Skip to content
1981
image of The installation shot: Autonomy and the photography of contemporary art

Abstract

Contemporary art circulates through ‘installation shots’. Overwhelmingly, artworks are viewed through eye-level photographs of depopulated exhibitions. Yet the historical affordances and limitations of the genre have seldom been theorized. This article addresses the ascendance of the installation shot as a process of industrial standardization shaped by market pressures. Departing from considerations of precedents in 1850s France, the article considers the rise of twentieth-century installation shot photography in the context of art’s declining self-evidence. The form, I argue, afforded a legible publicity photograph through which to advertise and disseminate exhibitionary appearances in the absence of other socially expedient means. A technique through which to achieve extra-artistic imperatives, the installation shot predominates within contemporary art. But it has been contested and negated. The article concludes with some reflections on how autonomy might be wrested from the circulation of art images today.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00125_1
2026-04-06
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor W. (1983), Prisms (trans. Samuel and S. Weber), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adorno, Theodor W. (2002), Aesthetic Theory (trans. R. Hullot-Kentor), London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aubenas, Sylie (2002), ‘Barrière de Clichy: A “university” of photography’, in Gustave Le Gray, 18201884 (ed. G. Baldwin, trans. J. Goodman, S. Grevet and S. Pinson), Los Angeles, CA: J. Paul Getty Museum, pp. 3186.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Aubenas, Sylvie, Le Gray, Gustave and Baldwin, Gordon (2002), Gustave Le Gray, 1820–1884 (ed. G. Baldwin, trans. J. Goodman, S. Grevet and S. Pinson), Los Angeles, CA: J. Paul Getty Museum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bajac, Quentin (2008), Encyclopaedia of Nineteenth Century Photography (ed. J. Hannavy), Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Baudelaire, Charles (1955), The Mirror of Art: Critical Studies (trans. J. Mayne), New York: Doubleday Anchor.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Beech, Dave (2021), ‘Redefining the exhibition’, PARSE, 13:1, Spring, https://doi.org/10.70733/i8dcyb9u74j5.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Benjamin, Walter (2004), Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 3: 19351938, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Benjamin, Walter (2006), Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 4: 193840, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bianchini, Franco and Parkinson, Michael (eds) (1993), Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: The West European Experience, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bishop, Claire (2005), Installation Art, London: Tate Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Brenner, Robert (2006), The Economics of Global Turbulence, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bruderlin, Markus (1993), ‘The image of the exhibition and the ruse of the image’, in M. Brüderlin (ed.), Das Bild der Ausstellung, Vienna: Hochschule für Angewandte Kunst in Wien, pp. 3653.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Campany, David (1999), ‘Conceptual art history, or a home for homes for America’, in M. Newman and J. Bird (eds), Rewriting Conceptual Art, London: Reaktion, pp. 12339.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Celant, Germano (2005), ‘A visual machine: Art installation and its modern archetypes’, in B. W. Ferguson, R. Greenberg and S. Nairne (eds), Thinking about Exhibitions, London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 26070.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Connor, Michael (2021), ‘The rules of the game: Curating online exhibitions, Part 2: Mise-en-Scène’, Rhizome, 12 April, https://rhizome.org/editorial/2021/apr/12/the-rules-of-the-game/. Accessed 20 January 2025.
  17. Cotton, Charlotte (2004), The Photograph as Contemporary Art, London: Thames & Hudson.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Crow, Thomas (1996), The Rise of the Sixties: American and European Art in the Era of Dissent, London: Orion.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. De Font-Réaulx, Dominique and Bolloch, Joelle (2006), The Work of Art and Its Reproduction, Milan: 5 Continents.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Elkins, James (2003), What Happened to Art Criticism?, Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Floyd, Katherine M. (2019), ‘Exhibition views: Towards a typology of the installation shot’, Revista de História da Arte, 14, pp. 93109.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Garcia, Tristan and Normand, Vincent (eds) (2019), Theater, Garden, Bestiary: A Materialist History of Exhibitions, London: Sternberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Garrido, Cristina (2019), The (Invisible) Art of Documenting Art, Madrid: Caniche.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Graw, Isabelle and Birnbaum, Daniel (eds) (2008), Canvases and Careers Today: Criticism and Its Markets, London: Sternberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Groys, Boris (2004), ‘Art in the age of biopolitics: From artwork to art documentation’, in D. Bulatov (ed.), Biomediale: Contemporary Society and Genomic Culture, Kaliningrad: National Center for Contemporary Arts, Yantarny Skaz, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Groys, Boris (2016), In the Flow, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Grundberg, Andy (2021), How Photography Became Contemporary Art: Inside an Artistic Revolution from Pop to the Digital Age, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hellman, Karen (2016), Real/Ideal: Photography in Mid-Nineteenth-Century France, Los Angeles, CA: Getty Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jones, Caroline A. (1996), Machine in the Studio: Constructing the Postwar American Artist, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Joyeux-Prunel, Béatrice (2019), ‘Internationalization through the lens: Nineteenth- and twentieth-century art periodicals and decentred circulation’, Journal of European Periodical Studies, 4:2, pp. 4869, https://doi.org/10.21825/jeps.v4i2.14902.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Le Gray, Gustave (1852), Photographie: traité nouveau, théorique et pratique, des procédés et manipulations: sur papier, sec, humide: sur verre, au collodion, à l’albumine, Paris: Lerebours et Secretan.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McAndrew, Clare, Suhail, Malik and Gerald, Nestler (2016), ‘Plotting the art market: An interview with Clare McAndrew’, Finance and Society, 2:2, pp. 15167, https://doi.org/10.2218/finsoc.v2i2.1728.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. McClellan, Andrew (2024), ‘Memorializing the museum: Maria Cosway’s Gallerie du Louvre, 18011803’, in A. Rabier (ed.), Maria Cosway, 17601838, Ghent: Snoeck, pp. 12631.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Merchant, Jamie (2024), Endgame: Economic Nationalism and Global Decline, London: Reaktion.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Milligan, Jennifer (2002), Making a Modern Archive: The Archives Nationales of France, 18501887, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Moalemi, Mahan (2019), ‘On the installation shots of contemporary art exhibitions’, Museum of Contemporary Photography of Ireland, 5 July, https://museum.photoireland.org/ie/2019/07/thing-aura-metadata.-A-poem-on-making_PhotoIreland_Festival_2019.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2025.
  37. Morgan, Robert C. (1993), ‘Half-truth: Performance and the photograph’, in C. Krull and R. C. Morgan (eds), Action/Performance and the Photograph, Los Angeles, CA: Jan Turner and Krull Galleries, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Nesbit, Molly (1987), ‘What was an author?’, Yale French Studies, 73, pp. 22957, https://doi.org/10.2307/2930205.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. O’Doherty, Brian (1986), Inside the White Cube, San Francisco, CA: The Lapis Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Osborne, Peter (1999), ‘Conceptual art and/as philosophy’, in M. Newman and J. Bird (eds), Rewriting Conceptual Art, London: Reaktion, pp. 4765.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Osborne, Peter (2013), Anywhere or Not at All: Philosophy of Contemporary Art, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Osborne, Peter (2018), The Postconceptual Condition, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Phelan, Peggy (1993), Unmarked: The Politics of Performance, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Plessis, Alain (1985), The Rise and Fall of the French Empire 185271 (trans. J. Mandelbaum), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rewald, John (1961), The History of Impressionism, New York: Museum of Modern Art.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Roberts, John (ed.) (1997), ‘Photography, iconophobia and the ruins of conceptual art’, in The Impossible Document: Photography and Conceptual Art in Britain 1966–1976, London: Cameraworks, pp. 746.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Rorimer, Anne (1999), ‘Siting the page: Exhibiting works in publications – some examples of conceptual art in the USA’, in M. Newman and J. Bird (eds), Rewriting Conceptual Art, London: Reaktion, pp. 1126.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sanchez, Michael (2013), ‘2011: Art in transmission’, Artforum, 51, Summer, pp. 295301.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Savedoff, Barbara E. (1993), ‘Looking at art through photographs’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 51:3, pp. 45562, https://doi.org/10.2307/431517.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sheldon, Julie (2018), ‘Picturing the installation shot’, in P. Meecham (ed.), A Companion to Modern Art, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 12743.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sluis, Katrina (2023), ‘Documentation in an age of photographic hypercirculation’, in A. Dekker and G. Giannachi (eds), Documentation as Art: Expanded Digital Practices, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 2737.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Tooze, Adam (2019), Crashed: How a Decade of Financial Crisis Changed the World, London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Voorhies, James (2017), Beyond Objecthood: The Exhibition as a Critical Form since 1968, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Wells, Liz (2008), ‘Revisiting photography as art’, in A. Auer and U. Schögl (eds), Jubilee, 30 Years, ESHPh Salzburg: Fotohof, pp. 246437.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wu, Chin-Tao (2002), Corporate Art Intervention since the 1980s, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Zerner, Henri (2002), ‘Gustave Le Gray, heliographer-artist’, in Gustave Le Gray, 1820–1884 (ed. G. Baldwin, trans. J. Goodman, S. Grevet and S. Pinson), Los Angeles, CA: J. Paul Getty Museum, pp. 20932.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00125_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00125_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test