Languaging designing | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 15, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1753-5190
  • E-ISSN: 1753-5204

Abstract

This article looks at how language can be used in metadesign approaches, processes and tools to foster empathic and considerate design teams. Metadesign places a strong emphasis on language as a tool for designing and communicating. It draws upon my doctoral thesis that considers a range of approaches to co-writing, and our forthcoming book, , which offers a range of perspectives regarding what metadesign teams can and should do to foster change now we have reached this existentially precipitous point in human history. The slow languaging approaches, processes and tools described here are used within my workshops with interdisciplinary teams.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00027_1
2022-01-01
2024-05-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barthes, R.. ( 1977a;), ‘ From work to text. ’, in S., Heath. (trans.), Image – Music – Text, London:: Fontana;, pp. 15564.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barthes, R.. ( 1977b;), ‘ The death of the author. ’, in S., Heath. (trans.), Image – Music – Text, London:: Fontana;, pp. 14248.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, T.. ( 2008;), ‘ Design thinking. ’, Harvard Business Review, June, pp. 110, http://hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinking/ar/1. Accessed 12 September 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Buchanan, R.. ( 1992;), ‘ Wicked problems in design thinking. ’, Design Issues, 8:2, pp. 521, http://www.ics.uci.edu. Accessed 24 October 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cope, B., and Kalantzis, M.. (eds) ( 2000), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Crutzen, P. J., and Stoermer, E. F.. ( 2000;), ‘ The Anthropocene. ’, IGBP Newsletter, vol. 42, Stockholm:: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences;, p. 12.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Crystal, D.. ( 2004), The Stories of English, London:: Penguin;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F.. ( 2013), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, London:: Bloomsbury Academic;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dorst, K.. ( 2011;), ‘ The core of “design thinking” and its application. ’, Design Studies, 32:6, pp. 52132.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dunne, A., and Raby, F.. ( 2013), Speculative Everything: Design Fiction and Social Dreaming, London:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Everett, D.. ( 2012), Language: The Cultural Tool, , paperback ed.., London:: Profile Books Ltd;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fry, T.. ( 2008), Design Futuring: Sustainability, Ethics and New Practice, London:: Berg;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fuller, R. B.. ( [1975] 1997), Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking, London:: Macmillan Publishing;, https://fullerfuture.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/buckminsterfuller-synergetics.pdf, Accessed 21 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Galloway, N., and Rose, H.. ( 2015), Introducing Global Englishes, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gay, N.. ( 2011;), ‘ Open space method: Mind engagement toolkit. ’, Mind.org, https://www.mind.org.uk/media-a/4924/open-space-method.pdf. Accessed 21 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Haraway, D. J.. ( 2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Koestler, A.. ( 1969), The Act of Creation, London:: Hutchinson and Company;.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuhn, T. S.. ( 2000), The Road Since Structure (eds J. Conant, and J. Haugeland.), London:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kurtz, C. F.. ( 2014), Working with Stories in Your Community: Participatory Narrative Inquiry, , 3rd ed.., New York:: Kurtz-Fernhout Publishing;.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M.. ( [1980] 2003), Metaphors We Live By, London:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ‘language’ ( 2022), Oxford English Dictionary, https://www.oed.com/. Accessed 25 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lockheart, J., and Raein, M.. ( 2012;), ‘ No one expects the design inquisition: Searching for a metaphorical solution for thinking, researching and writing through design. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 5:2, pp. 27589.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lockheart, J. M.. ( 2016;), ‘ Doing language together: Collaborative writing practice for design teams in higher education. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Goldsmiths:: University of London, https://research.gold.ac.uk/18524/1/DES_thesis_LockheartJ_2016.pd. Accessed 21 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Maeda, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ Design in tech report 2017. ’, Designintech.report, https://designintech.report/2017/03/11/design-in-tech-report-2017/. Accessed 9 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Maturana, H.. ( 1997), Metadesign, Santiago de Chile:: Instituto de Terapia Cognitiva (INTECO;), https://www.inteco.cl/articulos/006/texto_ing.htm. Accessed 12 October 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Maturana, H., and Varela, F. J.. ( [1987] 1992), The Tree of Knowledge, London:: Shambhala Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nelson, R.. ( 2013), Practice as Research in the Arts: Principles, Protocols, Pedagogies, Resistances, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rintoul, J.. ( 2017), Integrating Critical and Contextual Studies in Art and Design: Possibilities for Post-Compulsory Education, Abingdon and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Robinson, K.. ( 2008;), ‘ Changing paradigms. ’, a talk given at the Royal Society for the Enhancement of the Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA), London:, June.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ryan, P. L.. ( 2009), Three Person Solutions: Creating Sustainable Collaborative Relationships, West Lafayette, IN:: Purdue University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Senge, P. M., and Scharmer, C. O.. ( 2007;), ‘ Community action research: Learning as a community of practitioners, consultants and researchers. ’, in P. Reason, and H. Bradbury. (eds), The Handbook of Action Research, London:: Sage Publishing;, pp. 132.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Skou, N. P.. ( 2019;), ‘ Sign of the times: Slow design in the age of social acceleration. ’, in Z. Hendon, and A. Massey. (eds), Design, History and Time: New Temporalities in a Digital Age, London:: Bloomsbury Visual Arts;, pp. 14356.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Smith, B. D., and Zeder, M. A.. ( 2013;), ‘ The onset of the Anthropocene. ’, Anthropocene, 4, pp. 813.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Swain, M.. ( 2006;), ‘ Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. ’, in H. Byrnes. (ed.), Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, London:: Continuum;, pp. 95108.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tham, M., and Jones, H.. ( 2008;), ‘ Metadesign tools: Designing the seeds for shared processes of change. ’, in C. Cipolla, and P. P. Peruccio. (eds), Changing the Change Proceedings: Design, Visions, Proposals and Tools, 10–12 July, Turin:: Allemandi Conference Press;, pp. 1491505.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Turner, J.. ( 2011), Language in the Academy: Cultural Reflexivity and Intercultural Dynamics, Bristol:: Multilingual Matters;.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Vertovec, S.. ( 2007), New Complexities of Cohesion in Britain: Super-Diversity Transnationalism and Civil-Integration: A Report Commissioned by the Commission on Integration and Cohesion, London:: Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office;, https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/ER-2007-Complexities_Cohesion_Britain_CIC.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Weick, K. E.. ( 1993;), ‘ The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. ’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38:4, pp. 62852, https://rpulrls.ulrls.lon.ac.uk/ebsco-w-a/ehost. Accessed 9 April 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wood, J.. ( 2005;), ‘ The tetrahedron can encourage designers to formalise more responsible strategies. ’, Journal of Art, Design & Communication, 3:3, pp. 17592.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lockheart, Julia. ( 2022;), ‘ Languaging designing. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 15:1, pp. 2739, https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00027_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00027_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00027_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): co-writing; design tools; documentation; ideation; languaging; workshopping
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error