Cruelty and democracy: Understanding Lippmann’s gambit | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics
  4. Volume 18, Issue 2
  5. Article
Walter Lippmann’s Public Opinion at 100
  • ISSN: 1740-8296
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0918

Abstract

A paradox haunts Lippmann’s critique of democracy running through his early work in up through . Liberal democracies, despite their claim to securing space for human dignity and freedom, can be sites of incredible cruelty. From the racial prejudices cutting through American politics, to the way Americans treated adversaries during war, democracy appeared to do little to vitiate the human propensity to inflict suffering upon others. This article examines Lippmann’s understanding of cruelty as a recurring feature of democracy and how he grappled with the question of how to curb the democratic public’s worst impulses. I argue that while Lippmann offers an expansive understanding of cruelty his analysis continually gravitates towards the role of cruelty in democracy and how the existence of mobs and demagogues represent democracy’s ever-latent potential for cruelty. Exploring his thinking further, I suggest there are at least two distinct views on the origins and dynamics of cruelty in his work – what I designate ‘callous’ and ‘joyful’ cruelty – influenced by James and Freud respectively. Finally, I contend that recognizing the gravity Lippmann assigns to the problem of cruelty is important because it can help us understand his puzzling turn to natural law in . Here I suggest Lippmann’s turn to natural law should be read as a radical pragmatist gambit in which the myth of natural law is mobilized to create a ‘tradition of civility’ aimed at curbing democratic cruelty. When we attend to this side of Lippmann we see a version of him that is less a conservative reactionary and more an anxious critic desperate to ward off the darker impulses of democracy.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00063_1
2023-05-16
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ansell, C.. ( 2016;), ‘ Pragmatist interpretivism. ’, in M. Bevir. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 86–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Augsten, P.,, Glassner, S., and Rall, J.. ( 2022;), ‘ The myth of responsibility: Colonial cruelties and silence in German political discourse. ’, Global Studies Quarterly, 2:2, pp. 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Austin, J. L.. ( 2022;), ‘ Seeing all evil: The global cruelty of digital visibility. ’, Global Studies Quarterly, 2:2, pp. 1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bashovski, M.. ( 2022;), ‘ Everyday cruelties: Political economies of migration and indifference. ’, Global Studies Quarterly, 2:2, pp. 1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Blum, J. M.. (ed.) ( 1985;), ‘ Introduction: Walter Lippmann and the problem of order. ’, Public Philosopher: Selected Letters of Walter Lippmann, New York:: Ticknor & Fields;, pp. xi–li.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bottom, W. P., and Kong, D. T.. ( 2012;), ‘ The casual cruelty of our prejudices: On Walter Lippmann’s theory of stereotype and its “obliteration” in psychology and social science. ’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 48:4, pp. 363–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Carey, J. W.. ( 2009), Communication as Culture, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Collins, R.. ( 1974;), ‘ Three faces of cruelty: Towards a comparative sociology of violence. ’, Theory and Society, 1:4, pp. 415–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Diggins, J. P.. ( 1991;), ‘ From pragmatism to natural law: Walter Lippmann’s quest for the foundations of legitimacy. ’, Political Theory, 19:4, pp. 519–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Duff, A. S.. ( 2013;), ‘ Pundit for post-industrial times? Walter Lippmann as an information society theorist. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 16:6, pp. 967–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Farias, D. B. L.,, Casarões, G., and Magalhães, D.. ( 2022;), ‘ Radical right populism and the politics of cruelty: The case of COVID-19 in Brazil under President Bolsonaro. ’, Global Studies Quarterly, 2:2, pp. 1–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Gannon, K.. ( 2021;), ‘ US left Afghan airfield at night, didn’t tell new commander. ’, AP News, 6 July, https://apnews.com/article/bagram-afghanistan-airfield-us-troops-f3614828364f567593251aaaa167e623. Accessed 8 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Goetze, C.. ( 2022;), ‘ When the state shatters families: The US family separation policy of 2018, cruelty and patrimonial sovereignty. ’, Global Studies Quarterly, 2:2, pp. 1–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Goffman, E.. ( 1974), Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, Boston, MA:: North Eastern University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin, J.. ( 2014;), ‘ Walter Lippmann, the indispensable opposition. ’, in B. Jackson, and G. Clark. (eds), Trained Capacities: John Dewey, Rhetoric, and Democratic Practice, Columbia, SC:: University of South Carolina Press;, pp. 142–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Handlin, O.. ( 1955;), ‘ Does the people’s rule doom democracy? Walter Lippmann’s diagnosis of western decline. ’, Commentary, 1 January, pp. 1–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. James, W.. ( 1890), The Principles of Psychology, New York:: Henry Holt and Company;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Jansen, S. C.. ( 2009;), ‘ Phantom conflict: Lippmann, Dewey, and the fate of the public in modern society. ’, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 6:3, pp. 221–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Jansen, S. C.. ( 2012), Walter Lippmann: A Critical Introduction to Media and Communication Theory, New York:: Peter Lang;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Joas, H.. ( 1993), Pragmatism and Social Theory, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Lang, R. D.. ( 1956;), ‘ Review of the public philosophy by Walter Lippmann. ’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 23:2, pp. 366–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Lans, A.. ( 1955;), ‘ Review of essays in the public philosophy by Walter Lippmann. ’, The American Scholar, 24:3, pp. 352, 354, 356.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Lippmann, W.. ( 1913), A Preface to Politics, New York:: Mitchell Kennerley;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Lippmann, W.. ( 1915), The Stakes of Diplomacy, New York:: Henry Holt and Company;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lippmann, W.. ( 1922;), ‘ The abuse of tests. ’, The New Republic, 15 November, pp. 297–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lippmann, W.. ( 1927;), ‘ The south and the new society. ’, Social Forces, 6:1, pp. 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lippmann, W.. ( 1929), A Preface to Morals, New York:: The Macmillan Company;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lippmann, W.. ( 1932), Interpretations: 1931–1932, New York:: The MacMillan Company;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lippmann, W.. ( 1938), The Good Society, Boston, MA:: Little, Brown & Company;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Lippmann, W.. ( 1941a;), ‘ Education vs. western civilization. ’, The American Scholar, 10:2, pp. 184–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lippmann, W.. ( 1941b;), ‘ Ice-cold evil. ’, The Washington Post, 30 October, p. 13.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Lippmann, W.. ( 1945;), ‘ Plausible nonsense. ’, Washington Post, 6 December, p. 10.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Lippmann, W.. ( 1954;), ‘ The charge of treason. ’, Washington Post, 16 February, p. 13.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lippmann, W.. ( 1955), Essays in the Public Philosophy, New York:: Mentor Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Lippmann, W.. ( 1967;), ‘ “Limited war” with “unlimited aims”. ’, Newsweek, 16 July, pp. 16–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Lippmann, W.. ( [1928] 1993), American Inquisitors, New Brunswick, NJ:: Transaction Publishers;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Lippmann, W.. ( [1922] 2010), Public Opinion, Middletown, DE:: Feather Trail Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Niebuhr, R.. ( 1955;), ‘ A matter of popular will: Essays in the public philosophy. ’, New York Times, 20 February, pp. 3, 18.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Nielsen, R. K.. ( 2017;), ‘ The one thing journalism just might do for democracy: Counterfactual idealism, liberalis optimism, democratic realism. ’, Journalism Studies, 18:10, pp. 1251–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Schudson, M.. ( 2008;), ‘ The “Lippmann-Dewey debate” and the invention of Walter Lippmann as an anti-democrat 1986–1996. ’, International Journal of Communication, 2, pp. 1031–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Schuett, R.. ( 2010), Political Realism, Freud, and Human Nature in International Relations: The Resurrection of Realist Man, New York:: Palgrave MacMillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Serwer, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ The cruelty is the point. ’, The Atlantic, 3 October, https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/the-cruelty-is-the-point/572104/. Accessed 8 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Seyb, R. P.. ( 2022;), ‘ The journalist and the manipulator: Walter Lippmann, Karl Mannheim, and the case for a “new objectivity” to check demagoguery. ’, American Journalism, 39:2, pp. 196–221.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Sorel, G.. ( 1999), Reflections on Violence, New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Steel, R.. ( 1980), Walter Lippmann and the American Century, Boston, MA:: Little, Brown & Company;.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Steele, B. J.. ( 2021;), ‘ “The cruelty of righteous people”: Niebuhr on the urgency of cruelty. ’, Journal of International Political Theory, 17:2, pp. 203–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Van Rythoven, E.. ( 2021;), ‘ Walter Lippmann, emotion, and the history of international theory. ’, International Theory, 14:3, pp. 526–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Watkins, F. M.. ( 1956;), ‘ Review of essays in the public philosophy by Walter Lippmann. ’, American Political Science Review, 50:1, pp. 212–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Williams, M. C.. ( 2018;), ‘ International relations in the age of the image. ’, International Studies Quarterly, 62:4, pp. 880–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. World Food Programme ( 2021;), ‘ Afghanistan emergency. ’, World Food Programme, https://www.wfp.org/emergencies/afghanistan-emergency. Accessed 8 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Van Rythoven, Eric. ( 2022;), ‘ Cruelty and democracy: Understanding Lippmann’s gambit. ’, International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, Special Issue: ‘Walter Lippmann’s Public Opinion at 100’, 18:2&3, pp. 125–40, https://doi.org/10.1386/macp_00063_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00063_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): callous; cruelty; joyful; natural law; realism; Sigmund Freud; Walter Lippmann; William James

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error