Intersectional Design Cards: Exploring intersecting social and environmental factors across four levels of design

References

1. Costanza-Chock, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Design justice: Towards an intersectional feminist framework for design theory and practice. ’, in C. Mareis, and N. Paim. (eds), Design Struggles: Intersecting Histories, Pedagogies, and Perspectives, PLURAL series, Amsterdam:: Valiz;, pp. 333–53.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Crenshaw, K.. ( 1989;), ‘ Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. ’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140:1, pp. 139–67.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dinshaw, C.,, Aranjo, J.,, Szekely, A.,, Pitzer, L., and Gondi, A.. ( 2021), Innovations in Inclusive Design Class Discussion, Stanford University;, 7 April.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Jones, H.. ( 2022;), ‘ Beyond human-centred design: Mapping empathy in living systems. ’, in J. Wood. (ed.), Metadesigning: Designing in the Anthropocene, London:: Routledge, n.pag;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Jones, H., and Lundebye, A.. ( 2015;), ‘ Designing learning scenarios for sustainable futures workshop. ’, Nordes 2015: Design Ecologies, Konstfack – University of Arts, Crafts and Design;, Stockholm:, 7–10 June.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Jones, H.,, Schiebinger, L.,, Grimes, A., and Small, A.. ( 2021), Intersectional Design Cards: A Design Activity to Create Radically Inclusive Products, Processes, and Paradigms, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;, https://www.intersectionaldesign.com. Accessed 5 May 2022.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Jones, J. C.. ( 1970), Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures, Chichester:: Wiley and Sons;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Jones, J. C.. ( 1991), Designing Designing, London:: Architecture Design and Technology Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lundebye, A.. ( 2004;), ‘ Senseness. ’, MA dissertation, Goldsmiths:: University of London.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Lundebye, A.. ( 2022;), ‘ Facilitating team consciousness: Metadesign tools for collective imagining. ’, in J. Wood. (ed.), Metadesigning: Designing in the Anthropocene, London:: Routledge;, pp. 149–59.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Sadowska, N., and Tham, M.. ( 2005;), ‘ Minding the gap: Using artefacts to navigate private, professional and academic selves in design’, in. K. Grillner,, P. Glembrandt, and S.-O. Wallenstein. (eds), Beginnings: Experimental Research in Architecture and Design, Stockholm:: AKAD/AXL Books;, pp. 54–61.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Tham, M.. ( 2020), ‘Beyond pink and blue: Gender in technology’, Zoom seminar delivered at d.school, Stanford University;, Stanford, CA:, 14 May.
13. Tham, M., and Jones, H.. ( 2008;), ‘ Metadesign tools: Designing the seeds for shared processes of change. ’, in Cipolla, C., and Peruccio, P. P.. (eds), Changing the Change: Design, Visions, Proposals and Tools, proceedings, Turin, 10–12 July, pp. 1491–505.
    [Google Scholar]
14. West, M.,, Kraut, R., and Ei Chew, H.. ( 2019), I’d Blush if I Could: Closing the Gender Divides in Digital Skills through Education, UNESCO Report, GEN/2019/EQUALS/1 REV.4, Bonn:: BMZ;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Young, R.,, Cooper, A., and Blair, S.. ( 2001;), ‘ Redesigning design education – the next Bauhaus? A contextual discussion document for a new design praxis. ’, ICSID Conference Exploring Emergent Design Paradigms, Korea, 7–11 October.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Zou, J., and Schiebinger, L.. ( 2018;), ‘ AI can be sexist and racist: It’s time to make it fair. ’, Nature, 18 July, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05707-8. Accessed 21 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jones, Hannah. ( 2022;), ‘ Intersectional Design Cards: Exploring intersecting social and environmental factors across four levels of design. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 15:1, pp. 7–20, https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00025_1
    [Google Scholar]