Skip to content
1981
Volume 13, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2044-1983
  • E-ISSN: 2044-3706

Abstract

Based on French expressions of contemporary punk culture, this article looks at the formation of the pogo during gigs. Although this dance is one of the characteristics of punk expression, it remains little studied. From an interactionist perspective, using a comparative approach between different ethnographic fields, the aim is to understand how the order of the pogo is negotiated by the actors involved. More than that, the aim is to understand how this improvised collective dance produces disorder and gives rise to a community experience. To do this, we are interested in the context in which the pogo takes place. Venues play a decisive role in the implementation of this dance and help to create a playful space–time. A new world of meaning is created: the pogodrome. From then on, the physical commitment of the participants is linked to the rules of the pogodrome, and the breaks in interaction reveal the limits of the framework thus formed. Finally, the pogo appears to be a tool for embodying disorder, both physical and sociopolitical. In fact, the pogodrome becomes a territory of disorder, taken over by communities of practitioners that sometimes last beyond the time of the concert.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/punk_00232_1
2024-05-02
2025-03-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berrouka, Karim (2021), Le jour où l’humanité a niqué la fantasy, Chambéry: ActuSF.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brohm, Jean-Marie (2017), Ontologies du corps, Paris: Presses universitaires de Paris-Nanterre.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bromberger, Christian (1979), ‘Technologie et analyse sémiotique des objets: Pour une sémio-technologie’, Revue française d’anthropologie, 19:1, pp. 10540.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Candau, Joël (2010), ‘Intersensorialité humaine et cognition sociale’, Communications, 86:1, pp. 2536.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Céfaï, Daniel and Perreau, Laurent (eds) (2012), Erving Goffman et l’ordre de l’interaction, Paris: CURAPP-ESS and CEMS-IMM.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Charbonnier, Corentin (2018), ‘Le Hellfest, un espace de violences ritualisées’, Criminocorpus, 11, pp. 112.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Classen, Constance (1993), Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and Across Cultures, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Culton, Kenneth R. and Holtzman, Ben (2010), ‘The growth and disruption of a “free space”: Examining a suburban do it yourself (DIY) punk scene’, Space and Culture, 13:3, pp. 27084.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Détrez, Christine (2002), La construction sociale du corps, Paris: Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Donaghey, Jim and Tuaillon Demésy, Audrey (forthcoming 2024), ‘Dialectogram as creative methodology: Participatory research with/in punk spaces in Belfast, Northern Ireland and Val d’Ajol, France’, in L. Way and L. Ladlow (eds), Creative and Participatory Research: Key Issues and Innovative Developments, Bristol: Bristol University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Douglas, Mary (2005), De la souillure. Essai sur les notions de pollution et de tabou, Paris: La Découverte.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Driver, Christopher and Bennett, Andy (2015), ‘Music scenes, space and the body’, Cultural Sociology, 9:1, pp. 99115.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Elias, Nicolas (2010), ‘À propos de violence. Étude d’une danse communautaire du Nord-Est de la Turquie’, Cahiers d’ethnomusicologie, 23:1, pp. 11330.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Goffman, Erving (1961), Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goffman, Erving ([1967] 1982), Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goffman, Erving ([1974] 1986), Frame Analysis, Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gosling, Tim (2004), ‘Not for sale: The underground network of anarcho-punk’, in A. Bennett (ed.), Music Scenes Local Translocal, and Virtual, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Héron, Timothy (2021), Alternative Ulster! La scène punk en Irlande du Nord (1976–1983), Paris: Riveneuve.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hochschild, Arlie Russel (2017), Le prix des sentiments. Au cœur du travail émotionnel, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 16884.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Humeau, Pierig (2021), À corps et à cris. Sociologie des punks français, Paris: CNRS Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Le Berre, Maryvonne (1995), ‘Territoires’, in A. Bailly, R. Ferras and D. Pumain (eds), Encyclopédie de Géographie, Paris: Economica, pp. 61738.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lescop, Gildas (2003), ‘Honnie soit la Oi! Naissance, émergence et déliquescence d’une forme de protestation sociale et musicale’, Volume!, 2:1, pp. 10928.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Michaud, Yves (2018), ‘Définir la violence?’, in Y. Michaud (ed.), La violence, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 310.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller, Mitch (2020), ‘Dialectograms: Drawing arguing with the city’, City, 24:1–2, pp. 34347.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Nisbet, Robert (1984), La tradition sociologique, Paris: PUF.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nora, Pierre (1997), Les lieux de mémoire, Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. O’Hara, Craig (2003), La philosophie du punk, St Mury-Monteymond: Rytrut.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Perasović, Benjamin (2003), ‘Pogo on the terraces: Perspectives from Croatia’, Punk & Post-Punk, 1:3, pp. 285303.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Raveneau, Gilles (2011), ‘Suer: Traitements matériels et symboliques de la transpiration’, Ethnologie française, 41:1, pp. 4957.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Robène, Luc, Roux, Manuel and Serre, Solveig (2019), ‘Pogoter n’est pas jouer: Punk, pogo et combats figurés’, Ethnologie française, 49:3, pp. 54967.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Robène, Luc and Serre, Solveig (2016), ‘“On veut plus des Beatles et d’leur musique de merde!” Introduction au dossier La scène punk en France (1976–2016)’, Volume!, 13:1, pp. 715.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sainsaulieu, Ivan (2010), ‘Entre histoire et historicisme: Esquisse d’une typologie de la communauté en France’, in I. Sainsaulieu, M. Salzbrunn and L. Amiotte-Suchet (eds), Faire communauté en société, Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, pp. 2336.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Serre, Solveig (2015), ‘“Looking for my family, looking for my tribe”. Réflexion sur le public “corporellement engagé” de New Model Army’, Corps, 1:13, pp. 1928.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Small, Christopher (2019), Musiquer. Le sens de l’expérience musicale, Paris: Éditions de la philharmonie de Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tsitsos, William (1999), ‘Rules of rebellion: Slamdancing, moshing, and the American alternative scene’, Popular Music, 18:3. pp. 397414.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tuaillon Demésy, Audrey (2023), ‘I am a punk, I don’t give a damn! Chez Narcisse: A rural place of resistance’, Cultural Sociology, 12:2, https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755231160037.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Turner, Victor ([1969] 1990), Le phénomène rituel: Structure et contre-structure, Paris: PUF.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Van Genepp, Arnold ([1909] 1992), Les rites de passage, Paris: Éditions Picard.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Vigarello, Georges (2018), Le corps redressé: Histoire d’un pouvoir pédagogique, Paris: Le Félin.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wenger, Etienne (2005), La théorie des communautés de pratique. Apprentissage, sens et identité, St-Nicolas: Les presses de l’Université Laval.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/punk_00232_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/punk_00232_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): body; community; game; gigs; liminality; pogo; space
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test