Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics
  4. Volume 20, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 20, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1740-8296
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0918
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

The rise of fake news poses a significant challenge for governments worldwide, prompting the European Commission to address the urgency of combating disinformation. In the contemporary ‘market of attention’, where economic considerations often overshadow democratic and societal concerns, disinformation thrives. This study asserts that financial viability within news media markets is a critical yet overlooked factor in the fight against disinformation. The authors define financial viability as the capacity of institutions to balance income and expenses, positing that a financially sound news media market creates a resilient news landscape less susceptible to disinformation-induced harm. The research employs a comprehensive approach to assess this claim, commencing with a literature review on the financial viability of news media markets that leads to the development of a conceptual framework consisting of nine indicators to measure the financial viability of news media markets in relation to disinformation. Subsequently, primary and secondary data are collected from official and non-official data sources for each of the indicators across ten European countries and compared to the perceived exposure to disinformation in each country. Findings from the analysis reveal that financially viable news media markets exhibit greater resilience to disinformation. This underscores the significance of incorporating financial considerations into governmental efforts to counter disinformation. The article concludes by emphasizing the implications of the research for policy-makers, the news media industry and future research endeavours.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The European Commission (Award CEF-TC-2020-2)
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Intellect Ltd.
This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC), which allows users to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the article, as long as the author is attributed and the article is not used for commercial purposes. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00096_1
2025-07-31
2026-02-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mcp/20/2/mcp.20.2.173_Komorowski.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00096_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aalberg, T., Van Aelst, P. and Curran, J. (2010), ‘Media systems and the political information environment: A cross-national comparison’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15:3, pp. 255–71, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210367422.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Allcott, H. and Gentzkow, M. (2017), ‘Social media and fake news in the 2016 election’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31:2, pp. 211–36, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernecker, S., Flowerree, A. K. and Grundmann, T. (2021), The Epistemology of Fake News, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Berthon, P. R. and Pitt, L. F. (2018), ‘Brands, truthiness and post-fact: Managing brands in a post-rational world’, Journal of Macromarketing, 38:2, pp. 218–27, https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146718755869.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bleyer-Simon, K. and Nenadic, I. (2022), ‘News media subsidies in the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic: A European perspective’, Global Network of Internet and Society Research Centers, 21 May, https://networkofcenters.net/news/news-media-subsidies-first-wave-covid-19-pandemic-%E2%80%93-european-perspective. Accessed 29 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Braun, J. A. and Eklund, J. L. (2019), ‘Fake news, real money: Ad tech platforms, profit-driven hoaxes, and the business of journalism’, Digital Journalism, 7:1, pp. 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1556314.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bro, R. and Smilde, A. K. (2014), ‘Principal component analysis’, Analytical Methods, 6:9, pp. 2812–31, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41907j.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Brogi, E. and Bleyer-Simon, K. (2021), ‘Disinformation in the perspective of media pluralism in Europe: The role of platforms’, in R. Broemel, J. Lüdemann, R. Podszun and H. Schweitzer (eds), Perspectives on Platform Regulation, Baden Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, pp. 531–48, https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748929789.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bronner, G. (2022), Les Lumières à l’ère numérique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, https://www.vie-publique.fr/rapport/283201-lumieres-l-ere-numerique-commission-bronner-desinformation. Accessed 12 May 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, J. D. (2009), ‘Principal components analysis and exploratory factor analysis: Definitions, differences, and choices’, Statistics, 13:1, pp. 26–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bryanov, K. and Vziatysheva, V. (2021), ‘Determinants of individuals’ belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news’, PLoS One, 16:6, p. e0253717, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253717.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Celliers, M. and Hattingh, M. (2020), ‘A systematic review on fake news themes reported in literature’, in M. Hattingh, M. Matthee, H. Smuts, I. Pappas, Y. K. Dwivedi and M. Mäntymäki (eds), Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology: 19th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2020, Skukuza, South Africa, 6–8 April, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 223–34, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45002-1_19.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Chan, M., Lee, F. L. F. and Chen, H.-T. (2022), ‘Avoid or authenticate? A multilevel cross-country analysis of the roles of fake news concern and news fatigue on news avoidance and authentication’, Digital Journalism, 12:3, pp. 356–75, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.2016060.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cook, C. E., Geels, K. and Bakker, P. (2016), Hyperlocal Revenues in the UK and Europe: Mapping the Road to Sustainability and Resilience, London: Nesta, https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/hyperlocal-revenues-in-the-uk-and-europe-report.pdf. Accessed 15 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Couldry, N. and Turow, J. (2014), ‘Advertising, big data and the clearance of the public realm: Marketers’ new approaches to the content subsidy’, International Journal of Communication, 8, pp. 1710–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Council of Europe (2019), ‘Ensuring the financial sustainability of quality journalism’, Freedom of Expression, 13 February, https://www.coe.int/en/web/freedom-expression/news/-/asset_publisher/thFVuWFiT2Lk/content/ensuring-the-financial-sustainability-of-quality-journalism. Accessed 10 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Deutsche Welle Akademie (2021), ‘Safe. Strong. Viable.: The symbiosis between media viability and media safety’, DW.COM, May, https://www.dw.com/en/safe-strong-viable-the-symbiosis-between-media-viability-and-media-safety/a-57334604. Accessed 25 August 2023.
  18. Dholakia, N., Ozgun, A. and Atik, D. (2023), ‘The miasma of misinformation: A social analysis of media, markets, and manipulation’, Consumption Markets & Culture, 26:3, pp. 217–32, https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2022.2149508.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Diaz Ruiz, C. (2023), ‘Disinformation on digital media platforms: A market-shaping approach’, New Media & Society, 27:4, pp. 2188–211, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231207644.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Di Domenico, G., Sit, J., Ishizaka, A. and Nunan, D. (2021), ‘Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review’, Journal of Business Research, 124, pp. 329–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. European Commission (2022), ‘Tackling online disinformation: Shaping Europe’s digital future’, 15 October, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/online-disinformation. Accessed 25 August 2023.
  22. Free Press Unlimited (2016), ‘Media viability: Business development and innovation resource guide’, 3 December, https://kq.freepressunlimited.org/themes/media-viability/what-is-media-viability/definition-and-framework/. Accessed 24 August 2023.
  23. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Weeks, B. and Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2017), ‘Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: Social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22:3, pp. 105–23, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12185.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hallin, D. C. and Mancini, P. (2004), Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hameleers, M., Brosius, A. and de Vreese, C. H. (2022), ‘Whom to trust? Media exposure patterns of citizens with perceptions of misinformation and disinformation related to the news media’, European Journal of Communication, 37:3, pp. 237–68, https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211072667.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hansson, S., Orru, K., Siibak, A., Bäck, A., Krüger, M., Gabel, F. and Morsut, C. (2020), ‘Communication-related vulnerability to disasters: A heuristic framework’, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, p. 101931, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101931.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Harlow, S. (2018), ‘Quality, innovation, and financial sustainability: Central American entrepreneurial journalism through the lens of its audience’, Journalism Practice, 12:5, pp. 543–64, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1330663.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hendricks, V. F. and Vestergaard, M. (2019), Reality Lost: Markets of Attention, Misinformation and Manipulation, London: Springer Nature.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. House of Commons (2018), Disinformation and ‘Fake News’, London: The Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Humprecht, E. (2019), ‘Where “fake news” flourishes: A comparison across four Western democracies’, Information, Communication & Society, 22:13, pp. 1973–88, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2018.1474241.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Humprecht, E., Esser, F. and Van Aelst, P. (2020), ‘Resilience to online disinformation: A framework for cross-national comparative research’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25:3, pp. 493–516, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219900126.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Humprecht, E., Esser, F., Aelst, P. V., Staender, A. and Morosoli, S. (2023), ‘The sharing of disinformation in cross-national comparison: Analyzing patterns of resilience’, Information, Communication & Society, 26:7, pp. 1342–62, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.2006744.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Ismail, Z. (2018), Strengthening the Financial Independence of Independent Media Organisations (K4D Knowledge, Evidence and Learning for Development: 18), London: UK Department for International Development.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Jenyns, C. (2021), ‘Changing tides: The impact of crisis on advertising’, Media International Australia, 178:1, pp. 36–41, https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x20951996.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Knuutila, A., Neudert, L.-M. and Howard, P. N. (2022), ‘Who is afraid of fake news? Modeling risk perceptions of misinformation in 142 countries’, Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 3:3, pp. 1–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Kuo, R. and Marwick, A. (2021), ‘Critical disinformation studies: History, power, and politics’, Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2:4, pp. 1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G. and Rothschild, D. (2018), ‘The science of fake news’, Science, 359:6380, pp. 1094–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lind, F. and Boomgaarden, H. G. (2019), ‘What we do and don’t know: A meta-analysis of the knowledge gap hypothesis’, Annals of the International Communication Association, 43:3, pp. 210–24, https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1614475.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. McCombs, M. E. (1972), ‘Mass media in the marketplace’, Journalism and Communication Monographs, 24, pp. 1–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Newman, N. and Robertson, C. T. (2023), Paying for News: Price-conscious Consumers Look for Value Amid Cost-of-living Crisis, Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/paying-news-price-conscious-consumers-look-value-amid-cost-living-crisis#header--2. Accessed 25 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T. and Nielsen, R. K. (2023), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2023, Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, https://www.digitalnewsreport.org. Accessed 24 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Parcu, P. L. (2020), ‘New digital threats to media pluralism in the information age’, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 21:2, pp. 91–109, https://doi.org/10.1177/1783591719886101.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Ringnér, M. (2008), ‘What is principal component analysis?’, Nature Biotechnology, 26:3, pp. 303–04, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0308-303.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Schiffrin, A., Posetti, J., Edgerton, F. and Bell, E. (2022), Finding the Funds for Journalism to Thrive: Policy Options to Support Media Viability (Programme and Meeting Document CI-2022/WTR/1; World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development: 16), Paris: UNESCO, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381146. Accessed 25 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Shin, J. and Thorson, K. (2017), ‘Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media’, Journal of Communication, 67:2, pp. 233–55, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12284.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Strömbäck, J., Boomgaarden, H., Broda, E., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Tsfati, Y. and Vliegenthart, R. (2022), ‘From low-choice to high-choice media environments: Implications for knowledge resistance’, in J. Strömbäck, Å. Wikforss, K. Glüer, T. Lindholm and H. Oscarsson (eds), Knowledge Resistance in High-Choice Information Environments, London: Routledge, pp. 49–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Swire, B., Berinsky, A. J., Lewandowsky, S. and Ecker, U. K. (2017), ‘Processing political misinformation: Comprehending the Trump phenomenon’, Royal Society Open Science, 4:3, p. 160802, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160802.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Tandoc Jr, E. C. (2019), ‘The facts of fake news: A research review’, Sociology Compass, 13:9, p. e12724.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Tandoc Jr, E. C., Lim, Z. W. and Ling, R. (2018), ‘Defining “fake news” a typology of scholarly definitions’, Digital Journalism, 6:2, pp. 137–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Toff, B. and Kalogeropoulos, A. (2020), ‘All the news that’s fit to ignore: How the information environment does and does not shape news avoidance’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 84:S1, pp. 366–90, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa016.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Voci, D. and Nölleke-Przybylski, P. (2024), ‘Media economics research: Accessing and working with official and non-official statistics’, in U. Rohn, M. B. von Rimscha and T. Raats (eds), De Gruyter Handbook of Media Economics, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 61–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. and Pantti, M. (2021), ‘Introduction: The emotional turn in journalism’, Journalism, 22:5, pp. 1147–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Wasserman, H. (2020), ‘Fake news from Africa: Panics, politics and paradigms’, Journalism, 21:1, pp. 3–16, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917746861.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Young, D. G., Jamieson, K. H., Poulsen, S. and Goldring, A. (2018), ‘Fact-checking effectiveness as a function of format and tone: Evaluating FactCheck. Org and FlackCheck. Org’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95:1, pp. 49–75, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017710453.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Zimmer, F., Scheibe, K., Stock, M. and Stock, W. G. (2019), ‘Fake news in social media: Bad algorithms or biased users?’, Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 7:2, pp. 40–53.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00096_1
Loading
Is a financially viable news media market the key to fighting disinformation in Europe? A cross-country quantitative study
International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics 20, 173 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/macp_00096_1
/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00096_1
/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00096_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): comparative analysis; economic structures; journalistic sustainability; measurement framework; misinformation; public subsidies

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test