Skip to content
1981
Volume 21, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1476-413X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9509

Abstract

This study investigates the perceptions of young university voters in Portugal regarding political parties’ concerns about socio-economic issues and their preferences for state budget distribution. Utilizing a case study approach, we examine the relationship between young people’s priorities in state budget allocation and their perceptions of political parties’ positions on the left–right spectrum. Our findings reveal that young people generally perceive left-wing parties as more concerned with socio-economic issues, while right-wing parties are seen as being more focused on economic efficiency and national security. Furthermore, we observe gender differences in these perceptions, with young men leaning towards right-wing parties and young women towards left-wing parties. By analysing the relationship between young people’s budget priorities and their perceptions of political parties, this study contributes to the understanding of youth political engagement and representation in Portugal. The insights gained from this research can inform policy-makers and educators in fostering a more inclusive and responsive democratic system that addresses the needs and preferences of young citizens.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pjss_00056_1
2025-09-10
2026-04-11

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrain, C. and Smith, J. T. (2005), Political Democracy, Trust and Social Justice: A Comparative Overview, Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2000), ‘Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties’, The American Psychologist, 55:5, pp. 469–80, https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.469.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Belchior, A. M. (2012), ‘Explaining MPs’ perceptions of voters’ positions in a party-mediated representation system’, Party Politics, 20:3, pp. 403–15, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436046.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Belchior, A. M. (2015), ‘Crise económica e perceções sobre a ideologia dos partidos políticos em Portugal (2008–12)’ (‘Economic crisis and perceptions of the ideology of political parties in Portugal [2008–12]’), Análise Social, 50:217, pp. 734–60, https://scielo.pt/pdf/aso/n217/n217a03.pdf. Accessed 19 August 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Boix, C. (1997), ‘Political parties and the supply side of the economy: The provision of physical and human capital in advanced economies, 1960–90’, American Journal of Political Science, 41:3, pp. 814–45, https://doi.org/10.2307/2111676.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Börner, S. (2020), ‘Marshall revisited: EU social policy from a social-rights perspective’, Journal of European Social Policy, 30:4, pp. 421–35, https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928720904330.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bornschier, S. (2010), Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right: The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt14btchr. Accessed 8 August 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bosco, A. and Verney, S. (2012), ‘Electoral epidemic: The political cost of economic crisis in southern Europe, 2010–11’, South European Society and Politics, 17:2, pp. 129–54, https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2012.747272.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bouckaert, G. (2012), ‘Trust and public administration’, Administration, 60:1, pp. 91–115, https://kuleuven.limo.libis.be/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=lirias1866457&context=SearchWebhook&vid=32KUL_KUL:Lirias&search_scope=lirias_profile&adaptor=SearchWebhook&tab=LIRIAS&query=any,contains,LIRIAS1866457&offset=0. Accessed 4 November 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cahill, H. and Dadvand, B. (2018), ‘Re-conceptualising youth participation: A framework to inform action’, Children and Youth Services Review, 95, pp. 243–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.001.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cancela, J. and Magalhães, P. (2020), ‘As bases sociais dos partidos portugueses’ (‘The social bases of Portuguese parties’), working paper 60, Lisbon: Instituto Português de Relações Internacionais da Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Carmona, M. S. (2009), ‘The obligations of “international assistance and cooperation” under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A possible entry point to a human rights-based approach to Millennium Development Goal 8’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 13:1, pp. 86–109, https://doi.org/10.1080/13642980802532424.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Carroll, R. and Kubo, H. (2021), ‘Measuring and explaining the complexity of left–right perceptions of political parties’, Electoral Studies, 71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102310.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Casey, J. and Nexon, D. (2023), ‘The vexing rise of the transnational right’, Foreign Affairs, 19 January, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/vexing-rise-transnational-right. Accessed 16 April 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Collins, M. E., Augsberger, A., Gecker, W. and Lusk, K. (2018), ‘What does youth-led participatory budgeting reveal about youth priorities? Ideas, votes, and decisions’, Journal of Youth Studies, 21:4, pp. 476–94, https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2017.1394994.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Costa, P., Magalhães, P., Costa, E., Menezes, I., Silva, P. and Ferreira, P. (2020), ‘A participação política da juventude em Portugal: Relatório síntese’ (‘Youth political participation in Portugal: Synthesis report’), Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, https://www.shorturl.at/o955Q. Accessed 30 October 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. de Sousa, L. (2001), ‘Political parties and corruption in Portugal’, West European Politics, 24:1, pp. 157–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380108425422.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Estanque, E., Costa, H. A. and Soeiro, J. (2013), ‘The new global cycle of protest and the Portuguese case’, Journal of Social Science Education, 12:1, pp. 31–40, https://doi.org/10.4119/jsse-632.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. European Parliament, Directorate-General for Communication & Ipsos European Public Affairs (2021), Flash Eurobarometer: European Parliament Youth Survey Report, European Union, 22 September, https://doi.org/10.2861/60428.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Evans, G. and Tilley, J. (2017), The New Politics of Class: The Political Exclusion of the British Working Class, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Farthing, R. (2010), ‘The politics of youthful antipolitics: Representing the “issue” of youth participation in politics’, Journal of Youth Studies, 13:2, pp. 181–95, https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260903233696.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Fernandes, T. (2012), ‘Civil society after dictatorship: A comparison of Portugal and Spain, 1970s–90s’, working paper 384, Notre Dame: Kellogg Institute for International Relations.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Fieldhouse, E., Tranmer, M. and Russell, A. (2007), ‘Something about young people or something about elections? Electoral participation of young people in Europe: Evidence from a multilevel analysis of the European Social Survey’, European Journal of Political Research, 46:6, pp. 797–822, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00713.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Flanagan, C. A. and Levine, P. (2010), ‘Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood’, The Future of Children, 20:1, pp. 159–79, https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0043.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Freire, A. (2006), Esquerda e Direita na Política Europeia: Portugal, Espanha e Grécia em Perspectiva Comparativa (Left and Right in European Politics: Portugal, Spain and Greece in Comparative Perspective), Lisbon: Instituto de Ciências Sociais-Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Freire, A. (2008), ‘Party polarization and citizens’ left–right orientations’, Party Politics, 14:2, pp. 189–209, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068807085889.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Frieden, J. (2020), ‘The political economy of economic policy’, Finance & Development, 4–9 June, https://www.shorturl.at/Gs7Qi. Accessed 16 April 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Fukuda-Parr, S. and McNeill, D. (2019), ‘Knowledge and Politics in setting and measuring the SDGs: Introduction to special issue’, Global Policy, 10:S1, pp. 5–15, https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12604.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Giovinazzo, C., Pistoresi, B. and Poma, E. (2022), ‘Good governance and subjective wellbeing in Europe: The mediating role of trust in other people and institutions’, DEMB working paper series 212, Modena: Departamento Marco Biagi, Universidade de Modena e Reggio Emilia.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Goldberg, A. C. (2020), ‘The evolution of cleavage voting in four western countries: Structural, behavioural or political dealignment?’, European Journal of Political Research, 59:1, pp. 68–90, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12336.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Grasso, M. and Smith, K. (2022), ‘Gender inequalities in political participation and political engagement among young people in Europe: Are young women less politically engaged than young men?’, Politics, 42:1, pp. 39–57, https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957211028813.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Guedes, N. M. L. (2012), ‘Convergência Ideológica e de políticas públicas? PS e PSD numa comparação europeia’ (‘Ideological and public policy convergence? PS and PSD in a European comparison’), Ph.D. thesis, Lisbon: Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Inglehart, R. and Norris, P. (2016), ‘Trump, Brexit and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash’, working paper RWP16-026, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Jerit, J. and Barabas, J. (2012), ‘Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment’, The Journal of Politics, 74:3, pp. 672–84, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381612000187.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Kirshner, B. (2009), ‘Power in numbers: Youth organizing as a context for exploring civic identity’, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19:3, pp. 414–40, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00601.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Kiser, E. and Karceski, S. M. (2017), ‘Political economy of taxation’, Annual Review of Political Science, 20:1, pp. 75–92, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052615-025442.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Lobo, M. C. (2001), ‘The role of political parties in Portuguese democratic consolidation’, Party Politics, 7:5, pp. 643–53, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068801007005007.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lopes, H. F. (2023), ‘An unexpected socialist majority: The 2022 Portuguese general elections’, West European Politics, 46:2, pp. 437–50, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2070983.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Mayo, M. P. (2023), ‘Activating self-interest: The role of party polarization in preferences for redistribution’, Party Politics, 30:3, pp. 531–49, https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231161772.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. McDermott, M. and Jones, D. (2020), ‘Gender, sex and trust in government’, Politics & Gender, 18:2, pp. 297–320, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000720.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Mendes, M. S. and Dennison, J. (2020), ‘Explaining the emergence of the radical right in Spain and Portugal: Salience, stigma and supply’, West European Politics, 44:4, pp. 752–75, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1777504.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Meyer, T. and Wagner, M. (2020), ‘Perceptions of parties’ left–right positions: The impact of salience strategies’, Party Politics, 26:5, pp. 664–74, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818806679.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Mölder, M. (2013), ‘The validity of the RILE left–right index as a measure of party policy’, Party Politics, 22:1, pp. 37–48, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813509525.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Norris, P. (2004), ‘Young people and political activism: From the politics of loyalties to the politics of choice?’, Civic Engagement in the 21st Century: Toward a Scholarly and Practical Agenda, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 1–2 October.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2017), Youth Aspirations and the Reality of Jobs in Developing Countries: Mind the Gap, Paris: OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264285668-en.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2020), Governance for Youth, Trust and Intergenerational Justice: Fit for All Generations?, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/c3e5cb8a-en.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Palhau, J., Silva, P., Costa, E. and Costa, E. (2021), ‘Populismo nos partido,s políticos portugueses: Os programas eleitorais de 2019’ (‘Populism in Portuguese political parties: The 2019 electoral programmes’), População e Sociedade, 35, pp. 60–83, https://doi.org/10.52224/21845263/rev35a4.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Pennings, P. (1998), ‘Party responsiveness and socio-economic problem-solving in western democracies’, Party Politics, 4:3, pp. 393–404, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068898004003007.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Settersten Jr, R. A. and Ray, B. (2010), ‘What’s going on with young people today? The long and twisting path to adulthood’, The Future of Children, 20:1, pp. 19–41, https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0044.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Sloam, J. (2007), ‘Rebooting democracy: Youth participation in politics in the UK’, Parliamentary Affairs, 60:4, pp. 548–67, https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsm035.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Sloam, J. (2016), ‘Diversity and voice: The political participation of young people in the European Union’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18:3, pp. 521–37, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116647176.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Soroka, S. N., Stecula, D. A. and Wlezien, C. (2015), ‘It’s (change in) the (future) economy, stupid: Economic indicators, the media, and public opinion’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:2, pp. 457–74, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12145.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Taber, C. and Lodge, M. (2006), ‘Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:3, pp. 755–69, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2016), Youth and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, New York: United Nations.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Van der Brug, W. (1999), ‘Voters’ perceptions and party dynamics’, Party Politics, 5:2, pp. 147–69, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068899005002001.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/pjss_00056_1
Loading
Social sciences university students’ perceptions of socio-economic priorities and budget preferences of political parties in Portugal
Portuguese Journal of Social Science 21, 245 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss_00056_1
/content/journals/10.1386/pjss_00056_1
/content/journals/10.1386/pjss_00056_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): electoral behavior; left–right spectrum; policy engagement; social justice; state budget; youth

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test