Skip to content
1981
Volume 15, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1757-1979
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1987

Abstract

This article is a self-examination of the process and intentions behind writing the stage play, . It considers the ethics and ethos that arise throughout the play in an effort to more deeply clarify the underlying tensions associated with those elements. As a play that might be considered ‘absurdist’, probes issues of adoption, infertility, commercialism and what it means to be human on a planet where there is no scarcity of people. The play presents an infertile couple in capitalist America and their quest for a child in this fast-paced, ‘Frankensteinean’, dark comedy. The archetypal characters acerbically deliberate, discuss, deduct and raise ethical questions that are relevant to our world today. Technology, science and money mesh to beget the first mail-order Electric Boy. Ultimately a threat to the order and arrangement of the human world, the Electric Boy must be sacrificed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/peet_00076_7
2025-12-11
2026-04-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Laurie (1982), ‘O Superman’, Big Science, CD, USA: Warner Bros.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Chris (2015), ‘The hive mind’, in J. Brockman (ed.), What to Think about Machines That Think, New York: Harper Perennial, pp. 28284.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anon. (2011), ‘Woman tries to sell toddler on eBay’, Holland Sentinel, 17 May, https://www.hollandsentinel.com/story/news/2011/05/17/woman-tries-to-sell-toddler/45260188007/. Accessed 28 May 2025.
  4. Bowie, David (1974), ‘1984’, Diamond Dogs, CD, USA: RCA.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Čapek, Karel (1920), ‘R.U.R. or Rossum’s Universal Robots’, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Scholarly Commons, 27 July, https://commons.erau.edu/oer-main/61. Accessed 28 May 2025.
  6. Collodi, Carlo (1883), Pinocchio, Florence: Felice Paggi.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Esslin, Martin (1960), ‘The theatre of the absurd’, The Tulane Drama Review, 4:4, pp. 315, https://doi.org/10.2307/1124873.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Harrison, Jordan (2014), Marjorie Prime, New York: Samuel French.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Havel, Václav ([1969] 1993), The Increased Difficulty of Concentration, in V. Havel (ed.), The Garden Party and Other Plays (trans. V. Blackwell), New York: Grove Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ives, David ([1988] 1995), Sure Thing, New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kraftwerk (1978), ‘The Robots’, The Man-Machine, CD, USA: Capitol Records.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lisi, Antony G. (2015), ‘I, for one, welcome our machine overlords’, in J. Brockman (ed.), What to Think about Machines That Think, New York: Harper Perennial, pp. 2224.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Matthew 27: 46 (1985), King James Bible, International ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Meriwether, Elizabeth (2006), Heddatron, New York: Playscripts.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Midnight Star (1983), ‘Freak-A-Zoid’, No Parking on the Dance Floor, CD, USA: Solar.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nesse, Randolph (2015), ‘Will computers become like thinking, talking dogs?’, in J. Brockman (ed.), What to Think about Machines That Think, New York: Harper Perennial, pp. 28991.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. O’Donnell, James J. (2015), ‘Tangled up in the question’, in J. Brockman (ed.), What to Think about Machines That Think, New York: Harper Perennial, pp. 10607.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Overton, David (2020), The Electric Boy, unpublished play script.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Raza, S. Abbas (2015), ‘The values of artificial intelligence’, in J. Brockman (ed.), What to Think about Machines That Think, New York: Harper Perennial, pp. 25759.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Scott, Ridley (1982), Blade Runner, USA: Warner Brothers.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Scott, Ridley (2012), Prometheus, UK: Twentieth Century Fox.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Styx (1983), ‘Mr. Roboto’, Kilroy Was Here, CD, USA: A&M.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Vinge, Vernor (1993), ‘The coming technological singularity: how to survive in the post-human era’, VISION-21 Symposium, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 30–31 March.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Vouloumanos, Athena (2015), ‘Will machines do our thinking for us?’, in J. Brockman (ed.), What to Think about Machines That Think, New York: Harper Perennial, pp. 45657.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wollstonecraft, Mary S. (1818), Frankenstein; or, the Modern Prometheus, London: Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor and Jones.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Descartes, René (1850), Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting the Reason, and Seeking Truth in the Sciences (trans. J. Veitch), Edinburgh: Sutherland and Knox, https://literaturesave2.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/discourse-on-the-method-by-rene-descartes.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lean, David (1962), Lawrence of Arabia, UK: Columbia Pictures.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sophocles (429 BCE), Oedipus.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/peet_00076_7
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/peet_00076_7
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test