Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Moving Image Review & Art Journal (MIRAJ), The
  4. Volume 11, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2045-6298
  • E-ISSN: 2045-6301
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Stephen Dwoskin was a prolific experimental filmmaker from the mid-1960s until his death in 2012. Commonly associated with the New York underground film scene and the London Filmmakers’ Co-Op, which he co-founded in 1966, Jewish-American Dwoskin was also a childhood survivor of polio and a disability rights activist. Though an enduring oral legacy of feminist criticism of Dwoskin’s work remains since the 1980s, Dwoskin’s later work from the 1990s and 2000s is acutely understudied. In this article, I recontextualize earlier feminist positions in light of the ‘cripping’ of sexuality and gender proposed by recent critical disability studies, applied to two of Dwoskin’s later works. Adopting archival evidence of feminist critique, feminist art histories and Crip approaches to sexuality, I examine androgyny and genderqueerness in Dwoskin’s photomontages from (1993) and conflations of critical medical and BDSM-structured care in the film (2001). I conclude that Dwoskin’s work invites rich epistemological re-evaluation of both feminist critique and entrenched sociocultural conceptions of gendered subjectivity, intimacy and sexual agency.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • AHRC (Award AH/R007012/1)
© 2022 Intellect Ltd
This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The CC BY licence permits commercial and noncommercial reuse. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/miraj_00081_1
2022-04-01
2024-09-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/miraj/11/1/miraj.11.1.10.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/miraj_00081_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Azoury, Philippe. ( 2006;), ‘ A fleur de peau. ’, La Libération, 1 March, https://next.liberation.fr/cinema/2006/03/01/a-fleur-de-peau_31651. Accessed 1 March 2021.
  2. Babel, Anna. ( 2018;), ‘ The invisible walls of the whisper network. ’, Anthropology News, 59:3, pp. 67–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bahner, Julia. ( 2020), Sexual Citizenship and Disability: Understanding Sexual Support in Policy, Practice and Theory, Abingdon and New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bataille, Georges. ( 1966), Ma Mère, Paris:: Jean-Jacques Pauvert;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bataille, Georges. ( 1978), Story of the Eye (trans. D. Bergelson), New York:: Urizen Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauer, Robin. ( 2014), Queer BDSM Intimacies: Critical Consent and Pushing Boundaries, Basingstoke and New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Beauvoir, Simone de. ( 1953), The Second Sex (trans. H. M. Parshley), London:: Jonathan Cape;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bök, Christian. ( 2002), ’Pataphysics: The Poetics of an Imaginary Science, Evanston, IL:: Northwestern University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bovier, François. ( 2006;), ‘ Interview with Stephen Dwoskin: Filmography commented by the author. ’, Décadrages: Cinéma, à Travers Champs, 7, Spring, http://www.decadrages.ch/interview-stephen-dwoskin. Accessed 14 January 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Breton, André. ( [1928] 2013), Nadja, Paris:: Gallimard;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chamarette, Jenny. ( 2018;), ‘ Overturning feminist phenomenologies: Disability, complex embodiment, intersectionality, and film. ’, in S. Cohen Shabot, and C. Landry. (eds), Rethinking Feminist Phenomenology: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives, London:: Rowman & Littlefield;, pp. 187–208.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Clare, Eli. ( 2015), Exile and Pride: Disability, Queerness, and Liberation, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Creed, Barbara. ( 1993), The Monstrous-Feminine: Film, Feminism, Psychoanalysis, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Crenshaw, Kimberlé. ( 1991;), ‘ Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. ’, Stanford Law Review, 43:6, pp. 1241–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Curtis, David. ( 2007), A History of Artists’ Film and Video in Britain, London:: British Film Institute;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dunkley, Cara R., and Brotto, Lori A.. ( 2020;), ‘ The role of consent in the context of BDSM. ’, Sexual Abuse, 32:6, pp. 657–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Dwoskin, Stephen. ( 1982;), ‘ Letters to the editor: Intolerant teachings. ’, Films on Screen and Video, 2:6, p. 4.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dwoskin, Stephen. ( 1995;), ‘ Under film stars. ’, Skrien, 204, pp. 40–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Dwoskin, Stephen. ( n.d.), notebooks on films, box no DWO H2–1 box 1.2, Reading: Dwoskin Archive , University of Reading Museums and Special Collections Service;, MS 5502.
  20. Emmens, Elizabeth F.. ( 2009;), ‘ Intimate discrimination: The state’s role in the accidents of sex and love. ’, Harvard Law Review, 122:1307, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1694174. Accessed 12 July 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Enhance the UK ( 2021), https://enhancetheuk.org/about-us/. Accessed 5 February 2021.
  22. Erevelles, Nirmala, and Minear, Andrea. ( 2010;), ‘ Unspeakable offenses: Untangling race and disability in discourses of intersectionality. ’, Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 4:2, pp. 127–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Fox, Filippa. ( 2018;), ‘ A sex worker perspective. ’, Porn Studies, 5:2, pp. 197–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Fritsch, Kelly,, Heynen, Robert,, Ross, Amy Nicole, and van der Meulen, Emily. ( 2016;), ‘ Disability and sex work: Developing affinities through decriminalization. ’, Disability & Society, 31:1, pp. 84–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Garfield, Rachel. ( 2017;), ‘ Between seeing and knowing: Stephen Dwoskin’s Behindert and the camera’s caress. ’, in S. Clayton, and L. Mulvey. (eds), Other Cinemas: Politics, Culture and Experimental Film in the 1970s, New York:: IB Tauris;, pp. 235–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. ( 2005;), ‘ Feminist disability studies. ’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30:2, pp. 1557–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Garofalo Geymonat, Giulia. ( 2019;), ‘ Disability rights meet sex workers’ rights: The making of sexual assistance in Europe. ’, Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 16:2, pp. 214–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Haskell, Molly, and Dargis, Manohla. ( 2016), From Reverence to Rape: The Treatment of Women in the Movies, , 3rd ed.., Chicago, IL and London:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hedva, Johanna. ( 2016;), ‘ Sick woman theory. ’, Mask Magazine, 24, http://www.maskmagazine.com/not-again/struggle/sick-woman-theory. Accessed 20 January 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hirschmann, Nancy J.. ( 2012;), ‘ Disability as a new frontier for feminist intersectionality research. ’, Politics & Gender, 8:3, pp. 396–405.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Jarry, Alfred. ( 1996), Exploits and Opinions of Dr Faustroll, Pataphysician, Boston, MA:: Exact Change;.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kafer, Alison. ( 2013), Feminist, Queer, Crip, Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kaplan, E. Ann. ( 2013;), ‘ Introduction: From Plato’s cave to Freud’s screen. ’, in E. A. Kaplan. (ed.), Psychoanalysis and Cinema, London:: Routledge;, pp. 1–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kattari, Shanna K.. ( 2015;), ‘ “Getting it”: Identity and sexual communication for sexual and gender minorities with physical disabilities. ’, Sexuality & Culture, 19:4, pp. 882–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Krauss, Rosalind. ( 1981;), ‘ The photographic conditions of surrealism. ’, October, 19:102, pp. 3–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Lavin, Maud. ( 1990;), ‘ Androgyny, spectatorship, and the Weimar photomontages of Hannah Hoch. ’, New German Critique, 51, pp. 62–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Logan, William S.. ( 2007;), ‘ Closing pandora’s box: Human rights conundrums in cultural heritage protection. ’, in H. Silverman, and D. F. Ruggles. (eds), Cultural Heritage and Human Rights, New York:: Springer;, pp. 33–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lübecker, Nikolaj d’Origny. ( 2015), The Feel-Bad Film, Edinburgh:: Edinburgh University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Martin, Adrian. ( 2016;), ‘ Dwoskin, centripetal and centrifugal. ’, Screen, 57:1, pp. 74–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Mayne, Judith. ( 1993), Cinema and Spectatorship, London and New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. McRuer, Robert. ( 2006), Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability, New York:: New York University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Mingus, Mia. ( 2011;), ‘ Access intimacy: The missing link. ’, Leaving Evidence, 5 May, https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2011/05/05/access-intimacy-the-missing-link/. Accessed 5 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Modleski, Tania. ( 2016), The Women Who Knew Too Much: Hitchcock and Feminist Theory, , 3rd ed.., New York and London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Moodley, Jacqueline, and Graham, Lauren. ( 2015;), ‘ The importance of intersectionality in disability and gender studies. ’, Agenda, 29:2, pp. 24–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Morrison, Jenny. ( 2021;), ‘ Invoking intersectionality: Discursive mobilisations in feminism of the radical left. ’, Social Movement Studies, 20:6, pp. 635–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Mulvey, Laura. ( [1975] 1989), Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema, Basingstoke and New York:: Palgrave;.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Mulvey, Laura. ( [1981] 1989), Afterthoughts on ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’ Inspired by King Vidor’s Duel in the Sun (1946), London:: Palgrave;.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Mulvey, Laura. ( 2012;), ‘ Stephen Dwoskin, 1939–2012. ’, Sight & Sound Magazine, 22:9, https://www2.bfi.org.uk/news-opinion/sight-sound-magazine/comment/obituaries/stephen-dwoskin. Accessed 14 February 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Nead, Lynda. ( 1992), The Female Nude: Art, Obscenity, and Sexuality, London and New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. O’Donoghue, Darragh,, Chamarette, Jenny, and Garfield, Rachel. (forthcoming 2022;), ‘ Stephen Dwoskin: Intermedial artist. ’, in L. Nagib, and S. Solomon. (eds), The Moving Form of Film: Historicising the Medium through Other Media, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, n.pag.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Oliver, Michael. ( 1990), The Politics of Disablement, Basingstoke:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Peters, Maria V.. ( 2020;), ‘ From the whisper network to #MeToo: Framing gender, gossip and sexual harassment. ’, European Journal of American Studies, 15:4, https://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.16587. Accessed 17 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Piepzna-Samarasinha, Leah Lakshmi. ( 2018), Care Work: Dreaming Disability Justice, Vancouver:: Arsenal Pulp Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Raaberg, Gwen. ( 1998;), ‘ Beyond fragmentation: Collage as feminist strategy in the arts. ’, Mozaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 31:3, pp. 153–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Rees, A. L.. ( [1999] 2019), A History of Experimental Film and Video: From the Canonical Avant-Garde to Contemporary British Practice, , 2nd ed.., Basingstoke and London:: Bloomsbury and Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Reynolds, Dawn. ( 2007;), ‘ Disability and BDSM: Bob Flanagan and the case for sexual rights. ’, Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 4:1, pp. 40–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Sanders, Teela. ( 2007;), ‘ The politics of sexual citizenship: Commercial sex and disability. ’, Disability & Society, 22:5, pp. 439–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Schapiro, Miriam, and Meyer, Melissa. ( 1977;), ‘ Waste not want not: An inquiry into what women saved and assembled – FEMMAGE. ’, Heresies, 1:4, pp. 66–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Shakespeare, Tom,, Gillespie-Sells, Kath, and Davies, Dominic. ( 1996), The Sexual Politics of Disability: Untold Desires, London:: Cassell;.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Shakespeare, Tom, and Richardson, Sarah. ( 2018;), ‘ The sexual politics of disability, twenty years on. ’, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 20:1, pp. 82–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Sheppard, Emma. ( 2018;), ‘ Using pain, living with pain. ’, Feminist Review, 120:1, pp. 54–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Sins Invalid ( 2021), https://www.sinsinvalid.org. Accessed 4 March 2021.
  63. Smith, Simon. ( 1993;), ‘ Realism is rampant and erotica is on the loose. ’, Simon’s Diary, http://www.simonsdiary.co.uk/written%20work/Articles/haha.html. Accessed 24 April 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Spain, Ros. ( 1972;), ‘ Movies: Dyn Amo. ’, Spare Rib, 2, p. 35.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Stabile, Lua da Mota. ( 2020;), ‘ Sex work abolitionism and hegemonic feminisms: Implications for gender-diverse sex workers and migrants from Brazil. ’, Sociological Review, 68:4, pp. 852–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Studlar, Gaylyn. ( 1984;), ‘ Masochism and the perverse pleasures of the cinema. ’, Quarterly Review of Film Studies, 9:4, pp. 267–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Studlar, Gaylyn. ( 1987;), ‘ Gaylyn Studlar responds to Miriam Hansen’s “Pleasure, ambivalence, identification: Valentino and female spectatorship”. ’, Cinema Journal, 26:2, p. 51.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Tellier, Stephanie. ( 2017;), ‘ Advancing the discourse: Disability and BDSM. ’, Sexuality and Disability, 35:4, pp. 485–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Willemen, Paul. ( 1976;), ‘ Voyeurism, the look, and Dwoskin. ’, Afterimage, 6, Summer, pp. 40–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Wolff, Janet. ( 1990), Reinstating Corporeality: Feminism and Body Politics, Berkeley, CA and London:: University of California Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Women’s Liberation Workshop ( 1972;), ‘ Strip baby strip. ’, Shrew, 4:6, p. 6.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/miraj_00081_1
Loading
‘A long meandering slide’: Feminist critique, genderqueerness, sexual agency and Crip subjectivity in Stephen Dwoskin’s late works
Moving Image Review & Art Journal (MIRAJ), The 11, 10 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1386/miraj_00081_1
/content/journals/10.1386/miraj_00081_1
/content/journals/10.1386/miraj_00081_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): BDSM; disability studies; Dwoskin; experimental film; feminism; gaze; photomontage; sexuality

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error