Skip to content
1981
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2633-3732
  • E-ISSN: 2633-3740

Abstract

The visual is central to global politics. Over the past two decades, scholars in the field of international relations have increasingly recognized and examined the numerous and complex ways in which the visual, the political and the international are intertwined. They have scrutinized how a diverse range of global political phenomena – from war, diplomacy and development to election campaigns and refugee policies – are shaped by images and visual artefacts, such as photographs, film, videogames, satellite images, art, surveillance technologies, monuments and architecture. The purpose of this commentary is two-fold. First: I overview this bourgeoning body of literature on visuality in international relations. I discuss the emergence and evolution of this field of research, drawing attention to the significance of the ensuing contributions. Second: I highlight three key challenges that lie ahead: understanding the changing relationship between visuality and digitalization; embarking on more cross-disciplinary inquires; decolonizing research on visual communication. I end with highlighting that understanding the role of visuality goes far beyond appreciating the political impact of images. Visuality goes to the very core of politics because it shapes how we – as individuals and as collectives – see, perceive and enact the political world around us.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Australian Research Council (Award LP200200046)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00022_1
2023-04-24
2025-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ademolu, Edward. ( 2021;), ‘ Seeing and being the visualised “Other”: humanitarian representations and hybridity in African diaspora identities. ’, Identities, 28:2, pp. 20323.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adler-Nissen, Rebecca,, Andersen, Katrine E., and Hansen, Lene. ( 2020;), ‘ Images, emotions, and international politics: The death of Alan Kurdi. ’, Review of International Studies, 46:1, pp. 7595.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aiello, Giorgia, and Parry, Katy. ( 2019), Visual Communication: Understanding Images in Media Culture, London:: Sage Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bleiker, Roland. ( 2001;), ‘ The aesthetic turn in international political theory. ’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30:3, pp. 50933.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bleiker, Roland. ( 2009), Aesthetics and World Politics, Basingstoke:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bleiker, Roland. ( 2015;), ‘ Pluralist methods for visual global politics. ’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43:3, pp. 87290.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bleiker, Roland. ( 2017;), ‘ In search of thinking space: Reflections on the aesthetic turn in international political theory. ’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 45:2, pp. 25864.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bleiker, Roland. ( 2018a;), ‘ Aesthetic turn in international relations. ’, in P. James. (ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in International Relations, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bleiker, Roland. (ed.) ( 2018b), Visual Global Politics, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bleiker, Roland. ( 2021;), ‘ Seeing beyond disciplines: Aesthetic creativity in international theory. ’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 75:5, pp. 57390.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bleiker, Roland. (forthcoming 2023;), ‘ Preface: Decolonising visual global politics. ’, in A. Veneti, and M. Rovisco. (eds), Visual Politics in the Global South, Houndmills:: Palgrave;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bleiker, Roland, and Sally, Butler. ( 2016;), ‘ Radical dreaming: Indigenous art and cultural diplomacy. ’, International Political Sociology, 10:1, pp. 5674.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Boidy, Maxime,, Patarin-Jossec, Julie, and Hansen, Susan. ( 2020;), ‘ “I hate visual culture”: The controversial rise of visual studies and the disciplinary politics of the visible. ’, Visual Studies, 35:4, pp. 31018.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Branch, Jordan. ( 2014), The Cartographic State: Maps, Territory, and the Origins of Sovereignty, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Callahan, William A.. ( 2015;), ‘ The visual turn in IR: Documentary filmmaking as a critical method. ’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43:3, pp. 891910.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Callahan, William A.. ( 2020), Sensible Politics: Visualizing International Relations, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Campbell, David. ( 2003;), ‘ Cultural governance and pictorial resistance: Reflections on the imaging of war. ’, Review of International Studies, 29:S1, pp. 5773.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Campbell, David. ( 2004;), ‘ Horrific blindness: Images of death in contemporary media. ’, Journal of Cultural Research, 8:1, pp. 5574.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Campbell, David. ( 2007;), ‘ Geopolitics and visuality: Sighting the Darfur conflict. ’, Political Geography, 26, pp. 35782.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Caso, Federica. ( 2020;), ‘ Representing Indigenous soldiers at the Australian War Memorial. ’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 55:4, pp. 34561.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Choi, Shine. ( 2015), Re-Imagining North Korea in International Politics: Problems and Alternatives, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Choi, Shine. ( 2021;), ‘ The art of monument politics: The North Korean state, Juche and international relations. ’, Asian Studies Review, 45:3, pp. 43553.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Clark, Serena. ( 2022;), ‘ The “local-visual turn”: Understanding peacebuilding in post-conflict societies using photo-elicitation. ’, Peacebuilding, online first, pp. 123, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21647259.2022.2085941. Accessed 12 February 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Danchev, Alex. ( 2009), On Art and War and Terror, Edinburgh:: Edinburgh University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Danchev, Alex. ( 2016), On Good and Evil and the Grey Zone, Edinburgh:: Edinburgh University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Danchev, Alex, and Lisle, Debbie. (eds) ( 2009;), ‘ Introduction: Art, politics, purpose. ’, Review of International Studies, 35:4, pp. 77579.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Danielson, August, and Hedling, Elsa. ( 2022;), ‘ Visual diplomacy in virtual summitry: Status signalling during the coronavirus crisis. ’, Review of International Studies, 48:2, pp. 119.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Der Derian, James. ( 2009), Virtuous War: Mapping the Military-Industrial-Media-Entertainment Network, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fehrenbach, Heidi, and Rodogno, Davide. (eds) ( 2015), Humanitarian Photography: A History, New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Funnell, Lisa, and Dodds, Klaus. ( 2017), Geographies, Genders and Geopolitics of James Bond, Houndmills:: Palgrave;.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Garnsey, Eliza. ( 2019), The Justice of Visual Art: Creative State-Building in Times of Political Transition, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Grayson, Kyle,, Davies, Matt, and Simon, Philpott. ( 2009;), ‘ Pop goes IR? Researching the popular culture. ’, Politics, 29:3, pp. 15563.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Griffin, Penny. ( 2015), Popular Culture, Political Economy and the Death of Feminism, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hamilton, Caitlin. ( 2021), The Everyday Artefacts of World Politics, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hansen, Lene. ( 2011;), ‘ Theorizing the image for security studies: Visual securitization and the Muhammad cartoon crisis. ’, European Journal of International Relations, 17:1, pp. 5174.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Harman, Sophie. ( 2019), Seeing Politics: Film, Visual Method, and International Relations, Montreal:: McGill-Queen’s University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hozić, Aida A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Introduction: The aesthetic turn at 15. ’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 45:2, pp. 20105.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hutchison, Emma. ( 2014;), ‘ A global politics of pity? Disaster imagery and the emotional construction of solidarity after the 2004 Asian tsunami. ’, International Political Sociology, 8:1, pp. 119.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hutchison, Emma. ( 2016), Affective Communities in World Politics: Collective Emotions after Trauma, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hutchison, Emma. ( 2019;), ‘ Humanitarian emotions through history: Imaging suffering and performing aid. ’, in D. Martín-Moruno, and B. Pichel. (eds), Emotional Bodies: The Historical Performativity of Emotions, Champaign, IL:: University of Illinois Press;, pp. 21941.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Katja, Freistein,, Gadinger, Frank, and Unrau, Christine. ( 2022;), ‘ It Just Feels Right: Visuality and emotion norms in right-wing populist storytelling. ’, International Political Sociology, 16:4, pp. 123.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Lydon, Jane. ( 2017), Photography, Humanitarianism, Empire, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Millennium ( 2001), Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Special Issue: ‘Images and Narratives in World Politics. ’, 30:5, pp. 509803.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Moffitt, Benjamin. ( 2022;), ‘ How do populists visually represent “The People”?: A systematic comparative visual content analysis of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders’ Instagram accounts. ’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, online first, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/19401612221100418. Accessed 23 February 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Moore, Cerwyn, and Shepherd, Laura J.. ( 2010;), ‘ Aesthetics and global politics. ’, Global Society, 24:3, pp. 299434.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Premaratna, Nilanjana. ( 2021;), ‘ Dealing with Sri Lanka’s demons: Using documentary film for peacebuilding. ’, Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 16:1, pp. 3954.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Pruitt, Lesley J.. ( 2021;), ‘ Participatory video: A new outlook for international relations research. ’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 75:2, pp. 14260.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Shapiro, Michael J.. ( 2008), Cinematic Geopolitics, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Shepherd, Laura J.. ( 2013), Gender, Violence and Popular Culture: Telling Stories, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Shetty, Vaibhava. ( 2022;), ‘ The role of non-elites and eyewitness videos in the visual securitisation of Calais asylum seekers. ’, European Journal for International Security, 7:4, pp. 41334.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Shim, David. ( 2014;), ‘ Remote sensing place: Satellite images as visual spatial imaginaries. ’, Geoforum, 51: January, pp. 15260.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sliwinski, Sharon. ( 2011), Human Rights in Camera, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Veneti, Anastasia, and Rovisco, Maria. (eds) (forthcoming 2023), Visual Politics in the Global South, Houndmills:: Palgrave;.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Vokes, Richard, and Newbury, Darren. ( 2018;), ‘ Photography and African futures. ’, Visual Studies, 33:1, pp. 110.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Weber, Cynthia. ( 2006), Imagining America at War: Morality, Politics, and Film, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Weber, Cynthia. ( 2011), I am an American: Filming the Fear of Difference, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Bleiker, Roland. ( 2023;), ‘ Visualizing international relations: Challenges and opportunities in an emerging research field. ’, Journal of Visual Political Communication, 10:1, pp. 1725, https://doi.org/10.1386/jvpc_00022_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00022_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test