Skip to content
1981
Violence, Part 1
  • ISSN: 2040-3682
  • E-ISSN: 2040-3690

Abstract

This article examines the work of three artists – Harun Farocki, Hito Steyerl and Rabih Mroué – who in different ways mobilize the cinematic device of ‘shot/countershot’ in two distinct post-cinematic contexts (the moving image installation and the performance lecture) as a tool for scrutinizing images of war and violence from divergent historical, socio-economic, geopolitical and ethical perspectives. In returning to and reworking this classical cinematic device as an experimental and essayistic mode of montage and critical reflection, all three artists, as I argue, variously seek to counter the ideological naturalization and interpretive framing of representations of war and violence under conditions of digitalization and globalization, as well as to interrogate the interconnections between forms of direct, symbolic and systemic violence.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00061_1
2023-08-16
2026-04-10

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adorno, T. W.. ( [1958] 1991;), ‘ The essay as form. ’, in R. Tierdemann. (ed.), Notes to Literature (trans. S. W. Nicholsen), vol. 1, New York:: Columbia University Press;, pp. 323.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander, L.. ( 2021;), ‘ Facing off: From abstraction to diffraction in Hito Steyerl’s Abstract (2012). ’, Frames of Cinema Journal, 18, pp. 228.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Asad, T.. ( 2007), On Suicide Bombing, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett, B.. ( 2010;), ‘ Framing terror: Cinema, docudrama and the “War on Terror”. ’, Studies in Documentary Film, 4:3, pp. 20925.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blumenthal-Barby, M.. ( 2015;), ‘ “Cinematography of devices”: Harun Farocki’s Eye/Machine trilogy. ’, German Studies Review, 38:2, pp. 32951.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolter, J. D., and Grusin, R.. ( 2000), Remediation: Understanding New Media, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brecht, B.. ( [1931] 2000;), ‘ The Threepenny lawsuit. ’, in M. Silberman. (ed.), Brecht on Film and Radio, London:: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama;, pp. 14799.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Butler, J.. ( [2009] 2010), Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable?, London and New York:: Verso;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Daney, S.. ( 1999;), ‘ Before and after the image. ’, Discourse, 21:1, pp. 18199.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Daney, S.. ( [1997] 2006;), ‘ Montage obligatory: The war, the Gulf and the small screen. ’, Rouge, http://www.rouge.com.au/8/montage.html. Accessed 5 March 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Daney, S.. ( [1992] 2007;), ‘ The tracking shot in Kapo. ’, in Postcards from the Cinema (trans. P. D. Grant), Oxford and New York:: Berg;, pp. 1735.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Denson, S., and Leyda, J.. (eds) ( 2016), Post-Cinema: Theorizing 21st-Century Film, Falmer:: Reframe Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Eisenstein, S.. ( [1927] 1976;), ‘ Notes for a film of Capital. ’, October, 2, pp. 326.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Eisenstein, S.. ( [1929] 1988;), ‘ Perspectives. ’, in R. Taylor. (ed.), Selected Works, Vol. 1, 1922–1934, London:: British Film Institute;, pp. 15160.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Farocki, H.. ( 2000–03), Eye/Machine I–III, Germany:: ZDF/3sat, Greene Naftali and ZKM Karlsruhe;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Farocki, H.. ( 1994;), ‘ The industrialization of thought. ’, Discourse, 15:3, pp. 7677.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Farocki, H.. ( 2001;), ‘ Shot/countershot: The most important expression in filmic law of value. ’, in S. Gaensheimer, and N. Schafhausen. (eds), Nachdruck/Imprint: Texte/Writings, Berlin and New York:: Vorwerk 8 and Sternberg Press;, pp. 86111.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Farocki, H.. ( 2004;), ‘ Phantom images. ’, Public, 29, pp. 1322.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Farocki, H.. ( 2009;), ‘ Cross influence/soft montage. ’, in A. Ehmann, and K. Eshun. (eds), Harun Farocki: Against What? Against Whom?, London:: Koenig books;, pp. 6974.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Farocki, H., and Dziewior Y.. ( 2011;), ‘ Conversation, October 23, 2010, Kunsthaus Bregenz. ’, in Y. Dziewior. (ed.), Weiche Montagen/Soft Montages, Cologne:: Kunsthaus Bregnenz;, pp. 20425.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Feinstein, A.. ( 2011), The Shadow World: Inside the Global Arms Trade, London:: Penguin;.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Feldman, A.. ( 2015), Archives of the Insensible: Of War, Photopolitics, and Dead Memory, Chicago, IL:: The University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Flusser, V.. ( [1983] 2006), Towards a Philosophy of Photography (trans. A., Mathews.), London:: Reaktion Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Friis, S. M.. ( 2015;), ‘ “Beyond anything we have ever seen”: Beheading videos and the visibility of violence in the war against ISIS. ’, International Affairs, 91:4, pp. 72546.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Godard, J.-L.. ( 1967;), ‘ Camera eye. ’, in Loin du Vietnam (Far From Vietnam), France:: Art Theatre Guild;.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Goriunova, O., and Shulgin, A.. ( 2008;), ‘ Glitch. ’, in M. Fuller. (ed.), Software Studies: A Lexicon, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;, pp. 11019.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hüser, R.. ( 2004;), ‘ Nine minutes in the yard: A conversation with Harun Farocki. ’, in T. Elsaesser. (ed.), Harun Farocki: Working on the Sightlines, Amsterdam:: Amsterdam University Press;, pp. 297314.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Huyssen, A.. ( 2015), Miniature Metropolis: Literature in an Age of Photography and Film, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Khatib, L.. ( 2006), Filming the Modern Middle East: Politics in the Cinemas of Hollywood and the Arab World, London:: I. B. Tauris;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Levi, P.. ( 2010;), ‘ Cinema by other means. ’, October, 131, pp. 5168.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Linfield, S.. ( 2010), The Cruel Radiance: Photography and Political Violence, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Maartschukat, J., and Niedermeier, S.. ( 2013;), ‘ Violence and visibility: Historical and theoretical perspectives. ’, in J. Martschukat, and S. Niedermeier. (eds), Violence and Visibility in Modern History, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 124.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Marks, L. U.. ( 2014;), ‘ Arab glitch. ’, in A. Downey. (ed.), Uncommon Grounds: New Media and Critical Practices in North Africa and the Middle East, London and New York:: I. B. Tauris;, pp. 25871.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mbembe, A.. ( 2001), On the Postcolony, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Merrin, W.. ( 2018), Digital War: A Critical Introduction, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mroué, R.. ( 2012;), ‘ The pixelated revolution. ’, TDR: The Drama Review, 56:3, pp. 1835.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mroué, R.. ( 2020;), ‘ Attending to the glitch: Sand in the Eyes. ’, Performance Matters, 6:1, pp. 21132.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mroué, R., and Caner, C.. ( 2017;), ‘ Haunted by images of propaganda: Drone videos. ’, Daily Sabeh, 12 February, https://www.dailysabah.com/arts-culture/2017/12/02/haunted-by-images-of-propaganda-drone-videos. Accessed 5 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Mroué, R., and Downey, A.. ( [2012] 2022;), ‘ Lost in narration. ’, in N. Samman. (ed.), Rabih Mroué: Interviews, Berlin:: Hatje Cantz;, pp. 10522.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mroué, R., and Hahn, D.. ( [2015] 2022;), ‘ Thinking with an audience: Dissecting what is to be remembered. ’, in N. Samman. (ed.), Rabih Mroué: Interviews, Berlin:: Hatje Cantz;, pp. 20211.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Mroué, R., and Majdalanie, L.. ( 2022;), ‘ The in-between. ’, in N. Samman. (ed.), Rabih Mroué: Interviews, Berlin:: Hatje Cantz;, pp. 2039.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Pantenburg, V.. ( 2016;), ‘ Working images: Harun Farocki and the operational image. ’, in J. Eder, and C. Klonk. (eds), Image Operations: Visual Media and Political Conflict, Manchester:: Manchester University Press;, pp. 4962.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Patruss, K.. ( 2016;), ‘ The discourse on ISIS and the visual complexities in the ISIS beheading videos. ’, Politik, 19:4, pp. 6788.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Retort ( 2005), Afflicted Powers: Capital and Spectacle in a New Age of War, London and New York:: Verso;.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Roberts, J.. ( 2014), Photography and Its Violations, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Said, E. W.. ( 1997), Covering Islam: How Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World, New York:: Random House;.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Said, E. W.. ( [1979] 2003), Orientalism, New York:: Vintage Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sekula, A.. ( 1984;), ‘ The instrumental image: Steichen at war. ’, Photography against the Grain: Essays and Photo Works 1973–1983, Halifax, NS:: The Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design;, pp. 3351.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Stallabrass, J.. ( 2020), Killing for Show: Photography, War, and the Media in Vietnam and Iraq, Lanham, MD:: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers;.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Steyerl, H.. ( 2011;), ‘ In free fall: A thought experiment on vertical perspective. ’, e-flux, 24, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/24/67860/in-free-fall-a-thought-experiment-on-vertical-perspective/. Accessed 5 March 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Steyerl, H.. ( 2012), Abstract, Germany:: Hito Steyerl;.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Steyerl, H.. ( 2013), Is the Museum a Battlefield?, Turkey:: Hito Steyerl;.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Steyerl, H.. ( 2022;), ‘ Art and war. ’, New Left Review, 133&134, pp. 197201.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Toscano, A., and Kinkle, J.. ( 2015), Cartographies of the Absolute, Winchester:: Zero Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Virilio, P.. ( [1988] 1994), The Vision Machine (trans. J. Rose), Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Virilio, P.. ( [1989] 2009), War and Cinema: The Logistics of Perception (trans. P. Camiller), London and New York:: Verso;.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wallay, J.. ( 2003;), ‘ The material of film and the idea of cinema: Contrasting practices in sixties and seventies avant-garde film. ’, October, 103, pp. 1530.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Warner, R.. ( 2016;), ‘ Essaying the forms of popular cinema: Godard, Farocki and the principle of shot/countershot. ’, in E. A. Papazian, and C. Eades. (eds), The Essay Film: Dialogue, Politics, Utopia, London and New York:: Wallflower Press and Columbia University Press;, pp. 2867.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00061_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00061_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test