Skip to content
1981
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2040-3682
  • E-ISSN: 2040-3690

Abstract

Abstract

One of the key claims in Jean-Francois Lyotard’s “Discourse, Figure” is that the dialectical method (the backbone of Western philosophy) tends to obscure and hide all which is invisible, illegible and sensual. Lyotard’s strategy in exposing this rift within language (and philosophy) is by way of showing that the distance between the sign and the referent should not be thought of as negation but as a form of expression. Instead of the dialectical relation between the image and the object Lyotard proposes radical heterogeneity that he names ‘thickness’. This paper examines Lyotard’s non-dialectical approach in relation to the title of the book and argues that the comma is positioned as the sensual technology that creates the possibility of discursive continuity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pop.4.1.103_1
2013-09-01
2024-06-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pop.4.1.103_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): comma; Lyotard; radical heterogeneity; sensual technologies; thickness
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error