Participatory budgeting in the age of post-politics: Examining the discourses of citizens and representatives of expert-political systems in three municipalities in Portugal

References

1. Agenda 21 (1992), Report of the UN Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro: UNESCO, www.unesco.org/education/nfsunesco/pdf/RIO_E.PDF. Accessed 19 October 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arnstein, S. (1969), 'The ladder of participation', Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35:4, pp. 216-24.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Avritzer, L. (2003), 'Modelos de deliberação democrática: Uma análise do orçamento participativo no Brasil' ('Models of democratic deliberation: An analysis of participatory budgeting in Brazil'), in B. S. Santos (ed.), Democratizar a Democracia: Os Caminhos da Democracia Participativa (Democratizing Democracy: The Paths to Participatory Democracy), Porto: Afrontamento, pp. 561-98.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baiocchi, G. and Ganuza, E. (2014), 'Participatory budgeting as if emancipation mattered', Politics and Society, 42:1, pp. 29-50.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barnett, J., Burningham, K., Walker, G. and Cass, N. (2012), 'Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK', Public Understanding of Science, 21:1, pp. 36-50.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barry, J. and Ellis, G. (2011), 'Beyond consensus? Agonism, contestation, republicanism and a low-carbon future', in P. Devine-Wright (ed.), Renewable Energy and the Public: From Nimby to Participation, Oxford: Earthscan, pp. 29-42.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Batel, S., Castro, P., Devine-Wright, P. and Howarth, C. (2016), 'Developing a critical agenda to understand pro-environmental actions: Contributions from social representations and social practices theories', Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7:6, pp. 727-45.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Beck, U. (2009), World at Risk, Cambridge: Polity.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Blühdorn, I. (2013), 'The governance of unsustainability: Ecology and democracy after the post-democratic turn', Environmental Politics, 22:1, pp. 16-36.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Blühdorn, I. (2014), 'Post-ecologist governmentality: Post-democracy, post-politics and the politics of unsustainability', in J. Wilson and E. Swyngedouw (eds), The Post-Political and Its Discontents: Spaces of Depoliticisation, Spaces of Radical Politics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 146-66.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Castro, P. and Batel, S. (2008), 'Social representation change and resistance: On the difficulties of generalizing new norms', Culture and Psychology, 14:4, pp. 475-97.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Castro, P. and Mouro, C. (2016), '"Imagining ourselves" as participating publics: An example from biodiversity conservation', Public Understanding of Science, 25:7, pp. 858-72.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Clarke, V. and Braun, V. (2013), 'Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning', The Psychologist, 26:2, pp. 120-23.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Colander, D. and Qui Lin Chong, A. (2009), 'The choice architecture of choice architecture: Toward a non-paternalistic nudge policy', discussion paper 10-36, Vermont, CT: Middlebury College Economics.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cotton, M. and Devine-Wright, P. (2012), 'Making electricity networks "visible": Industry actor representations of "publics" and public engagement in infrastructure planning', Public Understanding of Science, 21:1, pp. 17-35.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dalton, R., Scarrow, E. and Cain, B. (2004), 'Advanced democracies and the new politics', Journal of Democracy, 15:1, pp. 124-38.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Delgado, C. (2013), 'Cidadãos, técnicos e políticos: Do que falamos, quando falamos de participação pública?' ('Citizens, technicians and politicians: What are we talking about when we talk about public participation?'), Forum Sociológico, 23, pp. 69-76.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Devine-Wright, P. (2009), 'Rethinking nimbyism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action', Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19:6, pp. 426-41.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Dias, N. (2013), Esperança democrática: 25 anos de orçamentos participativos no mundo. S. Brás de Alportel: Associação In Loco.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Entradas, M. (2016a), 'Experimenting with distributed approaches – case study: A "national-level" distributed dialogue on bioenergy in the United Kingdom', Public Understanding of Science, 25:4, pp. 490-98.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Entradas, M. (2016b), 'What is the public's role in "space" policymaking? Images of the public by practitioners of "space" communication in the United Kingdom', Public Understanding of Science, 25:5, pp. 603-11.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Falanga, R. (2013), 'Desafios e horizontes da participação cívica nas políticas públicas' ('Challenges and horizons of civic participation in public policy'), in J. Ferrão and A. Horta (eds), Ambiente, Território e Sociedade: Novas Agendas de Investigação (Environment, Territory and Society: New Research Agendas), Lisbon: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais, pp. 197-203.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Falanga, R. (2014), 'Changes need change: A psychosociological perspective on participation and social inclusion', Rivista di Psicologia Clinica, 2, pp. 24-38.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Falanga, R. (2018), 'Como aumentar a escala dos orçamentos participativos? O Orçamento Participativo Portugal e Orçamento Participativo Jovem Portugal' ('How to scale up participatory budgets? Portugal Participatory Budgeting and Portugal Youth Participatory Budget'), Policy Brief, Lisbon: Observa and ICS-ULisboa.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Fedozzi, L. (2009), 'Cultura política e orçamento participativo' ('Political culture and participatory budgeting'), Cadernos Metrópole, 11, pp. 385-414.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Figueiredo, E. and Fidélis, T. (2003), '"No meu quintal, não!" Contributos para uma análise dos movimentais ambientais de raiz popular em Portugal (1974-1994)' ('"Not in my backyard": Contributions towards an analysis of popular environmental movements in Portugal [1974-1994]'), Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 65, pp. 151-73.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Foucault, M. (1975), Surveiller et Punir (Discipline and Punish), Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gonçalves, M. E. (2002), 'Implementation of EIA directives in Portugal: How changes in civic culture are challenging political and administrative practice', Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22:3, pp. 249-69.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gonçalves, M. E. and Castro, P. (2009), 'Local is beautiful? Governing science-society relations in Europe', Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 8:2, pp. 191-207.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Harvey, D. (2006), Spaces of Global Capitalism, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hindmarsh, R. and Matthews, C. (2008), 'Deliberative speak at the turbine face: Community engagement, wind farms and renewable energy transitions in Australia', Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 10:3, pp. 217-32.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Knudsen, J. K., Wold, L. C., Aas, Ø., Haug, J. J. K., Batel, S., Devine-Wright, P. and Jacobsen, G. B. (2015), 'Local perceptions of opportunities for engagement and procedural justice in electricity transmission grid projects in Norway and the UK', Land Use Policy, 48, pp. 299-308.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kropp, C. (2018), 'Controversies around energy landscapes in third modernity', Landscape Research, 43:4, pp. 562-73.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lima, M. L. (2004), 'Images of the public in the debates about risk: Consequences for participation', Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 2:3, pp. 149-63.
    [Google Scholar]
35. McClymont, K. and O'Hare, P. (2008), 'We're not Nimbys! Contrasting local protest groups with idealised conceptions of sustainable communities', Local Environment, 13:4, pp. 1-15.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Moir, E. and Leyshon, M. (2013), 'The design of decision-making: Participatory budgeting and the production of localism', Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 18:9, pp. 1002-23.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Mouffe, C. (2013), Agonistics: Thinking The World Politically, New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Nadaï, A. and Labussiere, O. (2017), 'Exhaustible-renewable wind power', in S. Bouzarovski, M. J. Pasqualetti and V. C. Broto (eds), The Routledge Research Companion to Energy Geographies, London: Routledge, pp. 306-29.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Nunes, C. (2011), 'Expressões alterglobais na sociedade portuguesa: Ecos transnacionais de novas formas de acção colectiva?' ('Alterglobal expressions in Portuguese society: Transnational echoes of new forms of collective action?'), CIES working paper 104/2011, Lisbon: ISCTE-IUL-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Pomerantz, A. (1986), 'Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims', Human Studies, 9:2-3, pp. 219-29.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. J. (2005), 'A typology of public engagement mechanisms', Science, Technology and Human Values, 30:2, pp. 251-90.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Stirling, A. (2005), 'Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology', in M. Leach, I. Scooned and B. Wynne (eds), Science and Citizen: Globalization and the Challenges of Engagement, London: Zed, pp. 218-32.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Swyngedouw, E. (2011), 'Interrogating post-democracy: Reclaiming egalitarian political spaces', Political Geography, 30:7, pp. 370-80.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Swyngedouw, E. (2015), 'Urbanization and environmental futures: Politicizing urban political ecologies', in T. Perreault, G. Bridge and J. McCarthy (eds), Handbook of Political Ecology, London: Routledge, pp. 609-19.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Tait, M. and Inch, A. (2016), 'Putting localism in place: Conservative images of the good community and the contradictions of planning reform in England', Planning Practice and Research, 31:2, pp. 174-94.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Taylor, G. W. and Ussher, J. M. (2001), 'Making sense of SandM: A discourse analytic account', Sexualities, 4:3, pp. 293-314.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. (2008), NUDGE: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Vala, J., Brito, R. and Lopes, D. (1999), Expressões dos Racismos em Portugal (Expressions of Racisms in Portugal), Lisbon: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Žižek, S. (1999), The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Žižek, S. (2002), Welcome to the Desert of the Real, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Santos, Margarida, Batel, Susana and Gonçalves, Maria Eduarda (2019), 'Participatory budgeting in the age of post-politics: Examining the discourses of citizens and representatives of expert-political systems in three municipalities in Portugal', Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 18:2, pp. 153-72, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss_00003_1
    [Google Scholar]