Skip to content
1981
Volume 24, Issue 47
  • ISSN: 0845-4450
  • E-ISSN: 2048-6928

Abstract

Abstract

S3D and AR, emergence and augmentation, have certain similarities, for both call into question the surface of the image on the side of the viewer by introducing virtual elements into real space. A comparative analysis of the two strategies reveals that the mimetic program that largely structures the production and reception of technical images is not centred squarely on illusion, but more generally on immersion and more particularly on egocentric spatial immersion, which perceptually places the viewer at the centre of the virtual world. But at the present time, as they have developed so far, S3D and AR are imperfect responses to this ideal.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/public.24.47.132_1
2013-07-01
2024-05-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/public.24.47.132_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): AR; cinema; displays; eyewear; games; immersion; mobile; S3D
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error