Skip to content
1981
50 Years of Nixon’s Fall After Watergate
  • ISSN: 1740-8296
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0918
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

This article examines the enduring influence of Bob Woodward’s and Carl Bernstein’s investigative reporting during the Watergate affair and its relevance to present-day journalism. By contextualizing the iconic status of both investigative journalists within a nuanced perspective, this article juxtaposes their modus operandi with journalistic practices of the present day. In addition to academic literature, primary sources such as and personal accounts from the key figures form the foundation of this investigation into journalistic history. This article dissects the methodologies of the two pioneering journalists and their editors, examining contentious issues such as the use of anonymous sources. Furthermore, it confronts considerations such as the balance between comprehensive research and thus delaying publication vs. early release with subsequent corrections; the divergence from official sources to focus on grassroots testimonies and the preference for conversational interviews over formal recording methods and official press briefings. Finally, the article examines Woodward and Bernstein’s advocacy of objective journalism aiming at ‘the best obtainable version of the truth’, as stated by Bernstein.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00107_1
2026-03-12
2026-04-22

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mcp/20/3/mcp.20.3.283_Van-Gorp.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00107_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bernstein, C. and Woodward, B. ([1974] 2005), All the President’s Men, New York: Simon & Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein, C., Woodward, B. and Redford, R. (2011a), interviewed by a group of College of Communications students, The University of Texas at Austin, 21 April, https://www.pbs.org/video/klru-specials-redford-woodward-bernstein. Accessed 5 February 2026.
  3. Bernstein, C., Woodward, B. and Redford, R. (2011b), interviewed by M. Updegrove, ‘The legacy of All the President’s Men’, held at LBJ Library, Austin, 21 April, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVrGZSxpBEA. Accessed 5 February 2026.
  4. Bryant, N. (2024), The Truth About Watergate: A Tale of Extraordinary Lies & Liars, Walterville, OR: TrineDay.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell, W. J. (2010), Getting It Wrong: Ten of the Greatest Misreported Stories in American Journalism, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell, W. J. (2022), ‘Watergate at 50: Solidifying a mythical narrative’, American Journalism, 39:4, pp. 430–46, https://doi.org/10.1080/08821127.2022.2126412.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlson, M. (2010), ‘Embodying deep throat: Mark felt and the collective memory of Watergate’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 27:3, pp. 235–50, https://doi.org/10.1080/15295030903583564.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Carney, D. (2012), ‘Truth and the unnamed source’, Journal of Media Law, 4:1, pp. 117–45, https://doi.org/10.5235/175776312802483925.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cody, F. (2023), The News Event: Popular Sovereignty in the Age of Deep Mediatization, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Crouse, T. ([1973] 2003), The Boys on the Bus, New York: Random House.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Duffy, M. J. (2014), ‘Anonymous sources: A historical review of the norms surrounding their use’, American Journalism, 31:2, pp. 236–61, https://doi.org/10.1080/08821127.2014.905363.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Duffy, M. J. and Freeman, C. P. (2011), ‘Unnamed sources: A utilitarian exploration of their justification and guidelines for limited use’, Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 26:4, pp. 297–315, https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2011.606006.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Ehrlich, M. C. and Saltzman, J. (2015), Heroes and Scoundrels: The Image of the Journalist in Popular Culture, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Ettema, J. S. and Glasser, T. L. (1998), Custodians of Conscience: Investigative Journalism and Public Virtue, New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Feldstein, M. (2014), ‘Wallowing in Watergate: Historiography, methodology, and mythology in journalism’s celebrated moment’, American Journalism, 31:4, pp. 550–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/08821127.2014.968946.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Felt, M. and O’Connor, J. ([2006] 2017), Mark Felt: The Man Who Brought Down The White House, London: Ebury Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Foerstel, H. N. (2001), From Watergate to Monicagate: Ten Controversies in Modern Journalism and Media, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Harro-Loit, H. and Josephi, B. (2020), ‘Journalists’ perception of time pressure: A global perspective’, Journalism Practice, 14:4, pp. 395–411, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1623710.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Havill, A. (1993), Deep Truth: The Lives of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, New York: Birch Lane Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hughes-Hallett, L. (2004), Heroes: Saviours, Traitors and Supermen, London: Fourth Estate.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jackson, D. and Moloney, K. (2016), ‘Inside churnalism’, Journalism Studies, 17:6, pp. 763–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2015.1017597.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Jacobs, R. N. (2017), ‘Journalism after Trump’, American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 5:3, pp. 409–25, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-017-0044-8.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson, B. G., Bent, L. and Dade, C. (2020), ‘An ethic of advocacy: Metajournalistic discourse on the practice of leaks and whistleblowing from Valerie Plame to the Trump Administration’, Journal of Media Ethics, 35:1, pp. 2–16, https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2020.1731314.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kennedy, G. (1993), ‘News about the news: Changes and challenges in the 1990s’, Et Cetera, 50:1, p. 3.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kissinger, H. (1973), telephone conversation with R. Nixon, 17–18 April.
  26. Lee, T. and Hosam, C. (2020), ‘Fake news is real: The significance and sources of disbelief in mainstream media in Trump’s America’, Sociological Forum, 35, pp. 996–1018, https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12603.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lewis, J., Williams, A. and Franklin, B. (2008), ‘Four rumours and an explanation’, Journalism Practice, 2:1, pp. 27–45, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780701768493.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lippmann, W. ([1921] 2004), Public Opinion, Project Gutenberg, https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/6456. Accessed 30 April 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lule, J. (2001), Daily News, Eternal Stories: The Mythological Role of Journalism, New York: Guilford Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Marshall, J. (2011), Watergate’s Legacy and the Press: The Investigative Impulse, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. New York Times (1997), ‘Excerpts from new transcripts of 201 hours of secret Nixon tapes’, 31 October, p. 18, https://www.nytimes.com/1997/10/31/us/excerpts-from-new-transcripts-of-201-hours-of-secret-nixon-tapes.html. Accessed 10 February 2026.
  32. Pantic, M. and Cvetkovic, I. (2020), ‘Journalism practice in a digital age: Utilization of social media in online news’, American Communication Journal, 22:2, pp. 1–12, https://www.ac-journal.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Journalism-Practice-in-a-Digital-Age-Utilization-of-Social-Media-in-Online-News.pdf. Accessed 1 December 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Perloff, R. M. and Kumar, A. (2022), ‘The press and Watergate at 50: Understanding and reconstructing a seminal story’, Journalism Practice, 16:5, pp. 797–812, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.2018664.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Robinson, M. J. (1974), ‘The impact of televised Watergate hearings’, Journal of Communication, 24:2, pp. 17–30, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00365.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Schudson, M. (1992), Watergate in American Memory: How We Remember, Forget, and Reconstruct the Past, New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Schudson, M. (2004), ‘Notes on scandal and the Watergate legacy’, American Behavioral Scientist, 47:9, pp. 1231–38, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203262345.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Scott, C. R. and Rains, S. A. (2020), ‘(Dis)connections in anonymous communication theory: Exploring conceptualizations of anonymity in communication research’, Annals of the International Communication Association, 44:4, pp. 385–400, https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1843367.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Shepard, A. C. (2007), Woodward and Bernstein: Life in the Shadow of Watergate, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Splendore, S. (2020), ‘The dominance of institutional sources and the establishment of non-elite ones: The case of Italian online local journalism’, Journalism, 21:7, pp. 990–1006, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917722896.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Stern, S., Livan, G. and Smith, R. E. (2020), ‘A network perspective on intermedia agenda-setting’, Applied Network Science, 5:1, pp. 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-020-00272-4.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Sweeney, P. D. and Gruber, K. L. (1984), ‘Selective exposure: Voter information preferences and the Watergate affair’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46:6, pp. 1208–21, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1208.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Thorsen, E. (2017), ‘Whistleblowing in a digital age: Journalism after Manning and Snowden’, in B. Franklin and S. A. Eldridge II (eds), The Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies, London: Routledge, pp. 568–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Vonbun, R., Königslöw, K. K. V. and Schoenbach, K. (2016), ‘Intermedia agenda-setting in a multimedia news environment’, Journalism, 17:8, pp. 1054–73, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915595475.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Woodward, B. and Bernstein, C. (1976), The Final Days, New York: Simon & Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Woodward, B., Bernstein, C., Baker, P., Pries, D., Miller, M. and Frankel, G. (2011), ‘Could the media break a story like Watergate today?’, discussion panel delivered at LBJ Auditorium, Austin, TX, 21 April.
/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00107_1
Loading
Unravelling Watergate’s impact: Revisiting Bernstein and Woodward’s approach for journalism in the digital age
International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics 20, 283 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/macp_00107_1
/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00107_1
/content/journals/10.1386/macp_00107_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): hero-reporter; investigative journalism; journalism ethics; journalism history; media myth; unnamed sources

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test