Skip to content
1981
Navigating the Complexity of International Migration
  • ISSN: 1476-413X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9509

Abstract

This article explores various aspects of the migration of science, including the circulation of scientific knowledge and the productivity of individual scientists. The first part of the article examines concepts that have helped define scientific employment, emphasizing the idea that a scientist’s work should align with an episteme. The second part scrutinizes this situation in Portugal, shedding light on two specific developments: the recent expansion of the scientific workforce and the outputs emanating from national research institutions. This includes a brief statistical overview of the levels of expansion in financial terms and an exploration of the success of scientific publishing using data derived from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and national statistics agencies. Data reveal that while the number of works produced has increased at a time during which greater numbers of scientists were being contracted, especially the decade preceding the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact of their work may have declined due to a lack of peer recognition, illustrated by a sharp decline in the number of citations received. This suggests that greater investment in science, specifically in recruiting fixed-term contract researchers, has not necessarily translated into measurable success. It also highlights the additional challenges posed by change in how scientific knowledge and scientists migrate.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) (Award CEECIND/02453/2017)
  • The R&D Unit (Award UIDB/03126/2020)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pjss_00046_1
2024-05-27
2024-09-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adey, P. (2006), ‘If mobility is everything then it is nothing: Towards a relational politics of (im)mobilities’, Mobilities, 1:1, pp. 7594.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ampudia de Haro, F. (2017), ‘O impacto de (não) ter impacto: Para uma sociologia críticas das publicações científicas’ (‘The impact of [not] having an impact: Towards a critical sociology of scientific publications’), Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 113, pp. 83106.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, B. (1983), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1984), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brooks, R. and Waters, J. (2018), Materialities and Mobilities in Education, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cairns, D. (2022), ‘Migration decision-making, mobility capital and reflexive learning’, in D. Cairns (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Youth Mobility and Educational Migration, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 2534.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cairns, D. and Clemente, M. (2023), The Immobility Turn: Mobility, Migration and the COVID-19 Pandemic, Bristol: Bristol University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cairns, D., Cuzzocrea, V., Briggs, D. and Veloso, L. (2017), The Consequences of Mobility: Reflexivity, Social Inequality and the Reproduction of Precariousness in Highly Qualified Migration, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Castles, S. and Miller, M. J. (2009), The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World, 4th ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cresswell, T. (2011), ‘Mobilities I: Catching up’, Progress in Human Geography, 35:4, pp. 55058.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dardot, P. and Leval, C. (2014), The New Way of the World: Neoliberal Society, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) (2022), Portuguese Atlas of Research Units, Lisbon: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Firmino da Costa, A., Ávila, P., da Silva, B. and Ramos, P. (2012), Inserção Profissional de Investigadores Doutorados: Condições de Acolhimento, Formas de Inserção, Perspetivas de Futuro (‘Professional insertion of doctoral researchers: Conditions of reception, forms of insertion, prospects for the future’), Lisbon: CIES-IUL-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Foucault, M. (2002), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Green, P. (2020), ‘Disruptions of self, place and mobility: Digital nomads in Chiang Mai, Thailand’, Mobilities, 15:3, pp. 43145.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Makimoto, T. and Manners, D. (1997), Digital Nomad, Chichester: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Malet Calvo, D. and Ramos, M. J. (2018), ‘Suddenly last summer: How the tourist tsunami hit Lisbon’, Revista Andaluza de Anthropologóa, 15, pp. 4773.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Massey, D. S., Alarcón, R., Durand, J. and González, H. (1987), Return to Aztlan: The Social Process of International Migration from Western Mexico, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Milano, C., Cheer, J. M. and Novelli, M. (eds) (2019), Overtourism: Excesses, Discontents and Measures in Travel and Tourism, New York: CABI.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. OECD (Observatório do Emprego Científico e Docente) (2022a), ‘Contratos celebrados com doutorados – docentes e investigadores – após início do programa Estímulo ao Emprego Científico’ (‘Contracts signed with doctorates – teachers and researchers – after the start of the Scientific Employment Stimulus Programme’), https://empregocientificoedocente.dgeec.mec.pt/. Accessed 22 October 2023.
  21. OECD (2022b), ‘Welcome to OECD.Stat’, https://stats.oecd.org/. Accessed 21 June 2022.
  22. Peixoto, J. (2007), ‘Dinâmicas e regimes migratórios: O caso das migrações internacionais em Portugal’ (‘Migratory dynamics and regimes: The case of international migration in Portugal’), Análise Social XLII, 183, pp. 44569.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Pordata (2022), ‘Statistics about Portugal and Europe’, https://www.pordata.pt/en/europe. Accessed 21 June 2022.
  24. Ramos, A. and Fonseca, I. L. da (2020), Instrumentos de Apoio à Contratação de Doutorados por Entidades do SCTN (‘Instruments to support the hiring of doctorates by SCTN entities’), Lisbon: Gabinete de Estudos e Estratégia, FCT.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sheller, M. and Urry, J. (2006), ‘The new mobilities paradigm’, Environment and Planning A, 38:2, pp. 20726.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Thompson, B. Y. (2019), ‘The digital nomad lifestyle: (Remote) work/leisure balance, privilege, and constructed community’, International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 2:1–2, pp. 2742.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Urry, J. (ed.) (2007), Mobilities, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Volo, S. (2020), ‘Overtourism: Definitions, enablers, impacts and managerial challenges’, in H. Séraphin, T. Gladkikh and T. Vo Thanh (eds), Overtourism, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1126.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/pjss_00046_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/pjss_00046_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error