Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Writing in Creative Practice
  4. Volume 14, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 14, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1753-5190
  • E-ISSN: 1753-5204

Abstract

Quality, exegetical writing can be constrained when students marginalize poetic ways of thinking and replace them with carefully edited accounts that reshape the role and nature of emotional response. In the pursuit of rational, theoretically groomed accounts of practice, they can sometimes end up misrepresenting the embodied nature of their inquiries. Considering burgeoning research into poetic inquiry (PI) in the social sciences, this article employs a case study of five doctoral graduates in art and design who have articulated the role of poetic thinking in their creative practice theses. In addition to offering illustrations of how practice-led researchers use PI, the examples demonstrate ways in which poetic approaches can be employed to enhance communicative clarity beyond the constraints of conventional academic writing. Specifically, the examples demonstrate how poetic writing is used to process and articulate indigenous knowledge, enhance embodied thinking and inquiry and deepen levels of reflection and understanding. Such uses can cause a researcher to view the world differently and by extension, expand the nature of what it means to conduct research. In discussing the nature of poetic writing, the article considers three distinct profiles: exegetical writing employed when the nature of the practice is poetic; poetic writing that draws on indigenous approaches to scholarship and poetic writing used as a method for reflection.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00018_1
2021-09-01
2024-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ames, Roger, and Hall, David. ( 2003), Dao De Jing: A Philosophical Translation, New York:: Ballantine Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Steve. ( 1995;), ‘ Thinking things differently. ’, in Things 3, London:: V+A/RCA;, pp. 70–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnacle, Robyn. ( 2012;), ‘ Becoming a practitioner-researcher writer. ’, in B. Allpress,, R. Barnacle,, L. Duxbury, and E. Grierson. (eds), Supervising Practices for Postgraduate Research in Art, Architecture and Design, Rotterdam:: Sense Publishers;, pp. 81–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barone, Tom. ( 2001;), ‘ Science, art, and the predispositions of educational researchers. ’, Educational Researcher, 30:7, pp. 24–28, 10.3102/0013189X030007024. Accessed 28 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Baxter, Pamela, and Jack, Susan. ( 2008;), ‘ Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. ’, The Qualitative Report Volume, 13:4, pp. 544–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brumberger, Eva. ( 2003;), ‘ The rhetoric of typography: The persona of typeface and text. ’, Technical Communication, 50:2, pp. 206–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Carruth, Hayden. ( 1948;), ‘ The poet with wounds. ’, Poetry, 71:4, pp. 217–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Chen. ( 2018;), ‘ Bright on the grey sea: Utilizing the Xiang system to creatively consider the potentials of Menglong in film poetry. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Auckland:: Auckland University of Technology, Tuwhera;, http://hdl.handle.net/10292/11737. Accessed 14 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Davidson, George,, Seaton, Anne, and Simpson, John. ( 1985), Chambers Concise 20th Century Dictionary, Edinburgh:: W & R Chambers;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Denzin, Norman, and Lincoln, Yvonna. ( 2011;), ‘ Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. ’, in N. K. Denzin, and Y. Lincoln. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;, pp. 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Doloughan, Fiona. ( 2002;), ‘ The language of reflective practice in art and design. ’, Design Issues, 18:2, pp. 57–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Eiseley, Loren. ( 1972), Notes of an Alchemist, New York:: Scribner;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Faulkner, Sandra. ( 2007;), ‘ Concern with craft: Using ars poetica as criteria for reading research poetry. ’, Qualitative Inquiry, 13:2, pp. 218–34, https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040629563610.1177. Accessed 28 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Feagin, Joseph. ( 1991), A Case for the Case Study, Chapel Hill, NC:: The University of North Carolina Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Flores, Toni. ( 1982;), ‘ Field poetry. ’, Anthropology and Humanism Quarterly, 7:1, pp. 16–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hamilton, Jillian. ( 2011;), ‘ The voices of the exegesis. ’, in K. Friedman, and L. Justice. (eds), Practice, Knowledge, Vision: Doctoral Education in Design, Hong Kong:: School of Design, Hong Kong Polytechnic University;, n.pag., https://eprints.qut.edu.au/41832/1/Voices_of_the_Exegesis-_J._Hamilton.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hamilton, Jillian, and Jaaniste, Luke. ( 2009;), ‘ The effective and the evocative: Reflecting on practice-led research approaches in art and design. ’, in R. Woodrow. (ed.), Interventions in the Public Domain, Melbourne:: ACUADS Publishing;, pp. 340–43, https://eprints.qut.edu.au/29700/. Accessed 28 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hanauer, David. ( 2010), Poetry as Research: Exploring Second Language Poetry Writing, Amsterdam:: John Benjamins Pub;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ings, Welby. ( 2015;), ‘ The authored voice: Emerging approaches to exegesis design in creative practice Ph.D.s. ’, Educational Philosophy & Theory, 47:12, pp. 1277–90, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.974017. Accessed 28 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Keats, John. ( 1958), The Letters of John Keats 1814–1821, Cambridge:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Leavy, Patricia. ( 2015), Method Meets Art: Arts-Based Research Practice, , 2nd ed.., New York:: Guilford Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Leggo, Carl. ( 1999;), ‘ Research as poetic rumination: Twenty-six ways of listening to light. ’, The Journal of Educational Thought (JET), 33:2, pp. 113–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Leggo, Carl. ( 2008;), ‘ Astonishing silence: Knowing in poetry. ’, in. J. G. Knowles, and A. L. Cole. (eds), Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;, pp. 166–75, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226545.n14. Accessed 28 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Leggo, Carl,, Sinner, Anita,, Irwin, Rita,, Pantaleo, Kathy,, Gouzouasis, Peter, and Grauer, Kit. ( 2011;), ‘ Lingering in liminal spaces: A/r/tography as living inquiry in a language arts class. ’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24:2, pp. 239–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/09518391003641908. Accessed 28 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. MacNeil, Cheryl. ( 2000;), ‘ The prose and cons of poetic representation in evaluation reporting. ’, American Journal of Evaluation, 21:3, pp. 359–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(01)00100-X. Accessed 28 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Mäkelä, Maarit. ( 2007;), ‘ Knowing through making: The role of the artefact in practice-led research. ’, Knowledge and Policy, 20:3, pp. 157–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Mammeri, Mouloud, and Bourdieu, Pierre. ( 2004;), ‘ Dialogue on oral poetry. ’, Ethnography, 5:4, pp. 511–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Marshall, Catherine, and Rossman, Gretchen. ( 1995), Designing Qualitative Research, , 2nd ed.., Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Miles, Matthew, and Huberman, Michael. ( 1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Source Book, , 2nd ed.., Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Miller, Benjamin, and Crabtree, William. ( 1999), Doing Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Mortensen Steagall, Marcos. ( 2019;), ‘ The process of immersive photography: Beyond the cognitive and the physical. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Auckland University of Technology, Tuwhera, http://hdl.handle.net/10292/12251. Accessed 14 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Neilsen, Lori. ( 2008;), ‘ Lyric inquiry. ’, in J. G. Knowles, and A. L. Cole. (eds), Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;, pp. 93–102, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226545.n8. Accessed 28 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Nelson, Robert. ( 2004;), ‘ Doctoralness in the balance: The agonies of scholarly writing in studio research degrees. ’, Text, Special Issue, 3, http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue3/nelson.htm. Accessed 28 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Nepia, Moana. ( 2012;), ‘ Te Kore: The poetics of performance. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Auckland University of Technology, Tuwhera, http://hdl.handle.net/10292/5480. Accessed 28 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Newbury, Darren. ( 2001;), ‘ Diaries and fieldnotes in the research process. ’, Research Issues in Art Design and Media, 1, https://www.wordsinspace.net/course_material/mrm/mrmreadings/riadmIssue1.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Paltridge, Brian,, Starfield, Sue,, Ravelli, Loise, and Tuckwell, Kathryn. ( 2012;), ‘ Change and stability: Examining the macrostructures of doctoral theses in the visual and performing arts. ’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11:4, pp. 332–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Piirto, Jane. ( 2002;), ‘ The question of quality and qualifications: Writing inferior poems as qualitative research. ’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15:4, pp. 431–45, https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390210145507. Accessed 28 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Pouwhare, Robert. ( 2020;), ‘ Ngā Pūrākau mō Māui: Mai te Patuero, te Pakokitanga me te Whakapēpē ki te Kōrero Pono, ki te Whaihua Whaitake, mē ngā Honotanga. ’ (‘The Māui narratives: From sanitisation, dislocation and infantilisation, to veracity, relevance and connection’) , Ph.D. thesis, Auckland University of Technology, Tuwhera, http://hdl.handle.net/10292/13307. Accessed 14 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Prendergast, Monica. ( 2009;), ‘ Poem is what? Poetic inquiry in qualitative social science research. ’, International Review of Qualitative Research, 1:4, pp. 541–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Prendergast, Monica, and Galvin, Kathleen. ( 2015), Poetic Inquiry II: Seeing, Caring, Understanding, Berlin:: Springer Verlag;.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Schatzman, Leonard, and Strauss, Anselm. ( 1973), Field Research: Strategies for a Natural Sociology, Upper Saddle River, NJ:: Prentice Hall;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Scrivener, Stephen, and Ings, Welby. ( 2009;), ‘ Framing the typography extract from the exegesis of the thesis talking pictures. ’, Studies in Material Thinking, 3, pp. 1–6, https://www.materialthinking.org/sites/default/files/papers/ss_wi.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Sinfield, David. ( 2020;), ‘ Typographical voices: Reflections on the Pātea freezing works. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Auckland University of Technology, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23680.76806. Accessed 14 June 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Sinner, Anita,, Leggo, Carl,, Irwin, Rita,, Gouzouasis, Peter, and Grauer, Kit. ( 2006;), ‘ Arts-based educational research dissertations: Reviewing the practices of new scholars. ’, Canadian Journal of Education, 29:4, pp. 1223–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Vincent, Adam. ( 2018;), ‘ Is there a definition? Ruminating on poetic inquiry, strawberries, and the continued growth of the field. ’, Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal, 3:2, pp. 48–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Wees, William. ( 1999;), ‘ Film-poem or poem-film, film poems programme notes. ’, British Artists' Film & Video study collection archive, 10 April, https://www.academia.edu/20849192/Poetry-Film_and_The_Film_Poem_Some_Clarifications. Accessed 14 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Ings, Welby. ( 2021;), ‘ Resonant voices: The poetic register in exegetical writing for creative practice. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 14:2, pp. 121–41, https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00018_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00018_1
Loading
Resonant voices: The poetic register in exegetical writing for creative practice
Journal of Writing in Creative Practice 14, 121 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00018_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00018_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00018_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): cultural perspectives; exegetical writing; field notes; method; poetic inquiry (PI); poetic writing

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error