The first frame: A camera-less photographic encounter with the foetus

References

1. Adams, T. E., Ellis, C. and Jones, S. H. (2017), ‘Autoethnography’, in J. Matthes, C. S. Davis and R. F. Potter (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0011. Accessed 10 April 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anticipation Ultrasound Studio (2023), ‘The difference between 2D, 3D, 4D, HD and 5D ultrasounds’, Anticipation Ultrasound Studio, 13 July, https://anticipationultrasoundstudio.com/the-difference-between-2d-3d-4d-and-5d-ultrasounds/. Accessed 10 April 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baby Glimpse (2015), ‘3D/4D ultrasound’, Baby Glimpse 3D/4D Ultrasound, 21 April, https://www.babyglimpse.com.au/gallery1. Accessed 10 April 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barthes, R. (1981), Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, New York: Hill and Wang.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Beaumont-Thomas, B. (2021), ‘Baby on Nevermind cover sues Nirvana over child sexual exploitation’, The Guardian, 25 August, https://www.theguardian.com/music/2021/aug/25/baby-on-nevermind-cover-sues-nirvana-over-child-sexual-exploitation. Accessed 25 August 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Butler, J. ([1993] 2011), Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’, London and New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cannon, K. L. (2014), ‘Ec-statically queer images: Queering the photographic through fetal photography’, Photography and Culture, 7:3, pp. 269–83.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fahd, C. (2023), ‘Destigmatising infant loss with photography and hashtags on Instagram’, Photographies, 16:1, pp. 109–32.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gibson, R. (2010), ‘The known world’, TEXT, 14:8, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.52086/001c.31508.
10. Kuhn, A. (1995), Family Secrets: Acts of Memory and Imagination, London and New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Langford, M. (2021), Suspended Conversations: The Afterlife of Memory in Photographic Albums, Montreal, Kingston, London and Chicago, IL: McGill-Queen’s University Press, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1m0khpm. Accessed 4 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Mitchell, L. M. (2001), Baby’s First Picture: Ultrasound and the Politics of Fetal Subjects, Toronto, Buffalo, NY and London: University of Toronto Press, https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442671140. Accessed 4 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Nash, M. (2007), ‘From “bump” to “baby”: Gazing at the foetus in 4D’, Philament Surveillance, 10, pp. 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
14. National Cancer Institute (2016), ‘NCI dictionary of cancer terms’, National Cancer Institute, 16 September, https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/ultrasound-transducer. Accessed 5 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Nelson, M. (2016), The Argonauts, Melbourne: Text Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Nicolson, M. and Fleming, J. E. E. (2013), Imaging and Imagining the Fetus: The Development of Obstetric Ultrasound, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Orton, L. (2019), ‘You are my territory’, Philosophy of Photography, 10:1, pp. 73–88, https://doi.org/10.1386/pop_00007_7.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Palmer, J. (2009), ‘Seeing and knowing: Ultrasound images in the contemporary abortion debate’, Feminist Theory, 10:2, pp. 173–89.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Pettman, D. (2006), Love and Other Technologies: Retrofitting Eros for the Information Age, New York: Fordham University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Roberts, J. (2012), The Visualised Foetus: A Cultural and Political Analysis of Ultrasound Imagery, London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315551746.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Roberts, J., Griffiths, F. and Verran, A. (2017), ‘Seeing the baby, doing family: Commercial ultrasound as family practice?’, Sociology (Oxford), 51:3, pp. 527–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515591945.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Roberts, J., Griffiths, F. E., Verran, A. and Ayre, C. (2015), ‘Why do women seek ultrasound scans from commercial providers during pregnancy?’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 37:4, pp. 594–609, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12218.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Silverman, K. (2015), The Miracle of Analogy, or, the History of Photography, Part 1, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Teffer, N. (2012), ‘Touching images: Photography, medical imaging and the incarnation of light’, Photographies, 5:2, pp. 121–33, https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.uts.edu.au/10.1080/17540763.2012.700526.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Thomas, G. M. (2017), ‘Picture perfect: “4D” ultrasound and the commoditisation of the private prenatal clinic’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 17:2, pp. 359–77, https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540515602300.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ultrasound Care (n.d.), ‘Homepage’, https://ultrasoundcare.com.au. Accessed 19 January 2022.
    [Google Scholar]