Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Philosophy of Photography
  4. Volume 16, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2040-3682
  • E-ISSN: 2040-3690

Abstract

The images that have emerged from Gaza, capturing catastrophic violence inflicted upon the Palestinian people by the state of Israel, are atrocious, haunting, injurious. Gaza-based photojournalist Motaz Azaiza came to the fore in the early months of the onslaught as a critical source of on-the-ground information, capturing and posting a steady stream of horror to his Instagram account. Social media outlets are replete with images like his, paired alongside pleas to ‘Stop scrolling!’, ‘Keep looking!’ and ‘Don’t look away!’ This article questions what it means to look at images of atrocity within contexts defined by their financialization and instrumentalization, wherein images, now operational, work to fuel online economies and inform developments in machine learning and artificial intelligence. Reflecting on the images and commentary posted to Azaiza’s Instagram account and building on existing efforts to theorize intersections between spectatorship and photographic representations of atrocity, the article investigates the technical appropriation, financialization and instrumentalization of the atrocious image online, exposing its complicities and identifying how functions of the image that were once lauded are precisely those now being exploited.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00105_1
2025-05-08
2025-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abokhodair, Norah, Skop, Yarden, Rüller, Sarah, Aal, Konstantin, Elmimouni, Houda (2024), ‘Opaque algorithms, transparent biases: Automated content moderation during the Sheikh Jarrah Crisis’, First Monday, 29:4, pp. 1–25, https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v29i4.13620.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Abraham, Yuval (2024), ‘“Lavender”: The AI machine directing Israel’s bombing spree in Gaza’, +972 Magazine, 3 April, https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/. Accessed 28 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Alyan, Hala (2023), ‘Instagram post’, Instagram, 4 December, https://www.instagram.com/p/C0bxvCdOA3l/?img_index=6. Accessed 3 February 2025.
  4. Amnesty International (2024), ‘You Feel Like You Are Subhuman’: Israel’s Genocide Against Palestinians in Gaza, London: Amnesty International Ltd, https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde15/8668/2024/en/. Accessed 3 February 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Ananny, Mike and Crawford, Kate (2018), ‘Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability’, New Media & Society, 20:3, pp. 973–89, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Angus, Daniel, Burgess, Jean, Carah, Nicholas, Hayden, Lauren and Obeid, Abdul (2023), ‘Exploring Facebook’s “why am I seeing this” ad system: Meaningful transparency or further obfuscation?’, AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 31 December, https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2023i0.13389.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Angus, Siobhan (2024), Camera Geological: An Elemental History of Photography, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Azaiza, Motaz (2023a), ‘Please, don’t just watch.’, Instagram, 23 October, https://www.instagram.com/p/CywomOwARTg/. Accessed 3 February 2025.
  9. Azaiza, Motaz (2023b), ‘How cinematic it is!’, Instagram, 25 October, https://www.instagram.com/p/Cy2dZr9M799/. Accessed 3 February 2025.
  10. Azaiza, Motaz (@azaizamotaz9) (2023c), ‘It’s about life or death now...’, X, 2 December, https://x.com/azaizamotaz9/status/1731028122177360304. Accessed 5 February 2025.
  11. Azaiza, Motaz (@azaizamotaz9) (2023d), ‘Believe me or not...’, X, 4 December, https://x.com/azaizamotaz9/status/1731743783518138644. Accessed 5 February 2025.
  12. Azaiza, Motaz (2024), ‘Thank you @worldpressphoto for having me at your event in Amsterdam...’, Instagram, 25 May, https://www.instagram.com/p/C7ZmgKuo2Fb/. Accessed 3 February 2025.
  13. Azoulay, Ariella (2008), The Civil Contract of Photography, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Azoulay, Ariella (2023), ‘2023 ICP Infinity Awards: Critical writing, research, and theory - Ariella Aïsha Azoulay’, YouTube, 29 March, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPppLMlfaRU&ab_channel=MediaStorm. Accessed 3 February 2025.
  15. Butler, Judith (2009), Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable?, New York: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Carah, Nicholas, Angus, Daniel and Burges, Jean (2023a), ‘Tuning machines: An approach to exploring how Instagram’s machine vision operates on and through digital media’s participatory visual culture’, Culture Studies, 37:1, pp. 20–45, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2022.2042578.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Carah, Nicholas, Brown, Maria-Gemma and Hickman, Sarah (2023b), ‘Optimizing looking and buying on Instagram: Tracing the platformization of advertising and retail on mobile social media’, Television & New Media, 24:4, pp. 380–96, https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764221123033.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Crawford, Kate (2021), The Atlas of A.I., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Dewdney, Andrew (2021), Forget Photography, London: Goldsmiths University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Dewdney, Andrew and Sluis, Katrina (2023), The Networked Image in Post-Digital Culture, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Dong, Beibei, Zhuang, Mengzhou, Fang, Eric and Huang, Minxue (2024), ‘Tales of two channels: Digital advertising performance between AI recommendation and user subscription channels’, Journal of Marketing, 88:2, pp. 144–62, https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231190021.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Duffy, Brooke Erin and Meisner, Colten (2022), ‘Platform governance at the margins: Social media creators’ experiences with algorithmic (in)visibility’, Media, Culture & Society, 45:2, pp. 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221111923.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. El-Naggar, Mona, Collier, Neil, Boyer, Mark, Kylan, Hassan (2024), ‘Motaz Azaiza captures Gaza’s suffering. But “nothing changed”’, New York Times, 20 February, https://www.nytimes.com/video/world/middleeast/100000009304935/motaz-azaiza-gaza.html. Accessed 3 February 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gómez Cruz, Edgar (2016), ‘Photo-genic assemblages: Photography as a connective interface’, in E. Gómez Cruz and A. Lehmuskallio (eds), Digital Photography and Everyday Life, London: Routledge, pp. 228–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hand, Martin and Scarlett, Ashley (2023), ‘Introduction: The politics and practices of computational seeing’, photographies, 16:2, pp. 155–71, https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2023.2189287.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Henning, Michelle (2018), ‘Image flow: Photography on tap’, photographies, 11:2–3, pp. 133–48, https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2018.1445011.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hoelzl, Ingrid and Marie, Rémi (2015), Softimage, Bristol and Chicago, IL: Intellect.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Instagram (n.d.), ‘What happens to content you’ve deleted from your Instagram account’, https://help.instagram.com/711062676142607. Accessed 3 February 2025..
  29. Kane, Carolyn (2014), Chromatic Algorithms: Synthetic Color, Computer Art, and Aesthetics After Code, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kant, Tanya (2021), ‘Identity, advertising, and algorithmic targeting: Or how (not) to target your “ideal user”’, MIT Case Studies in Social and Ethical Responsibility of Computer, Summer, https://doi.org/10.21428/2c646de5.929a7db6.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lawler, Richard (2024), ‘Instagram makes more money from ads than YouTube does, and it has for years’, The Verge, 5 April, https://www.theverge.com/2024/4/5/24122541/instagram-ad-revenue-youtube-meta-ftc-monopoly. Accessed 28 September 2024.
  32. MacKenzie, Adrian and Munster, Anna (2019), ‘Platform seeing: Image ensembles and their invisualities’, Theory, Culture & Society, 36:5, pp. 3–22, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419847508.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Malevé, Nicolas (2021), ‘On the data set’s ruins’, AI & Society, 36, pp. 1117–31, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01093-w.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Malevé, Nicolas (2022), ‘The computer vision lab: The epistemic configuration of machine vision’, in A. Dewdney and K. Sluis (eds), The Networked Image in Post-Digital Culture, London: Routledge, pp. 83–101.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Malevé, Nicolas (2023), ‘Practices of benchmarking, vulnerability in the computer vision pipeline’, Photographies, 16:2, pp. 173–89, https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2023.2189159.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Malevé, Nicolas and Sluis, Katrina (2023), ‘The photographic pipeline of machine vision; or, machine vision’s latent photographic theory’, Critical AI, 1:1–2, pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1215/2834703X-10734066.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Massumi, Brian (2015), Politics of Affect, Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Mbembe, Achille (2003), ‘Necropolitics’, Public Culture, 15:1, pp. 11–40, https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-15-1-11.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Meta (2023), ‘Our approach to explaining ranking’, 31 December, https://transparency.meta.com/features/explaining-ranking. Accessed 28 September 2024.
  40. Meta (2023), ‘New AI advancements drive Meta’s ads system performance and efficiency’, 11 May, https://ai.meta.com/blog/ai-ads-performance-efficiency-meta-lattice/. Accessed 3 February 2025.
  41. Meta (2024), ‘Privacy policy’, 19 December, https://mbasic.facebook.com/privacy/policy/printable/. Accessed 28 September 2024.
  42. Mirzoeff, Nicholas (2011), The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Parikka, Jussi (2023), Operational Images: From the Visual to the Invisual, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Pasquinelli, Matteo (2009), ‘Google’s PageRank algorithm: A diagram of cognitive capitalism and the rentier of the common intellect’, in K. Becker and F. Stalder (eds), Deep Search: The Politics of Search Beyond Google, London: Transaction Publishers, pp. 152–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Phan, Thao and Wark, Scott (2021), ‘What personalisation can do for you! Or: How to do racial discrimination without “race”’, Culture Machine, Special Issue: ‘Machine Intelligences’, 20, https://culturemachine.net/vol-20-machine-intelligences/what-personalisation-can-do-for-you-or-how-to-do-racial-discrimination-without-race-thao-phan-scott-wark/. Accessed 5 February 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Rancière, Jacques (2008), The Emancipated Spectator, New York: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Rettberg, Jill Walker (2023), Machine Vision: How Algorithms Are Changing the Way We See the World, Cambridge: Polity.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Roberts, Sarah T. (2019), Behind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Roberts, Sarah T. (2021), ‘Abuse’, in N. B. Thylstrup, D. Agostinho, A. Ring, C. D’Ignazio and K. Veel (eds), Uncertain Archives: Critical Keywords for Big Data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 63–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Rubinstein, Daniel (2019), ‘Fractal photography and the politics of invisibility’, in M. Durden and J. Tormey (eds), Routledge Companion to Photography Theory, London: Routledge, pp. 337–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Skrubbletrang, Martina, Grunnet, Josefine and Tarp, Nicolai (2017), ‘#RIPINSTAGRAM: Examining user’s counter-narratives opposing the introduction of algorithmic personalization on Instagram’, First Monday, 22:4, https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i4.7574.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Sontag, Susan (2003), Regarding the Pain of Others, New York: Picador.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Srnicek, Nick (2016), Platform Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Stallabrass, Julian, Fletcher, Alex and Fisher, Andrew (2022), ‘Killing for Show: Interview with Julian Stallabrass’, Philosophy of Photography, 13:2, pp. 183–205, https://doi.org/10.1386/pop_00058_7.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Stein, Rebecca L. (2021), Screen Shots: State Violence on Camera in Israel and Palestine, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Stiegler, Bernard (2019), The Age of Disruption: Technology and Machines in Computational Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Terranova, Tiziana (2012), ‘Attention, economy and the brain’, Culture Machine, Special Issue: ‘Paying Attention’, 13, https://culturemachine.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/465-973-1-PB.pdf. Accessed 5 February 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Thylstrup, Nanna Bonde (2022), ‘The ethics and politics of data sets in the age of machine learning: Deleting traces and encountering remains’, Media, Culture & Society, 44:4, pp. 655–71, https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211060226.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Weizman, Eyal (2017), Forensic Architecture: Violence at the Threshold of Detectability, Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Zuboff, Shoshonna (2018), The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, New York: Public Affairs.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Zylinska, Joanna (2017), Nonhuman Photography, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00105_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): artificial intelligence; Motaz Azaiza; operational image; platform capitalism; social media; war photography

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test