Mirror, mirror on the wall: Candidate image and political impression management

References

1. Abelson, R.,, Kinder, D., and Peters, M.. ( 1982;), ‘ Affective and semantic components in political person perception. ’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42:4, pp. 619–30.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andersen, P. A., and Kibler, R. J.. ( 1978;), ‘ Candidate valence as a predictor of voter preference. ’, Human Communications Research, 5:1, pp. 4–14.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bass, B. M.. ( 1985), Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations, New York:: The Free Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bennett, L., and Entman, M.. ( 2001), Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berscheid, E., and Walster, E.. ( 1974;), ‘ A little bit about love. ’, in T. Hudson. (ed.), Foundations of Interpersonal Attraction, New York:: Academic Press;, pp. 355–81.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bondanella, P.. ( 2005), Niccolo Machiavelli: The Prince, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brehm, S. S.,, Kassin, S. M.,, Fein, S.,, Mervielde, I., and van Hiel, A.. ( 2006), Sociale Psychologie (Social Psychology), Gent:: Academia Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Caprara, G.,, Barbaranelli, C., and Zimbardo, P.. ( 1999;), ‘ Personality profiles and political parties. ’, Political Psychology, 20:1, pp. 175–96.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Caprara, G.,, Barbaranelli, C., and Zimbardo, P.. ( 2002;), ‘ When parsimony subdues distinctiveness: Simplified public perceptions of politician’s personalities. ’, Political Psychology, 23:1, pp. 77–95.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Clark, T. N., and Hoffman-Martinot, V.. ( 1998), The New Political Culture, Boulder, CO:: Westview;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. De Landtsheer, C.. ( 2004), Politiek Impressie Management in Vlaanderen en Nederland (‘Political impression management in Flanders and the Netherlands’), Leuven:: Acco;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. De Landtsheer, C.,, De Vries, P., and Vertessen, D.. ( 2008;), ‘ Political impression management: How metaphors, sound bites, appearance effectiveness, and personality traits can win elections. ’, Journal of Political Marketing, 7:34, pp. 217–38.
    [Google Scholar]
13. De Munter, S.. ( 2022;), Online Candidate Image: Analyzing the Online Image and Impression Management in Politics. , unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Antwerp.
    [Google Scholar]
14. De Vries, P.. ( 2007;), Candidate Image in Belgian Politics. , unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Antwerp.
    [Google Scholar]
15. De Vries, P.. ( 2013;), ‘ Crafting the political image: A Belgian case in perception politics. ’, in G. Kostas. (ed.), Political Marketing: Strategic Campaigns Culture, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 168–87.
    [Google Scholar]
16. De Vries, P.. ( 2017;), ‘ It’s all marketing, …Toch?’ (‘It’s all marketing ... is it not?’). , Res Publica Samenleving en Politiek, 2, pp. 217–31.
    [Google Scholar]
17. De Vries, P.. ( 2018;), ‘ Wat vraagt u voor uw stem?’ (‘What do you charge for your vote?’). , Samenleving en Politiek, 25:1, pp. 29–34.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dion, K.,, Berscheid, E., and Walster, E.. ( 1972;), ‘ What is beautiful is good. ’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24:2, pp. 285–90.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Druckman, J.. ( 2003;), ‘ The power of television images: The first Kennedy–Nixon debate revisited. , The Journal of Politics, 65:2, pp. 559–71.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Eagly, A.,, Ashmore, R.,, Makhijani, M., and Longo, L.. ( 1991;), ‘ What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. ’, Psychological Bulletin, 110:1, pp. 109–28.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Esser, F.. ( 1999;), ‘ Tabloidization of news: A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. ’, European Journal of Communication, 14:3, pp. 291–324.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Farkas, X., and Bene, M.. ( 2021;), ‘ Images, politicians, and social media: Patterns and effects of politicians’ image-based political communication strategies on social media. ’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26:1, pp. 119–42.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fiske, S. T., and Taylor, S. E.. ( 1991), Social Cognition, New York:: McGraw-Hill;.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Foti, R.,, Fraser, S., and Lord, G.. ( 1982;), ‘ Effects of leadership labels and prototypes on perceptions of political leaders. ’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 67:3, pp. 326–33.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Franklin, B.. ( 2004), Packaging Politics, London:: Arnold;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Franklin, M.. ( 1992), The Decline of Class Voting in Britain: Changes in the Basis of Electoral Choice, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Friebe, S.. ( 2020), No Filter: The Inside Story of Instagram, New York:: Simon & Schuster;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Grabe, M. E.,, Zhou, S., and Barnett, B.. ( 2001;), ‘ Explicating sensationalism in television news: Content and the bells and whistles of form. ’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45:4, pp. 635–55.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gunther, R., and Mughan, A.. ( 2000), Democracy and the Media: A Comparative Perspective, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Hacker, K. L.. ( 1992), Candidate Images in Presidential Elections, London:: Praeger;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hacker, K. L.. ( 2004), Presidential Candidate Images, Lanham, MD:: Rowman & Littlefield;.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hacker, K. L., and Zakahi, W.. ( 1994;), ‘ Reconsidering the issue image dichotomy: A statistical test of key candidate image construct assumptions. ’, The Mass Communication Division of the Western States Communication Association Convention, San Jose, CA, 23–27 February.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hacker, K. L.,, Zakahi, W.,, Gilles, M., and McQuitty, S.. ( 2000;), ‘ Components of candidate images: Statistical analyses of the issue–personae dichotomy in the presidential campaign of 1996. ’, Communication Monographs, 67:3, pp. 227–38.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Harvey, J. H.,, Town, J. P., and Yarkin, K. L.. ( 1981;), ‘ How fundamental is the fundamental attribution error?. ’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40:2, pp. 346–49.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hassin, R., and Trope, Y.. ( 2000;), ‘ Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. ’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, pp. 837–52.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Heider, F.. ( 1958), The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, New York:: Wiley;.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hinckley, B.,, Hofstetter, R., and Kessel, J.. ( 1974;), ‘ Information and the vote: A comparative election study. ’, American Politics Quarterly, 58:2, pp. 131–58.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hinsliff, G.. ( 2019;), ‘ How Instagram became the politicians’ playground. ’, The Guardian, 10 March, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/mar/10/how-instagram-became-the-politicians-playground. Accessed 6 September 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Holtz-Bacha, C., and Norris, P.. ( 2001;), ‘ To entertain, inform and educate: still the role of public television. ’, Political Communication, 18, pp. 123–40.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Jackson, L.. ( 1995;), ‘ Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. ’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 58:2, pp. 108–22.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Jackson, L., and Ervin, K.. ( 1992;), ‘ Height stereotypes of women and men: The liabilities of shortness for both sexes. ’, Journal of Social Psychology, 132:4, pp. 433–45.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Johnson, D. W.. ( 2007), No Place for Amateurs: How Political Consultants are Reshaping American Democracy, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Jung, Y.,, Ho, J.,, Tay, A.,, Go, Y., and Hong, T.. ( 2017;), ‘ Politician’s strategic impression management on Instagram. ’, Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Nanyang Technological University:, 1 April, https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/41420. Accessed 11 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kavanagh, D.. ( 1995), Election Campaigning: The New Marketing of Politics, Oxford:: Blackwell;.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Keating, C.,, Randall, D., and Kendrick, T.. ( 1999;), ‘ Presidential physiognomies: Altered images, altered perceptions. ’, Political Psychology, 20:3, pp. 593–610.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Kinder, D. R., and Abelson, R.. ( 1981;), ‘ Appraising presidential candidates: Personality and affect in the 1980 campaign. ’, Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, 3–6 September.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Lau, R. R.. ( 1984;), ‘ Political schemas, candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. ’, Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Toronto, 24–27 June.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Lau, R. R.. ( 2003;), ‘ Models of decision making. ’, in D. Sears,, L. Huddy, and R. Jervis. (eds), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 19–60.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Lees-Marshment, J.. ( 2004), The Political Marketing Revolution, Manchester:: Manchester University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Leroy, P., and Siune, K.. ( 1994;), ‘ The role of television in European elections: The cases of Belgium and Denmark. ’, European Journal of Communication, 9:1, pp. 47–69.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Lewis-Beck, M. S., and Rice, T.. ( 1992), Forecasting Elections, Washington D.C.:: Congressional Quarterly;.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Lilleker, D. G.. ( 2005;), ‘ The impact of political marketing on internal party democracy. ’, Parliamentary Affairs, 58:3, pp. 570–84.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Lilleker, D. G., and Lees-Marshment, J.. ( 2005), Political Marketing: A Comparative Perspective, Manchester:: Manchester University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Lilleker, D. G.. ( 2019;), ‘ The power of visual political communication: Pictorial politics through the lens of communication psychology. ’, in A. Veneti,, D. Jackson, and D. Lilleker. (eds), Visual Political Communication, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 37–51.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Lindholm, J.,, Carlson, T., and Högväg, J.. ( 2021;), ‘ See me, like me! Exploring viewers’ visual attention to and trait perceptions of party leaders on Instagram. ’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26:1, pp. 167–87.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Long, D. M.. ( 2021), Impression Management, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Lord, R. G.,, DeVader, C. L., and Allinger, G. M.. ( 1986;), ‘ A meta-analysis of the relations between personality traits and leadership perception: An application of validity generalization procedures. ’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71:3, pp. 402–10.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Luppia, A.,, McCubbins, M., and Popkin, S.. ( 2000), Elements of Reason: Cognitions, Choice and the Bounds of Rationality, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Maarek, P.. ( 1995), Politieke Marketing en Communicatie (‘Political marketing and communication’), Brussel:: VUB Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Mann, T. E., and Wolfinger, R. E.. ( 1980;), ‘ Candidates and parties in congressional elections. ’, American Political Science Review, 74:3, pp. 617–32.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Marcus, G.,, Neuman, W. R., and MacKuen, M.. ( 2000), Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment, Chicago, IL:: The University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Marcus, G. E.. ( 2002), The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics, University Park, PA:: Pennsylvania State University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Marcus, G. E.. ( 2003;), ‘ The psychology of emotion and politics. ’, in D. Sears,, L. Huddy, and R. Jervis. (eds), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 182–221.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Markus, G. B., and Converse, P. E.. ( 1979;), ‘ A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. ’, American Political Science Review, 73:4, pp. 1055–70.
    [Google Scholar]
65. McGraw, K.. ( 2003;), ‘ Political impressions: Formation and management. ’, in D. Sears,, L. Huddy, and R. Jervis. (eds), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 394–432.
    [Google Scholar]
66. McQuail, D.. ( 2005), Mass Communication Theory, London:: Sage Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Miller, A.,, Wattenberg, M., and Malanchuk, O.. ( 1982;), ‘ Cognitive representations of candidate asssessment. ’, Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver, 19–23 March.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Miller, A.,, Wattenberg, M., and Malanchuck, O.. ( 1986;), ‘ Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. ’, American Political Science Review, 80:2, pp. 521–40.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Moog, S., and Sluyter-Beltrao, J.. ( 2001;), ‘ The transformation of political Communication?. ’, in B. Axford, and R. Higgins. (eds), New Media and Politics, London:: Sage Publications;, pp. 30–63.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Muñoz, C. L., and Towner, T. L.. ( 2017;), ‘ The image is the message: Instagram marketing and the 2016 presidential primary season. ’, Journal of Political Marketing, 16:3&4, pp. 290–318.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Newman, B.. ( 1999a), Handbook of Political Marketing, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Newman, B.. ( 1999b), The Mass Marketing of Politics: Democracy in an Age of Manufactured Images, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Norris, P. ( 1998;), ‘ The battle for the campaign agenda. ’, in A. King. (ed.), New Labour Triumphs: Britain at the Polls, London:: Chatham House;, pp. 113–44.
    [Google Scholar]
74. O’Shaughnessy, N. J.. ( 1990), The Phenomenon of Political Marketing, New York:: Saint Martins Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Peng, Y.. ( 2021;), ‘ What makes politicians’ Instagram posts popular? Analyzing social media strategies of candidates and office holders with computer vision. ’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26:1, pp. 143–66.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T.. ( 1986), Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes To Attitude Change, Berlin:: Springer-Verlag;.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Poulakidakos, S., and Giannouli, I.. ( 2019;, ‘ Greek political leaders on Instagram: between “soft” and “hard” personalization. ’, in A. Veneti,, D. Jackson, and D. G. Lilleker. (eds), Visual Political Communication, London:: Palgrave MacMillan;, pp. 187–206.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Ragsdale, L.. ( 1980;), ‘ The fiction of congressional elections as presidential events. ’, American Politics Quarterly, 8:4, pp. 375–98.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Rosenberg, S.,, Bohan, L.,, McCafferty, P., and Harris, K.. ( 1986;), ‘ The image and the vote: The effect of candidate presentation on voter preference. ’, American Journal of Political Science, 30:1, pp. 108–27.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Rosenberg, S. W., and McCafferty, P.. ( 1987;), ‘ The image and the vote: manipulating voters’ preferences. ’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 51:1, pp. 31–47.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Rosenberg, S. W., and Kahn, S.. ( 1987;), ‘ Creating a political image and manipulating the vote: A preliminary report. ’, The Ninth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, San Francisco, 4–7 July.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Rosenberg, S.,, Kahn, S.,, Tran, T., and Le, M.. ( 1991;), ‘ Creating a political image: Shaping appearance and manipulating the vote. ’, Political Behavior, 13:4, pp. 345–67.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Russmann, U.,, Svensson, J., and Larsson, A. O.. ( 2019;), ‘ Political parties and their pictures: visual communication on Instagram in Swedish and Norwegian Election Campaigns. ’, in A. Veneti,, D. Jackson, and D. G. Lilleker. (eds), Visual Political Communication, Cham:: Palgrave MacMillan;, pp. 119–44, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18729-3_7. Accessed 7 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Scammell, M.. ( 1995), Designer Politics: How Elections Are Won, London:: Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Simge, A.. ( 2021;), ‘ How and why do consumers access news on social media?. ’, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2021/how-and-why-do-consumers-access-news-social-media. Accessed 7 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Street, J.. ( 2001), Mass Media, Politics and Democracy, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Wright, G.. ( 1974), Electoral Choice in America, Chapel Hill, NC:: Institute for Research in Social Sciences;.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Zebrowitz, L. A., and McDonald, S. M.. ( 1991;), ‘ The impact of litigants’ babyfacedness and attractiveness on adjudications in small claim courts. ’, Law and Human Behavior, 15:6, pp. 603–24.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Zebrowitz, L. A.. ( 1997), Reading Faces: Windows to the Soul?, Boulder, CO:: Westview Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Zebrowitz, L. A.,, Collins, M. A., and Dutta, R.. ( 1998;), ‘ Appearance and personality across the lifespan. ’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, pp. 736–49.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Zebrowitz, L. A., and Montepare, J.. ( 2005;), ‘ Appearance DOES matter. ’, Science, 308:5728, pp. 1565–66.
    [Google Scholar]
92. De Vries, Philippe. ( 2023;), ‘ Mirror, mirror on the wall: Candidate image and political impression management. ’, Journal of Visual Political Communication, 10:1, pp. 35–47, https://doi.org/10.1386/jvpc_00026_1
    [Google Scholar]