Skip to content
1981
Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2633-3732
  • E-ISSN: 2633-3740

Abstract

The Rohingya people of Myanmar (formerly Burma) have been described by the UN as the ‘most persecuted ethnic group in the world’. Yet despite recognition of the Rohingya’s attempted eradication as a genocide, this humanitarian crisis is rarely the subject of intensive news coverage and largely flies under the radar of international media. When the Rohingya’s plight does appear in the news, media coverage tends to portray this religious and ethnic minority as a displaced people fleeing their native Myanmar rather than depicting the reality of genocide and the gruesome visual truth of systematic, violent elimination. To document how an ongoing genocide is visually framed in news and understood by audiences, this article develops an inventory of visual frames used in coverage about the crisis, then employs a ‘picture prompt’ method of soliciting responses from viewers to document how these frames are received and interpreted. Analysis of 2132 responses from 533 online participants reveals stark differences in viewer evaluations of more graphic portrayals compared to mundane depictions of the crisis. The study summarizes the consequences that viewer interpretations of images of conflict and mass displacement can have for humanitarian support and perceptions of event severity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00028_1
2024-03-06
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amores, J. J. and Arcila, C. (2019), ‘Deconstructing the symbolic visual frames of refugees and migrants in the main Western European media’, in Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 16–19 October, León, Spain, León: University of Leon, pp. 91118.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Amores, J. J., Calderón, C. A. and Stanek, M. (2019), ‘Visual frames of migrants and refugees in the main Western European media’, Economics & Sociology, 12:3, pp. 14761.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beech, H. (2020), ‘Hundreds of Rohingya refugees stuck at sea with “zero hope”’, New York Times, 1 May, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/01/world/asia/rohingya-muslim-refugee-crisis.html#:~:text=At%20least%20three%20boats%20carrying,boats%20lost%20sight%20of%20them. Accessed 25 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bleiker, R., Campbell, D., Hutchison, E. and Nicholson, X. (2013), ‘The visual dehumanization of refugees’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 48:4, pp. 398416.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blinken, A. J. (2022), ‘Genocide, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing of Rohingya in Burma’, US Department of State, https://www.state.gov/burma-genocide/#:~:text=On%20March%2021%2C%202022%2C%20following,crimes%20against%20humanity%20against%20Rohingya. Accessed 25 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bock, M. A. (2020), ‘Theorising visual framing: Contingency, materiality and ideology’, Visual Studies, 35:1, pp. 112.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Borah, P. and Irom, B. (2021), ‘To donate or not to donate: Visual framing of the Rohingya refugees, attitude towards refugees and donation intentions’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 34:4, pp. 4381405.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brantner, C., Lobinger, K. and Wetzstein, I. (2011), ‘Effects of visual framing and evaluations of news stories on emotional responses about the Gaza conflict 2009’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88:3, pp. 52340.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bucy, E. P., D’Angelo, P. and Bauer, N. M. (2014), ‘Crisis, credibility, and the press: A priming model of news evaluation’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19:4, pp. 45375.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A. and Iyengar, S. (2016), ‘The end of framing as we know it… and the future of media effects’, Mass Communication and Society, 19:1, pp. 723.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chari, T. (2010), ‘Representation or misrepresentation? The New York Times’ framing of the 1994 Rwanda genocide’, African Identities, 8:4, pp. 33349.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Conlin, L. and Davie, W. R. (2015), ‘Missing white woman syndrome: How media framing affects viewers’ emotions’, Electronic News, 9:1, pp. 3650.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dan, V. (2018), Integrative Framing Analysis: Framing Health through Words and Visuals, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Deslandes, C. and Anderson, J. R. (2019), ‘Religion and prejudice toward immigrants and refugees: A meta-analytic review’, The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 29:2, pp. 12845.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dumitrescu, D. and Bucy, E. P. (2021), ‘Visual portrayals of people in need: The impact of refugee depictions, compassion, and support for humanitarian aid’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33:4, pp. 81839.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., Mollerstrom, J. and Munkhammar, S. (2013), ‘Gender differences in social framing effects’, Economics Letters, 118:3, pp. 47072.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Entman, R. M. (1993), ‘Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication, 43:4, pp. 5158.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Entman, R. M., Matthes, J. and Pelicano, L. (2009), ‘Nature, sources, and effects of news framing’, in K. Wahl-Jorgensen and T. Hanitzsch (eds), The Handbook of Journalism Studies, New York: Routledge, pp. 17590.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Elander, M. (2017), ‘Visual representations of the genocide’, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.110.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fortify Rights (2018), ‘They gave them long swords: Preparations for genocide and crimes against humanity against Rohingya Muslims in Rakhine State, Myanmar’, Fortify Rights, 19 July, https://www.fortifyrights.org/mly-inv-rep-2018-07-19/. Accessed 25 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Geise, S. and Baden, C. (2015), ‘Putting the image back into the frame: Modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame-processing theory’, Communication Theory, 25:1, pp. 4669.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Grabe, M. E. and Bucy, E. P. (2009), Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Graham, J., Haidt, J. and Nosek, B. A. (2009), ‘Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96:5, pp. 102946.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Haidt, J., Graham, J. and Joseph, C. (2009), ‘Above and below left-right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations’, Psychological Inquiry, 20:2–3, pp. 11019.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hellmueller, L. and Zhang, X. (2019), ‘Shifting toward a humanized perspective? Visual framing analysis of the coverage of refugees on CNN and Spiegel Online before and after the iconic photo publication of Alan Kurdi’, Visual Communication, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357219832790.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Human Rights Watch (2013), ‘Burma: Revoke “two-child policy” for Rohingya’, Human Rights Watch, 28 May, https://www.hrw.org/news/2013/05/28/burma-revoke-two-child-policy-rohingya. Accessed 25 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Irom, B., Borah, P. and Gibbons, S. (2022), ‘Visual framing of the Rohingya refugees: A comparative examination from newspapers in four countries’, Visual Communication Quarterly, 29:3, pp. 194209.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Irom, B. and Gibbons, S. (2021), ‘From media to hypermedia: Journalistic representations of Rohingya refugees and humanitarian communication’, Journalism, 24:3, pp. 58096, https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211018591.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jaworski, K. (2012), ‘The methodological crisis of theorising genocide in Africa: Thinking with Agamben and Butler’, African Identities, 10:3, pp. 34965.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Khin, T. (2017), ‘Rohingya: A preventable genocide allowed to happen’, Insight Turkey, 19:4, pp. 4353.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Krause, A. and Bucy, E. P. (2018), ‘Visual framing of fracking: How standing attitudes shape perceptions of environmental risk and economic benefit’, Environmental Communication, 12:3, pp. 32243.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. MacManus, T., Green, P. and de la Cour Venning, A. (2015), Countdown to Annihilation: Genocide in Myanmar, International State Crime Initiative, London: University of London, https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/25375. Accessed 25 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. McDaniel, E. L., Nooruddin, I. and Shortle, A. F. (2011), ‘Divine boundaries: How religion shapes citizens’ attitudes toward immigrants’, American Politics Research, 39:1, pp. 20533.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. McKinley, C. J. and Fahmy, S. (2011), ‘Passing the “breakfast test”: Exploring the effects of varying degrees of graphicness of war photography in the new media environment’, Visual Communication Quarterly, 18:2, pp. 7083.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Messaris, P. and Abraham, L. (2001), ‘The role of images in framing news stories’, in S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy Jr. and A. E. Grant (eds), Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 23142.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Paddock, R. C. (2020), ‘U.N. court’s order on Rohingya is cheered, but will Myanmar comply?’, New York Times, 24 January, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/24/world/asia/myanmar-rohingya-genocide.html. Accessed 25 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Parrott, S., Hoewe, J., Fan, M. and Huffman, K. (2019), ‘Portrayals of immigrants and refugees in US news media: Visual framing and its effect on emotions and attitudes’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63:4, pp. 67797.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Paul, R. (2021), ‘Rohingya refugee boat lands in Indonesia after 113-day voyage’, Reuters, 7 June, https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/rohingya-refugee-boat-lands-indonesia-after-113-day-voyage-2021-06-04/. Accessed 25 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Powell, T. E., Boomgaarden, H. G., de Swert, K. and de Vreese, C. H. (2015), ‘A clearer picture: The contribution of visuals and text to framing effects’, Journal of Communication, 65:6, pp. 9971017.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Robinson, J. P. and Levy, M. R. (1986), The Main Source: Learning from Television News, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Rodriguez, L. and Dimitrova, D. V. (2011), ‘The levels of visual framing’, Journal of Visual Literacy, 30:1, pp. 4865.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Rosina, M. (2022), The Criminalisation of Irregular Migration in Europe: Globalisation, Deterrence and Vicious Cycles, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Rowatt, W. C. (2019), ‘Associations between religiosity, political ideology, and attitudes toward immigrants: A mediation path-analytic approach’, Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 11:4, pp. 36881.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Schulten, K. (2015), ‘Skills and strategies: Making inferences’, New York Times, 2 September, https://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/09/02/skills-and-strategies-making-inferences/. Accessed 25 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Schulten, K. (2016), ‘How to teach with our picture prompts (and other Times’ images)’, New York Times blog, 7 September, https://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/09/07/how-to-teach-with-our-picture-prompts-and-other-times-images/#permid=21560531. Accessed 25 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schwartz, E. (2020), Testimony: An Update on the Rohingya Crisis, Washington, DC: Refugees International, https://www.refugeesinternational.org/events-and-testimony/an-update-on-the-rohingya-crisis/. Accessed 25 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. United Nations (1948), Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf. Accessed 25 December 2022.
  48. van Gorp, B. (2007), ‘The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in’, Journal of Communication, 57:1, pp. 6078.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wall, M. (2007), ‘An analysis of news magazine coverage of the Rwanda crisis in the United States’, in A. Thompson (ed.), Media and the Rwanda Genocide, Ottawa: IDRC, pp. 26173.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Werner, W. (2004), ‘“What does this picture say?”: Reading about the intertextuality of visual images’, International Journal of Social Education, 19:1, pp. 6482.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. World Food Program USA (2020), Rohingya Crisis: A Firsthand Look into the World’s Largest Refugee Camp, World Food Program USA, 8 December, https://www.wfpusa.org/articles/rohingya-crisis-a-firsthand-look-into-the-worlds-largest-refugee-camp/. Accessed 25 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wright, T. (2002), ‘Moving images: The media representation of refugees’, Visual Studies, 17:1, pp. 5366.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, X. and Hellmueller, L. (2017), ‘Visual framing of the European refugee crisis in Der Spiegel and CNN International: Global journalism in news photographs’, International Communication Gazette, 79:5, pp. 483510.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00028_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00028_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test