Skip to content
1981
Navigating the Complexity of International Migration
  • ISSN: 1476-413X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9509

Abstract

Throughout the twentieth century, the intensification of migration flows prompted an increasing focus by academics and policy-makers on fostering the integration of immigrants in receiving societies. This emphasis also led to discussions on the feasibility of measuring and monitoring integration. Numerous policies addressing migrant integration gained a sound conceptual foundation, reshaping knowledge production through interaction with policy-making and expanding data collection and analysis. Integration is a key illustration of potential reflective dialogue between research, policy and measurement. Nevertheless, publications that relate these three approaches of integration – theoretical, political and statistical – are scarce, primarily due to limited communication between these fields in most countries, a lack of covenant between theoretical, political and methodological concepts and indicators, and the multidimensional and dynamic nature of migrant integration. This article seeks to contribute to this debate, focusing on Portugal, a relatively ‘new’ immigration country recognized for having one of the world’s best integration policies, albeit without a historically rooted national integration model. This article examines the evolution of research–policy–statistics relationships and structures since the 1990s concerning migration and integration. It explores the foundations of the co-production of common operational concepts in theory, policy-making and statistical indicators, seeking a more comprehensive understanding and less dichotomized appropriation of these concepts. This article intends to promote reflection among policy actors, practitioners, scholars and statisticians regarding their actions and interactions in the context of the complexity of migrant integration. It also contributes to the research landscape by conceptualizing the intricacies of immigrant integration while assessing whether mainstreaming, rather than alienation, characterizes Portugal’s approach to organizing and guiding these processes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pjss_00045_1
2024-05-27
2024-09-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bijl, R. and Verweij, A. (2012), ‘Measuring and monitoring immigrant integration in Europe: Facts and views’, in R. Bijl and V. Arjen (eds), Measuring and Monitoring Immigrant Integration in Europe: Integration Policies and Monitoring Efforts in 17 European Countries, The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research – SCP, pp. 1142.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Breugel, I. V. and Scholten, P. (2019), ‘Governance by proxy: A comparative policy analysis of the mainstreaming of immigrant integration governance’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 22:3, pp. 20725, https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1619973.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Castles, S., Korac, M., Vasta, E. and Vertovec, S. (2001), Integration: Mapping the Field, July, Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Migration and Policy Research and Refugee Studies Centre and Home Office Immigration Research and Statistics Service (IRSS), https://publications.goettingen-research-online.de/handle/2/111219?cs=default. Accessed 12 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Commissioning of the European Communities (2003), ‘Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Immigration, Integration and Employment’, Brussels: European Commission (COM), 3 June, pp. 158, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2003:0336:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Commissioning of the European Communities (2005), ‘Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Common Agenda for Integration: Framework for the Integration of Third-Country Nationals in the European Union’, Brussels: European Commission (COM), 1 September, pp. 120, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52005DC0389. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Council of Europe (1996), Measurement and Indicators of Integration, Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, pp. 1182, https://coe.int/t/dg3/migration/archives/documentation/Series_Community_Relations/Measurement_indicators_integration_en.pdf. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Council of the European Union 14615/04 (2004), Annex: Common Basic Principles for Immigrant Integration Policy in the European Union, Brussels: European Commission, 19 November, pp. 1924, https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/sites/default/files/2008-08/docl_1274_415560448.pdf. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Council of the European Union 8771/10 (2010), ‘Zaragoza Declaration’, MIGR 40, SOC 271, https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-8771-2010-INIT/en/pdf. Accessed 12 April 2024.
  9. Decree-Law 3-A/96 (1996), Institui o Alto-Comissário para a Imigração e Minorias Étnicas (‘Establishes the High Commissioner for immigration and ethnic minorities’), 26 January, https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/decreto-lei/3-a-219553. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Decree-Law 251/2002 (2002), Cria o Alto-Comissariado para a Imigração e Minorias Étnicas (‘Creates the High Commission for immigration and ethnic minorities’), 22 November, https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/decreto-lei/251-2002-448756. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Decree-Law 167/2007 (2007), Aprova a orgânica do Alto Comissariado para a Imigração e Diálogo Intercultural, I. P. (‘Approves the High Commission for immigration and intercultural dialogue’), 3 May, https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/decreto-lei/167-2007-521254. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Decree-Law 31/2014 (2014), Aprova a orgânica do Alto Comissariado para as Migrações, I.P. (‘Approves the High Commission for migration’), 27 February, https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/decreto-lei/31-2014-572382. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. DOCT/1772/CSE/DSFA (2006), Estatísticas dos Movimentos Migratórios (‘Migratory movement statistics’), Lisbon: Documento do Conselho Superior de Estatística – Secção Permanente de Estatísticas Demográficas e Sociais, das Famílias e do Ambiente, Grupo de Trabalho sobre Estatísticas da Demografia, INE, https://ine.pt/ngt_server/attachfileu.jsp?look_parentBoui=1503986&att_display=n&att_download=y. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Entzinger, H. and Biezeveld, R. (2003), Benchmarking in Immigrant Integration, Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Favell, A. (2001), ‘Integration policy and integration research in Europe: A review and critique’, in A. Aleinikoff and D. Klusmeyer (eds), Citizenship Today: Global Perspectives and Practices, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, pp. 69122.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Filindra, A. and Goodman, S. W. (2019), ‘Studying public policy through immigration policy: Advances in theory and measurement’, Policy Studies Journal, 47:3, pp. 498516.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. FRA (EU Agency for Fundamental Rights) (2017), Together in the EU: Promoting the Participation of Migrants and their Descendants, Luxembourg: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, https://bit.ly/fra-2017. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Garcés-Mascareñas, B. and Penninx, R. (2016a), ‘Introduction: Integration as a three-way process approach?’, in B. Garcés-Mascareñas and R. Penninx (eds), Integration Process and Policies in Europe: Contexts, Levels and Actors, New York, Dordrecht and London: Springer Open IMISCOE Research Series, pp. 19, https://bit.ly/mascarenas-pennin-2016. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Garcés-Mascareñas, B. and Penninx, R. (2016b), ‘The concept of integration as an analytical tool and as a policy concept’, in B. Garcés-Mascareñas and R. Penninx (eds), Integration Process and Policies in Europe: Contexts, Levels and Actors, New York, Dordrecht and London: Springer Open IMISCOE Research, pp. 1129, https://bit.ly/mascarenas-pennin-2016. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Garcés-Mascareñas, B. and Penninx, R. (2016c), ‘Analysis and conclusion’, in B. Garcés-Mascareñas and R. Penninx (eds), Integration Process and Policies in Europe: Contexts, Levels and Actors, New York, Dordrecht and London: Springer Open IMISCOE Research, pp. 189202, https://bit.ly/mascarenas-pennin-2016. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Goodman, S. W. (2015), ‘Conceptualizing and measuring citizenship and integration policy: Past lessons and new approaches’, Comparative Political Studies, 48:14, pp. 190541, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015592648.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Koopmans, R. (2010), ‘Trade-offs between equality and difference: Immigrant integration, multiculturalism and the welfare state in cross-national perspective’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36:1, pp. 126, https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830903250881.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kraler, A., Reichel, D. and Entzinger, H. (2015), ‘Migration statistics in Europe: A core component of governance and population research’, in P. Scholten, H. Entzinger, R. Penninx and S. Verbeek (eds), Integrating Immigrants in Europe: Research–Policy Dialogues, New York, Dordrecht and London: Springer Open IMISCOE Research Series, pp. 3958, https://bit.ly/kraler-reichel-entzinger-2015. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Landecker, W. S. (1951), ‘Types of integration and their measurement’, American Journal of Sociology, 56:4, pp. 33240.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Machado, F. and Matias, A. R. (2006), Bibliografia sobre Imigração e Minorias Étnicas em Portugal 2000–2006 (‘Bibliography on immigration and ethnic minorities in Portugal 2000–2006’), Lisbon: FCG.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. MIPEX (2007), Migrant Integration Policy Index, Brussels: British Council and MPG (Migration Policy Group), September, https://mipex.eu/sites/default/files/downloads/migrant_integration_policy_index_mipex_ii-2007.pdf. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MIPEX (2020), Migrant Integration Policy Index, Brussels: MPG (Migration Policy Group) and CIDOB, June, https://www.mipex.eu/sites/default/files/downloads/pdf/files/a5/mipex-2020-book-a5.pdf. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Oliveira, C. R. (2012), ‘Monitoring immigrant integration in Portugal: Managing the gap between available data and implemented policy’, in R. Bijl and V. Arjen (eds), Measuring and Monitoring Immigrant Integration in Europe: Integration Policies and Monitoring Efforts in 17 European Countries, The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research – SCP, pp. 291312.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Oliveira, C. R. (coord.) (2014), Monitorizar a Integração de Imigrantes em Portugal: Relatório Estatístico Decenal (Monitoring Immigrant Integration in Portugal: Ten-Year Statistical Report), Lisbon: Observatório das Migrações/ACM.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Oliveira, C. R. (2016), ‘O desenvolvimento de planos de ação para a integração de imigrantes: Portugal e Europa na última década’ (‘The development of action plans for the integration of immigrants: Portugal and Europe in the last decade’), Revista Migrações, 13, pp. 1131.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Oliveira, C. R. (2022), ‘Integração de imigrantes: É possível medi-la?’ (‘Immigrant integration: Can it be measured?’), in C. R. Oliveira (ed.), Indicadores de Integração de Imigrantes: Relatório Estatístico Anual 2022 (Indicators of Immigrant Integration: Annual Statistical Report 2022), Lisbon: Observatório das Migrações/ACM, pp. 1218.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Oliveira, C. R., Abranches, M. and Healy, C. (2009), Handbook on How to Implement a One-Stop-Shop for Immigrant Integration, Lisbon: ACIDI.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Oliveira, C. R. and Peixoto, J. (2022), ‘Why choose the inclusionary path? Social policy in a recent welfare and immigration country: The case of Portugal’, in E. A. Koning (ed.), The Exclusion of Immigrants from Welfare Programmes: Cross-National Analysis and Contemporary Developments, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 195225.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Padilla, B. and França, T. (2020), ‘Políticas migratórias em Portugal: Complexidade e hiatos entre a lei e a prática’ (‘Migration policies in Portugal: Complexity and gaps between law and practice’), in L. Ribeiro and M. Oliveira (eds), Sociedades em Movimento: Fluxos Internacionais, Conflitos Nacionais (‘Societies on the move: International flows, national conflicts’), São Paulo: Intermeios, pp. 13153.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Pascouau, Y. (2014), Measures and Rules Developed in the EU Member States Regarding Integration of Third Country Nationals: Comparative Report, Brussels: European Policy Centre (EPC), https://bit.ly/pascouau-2014. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Pratt, S. (2015), ‘EU policymaking and research: Case studies of the communication on a community immigration policy and the common basic principles for integration’, in P. Scholten, H. Entzinger and R. Penninx (eds), Integrating Immigrants in Europe: Research–Policy Dialogues, New York, Dordrecht and London: Springer Open IMISCOE Research Series, pp. 11729, https://bit.ly/kraler-reichel-entzinger-2015. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schneider, J. and Crul, M. (2010), ‘New insights into assimilation and integration theory: Introduction to the Special Issue’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33:7, pp. 114348.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Scholten, P. (2018), ‘Research–policy relations and migration studies’, in R. Zapata-Barrero and E. Yalaz (eds), Qualitative Research in European Migration Studies, Cham: Springer Open IMISCOE Research Series, pp. 287302, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76861-8_16.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Scholten, P. (2020), ‘Mainstreaming versus alienation: Conceptualising the role of complexity in migration and diversity policymaking’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46:1, pp. 10826, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1625758.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Scholten, P., Entzinger, H. and Penninx, R. (2015a), ‘Research–policy dialogues on migrant integration in Europe: A conceptual framework and key questions’, in P. Scholten, H. Entzinger and R. Penninx (eds), Integrating Immigrants in Europe: Research–Policy Dialogues, New York, Dordrecht and London: Springer Open IMISCOE Research Series, pp. 116, https://bit.ly/kraler-reichel-entzinger-2015. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Scholten, P., Entzinger, H. and Penninx, R. (2015b), ‘Research–policy dialogues on migrant integration in Europe: Comparison and conclusion’, in P. Scholten, H. Entzinger and R. Penninx (eds), Integrating Immigrants in Europe: Research–Policy Dialogues, New York, Dordrecht and London: Springer Open IMISCOE Research Series, pp. 31536, https://bit.ly/kraler-reichel-entzinger-2015. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2009), Human Development Report 2009–Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development, New York: United Nations Development Programme, https://bit.ly/UNDP-2009. Accessed 26 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/pjss_00045_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/pjss_00045_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error