Skip to content
1981
Self-Authorized Discourses: The Case of Stickers
  • ISSN: 2633-3732
  • E-ISSN: 2633-3740

Abstract

The immense popularity of the sticker is due to its flexibility, both in relation to its mediacy and its rhetorical possibilities. But while stickers are used by a variety of senders, they are shunned by the mainstream political parties in Scandinavia (at least). This is puzzling, as political parties generally have been eager to pick up all means of communication to reach different segments of voters. In this article, I make a theoretical analysis of what exactly is the sticker’s mediacy (its way of being a medium) and what its rhetorical affordances are – meaning its potentials for fulfilling various functions in communication – and discuss these in relation to the role of the (mainstream) political party. Stickers can be used for all sorts of messages; they can include pictures, graphics and text; they are tactile and can use three-dimensional features and they can be used for any rhetorical purpose. Furthermore, they can be placed practically anywhere in private or public spaces (legally or, most often, illegally). They can be disseminated without any indication of the sender, and their distribution is left to individuals who may or may not belong to an organization. The question I address here is how this can affect the usability of the sticker for political parties in a Scandinavian context. I discuss these possibilities and constraints from the theoretical point of view of multimodal semiotics and rhetoric but also from a more pragmatic position of strategic political communication, assessing the potential use of stickers across the political field. The suggestion is to consider a new aspect – rhetorical liabilities – to describe the adverse effects of using a particular medium for political communication.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00044_1
2025-08-25
2026-04-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Backhaus, Peter (2007), Linguistic Landscapes: A Comparative Study of Urban Multilingualism in Tokyo, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bitzer, Lloyd F. (1968), ‘The rhetorical situation’, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1:1, pp. 1–14, https://www.jstor.org/stable/40236733.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bongrand, Michel (1986), Le marketing politique, Paris: P.U.F.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Brügger, Niels (2002), ‘Theoretical reflections on media and media history’, in N. Brüügger and S. Kolstrup (eds), Media History,Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, pp. 33–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruhn, Tommy and Doona, Joanna (2021), ‘Serious grappling with satire: Rhetorical genre affordances and invitations to participation in public controversy’, Javnost: The Public, 29:3, pp. 284–300, https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1983303.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibson, James J. (1977), ‘The theory of affordances’, in R. Shaw and J. Bransford (eds), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 62–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Khost, Peter H. (2018), Rhetor Response: A Theory and Practice of Literary Affordance, Denver, CO: University Press of Colorado and Utah State University Press, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv5137t9.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Kjeldsen, Jens E. (2018), ‘Visual rhetorical argumentation’, Semiotica, 2018:220, pp. 69–94, https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0136.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Kress, Gunther and van Leeuwen, Theo (1996), Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. McCroskey, James C. (2006), An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication, Boston: Pearson.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Noble, William (1993), ‘Meaning and the “Discursive Ecology”: Further to the debate on ecological perceptual theory’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 23:4, pp. 375–98, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1993.tb00541.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Novak, Zvonimir (2009), La lutte des signes: 40 ans d’autocollants politiques, Chaucre: Les éditions libertaires.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Oliver, Martin (n.d.), ‘Affordance’, Glossary of Multimodal Terms, https://multimodalityglossary.wordpress.com/affordance/. Accessed 27 May 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Reershemius, Gertrud (2019), ‘Lamppost networks*: Stickers as a genre in urban semiotic landscapes’, Social Semiotics, 29:5, pp. 622–44, https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504652.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Regeringen (2023), ‘Uttalande av statsminister Ulf Kristersson’, Regeringen, 24 November, https://www.regeringen.se/uttalanden/2023/11/uttalande-av-statsminister-ulf-kristersson/. Accessed 27 May 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Rivero, José J. B. (2019), ‘Mediacy, temporality, social cognition, and evolution’, Philosophies, 4:3, p. 44, https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies4030044.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Scollon, Ron and Scollon, Suzie W. (2003), Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Strömbäck, Jesper and van Aelst, Peter (2013), ‘Why political parties adapt to the media: Exploring the fourth dimension of mediatization’, International Communication Gazette, 75:4, pp. 341–58, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048513482266.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Vigsø, Orla (2010), ‘Extremist stickers: Epideictic rhetoric, political marketing, and tribal demarcation’, Journal of Visual Literacy, 29:1, pp. 28–46, https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2010.11674672.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Vigsø, Orla (2018), ‘Rhetoric’, in R. L. Heath and W. Johansen (eds), International Encyclopdia of Strategic Communication, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 1312–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Costall, Alan and Dreier, Ole (2012), Doing Things with Things: The Design and Use of Everyday Objects, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Forceville, Charles and Kjeldsen, Jens E. (2018), ‘The affordances and constraints of situation and genre: Visual and multimodal rhetoric in unusual traffic signs’, International Review of Pragmatics, 10:2, pp. 158–78, https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01002002.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Gibson, James J. (1979), The Ecological Approach to Perception, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Ma, Qian and Wen, Qiufang (2023), ‘Can space be conceptualized in a different way in political discourse?: An extended application of discourse space theory’, Discourse & Society, 34:6, pp. 712–31, https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265231188956.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00044_1
Loading
Parties against stickers?: On the reluctance of political parties to use stickers
Journal of Visual Political Communication 11, 229 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/jvpc_00044_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00044_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00044_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): affordance; mediacy; multimodality; negativity; rhetoric; satire; self-presentation

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test