Enabling metadesign through an exploration of misinterpretation: Design process verification focusing on the role of objects in the actual production process

References

1. Binder, T.,, Brandt, E.,, Ehn, P., and Halse, J.. ( 2015;), ‘ Democratic design experiments: Between parliament and laboratory. ’, CoDesign, 11:3&4, pp. 152–65, https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081248. Accessed 21 May 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bowker, G. C.,, Timmermans, S.,, Clarke, A. E., and Balka, E.. (eds) ( 2016), Boundary Objects and Beyond: Working with Leigh Star, Cambridge:: The MIT Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brown, V. A.,, Harris, J. A., and Russell, J. Y.. (eds) ( 2010), Tackling Wicked Problems through the Transdisciplinary Imagination, New York:: Earthscan;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dant, T.. ( 2005), Materiality and Society, Maidenhead:: Open University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ehn, P.. ( 2008;), ‘ Participation in design things. ’, in D. Hakken,, J. Simonsen, and T. Robertson. (eds), Participatory Design Conference (PDC), Bloomington, IN, 1–4 October, New York:: ACM Digital Library;, pp. 92–101.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Eriksen, M. A.. ( 2012;), ‘ Material matters in co-designing: Formatting & staging with participating materials in co-design projects, events & situations. ’, doctoral thesis, Malmö:: Malmö University.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Giddens, A.. ( 1990), The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge:: Polity;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Halskov, K., and Hansen, N. B.. ( 2015;), ‘ The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002–2012. ’, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, pp. 81–92.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Harris, R.. ( 1990), Language, Saussure and Wittgenstein: How to Play Games with Words, London and New York:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hormess, M.,, Lawrence, A.,, Schneider, J., and Stickdorn, M.. ( 2018), This Is Service Design Doing, Sebastopol, CA:: O’Reilly Media Inc;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kleinsmann, M., and Valkenburg, R.. ( 2008;), ‘ Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects. ’, Design Studies, 29:4, pp. 369–86.
    [Google Scholar]
12. McKim, R. H.. ( 1972), Experience in Visual Thinking, Monterey, CA:: Brooks and Cole Pub Co;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Redström, J.. ( 2008;), ‘ RE: Definitions of use?. ’, Design Studies, 29:4, pp. 410–23.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Sanders, E. B.-N., and Stappers, P. J.. ( 2008;), ‘ Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. ’, CoDesign, 4:1, pp. 5–18, https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068. Accessed 21 May 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Sennett, R.. ( 2008), The Craftsman, New Haven, CT and London:: Yale University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Star, S. L.. ( 1989;), ‘ The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. ’, in L. Gasser, and M. Huhns. (eds), Distributed Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, San Francisco, CA:: Morgan Kaufman;, pp. 37–54.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Wood, J.. ( 2007;), ‘ Win-win-win-win-win-win: Synergy tools for metadesigners. ’, in Inns, T.. (ed.), Designing for the 21st Century, Interdisciplinary Questions and Insights, Aldershot:: Gower Publishing;, pp. 114–28.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Tomohide, Mizuuchi,, Eizo, Okada, and Daijiro, Mizuno. ( 2022;), ‘ Enabling metadesign through an exploration of misinterpretation: Design process verification focusing on the role of objects in the actual production process. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 15:1, pp. 49–72, https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00029_1
    [Google Scholar]