Languaging designing

References

1. Barthes, R.. ( 1977a;), ‘ From work to text. ’, in S., Heath. (trans.), Image – Music – Text, London:: Fontana;, pp. 155–64.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barthes, R.. ( 1977b;), ‘ The death of the author. ’, in S., Heath. (trans.), Image – Music – Text, London:: Fontana;, pp. 142–48.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brown, T.. ( 2008;), ‘ Design thinking. ’, Harvard Business Review, June, pp. 1–10, http://hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinking/ar/1. Accessed 12 September 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Buchanan, R.. ( 1992;), ‘ Wicked problems in design thinking. ’, Design Issues, 8:2, pp. 5–21, http://www.ics.uci.edu. Accessed 24 October 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cope, B., and Kalantzis, M.. (eds) ( 2000), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures, London:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Crutzen, P. J., and Stoermer, E. F.. ( 2000;), ‘ The Anthropocene. ’, IGBP Newsletter, vol. 42, Stockholm:: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences;, p. 12.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Crystal, D.. ( 2004), The Stories of English, London:: Penguin;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F.. ( 2013), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, London:: Bloomsbury Academic;.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dorst, K.. ( 2011;), ‘ The core of “design thinking” and its application. ’, Design Studies, 32:6, pp. 521–32.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dunne, A., and Raby, F.. ( 2013), Speculative Everything: Design Fiction and Social Dreaming, London:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Everett, D.. ( 2012), Language: The Cultural Tool, , paperback ed.., London:: Profile Books Ltd;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fry, T.. ( 2008), Design Futuring: Sustainability, Ethics and New Practice, London:: Berg;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fuller, R. B.. ( [1975] 1997), Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking, London:: Macmillan Publishing;, https://fullerfuture.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/buckminsterfuller-synergetics.pdf, Accessed 21 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Galloway, N., and Rose, H.. ( 2015), Introducing Global Englishes, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gay, N.. ( 2011;), ‘ Open space method: Mind engagement toolkit. ’, Mind.org, https://www.mind.org.uk/media-a/4924/open-space-method.pdf. Accessed 21 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haraway, D. J.. ( 2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Koestler, A.. ( 1969), The Act of Creation, London:: Hutchinson and Company;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kuhn, T. S.. ( 2000), The Road Since Structure (eds J. Conant, and J. Haugeland.), London:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kurtz, C. F.. ( 2014), Working with Stories in Your Community: Participatory Narrative Inquiry, , 3rd ed.., New York:: Kurtz-Fernhout Publishing;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M.. ( [1980] 2003), Metaphors We Live By, London:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
21. ‘language’ ( 2022), Oxford English Dictionary, https://www.oed.com/. Accessed 25 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lockheart, J., and Raein, M.. ( 2012;), ‘ No one expects the design inquisition: Searching for a metaphorical solution for thinking, researching and writing through design. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 5:2, pp. 275–89.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lockheart, J. M.. ( 2016;), ‘ Doing language together: Collaborative writing practice for design teams in higher education. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Goldsmiths:: University of London, https://research.gold.ac.uk/18524/1/DES_thesis_LockheartJ_2016.pd. Accessed 21 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Maeda, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ Design in tech report 2017. ’, Designintech.report, https://designintech.report/2017/03/11/design-in-tech-report-2017/. Accessed 9 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Maturana, H.. ( 1997), Metadesign, Santiago de Chile:: Instituto de Terapia Cognitiva (INTECO;), https://www.inteco.cl/articulos/006/texto_ing.htm. Accessed 12 October 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Maturana, H., and Varela, F. J.. ( [1987] 1992), The Tree of Knowledge, London:: Shambhala Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Nelson, R.. ( 2013), Practice as Research in the Arts: Principles, Protocols, Pedagogies, Resistances, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Rintoul, J.. ( 2017), Integrating Critical and Contextual Studies in Art and Design: Possibilities for Post-Compulsory Education, Abingdon and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Robinson, K.. ( 2008;), ‘ Changing paradigms. ’, a talk given at the Royal Society for the Enhancement of the Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA), London:, June.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ryan, P. L.. ( 2009), Three Person Solutions: Creating Sustainable Collaborative Relationships, West Lafayette, IN:: Purdue University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Senge, P. M., and Scharmer, C. O.. ( 2007;), ‘ Community action research: Learning as a community of practitioners, consultants and researchers. ’, in P. Reason, and H. Bradbury. (eds), The Handbook of Action Research, London:: Sage Publishing;, pp. 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Skou, N. P.. ( 2019;), ‘ Sign of the times: Slow design in the age of social acceleration. ’, in Z. Hendon, and A. Massey. (eds), Design, History and Time: New Temporalities in a Digital Age, London:: Bloomsbury Visual Arts;, pp. 143–56.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Smith, B. D., and Zeder, M. A.. ( 2013;), ‘ The onset of the Anthropocene. ’, Anthropocene, 4, pp. 8–13.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Swain, M.. ( 2006;), ‘ Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. ’, in H. Byrnes. (ed.), Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, London:: Continuum;, pp. 95–108.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Tham, M., and Jones, H.. ( 2008;), ‘ Metadesign tools: Designing the seeds for shared processes of change. ’, in C. Cipolla, and P. P. Peruccio. (eds), Changing the Change Proceedings: Design, Visions, Proposals and Tools, 10–12 July, Turin:: Allemandi Conference Press;, pp. 1491–505.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Turner, J.. ( 2011), Language in the Academy: Cultural Reflexivity and Intercultural Dynamics, Bristol:: Multilingual Matters;.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Vertovec, S.. ( 2007), New Complexities of Cohesion in Britain: Super-Diversity Transnationalism and Civil-Integration: A Report Commissioned by the Commission on Integration and Cohesion, London:: Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office;, https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/ER-2007-Complexities_Cohesion_Britain_CIC.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Weick, K. E.. ( 1993;), ‘ The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. ’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38:4, pp. 628–52, https://rpulrls.ulrls.lon.ac.uk/ebsco-w-a/ehost. Accessed 9 April 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wood, J.. ( 2005;), ‘ The tetrahedron can encourage designers to formalise more responsible strategies. ’, Journal of Art, Design & Communication, 3:3, pp. 175–92.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lockheart, Julia. ( 2022;), ‘ Languaging designing. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 15:1, pp. 27–39, https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00027_1
    [Google Scholar]