Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Writing in Creative Practice
  4. Volume 14, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 14, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1753-5190
  • E-ISSN: 1753-5204

Abstract

Online learning can be an alienating experience; students can feel their emotions are disregarded, marginalized or even viewed as hindrances as they try to motivate themselves to learn, staring at the dancing pixels of their illuminated screens. They feel at a remove from other students, trapped in other rooms, far away from them. The closeness of bodies in a shared physical space is raised as an absence. And yet, we contend in this article that connecting with affect in online learning spaces could build connectivity that counteracts the alienation of social distancing. Raw creative affective discourses can be challenging, and uncomfortable for others to take in but they are necessary online. We show that using non-digital practices such as drawing and writing freely, without inhibitions, can immeasurably enhance the online experience, giving a space for affect to be expressed in a safe but emancipatory learning architecture.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00023_1
2021-09-01
2025-11-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ashworth, Peter D.. ( 2017;), ‘ Interiority, exteriority and the realm of intentionality. ’, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 48:1, pp. 39–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barad, K.. ( 2007), Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Barad, K.,, Dolphijn, R., and van der Tuin, I.. ( 2012;), ‘ Interview with Karen Barad. ’, in R. Dolphijn, and I. van der Tuin. (eds), New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies, Michigan:: Open Humanities Press;, pp. 48–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett, J.. ( 2001), The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings and Ethics, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Biesta, G.. ( 2013), The Beautiful Risk of Education, London and Boulder, CO:: Paradigm Publishers;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolton, G.. ( 2010), Reflective Practice: Writing and Professional Development, , 3rd ed.., London:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bolton, G., and Delderfield, R.. ( 2018), Reflective Practice: Writing and Professional Development, , 5th ed.., London:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Burgess, G.. ( 2021), The Digital Divide: What Does the Research Tell Us?, Cambridge:: Cambridge Centre for Housing & Planning Research;, https://www.cchpr.landecon.cam.ac.uk/system/files/documents/digital_divide_research.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. CAL ( 2021;), ‘ Centre for arts and learning online events. ’, recorded event for Miranda Matthews and Francis Gilbert, Affective Digital Presence in Creative Practice , 3 November 2020, https://www.gold.ac.uk/cal/events/. Accessed 7 July 2021.
  10. Clough, P. T., and O’Malley, J.. ( 2007), The Affective Turn Theorising the Social, Durham:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Craft, A.. ( 2011), Creativity and Education Futures: Learning in a Digital Age, Stoke on Trent:: Trentham;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cremin, T., and Oliver, L.. ( 2017;), ‘ Teachers as writers: A systematic review. ’, Research Papers in Education, 32:3, pp. 269–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Deleuze, G.,, Guattari, F., and Massumi, B.. ( 2013), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, London:: Bloomsbury Academic;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Elbow, P.. ( 1998), Writing without Teachers, , 2nd ed.., Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fox, N., and Alldred, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ New materialist social inquiry: Designs, methods and the research-assemblage. ’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18:4, pp. 399–414.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Freire, P.. ( 1996), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, London:: Penguin;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gilbert, F., and Matthews, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Finding a new path: Building affective online learning spaces for creative writing and arts practice. ’, BERA Blog, 25 August, https://www.bera.ac.uk/blog/finding-a-new-path-building-affective-online-learning-spaces-for-creative-writing-and-arts-practice. Accessed 28 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Guattari, F.,, Pindar, I., and Sutton, P.. ( 2014), The Three Ecologies, London:: Bloomsbury Revelations;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Jenson, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Digital literacy in a sociomaterial perspective. ’, in European Conference on E-Learning, pp. 659–61, XIII , 10.34190/EEL.19.062. Accessed 2 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kara, H.. ( 2020), Creative Research Methods: A Practical Guide, Bristol:: Policy Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Manning, E., and Massumi, B.. ( 2014), Thought in the Act: Passages in the Ecology of Experience, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Matthews, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Counter hegemony in post-compulsory art and design and gallery education, through Sartre and Foucault. ’, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 26:4, pp. 561–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Matthews, M.. ( 2021a;), ‘ Expanding from the small screen: Arts practice for affective digital presence. ’, International Journal of Art and Design Education, article first, 10.1111/jade.12359. Accessed 12 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Matthews, M.. (@mirandamatthews) ( 2021b;), ‘ Reflections on readings and arts practice. ’, https://www.instagram.com/mirandamatthews/. Accessed 28 July 2021.
  25. Minkel, J. R.. ( 2007;), ‘ String theory’s extra dimensions must be less than half the width of a human hair. ’, Scientific American, 16 January, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/string-theorys-extra-dime/. Accessed 28 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Ojeda-Castelo, J. J.,, Piedra-Fernandez, J. A.,, Iribarne, L., and Bernal-Bravo, C.. ( 2018;), ‘ KiNEEt: Application for learning and rehabilitation in special educational needs. ’, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77:18, pp. 24013–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Pahl, R. H.. ( 1996;), ‘ Chaos, Gaia, Eros: A Chaos pioneer uncovers the three great streams of history. ’, The Social Studies, Washington, 87:1, p. 45.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Rancière, J.. ( 2016), The Method of Equality, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Rocketbook ( 2021;), ‘ Rocketbook. ’, https://getrocketbook.com/. Accessed 23 February 2021.
  30. Springgay, S., and La Jevic, L.. ( 2008;), ‘ A/r/tography as an ethics of embodiment: Visual journals in preservice education. ’, Qualitative Inquiry, 14:1, pp. 67–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Statista ( 2021;), ‘ Number of sent and received e-mails per day worldwide from 2017 to 2025. ’, 7 April, https://www.statista.com/statistics/456500/daily-number-of-e-mails-worldwide/. Accessed 28 June 2021.
  32. UC Today ( 2021;), ‘ Must have video statistics 2020. ’, 27 July, https://www.uctoday.com/collaboration/video-conferencing/video-conferencing-statistics/. Accessed 28 June 2021.
  33. Wenger, E.. ( 1999), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives), Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Zapata, A.,, Kuby, C. R., and Thiel, J. J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Encounters with writing: Becoming-with posthumanist ethics. ’, Journal of Literacy Research, 50:4, pp. 478–501.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Zweig, S.. ( 1943), The World of Yesterday: An Autobiography, New York:: The Viking Press;, https://www.fadedpage.com/showbook.php?pid=20181225. Accessed 28 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Gilbert, Francis, and Matthews, Miranda. ( 2021;), ‘ Affective digital presence: How to free online writing and drawing?. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 14:2, pp. 209–37, https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00023_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00023_1
Loading
Affective digital presence: How to free online writing and drawing?
Journal of Writing in Creative Practice 14, 209 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00023_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00023_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00023_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): affect; creativity; drawing; free-writing; online learning; safe spaces

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test