The crystalline indexical return of Twin Peaks

References

1. Bazin, A. ([1955] 2004), ‘The evolution of film language’, in What Is Cinema?, vol. 1 (trans. H. Gray), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 23–40.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bazin, A. and Gray, H. ([1945] 1960), ‘The ontology of the photographic image’ (trans. H. Gray), Film Quarterly, 13:4, pp. 4–9, https://doi.org/10.2307/1210183.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bergson, H. ([1896] 2004), Matter and Memory (trans. N. Margaret Paul and W. Scott Palmer), New York: Dover Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biderman, S., Gil, R. and Lewit, I. (2019), ‘Life in the Black Lodge: The twin challenge of watching Twin Peaks’, in A. Dipaolo and J. Gillies (eds), The Politics of Twin Peaks, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 191–77.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bordwell, D., Staiger, J. and Thompson, K. ([1985] 2005), The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Styles & Mode of Production to 1960, Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dayan, D. (1974), ‘The tutor-code of classical cinema’, Film Quarterly, 28:1, pp. 22–31, https://doi.org/10.2307/1211439.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Deleuze, G. ([1968] 2006), Difference and Repetition (trans. P. Patton), London: Bloomsbury.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Deleuze, G. ([1985] 1989), Cinema 2: The Time Image (trans. H. Tomlinson and R. Galeta), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. ([1980] 1987), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (trans. B. Massumi), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Del Rio, E. (2008), Deleuze and the Cinemas of Performance: Powers of Affection, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Derrida, J. ([1992] 1995), The Gift of Death (trans. D. Wills), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Derrida, J. (1993), Aporias: Dying--awaiting (One Another At) the ‘Limits of Truth’ (trans. T. Dutoit), Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Derrida, J. ([1993] 1994), Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International (trans. P. Kamuf), Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Doane, M. A. (2003), ‘The object of theory’, in I. Margulies (ed.), Rites of Realism: Essays on Corporeal Cinema, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 89–80.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Elsasser, T. ([2009] 2021), ‘The mind-game film’, in W. Buckland, D. Polan and S. H. Jeong (eds), The Mind-game Film: Distributed Agency, Time Travel, and Productive Pathology, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 112–89.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gaut, B. (2010), A Philosophy of Cinematic Art, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hansen, M. (1997), ‘Introduction’, in S. Kracauer (ed.), Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. vii–xlv.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Heidegger, M. ([1927] 1996), Being and Time (trans. J. Stambaugh), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Heidegger, M. ([1954] 1977), The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (trans. W. Lovitt), New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hofstadter, D. ([1979] 1980), Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lynch, D. (1992), Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lynch, D. (1997), Lost Highway.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lynch, D. (2006), Inland Empire.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lyotard, J. F. ([1988] 2006), The Lyotard Reader and Guide (trans. K. Crome and J. Williams), Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Massumi, B. (2002), Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Nochimson, M. P. (2013), David Lynch Swerves: Uncertainty from Lost Highway to Inland Empire, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Nochimson, M. P. (2019), Television Rewired: The Rise of the Auteur Series, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Peirce, C. S. ([1931–35] 1974), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 5, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Penderecki, K. (1961), Threnody to the Victims of Hiroshima, Kraków: Polskie Wydawnictwo Muzyczne.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Powell, J. (2014), ‘David Lynch, Francis Bacon, Gilles Deleuze: The cinematic diagram and the hall of time’, Discourse, 36:3, pp. 339–09, https://doi.org/10.13110/discourse.36.3.0309.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Prince, S. (1996), ‘True lies: Perceptual realism, digital images, and film theory’, Film Quarterly, 49:3, pp. 27–37, https://doi.org/10.2307/1213468.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Rosen, P. (2003), ‘History of image, image of history: Subject and ontology in Bazin’, in I. Margulies (ed.), Rites of Realism: Essays on Corporeal Cinema, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 79–42.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Twin Peaks (1990–91, USA: Lynch/Frost Productions, Propaganda Films, Spelling Television and Twin Peaks Productions).
    [Google Scholar]
34. Twin Peaks: The Return (2017, USA: Showtime Networks, Rancho Rosa Partnership, Twin Peaks Productions and Lynch/Frost Productions).
    [Google Scholar]
35. Willemen, P. (1994), Looks and Frictions: Essays in Cultural Studies and Film Theory, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Zanger, A. Y. (2013), ‘Parallel images: The “real”, the ghost and the cinema’, The International Journal of the Image, 3:1, pp. 11–1.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Badiou, A. (2000), Deleuze: The Clamor of Being (trans. L. Burchill), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Blake, L. (2016), ‘Trapped in the hysterical sublime: Twin Peaks, postmodernism, and the neoliberal now’, in J. A. Weinstock and C. Spooner (eds), Return to Twin Peaks: New Approaches to Materiality, Theory, and Genre on Television, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 245–29.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hills, M. (2018), ‘Cult TV revival: Generational seriality, recap culture, and the “brand gap” of Twin Peaks: The Return’, Television & New Media, 19:4, pp. 310–27, https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476417742976.
    [Google Scholar]