The right to urban public space and aesthetic dissensus for democratic citizenship

References

1. Abaza, Mona. ( 2016;), ‘ The field of graffiti and street art in post-January 2011 Egypt. ’, in J. I. Ross. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Graffiti and Street Art, London:: Routledge;, pp. 318–33.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arendt, Hannah. ( [1963] 2006), On Revolution, New York:: Penguin Books;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Armstrong, Isobel. ( 2000), The Radical Aesthetic, Oxford:: Blackwell;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Balaban, Osman. ( 2012;), ‘ The negative effects of construction boom on urban planning and environment in Turkey: Unravelling the role of public sector. ’, Habitat International, 36:1, pp. 26–35.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Butler, Judith. ( 2011;), ‘ Bodies in alliance and the politics of the street. ’, 9 September, http://www.eipcp.net/transversal/1011/butler/en. Accessed 20 November 2019.
6. Butler, Judith. ( 2013;), ‘ Exercising freedom (interview with Judith Butler). ’, Revolutions: Global Trends & Regional Issues, 1:1, pp. 32–41.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Butler, Judith. ( 2014;), ‘ Foreword. ’, in Ü. Özkırımlı. (ed.), The Making of a Protest Movement in Turkey: #occupygezi, Basingstoke:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. vii– xvii.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Butler, Judith. ( 2015), Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly, London:: Harvard University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cagaptay, Soner. ( 2020), Erdoğan’s Empire: Turkey and the Politics of the Middle East, New York:: I.B. Tauris;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Castells, Manuel. ( 1983), The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements, London:: Edward Arnold;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Çelikkol, Aşkın. ( 2014;), ‘ Saturnalia revisited: Gezi Park protests and carnival today. ’, Cultura, lenguaje y representación: revista de estudios culturales de la Universitat Jaume I, 12, pp. 9–25, https://raco.cat/index.php/CLR/article/view/278150. Accessed 24 October 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Çınar, Alev. ( 2005), Modernity, Islam and Secularism in Turkey: Bodies, Places and Time, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Çolak, Erdem. ( 2014;), ‘ Art in street: The significant role of using the art, literature and humour in the Gezi resistance. ’, International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 7:4, pp. 463–76.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Della Porta, Donatella, and Mattoni, Alice. ( 2014), Spreading Protest: Social Movements in Times of Crisis, Colchester:: ECPR Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fainstein, Susan. ( 2014;), ‘ The just city. ’, International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18:1, pp. 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gambetti, Zeynep. ( 2014;), ‘ Occupy Gezi as politics of the body. ’, in Ü. Özkırımlı. (ed.), The Making of a Protest Movement in Turkey: #occupygezi, Basingstoke:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 89–102.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gilbert, Margeret. ( 1990;), ‘ Walking together: A paradigmatic social phenomena. ’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 15, pp. 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Grindon, Gavin. ( 2008), Aesthetics and Radical Politics, Newcastle:: Cambridge Scholars Publishing;.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gül, Murat,, Dee, John, and Cünük, Cahide Nur. ( 2014;), ‘ Istanbul’s Taksim Square and Gezi Park: The place of protest and the ideology of place. ’, Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 38:1, pp. 63–72.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gündüz, Erdem. ( 2019;), ‘ Article page. ’, Erdem Gündüz official website, http://www.erdemgunduz.org/ARTICLE.html. Accessed 11 December 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gürcan, Efe C., and Peker, Efe. ( 2015), Challenging Neoliberalism at Turkey’s Gezi Park: From Private Discontent to Collective Class Action, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. ( 2012;), ‘ Declaration. ’, 14 June, https://antonionegriinenglish.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/93152857-hardt-negri-declaration-2012.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2013.
23. Harvey, David. ( 2008;), ‘ The right to the city. ’, New Left Review, 53, September/October, pp. 23–40.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Harvey, David. ( 2012), Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution, London and New York:: Verso;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Harvey, David, and Potter, Cuz. ( 2009;), ‘ The right to the just city. ’, in P. Marcuse,, J. Connolly,, J. Novy,, I. Olivo,, C. Petter, and J. Steil. (eds), Searching for the Just City: Debates in Urban Theory and Practice, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 40–51.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hohle, Randolph. ( 2010;), ‘ Politics, social movements and the body. ’, Sociology Compass, 4:1, pp. 38–51.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Holston, James. ( 1998;), ‘ Spaces of insurgent citizenship. ’, in L. Sandercock. (ed.), Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicultural Planning History, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;, pp. 37–56.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Holston, James. ( 2009;), ‘ Insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries. ’, City and Society, 21:2, pp. 245–67.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hürriyet News ( 2013;), ‘ Polis Barikatinda “Kurutmalik Biber”. ’, 15 August, https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/polis-barikatinda-kurutmalik-biber-24527395. Accessed 23 October 2013.
30. Irazábal, Clara. ( 2008;), ‘ Citizenship, democracy and public space in Latin America. ’, in I. Clara. (ed.), Ordinary Places/Extraordinary Events: Citizenship, Democracy and Public Space in Latin America: Citizenship, Democracy and Public Space in Latin America, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 11–34.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Karakaş, Öznur. ( 2018;), ‘ Gezi assemblages: Embodied encounters in the making of an alternative space. ’, Studies in Social Justice, 12:1, pp. 38–55.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Konda ( 2014;), ‘ Gezi Raporu: Toplumun ’Gezi Parki Olaylari’ Algisi: Gezi Parkindkailer Kimlerdi?. ’, Konda Arastirma Ve Danismanlik, 5 June, https://konda.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/KONDA_GeziRaporu2014.pdf. Accessed 24 January 2018.
33. Kuymulu, Mehmet Bariş. ( 2013;), ‘ Reclaiming the right to the city: Reflections on the urban uprisings in Turkey. ’, City, 17:3, pp. 274–78.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lefebvre, Henri. ( 1968), Le Droit à la ville (The Right to the City), Paris:: Anthopos;.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lefebvre, Henri. ( 1996), Writings on Cities, Malden, MA:: Blackwell;.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lefebvre, Henri. ( 2003), The Urban Revolution (trans. R. Bononno.), Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Marshall, Thomas Humphrey. ( 1950), Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Mayer, Margit. ( 2000;), ‘ Urban social movements in an era of globalisation. ’, in P. Hamel,, H. Lustiger-Thaler, and M. Mayer. (eds), Urban Movements in Globalising World, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 141–57.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Mayer, Margit. ( 2009;), ‘ The “right to the city” in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. ’, City, 13:2&3, pp. 362–63.
    [Google Scholar]
40. McGarry, Aidan,, Erhart, Itir,, Eslen-Ziya, Hande,, Jenzen, Olu, and Korkut, Umut. ( 2020), The Aesthetics of Global Protest: Visual Culture and Communication, Amsterdam:: Amsterdam University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Merrifield, Andy. ( 2014), The New Urban Question, London:: Pluto Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Miraftab, Franak. ( 2012;), ‘ Planning and citizenship. ’, in R. Weber, and R. Crane. (eds), Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 1180–1204.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Purcell, Mark. ( 2002;), ‘ Citizenship and the right to the global city: Reimagining the capitalist world order. ’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27:3, pp. 564–90.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Purcell, Mark. ( 2008), Recapturing Democracy: Neoliberalization and the Struggle for Alternative Urban Futures, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Rancière, Jacques. ( 2004), The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible (trans. G. Rockhill.), London and New York:: Continuum;.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Rancière, Jacques. ( 2009a;), ‘ Contemporary art and the politics of aesthetics. ’, in B. Hinderliter,, V. Maimon,, J. Mansoor, and S. McCormick. (eds), Communities of Sense, Rethinking Aesthetics and Politics, Durham, NC and London:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Rancière, Jacques. ( 2009b), Aesthetics and Its Discontents (trans. S. Corcoran.), Cambridge and Malden, MA:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Rancière, Jacques. ( 2010), Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics (trans. S. Corcoran.), New York:: Continuum;.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Rancière, Jacques. ( 2011;), ‘ The thinking of dissensus: politics and aesthetics. ’, in P. Bowman, and R. Stamp. (eds), Reading Rancière: Critical Dissensus, London and New York:: Continuum;.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Rancière, Jacques. ( 2016;), ‘ Lecture by Jacques Rancière: Art and politics: Dissensus and its metamorphoses. ’, YouTube, 11 June, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3CKIZgwf3k&t=456s. Accessed 20 December 2019.
51. Secor, Anna. ( 2004;), ‘ There is an Istanbul that belongs to me: Citizenship, space and identity in the city. ’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94:2, pp. 352–68.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Seymour, Richard. ( 2013;), ‘ Turkey’s “standing man” shows how passive resistance can shake a state. ’, The Guardian, 18 June, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/18/turkey-standing-man. Accessed 9 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Souza, Marcelo. ( 2012;), ‘ The city in libertarian thought. ’, City, 16, pp. 4–33.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Taş, Hakki. ( 2015;), ‘ Turkey – from tutelery to delegative democracy. ’, Third World Quarterly, 36:4, pp. 776–91.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Temelkuran, Ece. ( 2019), How to Lose a Country: The 7 Steps from Democracy to Dictatorship, Sydney:: Harper Collins;.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Todap ( 2013;), ‘ Direnişten Önce ve Sonra Ruh Halleri - Atölye Raporu Sunumu. ’, TODAP, 22 September, http://todap.org/bolum_detay.aspx?yaziId=1370&bolumId=2. Accessed 15 January 2019.
57. Tsilimpoudini, Myrto. ( 2016), Sociology of Crisis, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Tunalı, Tijen. ( 2018;), ‘ Art of resistance: Carnival aesthetics and the Gezi street protests. ’, ASAP: Journal of the Association for the Study of the Arts of the Present, Special Issue: ‘Rules of Engagement: Art, Process, Protest’, 3:2, pp. 377–99.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Venturini, Federico. ( 2019;), ‘ Reconceptualising the right to the city and spatial justice through social ecology. ’, in F. Venturini,, E. Değirmenci, and I. Morales-Bernardos. (eds), Social Ecology and the Right to the City: Towards Ecological and Democratic Cities, Montreal:: Black Rose;, pp. 86–100.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Walton, Jeremy F.. ( 2015;), ‘ “Everyday I’m Çapulling!” Global flows and local frictions of Gezi. ’, in I. David, and K. F. Toktamis. (eds), Everywhere Taksim: Sowing the Seeds for a New Turkey, Amsterdam:: Amsterdam University Press;, pp. 45–57.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Yeğenoğlu, Melda. ( 2013;), ‘ Smells like Gezi spirit: Democratic sensibilities and carnivalesque politics in Turkey. ’, Radical Philosophy, 182, November/December, https://www.radicalphilosophy.com/commentary/smells-like-gezi-spirit. Accessed 20 July 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Yıldırım, Yavuz Y.. ( 2014;), ‘ The differences of Gezi Parki resistance in Turkish social movements. ’, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4, pp. 117–85.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Tunali, Tijen. ( 2021;), ‘ The right to urban public space and aesthetic dissensus for democratic citizenship. ’, Journal of Urban Cultural Studies, 8:2, pp. 247–66, https://doi.org/10.1386/jucs_00044_1
    [Google Scholar]