Skip to content
1981
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1753-5190
  • E-ISSN: 1753-5204

Abstract

The principle that classification may always be provisional and illusory continues to be of relevance and concern to art and curation that seeks to expose the fallacies of systematic order and taxonomy. Taking the museum as a starting point, this article explores the curation of information and objects by writers and artists who offer alternative spaces of representation and interpretation. Language is fundamental to these curatorial undertakings, for example: the keywords chosen as starting points by Daniel Spoerri and Marie-Louise Plessen for their 1981 Musée Sentimental de Prusse; Tate Liverpool’s choice of artwork for their 2014 interpretation of Raymond Williams’ 1988 book ; and Rose English’s choice of words to explore during her 1983 performance Plato’s Chair, included in the exhibition. Developing into a consideration of social networking as a space of curated representation, the article examines my own use of the hashtag and its relation to classification and keywords in a recent Instagram project @cartography_for_girls. I set up the account to share the thoughts of philosopher and novelist Iris Murdoch’s fictional women characters on a platform synonymous with personal articulation and connection seeking. The hashtag offered a taxonomy with which to engage with Iris Murdoch’s advocacy of the acceptance of contingency and to her assertion that ‘the task of classifying […] can perhaps never be more than a (serious) game’.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp.13.1.117_1
2020-01-01
2026-04-15

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2004), The Cultural Politics of Emotion, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, J. (2011), ‘Remaking the ready-made’, Frieze, 7 August, https://frieze.com/article/remaking-ready-made. Accessed 21 February 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Altorf, M. (2011), ‘After cursing the library: Iris Murdoch and the (in)visibility of women in philosophy’, Hypatia, 26:2, pp. 384402.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barlow, P. (2004), Objects for… and Other Things, London: Black Dog Publishing Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beckett, A. (2014), ‘Battles over language’, The Guardian, 15 February, https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/feb/15/keywords-raymond-williams-battles-language. Accessed 3 February 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Conradi, P. J. (2001), The Saint & the Artist, London: HarperCollins.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dworkin, C. (2017), ‘I can’t even: Affective imbalance in contemporary literature. Or: Goodbye to all that’, a lecture by Professor Craig Dworkin, Leeds Beckett University, 24 March (all quotes are transcribed from the recording of the lecture by The School of Art, Architecture & Design).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Eckhardt, U., Plessen, M. L. and Spoerri, D. (eds) (1981), Le Musee Sentimental de Prusse, Berlin: Verlag Frölich & Kaufmann GmbH.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Foucault, M. ([1966] 2005), The Order of Things, New York: Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Haidu, R. (2010), The Absence of Work: Marcel Broodthaers 1964–1976, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Healy, J. F. (ed.) (2004), Pliny the Elder: Natural History: A Selection, London: Penguin Classics.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Horner, A. and Rowe, A. (eds) (2015), Living on Paper, Letters from Iris Murdoch 1934–1995, London: Chatto & Windus.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hunt, A. (2016), Reviving Roman Religion, Sacred Trees in the Roman World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Irigaray, L. (1996), I Love to You, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lord, B. (2006), ‘Foucault’s museum: Difference, representation, and genealogy’, Museum and Society, 4:1, March, pp. 1114, https://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/museumstudies/museumsociety/documents/volumes/1lord.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Midgely, M. (2007), The Owl of Minerva: A Memoir, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Midgely, M. (2016), ‘A golden manifesto’, Philosophy Now, 116, October/November, pp. 3436.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Murdoch, I. (1987), The Book and the Brotherhood, London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Murdoch, I. (1992), Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals, Middlesex: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ‘Pliny’s Natural History’ (2010), In Our Time, BBC Radio 4, London, 8 July, 9.00 p.m.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Snauwaert, D. (2014), ‘Marcel Broodthaers, Musée d’Art Moderne, Département des Aigles, Section des Figures, 1972’, The Artist as Curator, vol. 5, Milan: Mousse Publishing, pp. 316.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Williams, R. (1988), Keywords, A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, London: Fontana Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sommer, C. (2020), ‘The (serious) game of classification: (I think I’m happy, she thought, but am I real?)’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 13:1, pp. 11729, doi: 10.1386/jwcp.13.1.117_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp.13.1.117_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test