oa Exploring viewers’ visual attention and emotional responses to populist communication: A laboratory study of the Finns Party leader’s strategies on Instagram and TikTok

References

1. Albertazzi, Daniele and Donatella, Bonansinga (2023), ‘Beyond anger: The populist radical right on TikTok’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 32:3, pp. 673–89, https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2163380.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney (2015), The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arter, David (2024), ‘“When in Rome do as the Romans do” or “Rome is for Romans only”?: How the search for a classification of the Finns Party could clear a way through the taxonomical jungle of the European far-right’, Party Politics, 31:3, pp. 514–24, https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688241227526.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bakker, Bert N. and Schumacher, Gijs (2025), ‘Using measures of psychophysiological and neural activity to advance understanding of psychological processes in politics’, in E. C. Busby, C. F. Karpowitz and C. J. Wong (eds), Handbook of Innovations in Political Psychology, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 429–66.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Banks, Antoine, Calvo, Ernesto, Karol, David and Telhami, Shibely (2021), ‘#polarizedfeeds: Three experiments on polarization, framing, and social media’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26:3, pp. 609–34, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220940964.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bast, Jennifer (2021), ‘Managing the image: The visual communication strategy of European right-wing populist politicians on Instagram’, Journal of Political Marketing, 23:1, pp. 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2021.1892901.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bast, Jennifer, Oschatz, Corinna and Renner, Anna-Maria (2022), ‘Successfully overcoming the “double bind?”: A mixed-method analysis of the self-presentation of female right-wing populists on Instagram and the impact on voter attitudes’, Political Communication, 39:3, pp. 358–82, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.2007190.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bonansinga, Donatella (2019), ‘The securitization of migration in populist discourse: Emotional and affective mechanisms at play’, in L. S. Talani and M. Rosina (eds), Tidal Waves?: The Political Economy of Migration and Populism, Lausanne: Peter Lang, pp. 151–72.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bonansinga, Donatella (2024), ‘Visual de-demonisation: A new era of radical right mainstreaming’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 27:2, pp. 603–11, https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481241259384.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bonansinga, Donatella (2025), ‘Legitimacy first: Marine Le Pen’s visual de-demonisation strategies on Instagram’, Politics and Governance, 13, https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8939.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bossetta, Michael (2023), ‘Social media digital architectures: A platform-first approach to political communication and participation’, in S. Coleman and L. Sørensen (eds), Handbook of Digital Politics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 226–70.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Carter, Benjamin T. and Luke, Steven G. (2020), ‘Best practices in eye tracking research’, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 155:1, pp. 49–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.05.010.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Choi, Jihyang and Lee, Jiyoung (2021), ‘“Enthusiasm” toward the other side matters: Emotion and willingness to express disagreement in social media political conversation’, The Social Science Journal, 62:3, pp. 544–60, https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1949548.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ekman, Paul and Friesen, Wallace V. (1986), ‘A new pan-cultural facial expression of emotion’, Motivation and Emotion, 10:2, pp. 159–68, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992253.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Eremenko, Yulia, Chentsova, Anna and Kuzmenko, Anastasia (2021), ‘Research of visual political communication perception by youth: Psychophysiological approach’, SHS Web of Conferences, 94, https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219403002.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Farkas, Xénia (2023), ‘Visual political communication research: A literature review from 2012 to 2022’, Journal of Visual Political Communication, 10:2, pp. 95–126, https://doi.org/10.1386/jvpc_00027_1.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Farkas, Xénia, Jackson, Daniel, Baranowski, Paweł, Bene, Márton, Russmann, Uta and Veneti, Anastasia (2022), ‘Strikingly similar: Comparing visual political communication of populist and non-populist parties across 28 countries’, European Journal of Communication, 37:5, pp. 545–62, https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231221082238.
    [Google Scholar]
18. González-Aguilar, Juan M., Segado-Boj, Francisco and Makhortykh, Mykola (2023), ‘Populist right parties on TikTok: Spectacularization, personalization, and hate speech’, Media and Communication, 11:2, pp. 232–40, https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6358.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Grabe, Maria E. and Bucy, Erik P. (2009), Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Guo, MeiJuan, Kwon, MahnWoo, Hwang, MiKyung and Zhou, YiMou (2023), ‘Eye perception and preference difference between different emotional content on TikTok and Twitter platforms’, Journal of Multimedia Information System, 10:2, pp. 153–62, https://doi.org/10.33851/jmis.2023.10.2.153.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hameleers, Michael (2021), ‘They are selling themselves out to the enemy! The content and effects of populist conspiracy theories’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33:1, pp. 38–56, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa004.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Haßler, Jörg, Kümpel, Anna S. and Keller, Jessica (2023), ‘Instagram and political campaigning in the 2017 German federal election: A quantitative content analysis of German top politicians’ and parliamentary parties’ posts’, Information, Communication & Society, 26:3, pp. 530–50, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.1954974.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Himmelroos, Staffan and Strandberg, Kim (eds) (2020), Ur majoritetens perspektiv: Opinionen om det svenska i Finland, Helsinki: Svenska Litteratursällskapet i Finland.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Humprecht, Edda, Amsler, Michael, Esser, Frank and Van Aelst, Peter (2024), ‘Emotionalized social media environments: How alternative news media and populist actors drive angry reactions’, Political Communication, 41:4, pp. 559–87, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2350416.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kissas, Angelos (2022), ‘Populist everyday politics in the (mediatized) age of social media: The case of instagram celebrity advocacy’, New Media & Society, 26:5, pp. 2766–85, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221092006.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kohout, Susann, Kruikemeier, Sanne and Bakker, Bert N. (2023), ‘May I have your attention, please? An eye tracking study on emotional social media comments’, Computers in Human Behavior, 139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107495.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kulke, Louisa, Feyerabend, Dennis and Schacht, Annekathrin (2020), ‘A comparison of the Affectiva iMotions facial expression analysis software with EMG for identifying facial expressions of emotion’, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00329.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Larsson, Anders O. (2023), ‘The rise of Instagram as a tool for political communication: A longitudinal study of European political parties and their followers’, New Media & Society, 25:10, pp. 2744–62, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211034158.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lilleker, Darren G. (2019), ‘The power of visual political communication: Pictorial politics through the lens of communication psychology’, in D. G. Lilleker and A. Veneti (eds), Research Handbook on Visual Politics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 37–51, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18729-3_3.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lilleker, Darren G. and Liefbroer, Mirjam (2018), ‘“Searching for something to believe in”: Voter uncertainty in a post-truth environment’, International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 14:3, pp. 351–66, https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.14.3.351_1.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lindholm, Jenny (2023), ‘Emotional responses to non-congruent emotional social media content’, OSF, 17 May, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GBMQY. Accessed 3 December 2025.
32. Lindholm, Jenny, Eklund, Jesper, Strandberg, Kim, Carlson, Tom and Andersson, Sören (2024), ‘Beyond negativity? A laboratory study on emotional responses to populist strategies on social media’, Frontiers in Political Science, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1415403.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Martella, Antonio and Bracciale, Roberta (2022), ‘Populism and emotions: Italian political leaders’ communicative strategies to engage Facebook users’, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35:1, pp. 65–85, https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1951681.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mayer, Nonna (2013), ‘From Jean-Marie to Marine Le Pen: Electoral change on the far right’, Parliamentary Affairs, 66:1, pp. 160–78, https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss071.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Melito, Francesco and Zulianello, Mattia (2024), ‘Populist visual communication: A state-of-the-art review’, Political Studies Review, 23:1, pp. 372–83, https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299241292575.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Moffitt, Benjamin (2016), The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Peng, Yilang and Lu, Yingdan (2023), ‘Computational visual analysis in political communication’, in D. Lilleker and A. Veneti (eds), Research Handbook on Visual Politics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 42–54.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Reeck, Crystal and Egner, Tobias (2015), ‘Interactions between attention and emotion’, in A. W. Toga (ed.), Brain Mapping: An Encyclopedic Reference, London: Academic Press, pp. 269–74.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Reinemann, Carsten, Aalberg, Toril, Esser, Frank, Strömbäck, Jesper and Vreese, Claes H. de (2017), ‘Populist political communication: Toward a model of its causes, forms, and effects’, in T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck and C. H. de Vreese (eds), Populist Political Communication in Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 12–25.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schmuck, Desirée, Tribastone, Miriam, Matthes, Jörg, Marquart, Franziska and Bergel, Eva M. (2020), ‘Avoiding the other side? An eye-tracking study of selective exposure and selective avoidance effects in response to political advertising’, Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 32:3, pp. 158–64, https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000265.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Stöckli, Sabrina, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael, Borer, Stefan and Samson, Andrea C. (2018), ‘Facial expression analysis with AFFDEX and FACET: A validation study’, Behavior Research Methods, 50:4, pp. 1446–60, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0996-1.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Vraga, Emily, Bode, Leticia and Troller-Renfree, Sonya (2016), ‘Beyond self-reports: Using eye tracking to measure topic and style differences in attention to social media content’, Communication Methods and Measures, 10:2&3, pp. 149–64, https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150443.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Yiend, Jenny (2010), ‘The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information’, Cognition & Emotion, 24:1, pp. 3–47, https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903205698.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Yuhao, Sun (2022), ‘Eye-tracking: The influence of picture and text layout on the effect of commercial advertising’, SADI International Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 9:3, pp. 1–5, https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2023.061716.
    [Google Scholar]