Skip to content
1981
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2050-9790
  • E-ISSN: 2050-9804
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

The aim of this contribution is to help develop a new model of the use of storytelling in planning. To this end, it draws on media studies research as well as literary studies that examine so-called transmedia storytelling devices. The authors use this method to examine the communication strategy around the 2030 Cantonal Master Plan of the Republic and Canton of Geneva (Switzerland). This communication strategy, which attempts to construct the reception of development projects, mobilizes practical regimes that can strengthen the engagement of different audiences with the process of giving narrative form to future urban developments. Communication and public participation in an urban project tend to hybridize, thereby complexifying debates on the use of storytelling in planning, which often contrast its educational use (explain projects to the general public) with its manipulative use (make projects desirable so they may be accepted). By conducting an analysis through the prism of transmedia storytelling, we can simultaneously consider these two aspects of communication in planning.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (Award IZCOZO_189881)
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Intellect Ltd.
This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The CC BY licence permits commercial and noncommercial reuse. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jucs_00098_1
2025-05-31
2026-04-22

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jucs/12/1/jucs.12.1.119_Matthey.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/jucs_00098_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ameel, Lieven (2016), ‘Towards a narrative typology of urban planning narratives for, in and of planning in Jätkäsaari, Helsinki’, Urban Design International, 22:4, pp. 318–30, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-016-0030-8.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ameel, Lieven (2021), The Narrative Turn in Urban Planning: Plotting the Helsinki Waterfront, London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aravot, Iris (1995), ‘Narrative-myth and urban design’, Journal of Architectural Education, 49:2, pp. 79–91, https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1995.10734670.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Arpin, Isabelle, Mounet, Coralie and Geoffroy, David (2015), ‘Inventaires naturalistes et rééducation de l’attention. Le cas des jardiniers de Grenoble’, Études rurales, 195, pp. 89–108, https://doi.org/10.4000/etudesrurales.10622.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakhtin, Mikhaïl ([1984] 2004), ‘Le roman d’apprentissage dans l’histoire du réalisme?’, in M. Bakhtin (ed.), Esthétique de la création verbale, Paris: Gallimard, pp. 211–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Broadhead, Jacqueline (2018), ‘Building an inclusive city narrative: Briefing note’, Learning and Reflections from Inclusive Cities: A Workshop on Strategic Communications and Narrative, Oxford, 16 April.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bulkens, Maartje, Minca, Claudio and Muzaini, Hamzah (2015), ‘Storytelling as method in spatial planning’, European Planning Studies, 23:11, pp. 2310–26, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.942600.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Childs, Mark C. (2008), ‘Storytelling and urban design’, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 1:2, pp. 173–86, https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170802221526.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen, Philip (2008), ‘Stuff happens: Telling the story and doing the business in the making of Thames Gateway’, in P. Cohen and M. J. Rustin (eds), London’s Turning: Thames Gateway: Prospects and Legacy, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 99–124.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Dionne, Caroline (2018), ‘We build spaces with words: Spatial agency, recognition and narrative’, in A. Sioli and Y. Jung (eds), Reading Architecture: Literary Imagination and Architectural Experience, London: Routledge, pp. 157–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Duranel, Guillaume (2019), ‘Les conventions de l’Architecture au prisme du dispositif du Grand Paris’, doctoral dissertation, Paris: Conservatoire national des arts et métiers (CNAM).
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Ernwein, Marion and Matthey, Laurent (2019), ‘Events in the affective city: Affect, attention and alignment in two ordinary urban events’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51:2, pp. 283–301, https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x18757509.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Filep, Crystall, Thomson-Fawcett, Michelle and Murray, Rae (2014), ‘Built narratives’, Journal of Urban Design, 19:3, pp. 298–16, https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.890043.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fischer, Frank (2009), ‘Discursive planning: Social justice as discourse’, in P. Marcuse, J. Connolly, J. Novy, I. Olivo, C. Potter and J. Steil (eds), Searching for the Just City: Debates in Urban Theory and Practice, London: Routledge, pp. 52–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fischer, Frank and Forester, John (eds) (1993), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, London: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Fischler, Raphaël (2000), ‘Communicative planning theory: A Foucauldian assessment’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19:4, pp. 358–68, https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x0001900405.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. FMR Agence (2020), Les Marronniers, projet de nouveau quartier au Grand-Saconnex: Récits citoyens, Geneva: République et canton de Genève.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gordon, David L. A. and Virginillo, Miranda (2022), ‘Evaluating the impact of the community planning association of Canada in the post-war revival of Canadian planning’, International Planning History Society Proceedings, 19:1, pp. 391–406, https://doi.org/10.7480/iphs.2022.1.6501.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Grant, Jill L. (2009), ‘Experiential planning: A practitioner’s account of Vancouver’s success’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 75:3, pp. 358–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360902965875.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hastings, Annette (1999), ‘Discourse and urban change: Introduction to the special issue’, Urban Studies, 36:1, pp. 7–12, https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993691.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hausser, Armelle Loreline (2023), ‘Participation citoyenne et numérique: Les civic tech: de nouveaux dispositifs pour planifier le territoire?’, doctoral dissertation, Lausanne: École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Healey, Patsy (1992), ‘Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory’, The Town Planning Review, 63:2, pp. 143–249, https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hodgers, Antonio (2023), interviewed by B. Rule, Radio Lac Matin, Radio Lac, Geneva, 16 February, https://www.radiolac.ch/podcasts/6-minutes-avec-16022023-0735-075644/. Accessed 1 March 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang, Huei-yu (2022), ‘Le transmédia storytelling en classe de français langue étrangère: Le cas de la réécriture de la bande dessinée numérique 2 sur book creator’, Revue de recherches en littératie médiatique multimodale, 16, pp. 1–27, https://doi.org/10.7202/1096909ar.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Irazábal, Clara (2009), ‘Realizing planning’s emancipatory promise: Learning from regime theory to strengthen communicative action’, Planning Theory, 8:2, pp. 115–39, https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209102230.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Jablonka, Ivan ([2014] 2017), L’Histoire est une littérature contemporaine: Manifeste pour les sciences sociales, Paris: Seuil.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jacobs, Keith (2006), ‘Discourse analysis and its utility for urban policy research’, Urban Policy and Research, 24:1, pp. 39–52, https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140600590817.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Jenkins, Henry (2006 [2003]), Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Jenkins, Henry (2010), ‘Transmedia storytelling and entertainment: An annotated syllabus’, Continuum, 24:6, pp. 943–58, https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2010.510599.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Jenkins, Henry (2013), ‘La licorne origami contre-attaque’, Terminal, 112, pp. 11–28, https://doi.org/10.4000/terminal.455.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Jenkins, Henry, Lashley, Mark C. and Creech, Brian (2017), ‘Voices for a new vernacular: A forum on digital storytelling: Interview with Henry Jenkins’, International Journal of Communication, 11, pp. 1061–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Jensen, Ole (2007), ‘Culture stories: Understanding cultural urban branding’, Planning Theory, 6:3, pp. 211–36, https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207082032.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Keunen, Bart and Verraest, Sofie (2012), ‘Tell-tale landscapes and mythical chronotopes in urban designs for twenty-first century Paris’, CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 14:3, https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2038.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kustritz, Anne (2017), ‘Interactivité, resémantisation, et plaisirs de la primauté ontologique: Les œuvres de fans comme centre du récit’, Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication, 10, pp. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.4000/rfsic.2672.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Lambelet, Sébastien (2019), Régimes urbains 2.0: gouverner les villes suisses du 21e siècle, doctoral dissertation, Geneva: Université de Genève.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Laplantine, François ([1996] 2000), La Description ethnographique, Paris: Nathan.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Mandelbaum, Seymour J. (1991), ‘Telling stories’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 10:3, pp. 209–14, https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9101000308.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Matthey, Laurent (2011), ‘Urbanisme fictionnel: l’action urbaine à l’heure de la société du spectacle’, Métropolitiques, https://metropolitiques.eu/Urbanisme-fictionnel-l-action.html. Accessed 20 May 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Matthey, Laurent (2014a), Building up stories: Sur l’action urbanistique à l’heure de la société du spectacle intégré, Geneva: A-Type.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Matthey, Laurent, Ambal, Julie, Gaberell, Simon and Cogato-Lanza, Elena (2023), ‘The empire of the narrative: Plan making through the prism of classical and postclassical narratologies’, Planning Theory, 22:3, pp. 292–15, https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952221125174.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. McAdams, Mindy (2016), ‘Transmedia storytelling’, World Journalism Education Congress, Auckland, 14–16 July.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Olensen, Kristian (2017), ‘Talk to the hand: Strategic spatial planning as persuasive storytelling of the Loop City’, European Planning Studies, 25:6, pp. 978–93, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1296936.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Ortiz, Catalina (2022), ‘Storytelling otherwise: Decolonising storytelling in planning’, Planning Theory, 22:2, pp. 177–200, https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952221115875.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Ortiz, Catalina and Millan, Gynna (2019), ‘Transmedia storytelling: Activating urban learning for slum upgrading’, The Bartlett Development Planning Unit Blog, 9 May, https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/dpublog/2019/05/09/transmedia-storytelling-activating-urban-learning-for-slum-upgrading/. Accessed 10 March 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Ouvrard, Pauline (2016), ‘Le nouvel esprit de l’urbanisme, entre scènes et coulisses: Une ethnographie de la fabrique du territoire de Saint-Nazaire à Nantes’, doctoral dissertation, Nantes: Université de Nantes.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Peltola, Taru and Tuomisaari, Johanna (2015), ‘Making a difference: Forest biodiversity, affective capacities, and the micro-politics of expert fieldwork’, Geoforum, 64, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.05.013.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Purcell, Mark (2009), ‘Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements?’, Planning Theory, 8:2, pp. 140–65, https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209102232.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Rannila, Päivi and Loivaranta, Tikli (2015), ‘Planning as dramaturgy: Agonistic approaches to spatial enactment’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39:4, pp. 788–806, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12214.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. République et canton de Genève (2013) ‘PAV: Le Point 2013’, 26 August, https://www.ge.ch/document/pav-point-2013. Accessed 1 March 2025.
  50. République et canton de Genève (2018), ‘L’aménagement du territoire en cinq clips’, Republic and Canton of Geneva Website, 29 November, https://www.ge.ch/actualite/amenagement-du-territoire-cinq-clips-29-11-2018. Accessed 1 March 2025.
  51. Ryan, Marie-Laure (2013), ‘Transmedial storytelling and transfictionality’, Poetics Today, 34:3, pp. 361–88, https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2325250.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Ryan, Marie-Laure (2015), ‘Transmedia storytelling: Industry buzzword or new narrative experience storyworlds’, Journal of Narrative Studies, 7:2, pp. 1–19, https://doi.org/10.5250/storyworlds.7.2.0001.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Ryan, Marie-Laure (2016), ‘Transmedia narratology and transmedia storytelling’, Artnodes, 18, pp. 37–46, https://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i18.3049.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Ryan, Marie-Laure (2018), ‘Sur les fondements théoriques de la narratologie transmédiale’, in S. Patron (ed.), Introduction à la narratologie postclassique: Les nouvelles directions de la recherche sur le récit, Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion, pp. 147–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Sandercock, Leonie (2003), ‘Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice’, Planning Theory & Practice, 4:1, pp. 11–28, https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935032000057209.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Sandercock, Leonie (2010), ‘From the campfire to the computer: An epistemology of multiplicity and the story turn in planning’, in L. Sandercock and G. Attili (eds), Multimedia Explorations in Urban Policy and Planning, Berlin: Springer, pp. 17–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Secchi, Bernardo (1984), Il racconto urbanistico: La politica della casa e del territorio in Italia, Torino: Einaudi.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Sharp, Lesley and Richardson, Tim (2001), ‘Reflections on Foucauldian discourse analysis in planning and environmental policy research’, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 3:3, pp. 193–209, https://doi.org/10.1002/jepp.88.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Throgmorton, James A. (1992), ‘Planning as persuasive storytelling about the future: Negotiating an electric power rate settlement in Illinois’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 12:1, pp. 17–31, https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9201200103.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Throgmorton, James A. (1996), Planning as Persuasive Storytelling: The Rhetorical Construction of Chicago’s Electric Future, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Throgmorton, James A. (2003), ‘Planning as persuasive storytelling in the context of “the Network Society”’, Planning Theory, 2:2, pp. 125–51, https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952030022003.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. UBS (2021), L’indicateur de compétitivité des cantons 2021, Zurich: UBS Switzerland AG.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Uyttenhove, Pieter, Keunen, Bart and Ameel, Lieven (2021), La puissance projective: Intrigue narrative et Projet Urbain, Genève: MètisPress.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Van Hulst, Merlijn (2012), ‘Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning’, Planning Theory, 11:3, pp. 299–318, https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212440425.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Vitalis, Louis and Guéna, François (2017), ‘Narrer pour concevoir, concevoir pour narrer: Enjeux épistémologiques croisés’, Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication, 10, https://doi.org/10.4000/rfsic.2603.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Walter, Mareile (2013), ‘Making plans-telling stories: Planning in Karlskrona/Sweden 1980–2010’, doctoral dissertation, Karlskrona: School of Planning and Media Design and Blekinge Institute of Technology.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Ward, Stephen (1998), Selling Places: The Marketing and Promotion of Towns and Cities 1850–2000, London: Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jucs_00098_1
Loading
Promoting a master plan by encouraging participation: On the culture of convergence in urban planning
Journal of Urban Cultural Studies 12, 119 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1386/jucs_00098_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jucs_00098_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jucs_00098_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): communication; narrative; plan making; public debate; storytelling; transmedia storytelling

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test