From i-doc to VR experience: New forms of user engagement in immersive digital documentaries | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 17 Number 1
  • ISSN: 1474-2756
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0578

Abstract

Audience research proves that possibilities of interaction in i-docs are often not fulfilled by the user, who is not really part of a ‘work in progress’ (as intended by the makers). With the shift and development of new digital formats (360-degree-films, nonfictional VR experiences, AR apps), the question of the possible interactive potential should be addressed once again. Since VR projects are fully immersive (mostly using head-mounted displays), there is no possible distraction from outside on the one hand. On the other hand, there is a shift from the computer game style aesthetic of early i-docs, with their pure spatial arrangement of events, to a more inclusive digital storytelling modality with the user experiencing his own world-building. This will be discussed with taking into consideration the non-fictional VR experience as a mode of actively combining immersion and storytelling for a satisfactory user experience. Afterwards two very different examples of nonfictional VR production will be presented, and their modalities will be briefly touched; the utilized approach and its user response will be discussed. A look at the future of possible developments concludes the essay.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ncin_00003_1
2020-03-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aston, Judith, and Gaudenzi, Sandra. ( 2012;), ‘ Interactive documentary: Setting the field. ’, Studies in Documentary Film, 6:2, pp. 12539.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertin, Kalina. ( 2017), MANIC VR, VR Doc, Canada, http://www.kalinabertin.com/manic-vr/. Accessed 8 August 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dufresne, David, and Brault, Philippe. ( 2010), Prison Valley, Interactive Documentary, France, http://prisonvalley.arte.tv/?lang=en. Accessed 8 August 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Folman, Ari. ( 2008), Waltz with Bashir, Israel, France and Germany:: Bridgit Folman Film Gang;, Les Films d'Ici and Razor Film Produktion .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gaudenzi, Sandra. ( 2013;), ‘ The living documentary. From representing reality to co-creating reality in digital interactive documentary. ’, Ph.D. thesis, London:: Goldsmith University;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lanier, Jaron. ( 2017), Dawn of the New Everything. A Journey through Virtual Reality, London:: Vintage;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Levy, Dany. ( 2018), Jerusalem Stories, VR Doc, Germany https://www.arte.tv/sites/en/webproductions/jerusalem-stories/?lang=en. Accessed 8 August 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. McMillan, Sally J.. ( 2006;), ‘ Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: Users, documents, and systems. ’, in L. Lievrouw, and S. Livingstone. (eds), Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Social Consequences of ICTs, London:: Sage;, pp. 20529.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mundhenke, Florian. ( 2016a;), ‘ Die Webdokumentation – Funktions- und Wahrnehmungswandel des Dokumentarischen im intermedialen Raum zwischen Fernsehen, Film und Neuen Medien. ’, in T. Weber, and C. Heinze. (eds), Medienkulturen des Dokumentarischen. Neue Formen, neue Perspektiven, inter- und transdisziplinäre Ansätze, Wiesbaden:: Springer VS;, pp. 14966.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mundhenke, Florian. ( 2016b;), ‘ Erforschung neuer Gestaltungs- und Rezeptionsformen des Dokumentarischen im Netz. Eine Nutzerstudie zur Webdokumentation Prison Valley (2010). ’, in O. Fahle,, B. Ochsner, and A. Wiehl. (eds), Die Herstellung von Evidenz: Zum Phänomen interaktiver Webdokumentationen, Augenblick, vol. 65&66, pp. 2339.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Nash, Kate. ( 2018;), ‘ Virtually real: Exploring VR documentary. ’, Studies in Documentary Film, 12:2, pp. 97100.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nichols, Bill. ( 2001), Introduction to Documentary, Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Thalhofer, Florian. ( 2010), Planet Galata, Interactive Documentary, Germany, http://planetgalata.com/. Accessed 8 August 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Weidle, Franziska. ( 2018;), ‘ How to reconcile that flinch: Towards a critical analysis of documentary situations in 360° and VR environment. ’, Participations – Journal in Audience and Reception Studies, 15:1, May, pp. 41226.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wiehl, Anna,, Rose, Mandy, and Cizek, Katerina. ( 2017;), ‘ Documentary as co-creative practice. ’, in J. Aston,, M. Rose, and S. Gaudenzi. (eds), I-Docs – The Evolving Practices of Interactive Documentary, New York:: Wallflower;, pp. 3848.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Willis, Holly. ( 2016), Fast Forward: The Future(s) of the Cinematic Arts, London and New York:: Wallflower;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mundhenke, Florian. ( 2020 [2019];), ‘ From i-doc to VR experience: New forms of user engagement in immersive digital documentaries. ’, New Cinemas, 17:1, pp. 3748, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/ncin_00003_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ncin_00003_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/ncin_00003_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error