pollack, E.. (2015), The Only Woman in the Room: Why Science is Still a Boys' Club, Boston:: Beacon Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Purple Seven (2015);, 'Gender in theatre'. , Purple Seven, https://purplesevenanalytics.com/. Accessed 15 July 2018 .
    [Google Scholar]
24. Rapoport, S.. (2003);, 'Rosalind Franklin: Unsung hero of the DNA revolution'. , New York History, 84:3, pp. 315-29.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Resnick, B.. (2019);, 'Male scientists are often cast as lone geniuses. Here's what happened when a woman was'. , Vox, 16 April, https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2019/4/16/18311194/black-hole-katie-bouman-trolls. Accessed 19 April 2019 .
    [Google Scholar]
26. Romm, R.. (2017);, 'Introduction'. , in R. Romm. (ed.), Double Bind: Women on Ambition, New York:: Liveright Publishing Company;, pp. 1-4.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Sayre, A.. (1978), Rosalind Franklin and DNA, New York:: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.;
    [Google Scholar]
28. Shaughnessy, N.. (2012), Applying Performance: Live Art, Socially Engaged Theatre and Affective Practice, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Shepherd-Barr, K.. (2006), Science on Stage: From Doctor Faustus to Copenhagen, Princeton:: Princeton University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Stephenson, S.. (1999), An Experiment with an Air Pump, New York:: Dramatists Play Service;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. The Royal Society (2010);, 'Most influential British women in science'. , The Royal Society, 21 March, https://royalsociety.org/news/2010/influential-british-women/. Accessed 17 August 2017 .
    [Google Scholar]
32. Trueman, M.. (2015);, 'West End review: Nicole Kidman in Photograph 51'. , Variety, 15 September, www.variety.com/2015/legit/reviews/photograph-51-review-nicole-kidman-1201593374/?. Accessed 8 March 2016 .
    [Google Scholar]
33. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2018);, 'Women in science'. , 29 June, http://uis.unesco.org/en/topic/women-science. Accessed 5 May 2019 .
34. Vetter, B.. (1996);, 'Myths and realities of women's progress in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering'. , in C. Davis,, A. Ginorio,, C. Hollenshead,, B. Lazarus,, P. Rayman. and associates (eds), The Equity Equation: Fostering the Advancement of Women in the Sciences, Mathematics, and Engineering, San Francisco:: Jossey-Bass Inc Publishers;, pp. 29-56.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Zehelein, E.. (2009), Science: Dramatic: Science Plays in America and Great Britain 1990-2007, Heidelberg:: Universitätsverlag Winter;.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ziegler, A.. (2011), Photograph 51, New York:: Dramatists Play Service;.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Tiehen, Jeanne. (2020);, 'Women in science: Theatrical representations and the realities they mirror'. , Journal of Science & Popular Culture, 3:1, pp. 7-22, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jspc_00009_1
    [Google Scholar]