Skip to content
1981
Self-Authorized Discourses: The Case of Stickers
  • ISSN: 2633-3732
  • E-ISSN: 2633-3740
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

This editorial introduces a Special Issue dedicated to the study of stickers as communicative artefacts within semiotic landscapes. Once limited mainly to commercial use, stickers have evolved into versatile tools for identity expression, political stance-taking, and grassroots activism. Despite their ubiquity in both urban and rural settings, stickers remain understudied in semiotic landscape research. The authors advocate for a more nuanced, multimodal, and linguistically informed approach to sticker analysis – one that considers their textual brevity, visual elements, emplacement, and discursive functions. Challenging conventional classifications of stickers as inherently urban or transgressive, the editorial proposes the term ‘self-authorized’ to describe signs emplaced without institutional sanction. The authors also reflect on methodological challenges and biases in current research practices, such as the neglect of ‘authorized’ stickers representing regulatory or infrastructural discourses – even though these can sometimes dominate a given sticker-scape. Accordingly, the authors encourage the development of comprehensive inventories and critical categorization. The Special Issue, comprising empirical studies from various geographic contexts, seeks to reposition stickers as legitimate and rich objects of interdisciplinary inquiry.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00046_2
2025-08-25
2026-04-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jvpc/11/2/jvpc.11.2.113_Reershemius.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00046_2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Al-Adaileh, Bilal A. and Kreishan, Lana J. (2021), ‘The pragmatic meanings of car stickers in Jordan’, Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 12:3, pp. 94–108, https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.3.p.94.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Auer, Peter (2010), ‘Sprachliche Landschaften: Die Strukturierung des öffent-lichen Raums durch die geschriebene Sprache’, in A. Deppermann and A. Linke (eds), Sprache intermedial: Stimme und Schrift, Bild und Ton, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 271–300.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Awcock, Hannah (2021), ‘Stickin’ it to the man: The geographies of protest stickers’, Area, 53:3, pp. 522–30, https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12720.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Awcock, Hannah and Rosenberg, Rae (2023), ‘Palimpsests of trans rights: Trans-positive stickers and the contestations of transphobia in public space’, Journal of Lesbian Studies, 28:3, pp. 486–503, https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2023.2229216.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Badarneh, Muhammad A. (2024), ‘Car bumper stickers in Jordan as a site of carnivalesque transgression and degradation’, Text & Talk, 44:3, pp. 319–41, https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2021-0144.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bloch, Linda-Renée (2000), ‘Setting the public sphere in motion: The rhetoric of political bumper stickers in Israel’, Political Communication, 17:4, pp. 433–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600050179059.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Blommaert, Jan (2008), Grassroot Literacies: Writing, Identity and Voice in Central Africa, London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Canagarajah, Suresh (2020), ‘English as a resource in a communicative assemblage: A perspective from flat ontology’, in C. J. Hall and R. Wicaksono (eds), Ontologies of English: Conceptualising the Language for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 295–314.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Case, Charles E. (1992), ‘Bumper stickers and car signs ideology and identity’, The Journal of Popular Culture, 26:3, pp. 107–19, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3840.1992.2603_107.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chiluwa, Innocent (2008), ‘Religious vehicle stickers in Nigeria: A discourse of identity, faith and social vision’, Discourse & Communication, 2:4, pp. 371–87, https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481308091909.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cole, Michael (2021), ‘Political street stickers in resistance to biopower in Poland: The case of Krakow during the 2020 Polish presidential election campaign’, The Journal of Illiberalism Studies, 1:1, pp. 59–78, https://doi.org/10.53483/vchv2526.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Conley, Jordan (2020), ‘Voting, votive, devotion: I voted stickers and ritualisation at Susan B. Anthony’s grave’, Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 36:2, pp. 43–62, https://doi.org/10.2979/jfemistudreli.36.2.05.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Doyle, Kylie and Tranter, Kieran (2015), ‘Automobility and “my family” stickers’, Continuum, 29:1, pp. 70–83, https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2014.968524.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Endersby, James and Towle, Michael J. (1996), ‘Tailgate partisanship: Political and social expression through bumper stickers’, The Social Science Journal, 33:3, pp. 307–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(96)90026-9.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gardner, Carol W. (1995), Bumper Sticker Wisdom: America’s Pulpit above the Tailpipe, Hillsboro, OR: Beyond Words Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gerbaudo, Paolo (2014), ‘Spikey posters: Street media and territoriality in urban activist scenes’, Space and Culture, 17:3, pp. 239–50, https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213501127.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hafez, Ola M. (2020), ‘“Moving” discourse: Egyptian bumper stickers as a communicative event’, International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3:9, pp. 26–40, https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.9.4.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hanauer, David I. (2012), ‘Transitory linguistic landscapes as political discourse: Signage at three demonstrations in Pittsburgh, USA’, in C. Hélot, M. Barni, R. Janssens and C. Bagna (eds), Linguistic Landscapes, Multilingualism and Social Change, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 139–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hausendorf, Heiko (2009), ‘Kleine Texte: über Randerscheinungen von Textualität’, Germanistik in der Schweiz: Onlinezeitschrift der Schweizerischen Akademischen Gesellschaft für Germanistik, 6:1, pp. 5–19, https://doi.org/10.24894/1664-2457.90056.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kallen, Jeffrey L. (2009), ‘Tourism and representation in the Irish linguistic landscape’, in E. Shohamy and D. Gorter (eds), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, London: Routledge, pp. 270–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Kallen, Jeffrey L. (2023), Linguistic Landscapes: A Sociolinguistic Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kress, Gunther (2010), Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication, Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Norris, Sigrid and Jones, Rodney H. (2005), ‘Introducing mediational means/ cultural tools’, in S. Norris and R. H. Jones (eds), Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, London: Routledge, pp. 49–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Nunn, Lisa M. and Bolt, Sophia C. (2015), ‘Wearing a rainbow bumper sticker: Experiential learning on homophobia, heteronormativity, and heterosexual privilege’, Journal of LGBT Youth, 12:3, pp. 276–301, https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2015.1045963.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Pennycook, Alistair (2009), ‘Linguistic landscapes and the transgressive semiotics of graffiti’, in E. Shohamy and D. Gorter (eds), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 302–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Piquette, Kathryn E. and Whitehouse, Ruth D. (2013), Writing as Material Practice: Substance, Surface and Medium, London: Ubiquity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Rains, Stephen A., Tumlin, Geoffrey R. and Knapp, Mark L. (2005), ‘Electronic bumper stickers: The content and interpersonal functions of messages attached to e-mail signatures’, Discourse Studies, 11:1, pp. 105–20, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445608098500.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Reershemius, Gertrud (2018), ‘Lamppost networks: Stickers as a genre in urban semiotic landscapes’, Social Semiotics, 29:5, pp. 622–44, https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504652.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Reershemius, Gertrud (2024), ‘Leaving one’s mark: Self-authorized commemorative practices in a rural semiotic landscape’, Multimodal Communication, 13:2, pp. 233–46, https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2023-0102.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Salamon, Hagar (2001), ‘Political bumper stickers in contemporary Israel: Folklore as an emotional battleground’, The Journal of American Folklore, 114, pp. 277–308, https://doi.org/10.2307/542024.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Salamon, Hagar (2005), ‘Haʿam in the turbulent discursive sphere of Israeli bumper stickers’, Hebrew Studies, 46, pp. 197–234, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2005.0030.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Schmidt, Siegfried J. (1994), Kognitive Autonomie und soziale Orientierung, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Schmitz, Ulrich (2017), ‘Randgrammatik und Design’, IDS Sprachreport, 33:3, pp. 8–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Schmitz, Ulrich and Ziegler, Evelyn (2016), ‘Sichtbare Dialoge im öffentlichen Raum’, Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 44:3, pp. 469–502, https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2016-0024.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Scollon, Ron and Scollon, Suzie W. (2003), Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Vasileva, Nadezhda (2021), ‘St. Petersburg as a place of belonging: Sticker artists inhabit and imagine the city’, Space and Culture, 27:4, pp. 459–72, https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312211025763.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Vigsø, Orla (2010), ‘Extremist stickers: Epideictic rhetoric, political marketing, and tribal demarcation’, Journal of Visual Literacy, 29:1, pp. 28–46, https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2010.11674672.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Vuorsola, Lasse (2020), ‘Minority positioning in physical and online spaces’, Linguistic Landscape: An International Journal, 6:3, pp. 297–325, https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.18031.vuo.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Wachendorff, Irmi, Ziegler, Evelyn and Schmitz, Ulrich (2017), ‘Graffitiscape im Ruhrgebiet’, in L. Lieb, S. Müller and D. Tophinke (eds), Graffiti: Deutschsprachige Auf- und Inschriften in sprach: und literaturwissenschaftlicher Perspektive, Vienna: Praesens, pp. 154–208.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Woldemariam, Hirut and Lanza, Elizabeth (2012), ‘Religious wars in the linguistic landscape of an African capital’, in C. Hélot, M. Barni, R. Janssens and C. Bagna (eds), Linguistic Landscapes, Multilingualism and Social Change, Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 169–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Ziegler, Evelyn (2023), ‘Praktiken des Stancetaking: Politische Graffitis in der Metropole Ruhr’, Kunst und Politik, 24, pp. 47–65, https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737015370.47.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Ziegler, Evelyn, Eickmans, Heinz, Schmitz, Ulrich, Uslucan, Haci-Halil, Gehne, David H., Kurtenbach, Sebastan, Mühlan-Meyer, Tirza and Wachendorff, Irmi (2022), Metropolenzeichen: Atlas zur visuellen Mehrsprachigkeit der Metropole Ruhr, Essen: DuEPublico, https://doi.org/10.17185/duepublico/75242.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Zifonun, Gisela, Hoffmann, Ludger and Strecker, Bruno (1997), Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00046_2
Loading
  • Article Type: Editorial
Keyword(s): linguistic characteristics; multimodality; quantitative and qualitative methodologies; self-authorized signage; semiotic landscapes; urban and rural contexts

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test