All the better for being vague? The authority of text | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Writing in Creative Practice
  4. Volume 13, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1753-5190
  • E-ISSN: 1753-5204

Abstract

In , George Eliot makes a claim for the superiority of writing over painting: ‘Language is a finer medium’, she has her character claim, because it is ‘[…] all the better for being vague’ (1871: 140). This is a perceived advantage that many artists would find it difficult to agree with as we find the use of text in both academia and in relationship to visual art to be anything but vague. On the contrary, language (and specifically writing) is the means by which hierarchies of power are established and reinforced and it is crucial in defining and conveying the meaning of images. For artists, this poses particular, well-rehearsed problems as we try to find a path between the ‘not-knowing’, the uncertainties of the visual and the authority of the written word. Rather than becoming trapped in the conventions of authoritative text, this article argues for a different way of writing in both academia and in the art world at large: one that reflects the processes of visual practice and thinking. Drawing on current experiments in collaborative writing, it argues for forms of texts that are more akin to speech: texts that forgo the authority of the word in favour of approaches that provide a space where uncertain and imperfectly formed ideas can be expressed and tested.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00008_1
2020-02-01
2023-09-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agence France-Presse ( 2014;), ‘ Turkish deputy prime minister says women should not laugh out loud. ’, The Guardian, 29 July, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/29/turkish-minister-women-laugh-loud-bulent-arinc. Accessed 4 November 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bank ( 1999;), ‘ Fax-Bak press release. ’, John Russell , http://www.john-russell.org/Web%20pages/Artworks/Exhibitions/Bank/A_fbl.html. Accessed 5 November 2017.
  3. Carroll, Lewis. ( [1871] 1907), Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There, , 5th ed.., London:: Macmillan & Co;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Cixous, Hélène. ( 1975;), ‘ The laugh of the Medusa. ’, Signs, 1:4, pp. 875–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Clance, Pauline, and Imes, Suzanne. ( 1978;), ‘ The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. ’, Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15:3, Fall, pp. 241–47, http://www.paulineroseclance.com/pdf/ip_high_achieving_women.pdf. Accessed 4 November 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Doubtfire, Joseph, and Stewart, Judith. ( 2016;), ‘ Curating in the dank dark (part II). ’, Curating the Contemporary , 16 November, https://curatingthecontemporary.org/2016/11/10/curating-in-the-dark-dank-part-ii/. Accessed 4 November 2017.
  7. Doubtfire, Joseph,, Quinn, James, and Stewart, Judith. ( 2016;), ‘ Curating in the dark (part I). ’, Curating the Contemporary, 16 June, https://curatingthecontemporary.org/2016/06/16/curating-in-the-dark/. Accessed 4 November 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Eliot, George. ( 1871–73), Middlemarch, London:: Blackwood;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gale, Ken, and Wyatt, Jonathan. ( 2006;), ‘ Inquiring into writing: An interactive interview. ’, Qualitative Inquiry, 12:6, December, pp. 1117–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Solnit, Rebecca. ( 2016;), ‘ How to be a writer: 10 tips from Rebecca Solnit. ’, Literary Hub, 13 September, http://lithub.com/how-to-be-a-writer-10-tips-from-rebecca-solnit/. Accessed 4 November 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Spender, Dale. ( 1980), Man-Made Language, Oxford:: Routledge and Keegan Paul;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilson, Andrew. ( 2013;), ‘ Fax-Bak (London: The Approach). ’, Tate , August, http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/bank-fax-back-london-the-approach-t13920. Accessed 5 November 2017.
  13. Stewart, J.. ( 2020;), ‘ All the better for being vague? The authority of text. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 13:2, pp. 259–270, doi: 10.1386/jwcp_00008_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00008_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): authority; collaboration; feminist; text; uncertainty; visual art

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error