Skip to content
1981
Southern European Perspectives on International Student Mobility
  • ISSN: 1476-413X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9509

Abstract

This article focuses on welfare retrenchment in Portugal by analysing the evolution of public sector employment up until 2013. A multidimensional analysis of the structure of public employment in the Portuguese state was developed, theoretically guided by the ‘hands of the state’ model proposed by Bourdieu, which divides the main functions of contemporary states between its left hand (more redistributive) and its right hand (more rational economic-oriented). Bourdieu’s approach is especially useful in addressing the transformations of the Portuguese public employment between 1979 and 2013, characterized by specific economic, social and political changes. In 2013 – a year in which the adjustment measures agreed by the Portuguese government, the European Central Bank, the European Commission and the International Monetary Fund during the global crisis were especially intense – we observed the tendency towards the disqualification of public employment and the shrinking of the left hand of the Portuguese state. Public policy orientations in the areas of education and science were particularly troubling, considering the structural backwardness the country faces in these fields in the context of the European Union.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pjss_00028_1
2020-09-01
2026-02-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahonen, P., Hyyryläinen, E. and Salminen, A. (2006), ‘Looking for governance configurations of European welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16:2, pp. 17384.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E. and Zucman, G. (eds) (2018), World Inequality Report 2018, Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alves, S. (2015), ‘Welfare state changes and outcomes: The cases of Portugal and Denmark from a comparative perspective’, Social Policy & Administration, 49:1, pp. 123.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnholtz, J. (2012), ‘Elites in the European field of power: Reproduction transformation and matters of content’, Praktiske grunde: Tidsskrift for kultur- og samfundsvidenskab, 2:3, pp. 5166.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Arnholtz, J. (2018), ‘Tensions, actors and inventions: Bourdieu’s sociology of the state as an unfinished but promising research program’, in T. Medvetz and J. J. Sallaz (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 577600.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Arnholtz, J. and Hammerslev, O. (2013), ‘Transcended power of the state: The role of actors in Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology of the state’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 14:1, pp. 4264.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Arts, W. and Gelissen, J. (2002), ‘Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more?’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12:2, pp. 13758.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Atkinson, W., Roberts, S. and Savage, M. (eds) (2013), Class Inequality in Austerity Britain: Power, Difference and Suffering, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bieling, H. J. (2012), ‘EU facing the crisis: Social and employment policies in times of tight budgets’, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 18:3, pp. 25571.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Blyth, M. (2013), Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (2012), The Politics of the New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Botelho, M. C., Nunes, N., Mauritti, R. and Craveiro, D. (2015), ‘Tendências de mudança das funções do Estado em Portugal’ (‘Trends in changing the functions of the state in Portugal’), in A. F. Costa and R. M. Carmo (eds), Desigualdades em Questão: Análises e Problemáticas (‘Inequalities at issue: Analysis and problems’), Lisbon: Mundos Sociais, pp. 5975.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1989), La Noblesse d’État (‘The state nobility’), Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bourdieu, P. (ed.) (1993), La Misère du Monde (‘The weight of the world’), Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bourdieu, P. (1998a), Contre Feux: Propos Pour Servir à la Résistance Contre L’Invasion Néo-libérale (‘Firing back: Against the tyranny of the market’), Paris: Liber-Raisons D’Agir.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bourdieu, P. (1998b), ‘On the fundamental ambivalence of the state’, Polygraph, 10, pp. 2132.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bourdieu, P. (2000), Propos Sur Le Champ Politique (‘About the politics field’), Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bourdieu, P. (2001), Contrefeux 2: Pour Un Mouvement Social Européen (‘Firing back 2: For a European social movement’), Paris: Raisons D’Agir Éditions.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bourdieu, P. (2008), Political Interventions: Social Science and Political Action, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Bourdieu, P. (2012), Sur l’État: Cours au Collège de France 1989–1992 (‘About the state: Courses at the College of France, 1989–1992’), Paris: Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Bourdieu, P., Droit, R. P. and Ferenczi, T. (2008), ‘The left hand and the right hand of the state’, Variant, 32, pp. 34, https://www.variant.org.uk/32texts/bourdieu32.html. Accessed 31 January 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L. and Farage, S. (1994), ‘Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field’, Sociological Theory, 12:1, pp. 118.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Brady, D. and Lee, H. Y. (2014), ‘The rise and fall of government spending in affluent democracies, 1971–2008’, Journal of European Social Policy, 24:1, pp. 5679.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Carmo, R. M. and Nunes, N. (2013), ‘As (des)igualdades face ao estado: Atitudes e representações sociais na Europa’ (‘[In]equality vis-à-vis the state: Attitudes and social representations in Europe’), in F. C. Silva (ed.), Os Portugueses e o Estado-Providência: Uma Perspetiva Comparada (‘The Portuguese and the welfare state: A comparative perspective’), Lisbon: ICS, pp. 85105.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Carmo, R. M., Nunes, N. and Ferreira, D. (2019), ‘Social inequalities and collective action in times of crisis: The case of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area’, Journal of Civil Society, 15:2, pp. 17896.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Carolo, D. and Pereirinha, J. (2010), ‘The development of the welfare state in Portugal: Trends in social expenditure between 1938 and 2003’, Revista de Historia Económica (Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History), 28:3, pp. 469501.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. CASES (2019), Social Economy Satellite Account 2016, Lisbon: Cooperativa António Sérgio para a Economia Social.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Chopra, R. (2003), ‘Neoliberalism as doxa: Bourdieu’s theory of the state and the contemporary Indian discourse on globalization and liberalization’, Cultural Studies, 17:3&4, pp. 41944.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (2012), ‘The alchemy of austerity’, Critical Social Policy, 32:3, pp. 299319.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Clayton, R. and Pontusson, J. (1998), ‘Welfare-state retrenchment revisited: Entitlement cuts, public sector restructuring, and inegalitarian trends in advanced capitalist societies’, World Politics, 51:1, pp. 6798.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Cohen, A. (2011), ‘Bourdieu hits Brussels: The genesis and structure of the European field of power’, International Political Sociology, 5:3, pp. 33539.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Crouch, C. (2015), Governing Social Risks in Post-Crisis Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Demmke, C. and Moilanen, T. (2012), Civil Services in the EU of 27: Reform Outcomes and the Future of the Civil Service, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. DGAEP (2005), Caracterização dos Recursos Humanos da Administração Pública Portuguesa (‘Characterization of the human resources of the Portuguese public administration’), Lisbon: DGAEP.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. DGAEP (2013), Análise da Evolução das Estruturas da Administração Pública Central Portuguesa Decorrente do PRACE e do PREMAC (‘Analysis of the evolution of the structures of the Portuguese central public administration arising from PRACE and PREMAC’), Lisbon: DGAEP.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Egan, M. and Tabar, P. (2016), ‘Bourdieu in Beirut: Wasta, the state and social reproduction in Lebanon’, Middle East Critique, 25:3, pp. 24970.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. European Commission (2011), ‘The economic adjustment programme for Portugal’, Occasional Papers, 79, 28 June, pp. 1116, https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/occasional_paper/2011/pdf/ocp79_en.pdf. Accessed 31 January 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Eurostat (2010), Public Employment in European Union Member States, Madrid: Spanish Government.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Ferrera, M. (1996), ‘The “southern model” of welfare in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6:1, pp. 1737.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ferrera, M. (2005), Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Gallie, D. and Paugam, S. (eds) (2000), Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Geiselberger, H. (ed.) (2017), The Great Recession, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Hammerschmid, G., Van de Walle, S., Andrews, R. and Bezes, P. (2016), Public Administration Reforms in Europe: The View from the Top, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Hay, C. and Wincott, D. (2012), The Political Economy of European Welfare Capitalism, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Jæger, M. M. and Kvist, J. (2003), ‘Pressures on state welfare in post-industrial societies: Is more or less better?’, Social Policy & Administration, 37:6, pp. 55572.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Karagiannis, N. and King, J. E. (eds) (2019), A Modern Guide to State Intervention, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kauppi, N. (2003), ‘Bourdieu’s political sociology and the politics of European integration’, Theory and Society, 32:5, pp. 77589.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Kauppi, N. (2018), Toward a Reflexive Political Sociology of the European Union, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Klitgaard, M. B. and Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2014), ‘Partisan effects on welfare retrenchment: Empirical evidence from a measurement of government intentions’, Social Policy & Administration, 47:1, pp. 5071.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Kuhlmann, S. and Wollmann, H. (2014), Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Leibfried, S., Huber, E., Lange, M., Levy, J. D. and Nullmeier, F. (2015), The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Lenoir, R. (2012), ‘L’État Selon Pierre Bourdieu’ (‘The state according to Pierre Bourdieu’), Sociétés Contemporaines, 87:3, pp. 12354.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Levy, J. D. (2010), ‘Welfare retrenchment’, in F. G. S. Castles, J. L. Leibfried, H. Obinger and C. Pierson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55265.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Loyal, S. and Quilley, S. (2017), ‘The particularity of the universal: Critical reflections on Bourdieu’s theory of symbolic power and the state’, Theory and Society, 46, pp. 42962.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Madureira, C. (2015), ‘A reforma da administração pública central no Portugal democrático: do período pós-revolucionário à intervenção da troika’ (‘The reform of the central public administration in democratic Portugal: From the post-revolutionary period to the intervention of the troika’), Revista de Administração Pública, 49:3, pp. 54762.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Marí-Klose, P. and Moreno-Fuentes, F. J. (2013), ‘The southern European welfare model in the post-industrial order’, European Societies, 15:4, pp. 47592.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Matsaganis, M. (2011), ‘The welfare state and the crisis: The case of Greece’, Journal of European Social Policy, 21:5, pp. 50112.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Matsaganis, M., Ferrera, M., Capucha, L. and Moreno, L. (2003), ‘Mending nets in the south: Anti-poverty policies in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain’, Social Policy & Administration, 37:6, pp. 63965.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Matsaganis, M. and Leventi, C. (2014), ‘The distributional impact of austerity and the recession in southern Europe’, South European Society and Politics, 19:3, pp. 393412.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Mauritti, R., Botelho, M. C., Nunes, N. and Craveiro, D. (2020), ‘Educação em tempos de austeridade’ (‘Education in times of austerity’), in A. Oliveira, E. Pereira and R. Mauritti (eds), Práticas Inovadoras em Gestão Universitária: Interfaces entre Brasil e Portugal (‘Innovative practices in university management: Interfaces between Brazil and Portugal’), Rio de Janeiro: Oficina de Livros Gráfica e Editora, pp. 12150.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Nullmeier, F. and Kaufmann, F. (2010), ‘Post-war welfare state development’, in F. G. S. Castles, J. L. Leibfried, H. Obinger and C. Pierson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 81101.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Ocampo, J. A. and Stiglitz, J. (2018), The Welfare State Revisited, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. OECD (1994), The OECD Jobs Study: Facts, Analysis, Strategies, Paris: OECD Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. OECD (2015), Government at a Glance 2015, Paris: OECD Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. OECD (2019), Government at a Glance 2019, Paris: OECD Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. O’Flynn, J., Blackman, D. and Halligan, J. (2014), Crossing Boundaries in Public Management and Policy: The International Experience, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Peillon, M. (1998), ‘Bourdieu’s field and the sociology of welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, 27:2, pp. 21329.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Pénet, P. (2018), ‘The IMF failure that wasn’t: Risk ignorance during the European debt crisis’, British Journal of Sociology, 69:4, pp. 103155.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Pierson, C. (2007), Beyond the Welfare State? The New Political Economy of Welfare, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Pierson, P. (1994), Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Pierson, P. (2001), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Rodrigues, C. F. (ed.) (2016), Desigualdade do Rendimento e Pobreza em Portugal: As Consequências Sociais do Programa de Ajustamento (‘Inequality of income and poverty in Portugal: The social consequences of the adjustment programme’), Lisbon: FFMS.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Saint-Martin, D. (2004), Building the New Managerialist State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Scharpf, F. (1999), Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Schinkel, W. (2015), ‘The sociologist and the state: An assessment of Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology’, British Journal of Sociology, 66:2, pp. 21535.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Silva, P. A. (2003), ‘Building a welfare state in a context of austerity: The Portuguese case’, in F. Monteiro, J. Tavares, M. Glatzer and A. Cardoso (eds), Portugal, Strategic Options in a European Context, New York and London: Lexington Books, pp. 10727.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Starke, P. (2006), ‘The politics of welfare state retrenchment: A literature review’, Social Policy & Administration, 40:1, pp. 10420.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Stoleroff, A. (2007), ‘The revolution in the public services sector in Portugal: With or without the unions’, Transfer, 13:4, pp. 63152.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Suleiman, E. (2003), Dismantling Democratic States, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Vis, B., Van Kersbergen, K. and Hylands, T. (2011), ‘To what extent did the financial crisis intensify the pressure to reform the welfare state?’, Social Policy & Administration, 45:4, pp. 33853.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Wagner, A. C. (2012), ‘La noblesse d’état et ses prolongements’ (‘The nobility of the state and its prolongations’), in F. Lebaron and G. Mauger (eds), Lectures de Pierre Bourdieu (‘Pierre Bourdieu lectures’), Paris: Ellipse, pp. 16992.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Zartaloudis, S. (2014), ‘The impact of the fiscal crisis on Greek and Portuguese welfare states: Retrenchment before the catch-up?’, Social Policy & Administration, 48:4, pp. 43049.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Mauritti, Rosário, Nunes, Nuno, Botelho, Maria do Carmo and Craveiro, Daniela (2020), ‘The left and right hands of the Portuguese state: Welfare retrenchment of public employment’, Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 19:2&3, pp. 23757, https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss_00028_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/pjss_00028_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/pjss_00028_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test