Skip to content
1981
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2633-3732
  • E-ISSN: 2633-3740

Abstract

Art of all forms is inherently political, even if it does not pursue an explicitly political agenda. Who is and who is not depicted and what is commemorated and what is not can reflect power and representational relations within a society. Similarly, the accessibility of art, and how art can transform landscapes such as urban environments, is the result of political decisions. Drawing on work highlighting how some post-industrial cities have been transformed through art installations, we utilize explorative walking in deindustrialized city spaces, the neighbouring communities where art is devoid of context. Spaces where there is a lack of art and so a failing to transform landscapes or to commemorate and memorialize their industrial heritage. We focus on the sociocultural significance of such art in – or, notably, without – context in deindustrialized spaces and propose a critical reading of these as sites of ‘meaning’. We ask how the art that is and is not contributes to senses of exclusion and marginalization when urban environments fail to move into a transindustrial phase.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • AHRC and DFG (Award AH/Y007603/1)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00048_1
2025-11-29
2026-02-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andremann, J. and Rowe, W. (2005), Images of Power: Iconography, Culture and the State in Latin America, New York: Berghahn.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arts Council (2002), Pride of Place: How the Lottery Contributed 1 Billion to the Arts in England, London: Arts Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Benjamin, W. ([1982] 1999), The Arcades Project (trans. H. Eiland and K. McLaughlin), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cecar, S. (2007), Blatcherism: How Much Thatcherism is in Blairism: New Labour’s Neoliberal Policies, Farnham: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. de Certeau, M. (1984), The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheles, L. (2023), ‘The faces of leadership: Picturing power in democratic countries and dictatorial regimes’, in D. Lilleker and A. Veneti (eds), Research Handbook on Visual Politics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 12337.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Crafts, N. (2012), ‘British relative economic decline revisited: The role of competition’, Explorations in Economic History, 49:1, pp. 1729, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2011.06.004.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Da Costa Vieira, T. (2023), ‘“In time, every worker a capitalist”: Accumulation by legitimation and authoritarian neoliberalism in Thatcher’s Britain’, Competition & Change, 27:5, pp. 72947, https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294231153028.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Daniels, S. (2013), ‘The implications of industry: Turner and Leeds’, in T. J. Barnes and J. S. Duncan (eds), Writing Worlds: Discourse, Text and Metaphor in the Representation of Landscape, London: Routledge, pp. 3849.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Edensor, T. (2005), ‘The ghosts of industrial ruins: Ordering and disordering memory in excessive space’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23:6, pp. 82949, https://doi.org/10.1068/d58j.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Edge, N. (2005), ‘Future forecast: Social space’, Artist Newsletter, 25 November, pp. 2425.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gee, G. (2017), Art in the North of England, 1979–2008, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Giordano, B. and Twomey, L. (2002), ‘Economic transitions: Restructuring local labour markets’, in J. Peck and K. Ward (eds), City of Revolution: Restructuring Manchester, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 5062.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Goodall, M. (1998), ‘All points north’, The Big Issue in the North, 25–31 May, p. 22.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Greenwood, J. (2001), ‘Within a third space’, Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 6:2, pp. 193205, https://doi.org/10.1080/13569780120070731.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hancock, L. and Mooney, G. (2013), ‘“Welfare ghettos” and the “broken society”: Territorial stigmatization in the contemporary UK’, Housing, Theory and Society, 30:1, pp. 4664, https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2012.683294.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hobsbawm, E. (1996), ‘Identity politics and the left’, New Left Review, 217:1, pp. 3847, https://newleftreview.org/issues/i217/articles/eric-hobsbawm-identity-politics-and-the-left. Accessed 10 December 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Holgate, J. (2021), ‘Trade unions in the community: Building broad spaces of solidarity’, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 42:2, pp. 22647, https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x18763871.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Horspool, D. (2009), The English Rebel: One Thousand Years of Trouble-Making from the Normans to the Nineties, Basingstoke: Penguin UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jewell, H. M. (1994), The North-South Divide: The Origins of Northern Consciousness in England, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jones, P. and Wilks-Heeg, S. (2007), ‘Packaging culture, regulating cultures: The re-branded city’, in C. Grunenberg and R. Knifton (eds), Centre of the Creative Universe: Liverpool and the Avant-Garde, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, pp. 20219.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kelliher, D. (2015), ‘The 1984-5 miners’ strike and the spirit of solidarity’, Soundings, 60:60, pp. 11829, https://doi.org/10.3898/136266215815872953.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. King, A. (1975), ‘Overload: Problems of governing in the 1970s’, Political Studies, 23:2–3, pp. 28496, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1975.tb00068.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lasczik, A., Rousell, D., Irwin, R. L., Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A. and Lee, N. (2021), Walking with A/r/tography, London: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ledger, R. (2017), Neoliberal Thought and Thatcherism: ‘A Transition From Here to There?, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, N. (2017), ‘Powerhouse of cards? Understanding the “northern powerhouse”’, Regional Studies, 51:3, pp. 47889, https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1196289.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mackinnon, D. (2021), ‘Governing uneven development: The Northern Powerhouse as a “state spatial strategy”’, Territory, Politics, Governance, 9:5, pp. 61335, https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1743202.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Memou, A. (2024), ‘Photographs of solidarity and archival memory in the miners’ strike 1984–1985’, Visual Culture in Britain, 22:1–3, pp. 4954, https://doi.org/10.1080/14714787.2024.2428063.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Minford, P. (2006), ‘Modelling the UK economy–theory, policy and testing since the 1970s’, CiteSeer, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=faa83125df747c6315ac8c80962edcf7cf7ae1a5. Accessed 13 December 2024.
  30. Mitchell, W. J. T. (1994), Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Morrison, J. (2022), The Left Behind: Reimagining Britain’s Socially Excluded, London: Pluto.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mouffe, C., Deutsche, R., Joseph, B. W. and Keenan, T. (2001), ‘Every form of art has a political dimension’, Grey Room, 2, pp. 98125, https://doi.org/10.1162/152638101750173019.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Muldoon, S. (2005), ‘Hogarth’s Gin Lane and Beer Street’, International Journal of Surgery, 3:2, pp. 15962, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2005.03.006.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Nunn, A. (2014), ‘The contested and contingent outcomes of Thatcherism in the UK’, Capital & Class, 38:2, pp. 30321, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816814530126.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Papadopoulou, I. I. and Veneti, A. (2005), ‘Committed art and propaganda’, 55th Annual Political Studies Association Conference, Leeds, 4–7 April, https://gpsg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2005-P3-Papadopoulou-and-Veneti.pdf. Accessed 5 August 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Phillips, T. (1990), ‘Sculpting our age’, Yorkshire Post, p. 12.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. The Reytons (2017), ‘Kids off the Estate’, K.O.T.E, UK: Scruff of the Neck Records.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Russmann, U. and Veneti, A. (2022), ‘Image-as-data & visual methods’, in A. Ceron (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Technology & Politics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 9094.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Stewart, G. (2013), Bang! A History of Britain in the 1980s, New York: Atlantic Books Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Tookey, H. (2015), ‘Re-placing Malcolm Lowry: From the Mersey to the world (and back again)’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 8:23, pp. 193215, https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp.8.2_3.193_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. urbancanvas (2025), ‘Our hand-painted mural entitled “By Industry and Honour”...’, Instagram post, 17 January, https://www.instagram.com/urbancanvas/p/DE7-0eHIE9H/?img_index=1. Accessed 5 August 2025.
  42. Vall, N. (2018), ‘Coal is our strife: Representing mining heritage in North East England’, Contemporary British History, 32:1, pp. 10120, https://doi.org/10.1080/13619462.2017.1408541.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Vicinus, M. (2024), The Industrial Muse: A Study of Nineteenth Century British Working-Class Literature, New York: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Vinen, R. (2019), ‘A war of position? The Thatcher Government’s preparation for the 1984 miners’ strike’, The English Historical Review, 134:566, pp. 12150, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cez001.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Waters, C. (1999), ‘Representations of everyday life: LS Lowry and the landscape of memory in postwar Britain’, Representations, 65, pp. 12150, https://doi.org/10.2307/2902964.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Zukin, S. (1987), ‘Gentrification: Culture and capital in the urban core’, Annual Review of Sociology, 13:1, pp. 12947, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.13.1.129.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00048_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00048_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test