Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Visual Political Communication
  4. Volume 12, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2633-3732
  • E-ISSN: 2633-3740

Abstract

This study employs an eye-tracking experiment with Instagram posts to explore how (political) actors can capture users’ attention with mobilizing messages and encourage political participation. Grounded in the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), the study investigates both top-down (low vs. high involvement) and bottom-up factors (neutral vs. activating image; political vs. non-political source) in influencing political participation. The findings indicate that issue involvement is a significant predictor of low-threshold participation (liking, sharing), while task involvement significantly predicts high-threshold participation ([intention to] purchase). Additionally, visual attention significantly affects high-threshold but not low-threshold participation. These results contribute to understanding attentional mechanisms in political mobilization and provide strategic insights for designing effective visual social media campaigns.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Bavarian State Ministry of Science and the Arts and coordinated by the Bavarian Research Institute for Digital Transformation
© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00047_1
2025-11-29
2026-02-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bode, L., Vraga, E. K. and Troller-Renfree, S. (2017), ‘Skipping politics: Measuring avoidance of political content in social media’, Research and Politics, 4:2, pp. 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168017702990.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Boulianne, S., Koc-Michalska, K. and Bimber, B. (2020), ‘Mobilizing media: Comparing TV and social media effects on protest mobilization’, Information, Communication & Society, 23:5, pp. 642–64, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2020.1713847.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Brünker, F., Wischnewski, M., Mirbabaie, M. and Meinert, J. (2020), ‘The role of social media during social movements: Observations from the #metoo debate on Twitter’, in T. X. Bui (ed.), Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, USA, 7–10 January, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.288.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bucher, H.-J. and Schumacher, P. (2006), ‘The relevance of attention for selecting news content: An eye-tracking study on attention patterns in the reception of print and online media’, Communications, 31:3, pp. 347–68, https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2006.022.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bucher, H.-J. and Schumacher, P. (2012), ‘Aufmerksamkeit und Informationsselektion: Blickdaten als Schlüssel zur Aufmerksamkeitssteuerung’, in H.-J. Bucher and P. Schumacher (eds), Interaktionale Rezeptionsforschung: Theorie und Methode der Blickaufzeichnung in der Medienforschung, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 83–107.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cao, Y., Qu, Q., Duffy, V. G. and Ding, Y. (2019), ‘Attention for web directory advertisements: A top-down or bottom-up process?’, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35:1, pp. 89–98, https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1432162.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Christenson, D. P., Smidt, C. D. and Panagopoulos, C. (2014), ‘Deus ex Machina: Candidate web presence and the presidential nomination campaign’, Political Research Quarterly, 67:1, pp. 108–22, https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913494017.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Doerr, N., Mattoni, A. and Teune, S. (2013), ‘Toward a visual analysis of social movements, conflict, and political mobilization’, in N. Doerr, A. Mattoni and S. Teune (eds), Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, vol. 35, Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 11–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Duchowski, A. T. (2017), Eye Tracking Methodology, Cham: Springer International Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Earnheardt, M. B. (2013), ‘Motivating the U.S. voter: The functions of elaboration and political motives when using TV and the internet’, Atlantic Journal of Communication, 21:1, pp. 65–94, https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2012.728116.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Eveland, W. P. (2001), ‘The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news’, Communication Research, 28:5, pp. 571–601, https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028005001.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferrara, E. (2020), ‘Dynamics of attention and public opinion in social media’, in B. Foucault Welles and S. González-Bailón (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Networked Communication, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 377–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Geise, S., Heck, A. and Panke, D. (2020), ‘The effects of digital media images on political participation online: Results of an eye-tracking experiment integrating individual perceptions of “photo news factors”’, Policy & Internet, 13:1, pp. 54–85, https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.235.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Geise, S., Panke, D. and Heck, A. (2021), ‘Still images – moving people? How media images of protest issues and movements influence participatory intentions’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26:1, pp. 92–118, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220968534.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Haller, A. and Kruschinski, S. (2020), ‘Politisches Microtargeting: Eine normative Analyse von datenbasierten Strategien gezielter Wähler_innenansprache‘, Communicatio Socialis, 53:4, pp. 519–30, https://doi.org/10.5771/0010-3497-2020-4-519.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Haßler, J., Maurer, M. and Oschatz, C. (2019), ‘What you see is what you know: The influence of involvement and eye movement on online users’ knowledge acquisition’, International Journal of Communication, 13, pp. 3739–63, https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/10937. Accessed 26 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Heiss, R. and Matthes, J. (2016), ‘Mobilizing for some’, Journal of Media Psychology, 28:3, pp. 123–35, https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000199.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Holbert, R. L., Garrett, R. K. and Gleason, L. S. (2010), ‘A new era of minimal effects? A response to Bennett and Iyengar’, Journal of Communication, 60:1, pp. 15–34, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01470.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Jennings, F. J. (2019), ‘An uninformed electorate: Identity-motivated elaboration, partisan cues, and learning’, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 47:5, pp. 527–47, https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1679385.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Josephson, S. and Miller, J. S. (2015), ‘Just state the facts on twitter: Eye tracking shows that readers may ignore questions posted by news organizations on Twitter but not on Facebook’, Visual Communication Quarterly, 22:2, pp. 94–105, https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2015.1042161.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. (1980), ‘A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension’, Psychological Review, 87:4, pp. 329–54, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Karpf, D. (2017), Analytic Activism: Digital Listening and the New Political Strategy, New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Keib, K., Espina, C., Lee, Y.-I., Wojdynski, B. W., Choi, D. and Bang, H. (2018), ‘Picture this: The influence of emotionally valenced images, on attention, selection, and sharing of social media news’, Media Psychology, 21:2, pp. 202–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1378108.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim, S. C., Vraga, E. K. and Cook, J. (2021), ‘An eye tracking approach to understanding misinformation and correction strategies on social media: The mediating role of attention and credibility to reduce HPV vaccine misperceptions’, Health Communication, 36:13, pp. 1687–96, https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1787933.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kirkorian, H. L., Anderson, D. R. and Keen, R. (2012), ‘Age differences in online processing of video: An eye movement study’, Child Development, 83:2, pp. 497–507, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01719.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Klimmt, C. and Rosset, M. (2020), Das Elaboration-Likelihood-Modell, 2nd ed., Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Klinger, U. and Svensson, J. (2015), ‘The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach’, New Media & Society, 17:8, pp. 1241–57, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Koch, T., Peter, C. and Müller, P. (2019), Das Experiment in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kristofferson, K., White, K. and Peloza, J. (2014), ‘The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial action’, Journal of Consumer Research, 40:6, pp. 1149–66, https://doi.org/10.1086/674137.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kruikemeier, S., Lecheler, S. and Boyer, M. M. (2018), ‘Learning from news on different media platforms: An eye-tracking experiment’, Political Communication, 35:1, pp. 75–96, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1388310.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Magin, M., Podschuweit, N., Haßler, J. and Russmann, U. (2017), ‘Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication: A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns’, Information, Communication & Society, 20:11, pp. 1698–719, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1254269.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Moran, G., Muzellec, L. and Johnson, D. (2020), ‘Message content features and social media engagement: Evidence from the media industry’, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29:5, pp. 533–45, https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-09-2018-2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. O’Keefe, D. J. (2008), ‘Elaboration Likelihood model’, in W. Donsbach (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 1475–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Pearson, G. (2021), ‘Sources on social media: Information context collapse and volume of content as predictors of source blindness’, New Media & Society, 23:5, pp. 1181–99, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820910505.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. (1979), ‘Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37:10, pp. 1915–26, https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.37.10.1915.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. (1984), ‘Source factors and the elaboration Likelihood model of persuasion’, Advances in Consumer Research, 11, pp. 668–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. (1986), ‘The elaboration Likelihood model of persuasion’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, pp. 123–205, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Petty, R. E. and Wegener, D. T. (1999), ‘The elaboration Likelihood model: Current status and controversies’, in S. Chaiken and Y. Trope (eds), Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 41–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. and Goldman, R. (1981), ‘Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41:5, pp. 847–55, https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.41.5.847.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. and Schumann, D. (1983), ‘Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement’, Journal of Consumer Research, 10:2, p. 135, https://doi.org/10.1086/208954.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Pohl, K. (2023), ‘Mehr als nur ein Like? Der Einfluss mobilisierender Social-Media-Beiträge auf die politische Partizipation’, Ph.D. thesis, Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Rakoczi, G. (2012), ‘Eye tracking in Forschung und Lehre: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen eines vielversprechenenden Erkenntnismittels’, in G. S. Csanyi (ed.), Medien in der Wissenschaft: Digitale Medien – Werkzeuge für exzellente Forschung und Lehre: Tagungsband, vol. 61, Münster among others: Waxmann, pp. 87–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Shahin, S., Saldaña, M. and Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2020), ‘Peripheral elaboration model: The impact of incidental news exposure on political participation’, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18:2, pp. 148–63, https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1832012.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Sülflow, M., Schäfer, S. and Winter, S. (2019), ‘Selective attention in the news feed: An eye-tracking study on the perception and selection of political news posts on Facebook’, New Media & Society, 21:1, pp. 168–90, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818791520.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Theeuwes, J., Reimann, B. and Mortier, K. (2006), ‘Visual search for featural singletons: No top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming’, Visual Cognition, 14:4–8, pp. 466–89, https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500195110.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Theocharis, Y. (2015), ‘The conceptualization of digitally networked participation’, Social Media + Society, 1:2, pp. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610140.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Theocharis, Y. and van Deth, J. W. (2018), Political Participation in a Changing World: Conceptual and Empirical Challenges in the Study of Citizen Engagement, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Theocharis, Y., Moor, J. and van Deth, J. W. (2021), ‘Digitally networked participation and lifestyle politics as new modes of political participation’, Policy & Internet, 13:1, pp. 30–53, https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.231.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Theocharis, Y., Boulianne, S., Koc-Michalska, K. and Bimber, B. (2023), ‘Platform affordances and political participation: How social media reshape political engagement’, West European Politics, 46:4, pp. 788–811, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2087410.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Tufekci, Z. (2017), Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest, New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J. and Tucker, J. A. (2015), ‘Political expression and action on social media: Exploring the relationship between lower- and higher-threshold political activities among Twitter users in Italy’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20:2, pp. 221–39, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12108.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Valenzuela, S., Halpern, D., Katz, J. E. and Miranda, J. P. (2019), ‘The paradox of participation versus misinformation: Social media, political engagement, and the spread of misinformation’, Digital Journalism, 7:6, pp. 802–23, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623701.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. van Deth, J. W. (2009), ‘Politische Partizipation’, in V. Kaina and A. Römmele (eds), Politische Soziologie, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 141–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L. and Brady, H. E. (1995), Voice and Equality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Verplanken, B. (1991), ‘Persuasive communication of risk information: A test of cue versus message processing effects in a field experiment’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17:2, pp. 188–93, https://doi.org/10.1177/014616729101700211.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Vissers, S. and Stolle, D. (2013), ‘The internet and new modes of political participation: Online versus offline participation’, Information, Communication & Society, 17:8, pp. 937–55, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2013.867356.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Vraga, E., Bode, L. and Troller-Renfree, S. (2016), ‘Beyond self-reports: Using eye tracking to measure topic and style differences in attention to social media content’, Communication Methods and Measures, 10:2–3, pp. 149–64, https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150443.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Wurst, A.-K., Pohl, K. and Haßler, J. (2023), ‘Mobilization in the context of campaign functions and citizen participation’, Media and Communication, 11:3, pp. 129–40, https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i3.6660.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00047_1
Loading
Visual attention to mobilizing political social media posts: An eye-tracking study
Journal of Visual Political Communication 12, 55 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1386/jvpc_00047_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00047_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00047_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): bottom-up factors; elaboration likelihood model; experiment; involvement; political participation; social media; top-down factors

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test