Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Philosophy of Photography
  4. Volume 16, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2040-3682
  • E-ISSN: 2040-3690

Abstract

What if we focused on different camera constellations in order to understand the future and history of photographies, instead of focusing on specific (photographic) representations? This realignment towards the camera would not only take into account the kinds of devices commonly considered to be cameras but also include alternative forms and methods of measurement and electromagnetic sensing – historical and contemporary – which are involved in developing our techno-visual imaginaries. The speculative camera, as described in this article, explicitly addresses the camera as an assemblage that includes not only particular photographic devices but also a range of other techniques, technologies and ways of being which form a backdrop for photographies. This assemblage is held steady via a constellation which may include tens or hundreds of devices. This article presents three cross sections exploring the relationships between photographies and: (1) navigational abilities practised by members of the animal kingdom (notably bat echolocation), (2) human wayfinding, seafaring and astronomy and (3) volumetric mapping (like infrared sensing, Light Detection and Ranging [LIDAR] and photogrammetry). Common to all three is the articulation of temporality through observations, time-stamping and time-synchronicity, which, we suggest, is pivotal to all camera operations. The speculative character of these camera operations lies in the fact that they are all based on models or programmes, that need to be activated to make camera constellations work.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00102_1
2025-05-08
2025-06-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barthes, R. (1980), Camera Lucida, New York: Hill and Wang.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Batchen, G. (1999), Burning With Desire: The Conception of Photography, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Benovsky, J. (2014), ‘The limits of photography’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 22:5, pp. 716–33, https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2014.923015.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Boulamwini, J. (2023), Unmasking AI: My Mission to Protect What Is Human in a World of Machines, New York: Random House.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Caine, A. (2019), ‘Granular realism: Ontology and counter-dominant practices of spatial photography’, Ph.D. thesis, London: Goldsmiths University of London.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Canales, J. (2010), A Tenth of a Second: A History, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. ‘camera’ (2024), OED Online, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/1020163718.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen, J. and Meskin, A. (2004), ‘On the epistemic value of photographs’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 62:2, pp. 197–210, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-594x.2004.00152.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cornford, S. (2023), ‘Inverting resolution: Accounting for the planetary cost of earth observation’, Journal of Visual Culture, 22:1, pp. 93–110, https://doi.org/10.1177/14704129231161947.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Crawford, K. (2021), Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cubitt, S. (2021), ‘Mass image, Anthropocene image, image commons’, in J. Parikka and T. Dvorák (eds), Photography Off the Scale: Technologies and Theories of the Mass Image, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 25–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Currie, G. (1995), Image and Mind: Film, Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Farocki, H. (2000–03), Eye/Machine I–III, video installation, https://www.harunfarocki.de/installations/2000s/2003/eye-machine-iii.html. Accessed 10 April 2025.
  14. Farocki, H. (2004), ‘Phantom images’, Public, 29, pp. 12–22, https://public.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/public/article/view/30354. Accessed 10 April 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fisher, A. (2016), ‘On the scale of photographic abstraction’, Photographies, 9:2, pp. 203–15, https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2016.1181100.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Flusser, V. (1991), ‘What is the literal meaning of “photography”?’, European Photography, 12, pp. 44–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Flusser, V. (2000), Towards a Philosophy of Photography, London: Reaktion.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Flusser, V. (2011), ‘The gesture of photographing’, Journal of Visual Culture, 10:3, pp. 279–93, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412911419742.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Galison, P. (2000), ‘Einstein’s clocks: The place of time’, Critical Inquiry, 26:2, pp. 355–89, https://doi.org/10.1086/448970.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gaut, B. (2008), ‘Opaque pictures’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 246:4, pp. 381–96, https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.246.0381.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gustavson, T. (2012), Camera: A History of Photography from Daguerreotype to Digital, New York: Union Square & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Helmreich, S. (2007), ‘An anthropologist underwater: Immersive soundscapes, submarine cyborgs, and transductive ethnography’, American Ethnologist, 34:4, pp. 621–41, https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2007.34.4.621.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Henning, M. (2019), Photography: The Unfettered Image, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Ingold, T. (2017), ‘Surface visions’, Theory, Culture & Society, 34:7–8, pp. 99–108, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417730601.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Latour, B. (1986), ‘Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together’, in A. Kuklick (ed.), Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, vol. 6, Chicago, IL: Northwestern University, pp. 1–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Latour, B. (2000), ‘When things strike back: A possible contribution of “science studies” to the social sciences’, The British Journal of Sociology, 51:1, pp. 107–23, https://doi.org/10.1080/000713100358453.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lehmuskallio, A. (2020), ‘The camera as a meeting place for decision making’, in A. Hall (ed.), The Camera as Actor, London: Routledge, pp. 17–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1993), Gesture and Speech, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Mauss, M. (1973), ‘Techniques of the body’, Economy and Society, 2:1, pp. 70–88, https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147300000003.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. National Maritime Museum (2023), Flamsteed House, Royal Observatory, Greenwich, UK, 14 May.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Noë, A. (2006), Action in Perception, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Schröter, J. (2014), 3D: History, Theory, and Aesthetics of the Transplane Image, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Seaver, N. (2018), ‘What should an anthropology of algorithms do?’, Cultural Anthropology, 33:3, pp. 375–85, https://doi.org/10.14506/ca33.3.04.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Seth, A. K. and Bayne, T. (2022), ‘Theories of consciousness’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 23:7, pp. 439–52, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-022-00587-4.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Siegert, B. (2015), ‘Longitude and simultaneity in philosophy, physics, and empires’, Configurations, 23:2, pp. 145–63, https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2015.0011.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Steyerl, H. (2017), ‘Ripping reality: Blind spots and wrecked data in 3D’, in H. Steyerl (ed.), Duty Free Art, London: Verso, pp. 191–206.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Toister, Y. (2020), Photography from the Turin Shroud to the Turing Machine, Bristol and Chicago, IL: Intellect and University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Walker Rettberg, J. (2023), Machine Vision: How Algorithms Are Changing the Way We See the World, Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Walton, Kendall L. (1984), ‘Transparent pictures: On the nature of photographic realism’, Critical Inquiry, 11:2, pp. 246–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Zylinska, J. (2017), Nonhuman Photography, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Daston, L. and Galison, P. (1992), ‘The image of objectivity’, Representations, 40, pp. 81–128, https://doi.org/10.2307/2928741.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Grimm, A. (2007), ‘The origin of the term photogrammetry’, Photogrammetric Week 2007, Stuttgart, Germany.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00102_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): active sensing; constellation; decision-making; photogrammetry; speculation; temporality; volumetric mapping

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test