Skip to content
1981
Volume 17, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1740-8296
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0918

Abstract

The open internet and net neutrality are intertwined. People debate whether net neutrality safeguards part of the open internet or not. The commercial aspect is paramount. Zero rating is one of these practices that is often discussed, especially in relation to developing countries. The open internet regulation addresses commercial practices. It is, however, vague and can be interpreted in multiple ways. To answer the question if zero rating is going against net neutrality or if it enables net neutrality, five case studies were analysed and 18 experts interviewed. To support the case studies, documents were analysed. In certain circumstances, it is useful to zero rate information. Zero rating mostly violates net neutrality and the open internet, because of its imbedded discrimination. Some zero rating offers are beneficial and do not harm competition. This mostly concerns offers evolving around e-learning, health and government information.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00051_1
2021-09-01
2026-04-23

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ACM (The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets) (2014), ‘Besluit van Autoriteit Consument en Markt tot het opleggen van een boete ter zake van overtreding van artikel 7.4a, eerste lid, van de Telecommunicatiewet inzake netneutraliteit’, 18 December, https://www.acm.nl/sites/default/files/old_publication/publicaties/13763_besluit-kpn-netneutraliteit-2015-01-27.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2020.
  2. ACM (The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets) (2015), ‘Fines imposed on Dutch telecom companies KPN and Vodafone for violation of net neutrality regulations’, 27 January, https://www.acm.nl/en/publications/publication/13765/Fines-imposed-on-Dutch-telecom-companies-KPN-and-Vodafone-for-violation-of-net-neutrality-regulations. Accessed 20 April 2020.
  3. Alan, F. (2016), ‘T-Mobile ordered to stop offering its data free music streaming service in the Netherlands’, Phone Arena, 24 December, https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-ordered-to-stop-offering-its-data-free-music-streaming-service-in-the-netherlands_id89378. Accessed 25 April 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnold, R., Waldburger, M., Morasch, B., Schmid, F. and Schneider, A. (2015), ‘The value of network neutrality to European consumers’, 26th European Regional International Telecommunications Society (ITS) Conference, Madrid, Spain, 24–27 June, Calgary: International Telecommunications Society (ITS), pp. 1–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Barratt, M. (2003), ‘Organizational support for evidence-based practice within child and family social work: A collaborative study’, Child & Family Social Work, 8:2, pp. 143–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Belli, L. (2016), ‘Net neutrality, zero rating and the minitelisation of the internet’, Journal of Cyber Policy, 2:1, pp. 1–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BEREC (2016), ‘BEREC guidelines on the implementation by national regulators of European net neutrality rules (BoR (16) 127)’, 30 August, https://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/regulatory_best_practices/guidelines/6160-berec-guidelines-on-the-implementation-by-national-regulators-of-european-net-neutrality-rules. Accessed 20 February 2020.
  8. BEREC (2019), ‘Draft BEREC guidelines on the implementation of the open internet regulation (BoR (19) 179)’, 3 October, https://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/regulatory_best_practices/guidelines/8850-draft-berec-guidelines-on-the-implementation-of-the-open-internet-regulation. Accessed 20 February 2020.
  9. Björksten, G., Chima, R. J. S. and Massé, E. (2016), ‘Zero rating: A global threat to the open internet’, in L. Belli (ed.), Net Neutrality Reloaded: Zero Rating, Specialized Service, Ad Blocking and Traffic Management, Rio de Janeiro: FGV Direito Rio, pp. 106–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Blevins, J. and Shade, L. (2010), ‘Editorial: International perspectives on network neutrality: Exploring the politics of internet traffic management and policy implications for Canada and the U.S.’, Global Media Journal, 3:1, pp. 1–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bourreau, M., Kourandi, F. and Valletti, T. (2015), ‘Net neutrality with competing internet platforms’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 63:1, pp. 30–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brake, D. (2016), ‘Mobile zero rating: The economics and innovation behind free data’, in L. Belli (ed.), Net Neutrality Reloaded: Zero Rating, Specialised Service, Ad Blocking and Traffic Management, Rio de Janeiro: FGV Direito Rio, pp. 132–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bundesnetzagentur (2017), ‘Bundesnetzagentur sichert Netzneutralität – Teilaspekte van „StreamOn“ werden untersagt’, press release, Bundesnetzagentur, 15 December, https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/DE/2017/15122017_StreamOn.html. Accessed 25 May 2020.
  14. Bundesnetzagentur (2018), ‘Netzneutralität in Deutschland. Jahresbericht 2017/2018’, Bundesnetzagentur, https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Netzneutralitaet/Netzneutralitaet_Jahresbericht%202017_2018.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4. Accessed 25 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Busvine, D. and Merriman, J. (2019), ‘Deutsche Telekom loses lawsuit over all-you-can-watch video product’, Reuters, 15 July, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-deutsche-telekom-regulator-idUSKCN1UA188. Accessed 25 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Candeub, A. and McCartney, D. (2012), ‘Law and the open internet’, Federal Communications Law Journal, 64:3, pp. 492–548.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Carrillo, A. J. (2016), ‘Having your cake and eating it too? Zero rating, net neutrality, and international law’, Stanford Technology Law Review, 19, pp. 364–429.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Cerf, V. (2009), ‘The open internet’, Telecommunications Journal of Australia, 59:2, pp. 18–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Choi, J. P. and Kim, B. C. (2010), ‘Net neutrality and investment incentives’, The RAND Journal of Economics, 41:3, pp. 446–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Coldewey, D. (2017a), ‘FCC voices “serious concerns” over AT&T’s zero-rating scheme’, Tech Crunch, 12 January, https://techcrunch.com/2017/01/11/fcc-voices-serious-concerns-over-atts-zero-rating-scheme/?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAIq2vKSLYYNRMvV4UuD4VmlDGo1qKXB96nAI3y2notIKU26mDqOwXRqWgOxcb0RQZvCHR4JEO99qrNqlgONAXAdoVc6q4iabGFL6A8MRHoBTLs0sdbwm9mvOoL08wJ7l40kvD13k003fovZiaVF3BX63OO1Tqr7HSmqHrc5BXmmu. Accessed 5 June 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Coldewey, D. (2017b), ‘Wtf is zero rating?’, TechCrunch, 16 April, https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/16/wtf-is-zero-rating/. Accessed 5 June 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Conradi, M. (2017), ‘Zero-rating and net neutrality: Decisions (so far) in the EU’, Technology Licenses & Transactions, Telecoms, Technology’s Legal Edge, 26 July, https://www.technologyslegaledge.com/2017/07/zero-rating-and-net-neutrality-decisions-so-far-in-the-eu/. Accessed 25 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Cooper, A. and Brown, I. (2015), ‘Net neutrality: Discrimination, competition, and innovation in the UK and US’, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 15:1, pp. 1–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Council of Europe (1950), European Convention on Human Rights, 3 September, Rome: Council of Europe.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Cowhey, P. F., Aronson, J. D. and Abelson, D. (2009), Transforming Global Information and Communication Markets: The Political Economy of Innovation, London: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. d’Aspremont, C., Gabszewicz, J. J. and Thisse, J. F. (1979), ‘On hotelling’s stability in competition’, Econometrica, 47:5, pp. 1145–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Dent, S. (2017), ‘FCC: Verizon and AT&T “zero-rating” perks harm consumers’, Engadget, 12 January, https://www.engadget.com/2017-01-12-fcc-verizon-and-atandt-zero-rating-perks-harm-consumers.html. Accessed 5 June 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Eisenach, J. A. (2016), ‘The economics of zero rating’, in L. Belli (ed.), Net Neutrality Reloaded: Zero Rating, Specialised Service, Ad Blocking and Traffic Management, Rio de Janeiro: FGV Direito Rio, pp. 117–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. European Commission (2015), ‘Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the european parliament and of the council of 25 November 2015 laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union [Regulation 2015/2120]’, European Commission, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2015.310.01.0001.01.ENG. Accessed 25 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. FCC (2015), ‘FCC releases open internet report and order on remand, declaratory ruling, and order’, FCC, Washington, DC, 12 March, https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-releases-open-internet-order. Accessed 5 June 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. FCC (2016), ‘Letter regarding AT&T’s sponsored data program’, FCC, 9 November, https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjKv437_u_1AhVMyaQKHWOwC5oQFnoECBEQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.arstechnica.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F11%2FLetter-to-R-Quinn-11-9-2016.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2aUIsiVHMioTd25wGoHcqW. Accessed 5 June 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. FCC (2017), ‘Restoring internet freedom order’, FCC, 5 January, https://www.fcc.gov/fcc-releases-restoring-internet-freedom-order. Accessed 5 June 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Frankston, B. (2018), ‘From net neutrality to seizing opportunity’, IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 7:6, pp. 55–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Fung, B. (2017), ‘AT&T may be violating net neutrality with this program, the FCC says’, The Washington Post, 11 January, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/01/11/atts-sponsored-data-program-may-violate-net-neutrality-the-fcc-says/. Accessed 5 June 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Futter, A. and Gillwald, A. (2015), Zero-Rated Internet Services: What Is to Be Done?, South Africa: Research ICT Africa, September, https://www.researchictafrica.net/docs/Facebook%20zerorating%20Final_Web.pd. Accessed 10 October 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Garrett, T., Setenareski, L. E., Peres, L. M., Bona, L. C. and Duarte, E. P. (2018), ‘Monitoring network neutrality: A survey on traffic differentiation detection’, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20:3, pp. 2486–517.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Gautier, A. and Somogyi, R. (2020), ‘Prioritization vs zero-rating: Discrimination on the internet’, International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2020.102662. Accessed 10 October 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Gebhart, G. (2016), ‘Zero-rating in emerging mobile markets: Free basics and Wikipedia zero in Ghana’, ICTD ’16 Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, Ann Arbour, MI, 3–6 June, New York: ACM Digital Library.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Gillwald, A., Chair, C., Futter, A., Koranteng, K., Odufuwa, F. and Walubengo, J. (2016), ‘Much ado about nothing? Zero-rating in the African context’, IDRC CRDI Department for International Development, 12 September, https://researchictafrica.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/2016_RIA_Zero-Rating_Policy_Paper_-_Much_ado_about_nothing.pdf. Accessed 25 October 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Glowniak, J. (1998), ‘History, structure, and function of the internet’, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 28:2, pp. 135–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Goodman, E. P. (2016), ‘Zero-rating broadband data: Equality and free speech at the network’s other edge’, Colorado Technology Law Journal, 15, pp. 63–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Greenstein, S., Peitz, M. and Valletti, T. (2016), ‘Net neutrality: A fast lane to understanding the trade-offs’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30:2, pp. 127–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Guo, H., Cheng, H. K. and Bandyopadhyay, S. (2013), ‘Broadband network management and the net neutrality debate’, Production and Operations Management, 22:5, pp. 1287–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Gürkaynak, G., Özgün, İ. and Bakanoğulları, U. (2018), ‘Competing bits: Net neutrality, zero-rating and competition law’, in G. Gürkaynak (ed.), The Academic Gift Book of ELIG, Attorneys-at-Law in Honor of the 20th Anniversary of Competition Law Practice in Turkey, Istanbul: Legal Yayıncılık A.Ş, pp. 29–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Handford, R. (2015), ‘Dutch regulator fines KPN, Vodafone over net neutrality breaches’, Mobile World Live, 27 January, https://www.mobileworldlive.com/featured-content/home-banner/dutch-regulator-fines-kpn-vodafone-net-neutrality-breaches/. Accessed 25 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Hawk, T. (2018), ‘Wij zetten de strijd tegen zero rating door bij de rechter’, Bits of Freedom, 17 May, https://www.bitsoffreedom.nl/2018/05/17/wij-zetten-de-strijd-tegen-zero-rating-door-bij-de-rechter/. Accessed 25 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Hijink, M. (2016), ‘“Datavrije muziek” T-Mobile is tegen de regels’, NRC, 10 October.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Hogendorn, C. (2005), ‘Regulating vertical integration in broadband: Open access versus common carriage’, Review of Network Economics, 4:1, pp. 19–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Hotelling, H. (1929), ‘Stability in competition’, The Economic Journal, 39:153, pp. 41–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Howell, B. and Layton, R. (2019), ‘Strategic use of zero-rating of mobile data’, in B. Orlando (ed.), Strategy and Behaviors in the Digital Economy, London: IntechOpen.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Inceoglu, F. and Liu, X. (2019), ‘Multiproduct price discrimination with quantity limits: An application to zero-rating’, Economics Letters, 180, pp. 41–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Jain, R. (1996), ‘Congestion control and traffic management in ATM networks: Recent advances and a survey’, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 28:13, pp. 1723–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Jeitschko, T. D., Kim, S. J. and Yankelevich, A. (2020), ‘Zero-rating and vertical content foreclosure’, Information Economics and Policy, 55, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFOECOPOL.2020.100899. Accessed 25 October 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Jordan, S. (2017), ‘Evaluating zero-rating and associated throttling practices under the open internet order’, Journal of Information Policy, 7, pp. 450–507.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Jullien, B. and Sand-Zantman, W. (2018), ‘Internet regulation, two-sided pricing, and sponsored data’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 58, pp. 31–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Knieps, G. (2011), ‘Network neutrality and the evolution of the internet’, International Journal of Management and Network Economics, 2:1, pp. 24–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Krämer, J. and Peitz, M. (2018), ‘A fresh look at zero-rating’, Telecommunications Policy, 42:7, pp. 501–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Kreiken, F. (2015), ‘Two Dutch telcos fined for net neutrality violations’, Bits of Freedom, 12 February, https://www.bitsoffreedom.nl/2015/02/12/two-dutch-telcos-fined-for-net-neutrality-violations/. Accessed 2 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Krieger, J. (2018), ‘Court confirms: Deutsche Telekom’s zero-rating service violates law’, Broadband TV News, 20 November, https://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2018/11/20/court-confirms-deutsche-telekoms-zero-rating-service-violates-law/. Accessed 25 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Krieger, J. (2019), ‘Court: Deutsche Telekom must change zero-rating service’, Broadband TV News, 15 July, https://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2019/07/15/court-deutsche-telekom-must-change-zero-rating-service/. Accessed 26 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Krivokapic, D. and Minovic, A. (2019), ‘Regulatory challenges of zero-rating’, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 80, pp. 837–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Layton, R. and Elaluf-Calderwood, S. (2015), ‘Zero rating: Do hard rules protect or harm consumers and competition? Evidence from Chile, Netherlands and Slovenia’, TPRC 43 – Research Conference on Communications, Information, and Internet Policy, Arlington, VA, 15 August, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2587542. Accessed 24 December 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Layton, R. and Elaluf-Calderwood, S. (2016), ‘Free basics research paper: Zero rating, free data, and use cases in mhealth, local content and service development, and ICT4D policymaking’, TPRC 44: The 44th Research Conference on Communications, Information and Internet Policy, George Mason University, Arlington, VA, 27 September, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2757384. Accessed 24 December 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Lemley, M. A. and Lessig, L. (2000), ‘The end of end-to-end: Preserving the architecture of the internet in the broadband era’, Ucla Law Review, 48, pp. 925–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Litan, R. E. and Singer, H. J. (2006), ‘Unintended consequences of net neutrality regulation’, Journal on Telecommunication & High Technology Law, 5, https://ssrn.com/abstract=942043. Accessed 25 February 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Lodder, N. (2019), ‘Prejudiciële vragen over uitleg netneutraliteit: Zero rating toegestaan?’, Solv., 11 April, https://solv.nl/blog/prejudiciele-vragen-over-uitleg-netneutraliteit-zero-rating-toegestaan/. Accessed 4 June 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Loods, K. (2016), ‘T-Mobile zal recht van klanten bepleiten voor de rechter’, T-Mobile, 11 October, https://newsroom.t-mobile.nl/t-mobile-zal-recht-van-klanten-bepleiten-voor-de-rechter. Accessed 25 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Ma, R. T. and Misra, V. (2013), ‘The public option: A nonregulatory alternative to network neutrality’, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 21:6, pp. 1866–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Magyar Nemzet (2017), ‘NMHH: Telenor violated net neutrality’, Magyar Nemzet, 27 January, https://magyarnemzet.hu/gazdasag-archivum/2017/01/nmhh-a-telenor-megsertette-a-halozatsemlegesseget. Accessed 2 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Maillé, P., Simon, G. and Tuffin, B. (2016), ‘Toward a net neutrality debate that conforms to the 2010s’, IEEE Communications Magazine, 54:3, pp. 94–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Marcus, J. S., Nooren, P., Cave, J. and Carter, K. R. (2011), Network Neutrality: Challenges and Reponses in the EU and the U.S., Brussels, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2011/457369/IPOL-IMCO_ET%282011%29457369_EN.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Marini-Balestra, F. and Tremolada, R. (2015), ‘The EU debate on net neutrality: What about zero-rating?’, Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 21:5, pp. 115–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Marsden, C. T. (2013), ‘Network neutrality: A research guide’, in I. Brown (ed.), Research Handbook on Governance of the Internet, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 419–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Marsden, C. T. (2016a), ‘Better regulation of net neutrality: A critical analysis of zero rating implementation in India, the United States and the European Union’, in L. Belli (ed.), Net Neutrality Reloaded: Zero Rating, Specialised Service, Ad Blocking and Traffic Management, Rio de Janeiro: FGV Direito Rio, pp. 52–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Marsden, C. T. (2016b), ‘Comparative case studies in implementing net neutrality: A critical analysis of zero rating’, SCRIPTed, 13:1, https://script-ed.org/article/comparative-case-studies-in-implementing-net-neutrality-a-critical-analysis-of-zero-rating/. Accessed 20 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Meinrath, S. and Pickard, V. (2008), ‘Transcending net neutrality: Ten steps toward an open internet’, Education Week Commentary, 12:6, pp. 11–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Meyer, D. (2017), ‘Net neutrality: Key zero rating decision made by Germany’, ZDNet, 10 October, https://www.zdnet.com/article/net-neutrality-key-zero-rating-decision-made-by-germany/. Accessed 25 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Neuhetzki, T. (2020), ‘Telekom StreamOn: Das bietet die kostenlose Daten-Flatrate’, Inside Digital, 2 May, https://www.inside-digital.de/ratgeber/telekom-streamon-daten-flatrate-video-whatsapp. Accessed 26 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. NMHH (2017), ‘Újabb döntés a megkülönböztetéstől mentes Internetezésért’, Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság, 27 January.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Nooren P. (2017), ‘To binge or not to binge: Net neutrality and video distribution in Europe and the US-key’, in TVX-in-Industry paper, ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for Television and Online Video, Hilversum, The Netherlands, 14–16 June, pp. 1–4.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. OECD (2019), ‘The effects of zero rating’, OECD Digital Economy Papers, no. 285, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/6eefc666-en. Accessed 15 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Pieters, J. (2017), ‘T-Mobile can continue data-free music streaming service: Court’, NL Times, 21 April, https://nltimes.nl/2017/04/21/t-mobile-can-continue-data-free-music-streaming-service-court. Accessed 2 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Preiskel, D. (2018), ‘EU net neutrality court decision on Deutsche Telekom’s zero-rated StreamOn’, Preiskel & Co., 29 November, https://www.preiskel.com/eu-net-neutrality-court-decision-on-deutsche-telekoms-zero-rated-streamon/. Accessed 26 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Pressman, A. (2017), ‘T-mobile gets Dutch court’s okay of free data for music streaming’, Fortune, 24 April, https://fortune.com/2017/04/24/t-mobile-dutch-net-neutrality-ruling/. Accessed 28 April 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Preta, A. and Peng, P. (2015), ‘Discrimination and neutrality on the internet: The zero rating case’, https://www.academia.edu/24293750/Discrimination_and_Neutrality_on_the_internet_the_Zero_Rating_Case. Accessed 10 January 2020.
  86. Rechtbank Rotterdam (2017), ‘ECLI:NL:RBROT:2017:2940’, Rechtbank Rotterdam, 20 April, https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBROT:2017:2940. Accessed 25 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Rewheel (2015), ‘In the Netherlands, where zero-rating is banned, KPN just doubled (free of charge) the mobile internet volume caps to encourage a carefree usage of its online videos’, Rewheel, 6 February, https://research.rewheel.fi/insights/2015_feb_kpn_volume_caps/. Accessed 28 April 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Rowley, J. (2002), ‘Using case studies in research’, Management Research News, 25:1, pp. 16–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Schuett, F. (2010), ‘Network neutrality: A survey of the economic literature’, Review of Network Economics, 9:2, https://doi.org/10.2202/1446-9022.1224. Accessed 10 February 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Sickinghe, F. and Steenbruggen, W. (2015), ‘Netneutraliteit: ACM beboet KPN en Vodafone; zero-rating in Europa’, BirdBuzz, 5 February, https://birdbuzz.nl/sectoren/technology-communications/netneutraliteit-acm-beboet-kpn-en-vodafone-zero-rating-in-europa/#page=1. Accessed 25 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Sluijs, J. P. (2012), ‘From competition to freedom of expression: Introducing Article 10 ECHR in the European network neutrality debate’, Human Rights Law Review, 12:3, pp. 509–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Stallman, E. and Adams, R. S. (2016), ‘Zero rating: A framework for assessing benefits and harms’, Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT), 13 January, https://cdt.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/CDT-Zero-Rating_Benefits-Harms5_1.pdf. Accessed 9 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Szabó, A. (2020), ‘Ki befolyásolhatja, hogy mi jut el a felhasználókhoz a neten? A hálózatsemlegesség aktuális kérdéseiről’, Mérce, 11 January, https://merce.hu/2020/01/11/ki-befolyasolhatja-hogy-mi-jut-el-a-felhasznalokhoz-a-neten/. Accessed 2 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Taylor, L. (2016), ‘From zero to hero: How zero-rating became a debate about human rights’, IEEE Internet Computing, 20:4, pp. 79–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Telecommunicatiewet, artikel 7.4a lid 2 & 3 (2017), ‘Telecommunicatiewet’, 10 March, https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0009950/2017-03-10#Hoofdstuk7_Artikel7.4a. Accessed 20 May 2020.
  96. Telenor Magyarország Zrt. v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság Elnöke (2020a), ‘Conclusie van advocaat-generaal M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona van 4 maart 2020. Cases C-807/18 and C-39/19’, European Commission, 4 March, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62018CC0807&qid=1644322950899. Accessed 2 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Telenor Magyarország Zrt. v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság (2020b), ‘Judgement of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 September 2020. Cases C-807/18 and C-39/19’, European Commission, 15 September, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62018CJ0807. Accessed 5 October 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. United Nations (1948), ‘Universal declaration of human rights’, United Nations, 10 December, https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights. Accessed 5 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. van Assema, P., Mesters, I. and Kok, G. (1992), ‘Het focusgroep-interview: Een stappenplan’, TSG (Dutch Journal of Health Sciences), 70:7, pp. 431–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. van Miltenburg, O. (2016), ‘ACM eist dat T-Mobile stopt met “Datavrije Muziek”’, Tweakers, 23 December, https://tweakers.net/nieuws/119363/acm-eist-dat-t-mobile-stopt-met-datavrije-muziek.html. Accessed 2 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. van Schewick, B. (2006), ‘Towards an economic framework for network neutrality regulation’, Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, 5, pp. 329–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. van Schewick, B. (2015), ‘Network neutrality and zero-rating’, Attachment to Barbara van Schewick’s Ex Parte in the Matter of Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet Submitted February, 19:2015, pp. 14–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. van Schewick, B. (2016), T-Mobile’s Binge On Violates Key Net Neutrality Principles, CIS, 29 January, http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2016/01/t-mobiles-binge-violates-key-net-neutrality-principles. Accessed 25 October 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Vaughan-Nicols, S. J. (2019), ‘Zero rating: Another way of poisoning net neutrality’, ZDNet, 7 February, https://www.zdnet.com/article/zero-rating-another-way-of-poisoning-net-neutrality/. Accessed 25 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Waterman, R. G. (2020), ‘Opinion of the Advocate General of the Court of Justice on net neutrality and zero-rating’, Bird & Bird, March, https://www.twobirds.com/en/news/articles/2020/netherlands/opinion-of-the-advocate-general-of-the-court-of-justice-on-net-neutrality-and-zero-rating. Accessed 28 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Weisman, D. L. and Kulick, R. B. (2010), ‘Price discrimination, two-sided markets, and net neutrality regulation’, Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 13, pp. 81–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Wokke, A. (2017), ‘T-Mobile mag van rechter muziekstreaming buiten databundel laten Vallen’, Tweakers, 20 April, https://tweakers.net/nieuws/123801/t-mobile-mag-van-rechter-muziekstreaming-buiten-databundel-laten-vallen.html. Accessed 28 April 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Wokke, A. (2018), ‘Nederlandse Tweede Kamer haalt verbod op zero-rating uit Telecommunicatiewet’, Tweakers, 12 April, https://tweakers.net/nieuws/137337/nederlandse-tweede-kamer-haalt-verbod-op-zero-rating-uit-telecommunicatiewet.html. Accessed 28 April 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Wu, T. (2003), ‘Network neutrality, broadband discrimination’, Journal on Telecommunication & High Technology Law, 2, pp. 141–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Ziewitz, M. and Brown, I. (2013), ‘A prehistory of internet governance’, in I. Brown (ed.), Research Handbook on Governance of the Internet, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 3–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Zeit Online (2019), ‘Telekom muss ihre Stream-On-Tarife ändern’, Zeit Online, 15 July, https://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/2019-07/telekom-streamon-gerichtsentscheidung-tarife-angebot-aenderung?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F. Accessed 5 June 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Aerssens, Janneke, Donders, Karen and Trappel, Josef (2021), ‘Is zero rating the end of net neutrality and the open internet? An analysis of business practices and policy approaches’, International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 17:3, pp. 239–61, https://doi.org/10.1386/macp_00051_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00051_1
Loading
Is zero rating the end of net neutrality and the open internet? An analysis of business practices and policy approaches
International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics 17, 239 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/macp_00051_1
/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00051_1
/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00051_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): competition; internet service providers; net neutrality; open internet; zero rating

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test