Skip to content
1981
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2044-1983
  • E-ISSN: 2044-3706

Abstract

This article will explore whether; in this postmodern era, where secondary sourcing is in the ascendant, where double-coding trumps coherence and where appropriation and sampling signify the triumph of the accidental or the archival; I. Kant is winning the argument that intentionality on the part of an artist is not a prerequisite for aesthetic response. Furthermore, I will explore whether the joyous inclusivity of the punk and post-punk eras has actually led to a counterproductive cultural relativism; an eschewing, on the part of composers or song writers, of the traditional aesthetics and purpose of musical composition; a Baudrillardian distancing from a direct emotional engagement with an audience; and consequently to a cultural dearth in society at wide. I will draw upon my own experience as a songwriter and occasional film score composer as well as my observations of peers in the business to posit that this state of affairs is an alienating one that has contributed to a climate of social disengagement.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/punk.2.1.73_1
2013-03-01
2025-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/punk.2.1.73_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test