Form and content in early modern legal books: Bridging material bibliography with history of legal thought | Intellect Skip to content
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1476-413X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9509


According to common sense, a book is a way of conveying ideas. On their own books do not alter or add anything to what authors want to communicate to readers. The most recent history of books has produced a Copernican shift from this simplistic view of the nature of these companions. Books do matter. Their material naturefrom page-layout, to typographical devices, graphics, format and even their bindingconveys meaning. This article seeks to relate intellectual shifts in early modern legal theory to actual changes in the ideas dominating the understanding of law. The paper would like to examine the problematic the imperial position traditional legal history gives to an individual author (reviving the question once posed by Foucault: what is an author?). Is the author merely an intellectual evolution in the creation of new figures of legal discourse?


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): history of book; history of law; legal thought
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error