Skip to content
1981
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1740-8296
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0918

Abstract

This study examines marginalized communities in postcolonial states, in particular transgender people, and attempts to understand the tension between globalized or transnational ‘queer’ language and local vernacular ‘Indigenous’ language. Drawing upon postcolonial concepts of appropriation and abrogation – typically only limited to the ‘literary studies’ tradition – this article analyses how colonial aesthetics are articulated and rejected on social media by multilingual transgender activists in the Pakistani context. By using the case study of the Indigenous – Pakistan’s transgender community – we analyse 600 social media posts from public Instagram accounts of four activists including Mehrub Moiz Awan, Shahzadi Rai, Hina Baloch and Nayyab Ali. Using a multimodal critical discourse analysis combined with the theoretical framework of postcolonial appropriation and abrogation, we find that activists deploy innovative linguistic and textual strategies such as code-switching, codemixing, metonymy, interlanguage and neologisms to negotiate their hybrid identities. We argue that contestation between ‘the global’ and ‘the vernacular’ is manifested through code-switching from one language to the other or between formal and informal registers, creating culture-specific neologisms or lexical items, colloquialisms, metaphors and slang. Through deploying visual modality, iconic global symbols, ‘trans’ colours, emojis and clothing artefacts, khwajasiras create new meanings on social media. Lastly, this study critically shows that transgender activists challenge and co-opt normative conventions as they draw on the past, Indigenous knowledge(s), spirituality, religious terminologies and historical allusions in their linguistic repertories to resist and dismantle dominant power relations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00092_1
2025-02-07
2025-05-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mcp/20/1/mcp.20.1.91_Ali.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00092_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abidin, C. (2016), ‘Visibility labour: Engaging with influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram’, Media International Australia, 161:1, pp. 86100, https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X16665177.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed, Z. S. and Karim, U. (2024), ‘Saudi Arabia’s soft power in Pakistan’, Journal of Political Power, 17:1, pp. 4264, https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2024.2341024.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alang, S., Fomotar, M. (2015), ‘Postpartum depression in an online community of lesbian mothers: Implications for clinical practice’, Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 19, pp. 2139, https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2014.910853.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali, Nayyab (@nayyabalipk) (2022), Instagram, 23 September, https://www.instagram.com/p/Ci2r4AgIFxt/. Accessed 21 January 2025.
  5. Awan, Mehrub @unrelentlesslyyours (2023), Instagram, 13 March, https://www.instagram.com/p/CpvJYezpzxZ. Accessed 20 December 2024.
  6. Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G. and Tiffin, H. (1989), The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-colonial Literatures, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G. and Tiffin, H. (2002), The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-colonial Literatures, 2nd ed., London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Baloch, Hina (@surkhina) (2023), Instagram, 10 March, https://www.instagram.com/p/CpnpcTeKP95/. Accessed 20 December 2024.
  9. Baloch, Hina (@surkhina) (2023), ‘First time, a KhawajaSira from Pakistan, a South Asian Hijra person is #ChosenForChevening making my way to @soasuni for Masters in Gender Studies’, Instagram, 11 September, https://www.instagram.com/p/CxD1hRoMF8d/?utm_source=ig. Accessed 20 December 2024.
  10. Bates, L. (2020), Men Who Hate Women: From Incels to Pickup Artists, the Truth about Extreme Misogyny and How It Affects Us All, London: Simon & Schuster UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bhabha, H. K. (1994), The Location of Culture, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Butler, J. (1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Costello, L., McDermott, M. L. and Wallace, R. (2017), ‘Netnography: Range of practices, misperceptions, and missed opportunities’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16:1, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917700647.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Creswell, J. W. and Plano Clark, V. L. (2011), Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Davis, F. (1979), Yearning for Yesterday: A Sociology of Nostalgia, New York: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Di Guardo, M. and Castriotta, M. (2013), ‘The challenge and opportunities of crowdsourcing web communities: An Italian case study’, International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 4, pp. 7992, https://doi.org/10.7903/ijecs.1112.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B. and Carter, M. (2015), ‘#Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular’, Information, Communication & Society, 18:3, pp. 25568, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ging, D. (2019), ‘Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the Manosphere’, Men and Masculinities, 22:4, pp. 63857, https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Green, D. W. (2018), ‘Language control and code-switching’, Languages, 3:2, p. 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/languages3020008.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Grimes, S. M. (2014), ‘Little big scene: Making and playing culture in media Molecule’s LittleBigPlanet’, Cultural Studies, 29:3, pp. 379400, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2014.937944.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Halliday, M. (1985), An Introduction to Functional Grammar, London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Halliday, M. (2003), On Language and Linguistics, London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hariman, R. and Lucaites, J. L. (2015), ‘Icons, iconicity, and cultural critique’, Sociologica: Italian Journal of Sociology, 1, pp. 132, https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.2383/80393.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hasan, S. (2022), ‘Transgender march seeks right to live with dignity, equality and respect’, Dawn Newspaper, November, https://www.dawn.com/news/1722092. Accessed 3 July 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Higgins, C. (2009), English as a Local Language: Post-colonial Identities and Multilingual Practices, Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Highfield, T. (2016), Social Media and Everyday Politics, Malden, MA: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hinchy, J. (2019), Governing Gender and Sexuality in Colonial India: The Hijra, c. 1850–1900, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hurley, Z. (2019), ‘Imagined affordances of Instagram and the fantastical authenticity of female gulf-Arab social media influencers’, Social Media + Society, 5:1, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118819241.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jaffer, A. (2017), ‘Spiritualizing marginality: Sufi concepts and the politics of identity in Pakistan’, Society and Culture in South Asia, 3:2, pp. 17597, https://doi.org/10.1177/239386171770629.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jaffrelot, C. (2002), A History of Pakistan and Its Origins, Cambridge: Anthem Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kasmani, O. (2022), Queer Companions: Religion, Public Intimacy, and Saintly Affects in Pakistan, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Khan, F. A. (2016), ‘Khwaja Sira activism: The politics of gender ambiguity in Pakistan’, TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 3:1–2, pp. 15864, https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-3334331.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Khan, F. A. (2019), ‘Translucent citizenship: Khwaja Sira activism and alternatives to dissent in Pakistan’, South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 20:20, https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj.5034.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Khokhlova, L. V. (2014), ‘Majority language death’, in H. C. Cardoso (ed.), Language Endangerment and Preservation in South Asia, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press, pp. 1945.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kozinets, R. (2010), Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996), Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Leaver, T. and Highfield, T. (2018), ‘Visualizing the ends of identity: Pre-birth and post-death on Instagram’, Information, Communication & Society, 21:1, pp. 3045, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1259343.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Leaver, T., Highfield, T. and Abidin, C. (2020), Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures, Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Light, B., Burgess, J. and Duguay, S. (2018), ‘The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps’, New Media & Society, 20:3, pp. 881900, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Machin, D. (2007), Introduction to Multimodal Analysis, London: Hodder Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Machin, D. and van Leeuwen, T. (2004), ‘Global media: Generic homogeneity and discursive diversity’, Continuum, 18:1, pp. 99120, https://doi.org/10.1080/1030431032000181021.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Machin, D. and Mayr, A. (2012), How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction, Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Martin, J. R. and Wodak, R. (2003), Re/Reading the Past: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of History, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pamment, C. (2010), ‘Hijraism: Jostling for a third space in Pakistani politics’, TDR/The Drama Review, 54:2, pp. 2950, https://doi.org/10.1162/dram.2010.54.2.29.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Pamment, C. (2019), ‘The Hijra clap in neoliberal hands: Performing trans rights in Pakistan’, TDR/The Drama Review, 63:1, pp. 14151, https://doi.org/10.1162/dram_a_00821.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Pandya, A. and Lodha, P. (2021), ‘Social connectedness, excessive screen time during COVID-19 and mental health: A review of current evidence’, Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 3, https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2021.684137.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Pennycook, A. (2003), ‘Global Englishes, Rip Slyme and performativity’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7:4, pp. 51333.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Pennycook, A. (2019), ‘From translanguaging to translingual activism’, in D. P. Macedo and M. DeGraff (eds), Decolonizing Foreign Language Education: The Misteaching of English and other Colonial Languages, New York: Routledge, pp. 16986.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Piller, I. and Takahashi, K. (2006), ‘A passion for English: Desire and the language market’, in A. Pavlenko (ed.), Bilingual Minds: Emotional Experience, Expression and Representation, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 5983.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Rai, Shahzadi (@shahzadi_rai) (2022), “We are the T & I of the LGBT+ Community” - Shahzadi Rai’, Instagram, 21 December, https://www.instagram.com/p/CmbiLuTK0Pb/. Accessed 20 December 2024.
  51. Reddy, G. (2005), With Respect to Sex: Negotiating Hijra Identity in South India, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Scott, J. S., Simpson-Housley, P. and Griffiths, G. (2001), Mapping the Sacred: Religion, Geography and Postcolonial Literatures, Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Shroff, S. (2020), ‘Operationalizing the “New” Pakistani transgender citizen: Legal gendered grammars and trans frames of feeling’, in A. Roy (ed.), Gender, Sexuality, Decolonization: South Asia in the World Perspective, London: Routledge, pp. 26082.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Skuy, D. (1998), ‘Macaulay and the Indian Penal Code of 1862: The myth of the inherent superiority and modernity of the English legal system compared to India’s legal system in the nineteenth century’, Modern Asian Studies, 32:3, pp. 51357, http://www.jstor.org/stable/313159. Accessed 19 December 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Soja, E. W. (1996), Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang, X., Spotti, M., Juffermans, K., Cornips, L., Kroon, S. and Blommaert, J. (2014), ‘Globalization in the margins: Toward a re-evaluation of language and mobility’, Applied Linguistics Review, 5:1, pp. 2344, https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2014-0002.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wurst, A. K., Pohl, K., Hassler, J. and Jackson, D. (2023), ‘“Emojis in Parties” online communication during the 2019 European Election Campaign: Toward a typology of political emoji use’, International Journal of Communication, 17, pp. 4686706, https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/20268/4259. Accessed 19 December 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Young, R. (2001), Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Zaidi, A. (2014), ‘Exiled in its own land: Diasporification of Punjabi in Punjab’, South Asian Diaspora, 6:2, pp. 20924, https://doi.org/10.1080/19438192.2014.912467.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00092_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00092_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): discourse; gender; khwajasira; language; multimodality; transgender
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test